Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?
On 11/20/18 16:23, Andrew wrote: > The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's > at an intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads > just connect. > > The only exception I think could make sense is if the /*only* /function > of the connector is to connect to a service road–like in a > right-in/right-out configuration– and U-turns aren't permitted. If the > connector allows U-turns on a dual-carriage arterial, then it ought to > be a link so it has the same priority in routing. In the case of a median crossing (the third example in the original, and the one I was commenting about earlier), I will make it a *_link instead of service if it connects two service roads, so routing works as expected. -- Shawn K. Quinn http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 4:06 PM Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot > checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 > > To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I > can get the instructions right. > Either such a segment is part of a 3 or 4 way intersection of higher class > dual carriageway roads, in which case it should probably be named. > Or as in this case, it is an extension of the service road, and it should > be highway=service and remain unnamed like the service road itself. > ..And I guess a third case is like > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288576287 , which should be a _link? > I tend to think of these as links. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?
The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's at an intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads just connect. The only exception I think could make sense is if the *only *function of the connector is to connect to a service road–like in a right-in/right-out configuration– and U-turns aren't permitted. If the connector allows U-turns on a dual-carriage arterial, then it ought to be a link so it has the same priority in routing. Thanks, Andrew On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 4:07 PM Martijn van Exel Hi, > As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot > checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 > > To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I > can get the instructions right. > Either such a segment is part of a 3 or 4 way intersection of higher class > dual carriageway roads, in which case it should probably be named. > Or as in this case, it is an extension of the service road, and it should > be highway=service and remain unnamed like the service road itself. > ..And I guess a third case is like > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288576287 , which should be a _link? > > Advice welcome! > > Martijn > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?
On 11/20/18 16:06, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot > checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 > > To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I can > get the instructions right. > Either such a segment is part of a 3 or 4 way intersection of higher class > dual carriageway roads, in which case it should probably be named. > Or as in this case, it is an extension of the service road, and it should be > highway=service and remain unnamed like the service road itself. > ..And I guess a third case is like > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288576287 , which should be a _link? I've been tagging those as *_link for years except on unclassified and residential, which do not have a related *_link. -- Shawn K. Quinn http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?
Hi, As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I can get the instructions right. Either such a segment is part of a 3 or 4 way intersection of higher class dual carriageway roads, in which case it should probably be named. Or as in this case, it is an extension of the service road, and it should be highway=service and remain unnamed like the service road itself. ..And I guess a third case is like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288576287 , which should be a _link? Advice welcome! Martijn ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
