Re: [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands
On 5/29/2012 6:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31457349 I propose to fix these. But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland wetland=swamp (An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.) be correct? If there are no objections, I'm going to do this sometime today. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands
The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31457349 I propose to fix these. But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland wetland=swamp (An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.) be correct? Or is it better to choose natural=* tag and add a multipolygon for the other? ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us