Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-23 Thread stevea
Steve, I agree that if we could have another month at least, we 
could probably at least untaint all of the Interstates in the US if 
everybody helped out.  It would be better than nothing at least IMO.


But Steve, it doesn't help that you are also one of the undecided 
users in CA.


- James



James:  First of all, I am not undecided, I accepted the newer CT 
about a year ago, and have seriously contributed thousands of 
improvements to OSM since 2009.  Check 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stevea if you need proof.  Second 
of all, I am in a state called California, I have never been to a 
place called CA.  (And there is a difference; see the Buck Act of 
1940).  Please be careful!


I'm just trying to ignite some serious discussion on the possibility 
of slightly pushing back the April 1 deadline, a modest, timely and 
actually quite helpful proposal, in my opinion.


Happy mapping to everybody, long live OSM,

SteveA
California

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-23 Thread James Mast

Sorry, my bad.  I saw another Steve A account in California that was 
Undecided and thought that was your account since it edited in Fresno, 
California.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve_A And yes, I do agree a 
possible push back at least a month would be helpful.  Especially for South 
Carolina and California. -- James
  Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:08:18 -0700
 To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 From: stevea...@softworkers.com
 Subject: Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!
 
 Steve, I agree that if we could have another month at least, we 
 could probably at least untaint all of the Interstates in the US if 
 everybody helped out.  It would be better than nothing at least IMO.
 
 But Steve, it doesn't help that you are also one of the undecided 
 users in CA.
 
 - James
 
 
 James:  First of all, I am not undecided, I accepted the newer CT 
 about a year ago, and have seriously contributed thousands of 
 improvements to OSM since 2009.  Check 
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stevea if you need proof.  Second 
 of all, I am in a state called California, I have never been to a 
 place called CA.  (And there is a difference; see the Buck Act of 
 1940).  Please be careful!
 
 I'm just trying to ignite some serious discussion on the possibility 
 of slightly pushing back the April 1 deadline, a modest, timely and 
 actually quite helpful proposal, in my opinion.
 
 Happy mapping to everybody, long live OSM,
 
 SteveA
 California
 
 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
  ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread James Mast

The 27th? Damn.  I thought it was going to go read-only on the 1st...  At least 
that's what I've been telling people who I've been contacting to see if they 
will accept the new CT (which is still being somewhat successful geting at 
least 2-3 people a day to accept). Ugh. - James
  Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:59:07 -0500
 From: toby.mur...@gmail.com
 To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!
 
 I don't think this has been reposted to talk-us yet. According to the
 latest license change rebuild plan, the database will enter read-only
 mode on March 27th for the license rebuild:
 http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
 
 So that gives us a matter of days to do any more remapping. It seems
 like the US hasn't seen a concerted effort to remap dirty data like
 some other countries have. So here is my attempt to get that started.
 I'm not sure if some people still don't know about the license change
 of if people think someone else will take care of the important
 things... But *everything* is on the chopping block!
 
 Some highlights:
 
 1) State/county borders. I've actually cleaned up a good chunk of
 these and hope to finish in the next few days. I may have to reimport
 some of the remaining ways. Anyone have thoughts on the best source
 for this information?
 
 2) The interstate system. I've taken care of about 4 or 5 states here
 in the midwest but there is a large swath from Illinois down to South
 Carolina that will become unroutable on April 1st. This will set OSM
 back immensely in the eyes of anyone actually trying to use our data.
 
 3) Specific cities: Los Angeles, Ausin, Seattle. Most major cities
 have some unclean blobs in them but these are particularly nasty. User
 blars has not responded to repeated requests for contact and I have
 reason to believe he is intentionally ignoring anything OSM related.
 His contributions are beyond huge in the LA area and really along a
 lot of the west coast. Seattle is mostly affected by user Sunny who
 has proven to be unreachable despite my best cyberstalking attempts.
 Austin, TX is also largely affected by one prolific user but it has
 actually gotten some attention so it isn't entirely doomed.
 
 4) Shorelines. These were imported from a public domain source by an
 anonymous user. I'm tempted to largely mark this with odbl=clean and
 call it a day. Thoughts?
 
 
 In light of this, I would strongly encourage everyone reading this
 list to suspend your current mapping efforts and concentrate entirely
 on license remapping for the next few days. It's not the most fun work
 but it needs to get done.
 
 Tools to use:
 
 JOSM license change plugin. Select everything in an area and hit the
 License Check button. Start deleting red things and replacing them
 from clean sources:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/LicenseChange
 
 Potlatch2 I think now has the license change layer enabled by default.
 If not, go into the options and make sure Show license status is
 checked. Again... remove anything with a red halo and replace.
 
 Badmap. Dirty interstates are clearly visible:
 http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=5lat=41.12823lon=-99.48465layers=00B0
 
 OSM Inspector. Good for drilling down and finding individual objects to remap:
 http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfelon=-100.24219lat=40.17384zoom=4
 
 TIGER 2011 road name tiles. Used as a background imagery layer while
 editing. Good to pull street names while remapping residential areas.
 Just be sure to expand the abbreviations while you're at it.
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_2011
 
 I have also written two blog posts on my own remapping efforts. The
 first focuses on interstates where there is existing clean data to
 work with. The biggest trick here is making sure you don't break the
 route relations. But honestly I wouldn't worry about it too much. As
 long as the ways are intact, routing will continue to work. We can
 come back later and clean up the route relations after the license
 change.
 http://ksmapper.blogspot.com/2012/01/license-change-mapping.html
 
 The second post is quite a bit more technical and I don't expect many
 others to follow it really. It was useful in that area of LA but it
 involves some traditional GIS tools, data analysis and a little python
 coding. For this type of work, most people would be better off using
 the TIGER 2011 road name tiles listed above.
 http://ksmapper.blogspot.com/2012/03/remapping-using-tiger-2011.html
 
 Honestly, it is kind of late to be sending out this email... I
 probably should have done it a couple of weeks ago but hopefully we
 can still make a meaningful dent in the dirty data. At least this
 whole process is almost over...
 
 Toby
 
 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread Toby Murray
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
 The 27th? Damn.  I thought it was going to go read-only on the 1st...  At
 least that's what I've been telling people who I've been contacting to see
 if they will accept the new CT (which is still being somewhat successful
 geting at least 2-3 people a day to accept). Ugh.

Yeah, that was my first reaction too. And several others have
expressed concerns about the tight schedule for a couple of different
reasons. So there is still a chance that it will be pushed back a
little. But either way... not much time left.

Toby

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread stevea

I don't think this has been reposted to talk-us yet. According to the
latest license change rebuild plan, the database will enter read-only
mode on March 27th for the license rebuild:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan


It has been stated that it is a GOAL to pull the plug on April 1st. 
The Sword of Damocles wielded by the Powers That Be in OSM are under 
no hard-and-fast obligation to do so, they are just trying to reach a 
stated goal.


If (as it is looking more and more to be true) that significant areas 
will disappear from the map, making routing and other important uses 
of these data seriously impaired, it is incumbent upon the Powers 
That Be to declare failure at reaching the stated goals.  Yes, this 
is disappointing, but it is true.  The only meaningful conclusion 
that can be reached is to give the OSM community more time and push 
back the April 1st (or March 27th) deadline.  (One month?  Three 
months?)


Is this an eleventh hour request to do so?  Well, yes!  But every 
word of the above is true.


The OSM community simply must have more time to complete these tasks. 
It is as simple as that.  Don't cripple an extremely useful and 
becoming-more-mainstream and rather popular tool with arbitrary and 
capricious dates on a calendar.  Plan and assess, yes, that has 
already happened, but now is the time to RE-assess, and reach the 
solemn conclusion that flipping the switch on significant data in 
barely a week is ill-advised at best, and will be a crippling body 
blow to the project at worst.  Perhaps one from which the project 
will not fully recover.


Nobody asked me to say it, but I'm asking for three more months.  We 
can complete needed tasks by then.


SteveA
California

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-21 Thread Toby Murray
I don't think this has been reposted to talk-us yet. According to the
latest license change rebuild plan, the database will enter read-only
mode on March 27th for the license rebuild:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan

So that gives us a matter of days to do any more remapping. It seems
like the US hasn't seen a concerted effort to remap dirty data like
some other countries have. So here is my attempt to get that started.
I'm not sure if some people still don't know about the license change
of if people think someone else will take care of the important
things... But *everything* is on the chopping block!

Some highlights:

1) State/county borders. I've actually cleaned up a good chunk of
these and hope to finish in the next few days. I may have to reimport
some of the remaining ways. Anyone have thoughts on the best source
for this information?

2) The interstate system. I've taken care of about 4 or 5 states here
in the midwest but there is a large swath from Illinois down to South
Carolina that will become unroutable on April 1st. This will set OSM
back immensely in the eyes of anyone actually trying to use our data.

3) Specific cities: Los Angeles, Ausin, Seattle. Most major cities
have some unclean blobs in them but these are particularly nasty. User
blars has not responded to repeated requests for contact and I have
reason to believe he is intentionally ignoring anything OSM related.
His contributions are beyond huge in the LA area and really along a
lot of the west coast. Seattle is mostly affected by user Sunny who
has proven to be unreachable despite my best cyberstalking attempts.
Austin, TX is also largely affected by one prolific user but it has
actually gotten some attention so it isn't entirely doomed.

4) Shorelines. These were imported from a public domain source by an
anonymous user. I'm tempted to largely mark this with odbl=clean and
call it a day. Thoughts?


In light of this, I would strongly encourage everyone reading this
list to suspend your current mapping efforts and concentrate entirely
on license remapping for the next few days. It's not the most fun work
but it needs to get done.

Tools to use:

JOSM license change plugin. Select everything in an area and hit the
License Check button. Start deleting red things and replacing them
from clean sources:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/LicenseChange

Potlatch2 I think now has the license change layer enabled by default.
If not, go into the options and make sure Show license status is
checked. Again... remove anything with a red halo and replace.

Badmap. Dirty interstates are clearly visible:
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=5lat=41.12823lon=-99.48465layers=00B0

OSM Inspector. Good for drilling down and finding individual objects to remap:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfelon=-100.24219lat=40.17384zoom=4

TIGER 2011 road name tiles. Used as a background imagery layer while
editing. Good to pull street names while remapping residential areas.
Just be sure to expand the abbreviations while you're at it.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_2011

I have also written two blog posts on my own remapping efforts. The
first focuses on interstates where there is existing clean data to
work with. The biggest trick here is making sure you don't break the
route relations. But honestly I wouldn't worry about it too much. As
long as the ways are intact, routing will continue to work. We can
come back later and clean up the route relations after the license
change.
http://ksmapper.blogspot.com/2012/01/license-change-mapping.html

The second post is quite a bit more technical and I don't expect many
others to follow it really. It was useful in that area of LA but it
involves some traditional GIS tools, data analysis and a little python
coding. For this type of work, most people would be better off using
the TIGER 2011 road name tiles listed above.
http://ksmapper.blogspot.com/2012/03/remapping-using-tiger-2011.html

Honestly, it is kind of late to be sending out this email... I
probably should have done it a couple of weeks ago but hopefully we
can still make a meaningful dent in the dirty data. At least this
whole process is almost over...

Toby

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us