Re: [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-30 Thread Nathan Edgars II

On 5/29/2012 6:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:

The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be
deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as
note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since
natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31457349

I propose to fix these.

But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland
wetland=swamp (An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.)
be correct?


If there are no objections, I'm going to do this sometime today.

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-29 Thread Nathan Edgars II
The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be 
deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as 
note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since 
natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31457349


I propose to fix these.

But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland 
wetland=swamp (An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.) 
be correct? Or is it better to choose natural=* tag and add a 
multipolygon for the other?


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us