Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Yury Yatsynovich
I see. Thanks for clarifying, Russell!

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:33 PM Russell Nelson  wrote:

> It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be.
> That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new
> building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an address
> immediately.  When a new address is assigned to a new (split out)
> parcel, the interpolation will give it an address immediately.
>
> On 6/18/20 3:19 PM, Yury Yatsynovich wrote:
> > Oh, wow!
> > Maybe that's fine, but to me it looks like duplicated info. As far as
> > I understand, extrapolation lines are needed in areas where buildings
> > are not mapped yet and, hence, the extrapolation/approximate location
> > of the address is the best one can get. If the address is precisely
> > assigned to a building, why would one need the same address on the
> > extrapolation line? But, again, that's just my opinion and maybe I'm
> > overlooking something important.
>


-- 
Yury Yatsynovich
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Russell Nelson
It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be. 
That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new 
building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an address 
immediately.  When a new address is assigned to a new (split out) 
parcel, the interpolation will give it an address immediately.


On 6/18/20 3:19 PM, Yury Yatsynovich wrote:

Oh, wow!
Maybe that's fine, but to me it looks like duplicated info. As far as 
I understand, extrapolation lines are needed in areas where buildings 
are not mapped yet and, hence, the extrapolation/approximate location 
of the address is the best one can get. If the address is precisely 
assigned to a building, why would one need the same address on the 
extrapolation line? But, again, that's just my opinion and maybe I'm 
overlooking something important.


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Yury Yatsynovich
Oh, wow!
Maybe that's fine, but to me it looks like duplicated info. As far as I
understand, extrapolation lines are needed in areas where buildings are not
mapped yet and, hence, the extrapolation/approximate location of the
address is the best one can get. If the address is precisely assigned to a
building, why would one need the same address on the extrapolation line?
But, again, that's just my opinion and maybe I'm overlooking something
important.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:58 PM Russell Nelson  wrote:

> I have done this in the area around Potsdam, NY. Assigning the address to
> the centroid of all the points that describe the parcel works quite well.
> It's not perfect, though. Look at May Road. I've entered addresses there in
> three different ways:
>
>   o On the building as an area, traced by hand and added by hand.
>
>   o On the centroid of the parcel as a point.
>
>   o On an address interpolation way, which hops from parcel point to
> parcel point.
>
> The addresses are, as a rule, close enough to the houses to be well worth
> the effort it took to import them. But, go look at it yourself.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/44.70688355057632/-74.96382634924055
> On 6/18/20 12:07 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
>
> I support this import.
>
> I would also support the import of addresses for neighboring Oakland, CA.
>
> -mike.
>
> 
> michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
> sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html
>
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Yury Yatsynovich 
> wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> I've been recently thinking about importing addresses for San Francisco,
> CA.
> It looks like there has been interest in this kind of import (the page
> devoted to it was created in 2010,
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Address_Import).
>
> So, please, consider this message as my "community buy-in": does anyone
> have any objections related to this possible import?
> By now I've obtained a permit from the data owner (
> https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Addresses-Enterprise-Addressing-System/3mea-di5p)
> and almost finished writing my code for matching buildings to address
> points.
>
> If there are no objections, I'll go on with organising all documentation
> and sharing the code/resulting .osm-files for review by OSM community.
>
> Looking forward to receiving your feedback!
>
> p.s. I have some experience in importing addresses (e.g., see
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/MassGIS_Addresses)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Yury Yatsynovich
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing 
> listTalk-us@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>


-- 
Yury Yatsynovich
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Russell Nelson
I have done this in the area around Potsdam, NY. Assigning the address 
to the centroid of all the points that describe the parcel works quite 
well. It's not perfect, though. Look at May Road. I've entered addresses 
there in three different ways:


  o On the building as an area, traced by hand and added by hand.

  o On the centroid of the parcel as a point.

  o On an address interpolation way, which hops from parcel point to 
parcel point.


The addresses are, as a rule, close enough to the houses to be well 
worth the effort it took to import them. But, go look at it yourself.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/44.70688355057632/-74.96382634924055

On 6/18/20 12:07 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:

I support this import.

I would also support the import of addresses for neighboring Oakland, CA.

-mike.


michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/ca http://mike.teczno.com/contact.html

On Jun 18, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Yury Yatsynovich 
mailto:yury.yatsynov...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Greetings!

I've been recently thinking about importing addresses for San 
Francisco, CA.
It looks like there has been interest in this kind of import (the 
page devoted to it was created in 2010, 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Address_Import).


So, please, consider this message as my "community buy-in": does 
anyone have any objections related to this possible import?
By now I've obtained a permit from the data owner 
(https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Addresses-Enterprise-Addressing-System/3mea-di5p) 
and almost finished writing my code for matching buildings to address 
points.


If there are no objections, I'll go on with organising all 
documentation and sharing the code/resulting .osm-files for review by 
OSM community.


Looking forward to receiving your feedback!

p.s. I have some experience in importing addresses (e.g., see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/MassGIS_Addresses)





--
Yury Yatsynovich
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Michal Migurski
One building can definitely have more than a single address.

Addresses provide postal delivery information and don't necessarily correspond 
1:1 with other concepts like physical buildings or legal parcels.

-mike.


michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html

> On Jun 18, 2020, at 11:08 AM, Joseph Eisenberg  
> wrote:
> 
> Legally in San Francisco does the address refer to the property, the 
> building, or the entrance? 
> 
> While I'm from California originally, I admit that I don't know the 
> definition of an address there. 
> 
> If one building can have more than one address (based on separate entrances), 
> then it would be best to use nodes.
> 
> - Joseph Eisenberg
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Yury Yatsynovich  > wrote:
> I saw addresses in SF mapped both ways -- some are mapped as nodes inside the 
> buildings or on contours of buildings (as entrances); others are added 
> directly on the ways/relations of buildings.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:20 PM Joseph Eisenberg  > wrote:
> >  matching buildings to address points
> 
> I support the idea of adding missing addresses. However, is it best practice 
> to match the address with the building area? 
> 
> Currently in SF are almost all addresses matched with buildings, or are some 
> mapped as nodes or separate area features?
> 
> -- Joseph Eisenberg
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:30 AM Yury Yatsynovich  > wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> I've been recently thinking about importing addresses for San Francisco, CA.
> It looks like there has been interest in this kind of import (the page 
> devoted to it was created in 2010, 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Address_Import 
> ).
> 
> So, please, consider this message as my "community buy-in": does anyone have 
> any objections related to this possible import?
> By now I've obtained a permit from the data owner 
> (https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Addresses-Enterprise-Addressing-System/3mea-di5p
>  
> )
>  and almost finished writing my code for matching buildings to address points.
> 
> If there are no objections, I'll go on with organising all documentation and 
> sharing the code/resulting .osm-files for review by OSM community.
> 
> Looking forward to receiving your feedback!
> 
> p.s. I have some experience in importing addresses (e.g., see 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/MassGIS_Addresses 
> )
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Yury Yatsynovich
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Yury Yatsynovich
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Legally in San Francisco does the address refer to the property, the
building, or the entrance?

While I'm from California originally, I admit that I don't know the
definition of an address there.

If one building can have more than one address (based on separate
entrances), then it would be best to use nodes.

- Joseph Eisenberg

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Yury Yatsynovich 
wrote:

> I saw addresses in SF mapped both ways -- some are mapped as nodes inside
> the buildings or on contours of buildings (as entrances); others are added
> directly on the ways/relations of buildings.
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:20 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >  matching buildings to address points
>>
>> I support the idea of adding missing addresses. However, is it best
>> practice to match the address with the building area?
>>
>> Currently in SF are almost all addresses matched with buildings, or are
>> some mapped as nodes or separate area features?
>>
>> -- Joseph Eisenberg
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:30 AM Yury Yatsynovich <
>> yury.yatsynov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings!
>>>
>>> I've been recently thinking about importing addresses for San Francisco,
>>> CA.
>>> It looks like there has been interest in this kind of import (the page
>>> devoted to it was created in 2010,
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Address_Import).
>>>
>>> So, please, consider this message as my "community buy-in": does anyone
>>> have any objections related to this possible import?
>>> By now I've obtained a permit from the data owner (
>>> https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Addresses-Enterprise-Addressing-System/3mea-di5p)
>>> and almost finished writing my code for matching buildings to address
>>> points.
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I'll go on with organising all documentation
>>> and sharing the code/resulting .osm-files for review by OSM community.
>>>
>>> Looking forward to receiving your feedback!
>>>
>>> p.s. I have some experience in importing addresses (e.g., see
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/MassGIS_Addresses)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yury Yatsynovich
>>> ___
>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Yury Yatsynovich
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

2020-06-18 Thread Michal Migurski
I support this import.

I would also support the import of addresses for neighboring Oakland, CA.

-mike.


michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html

> On Jun 18, 2020, at 8:23 AM, Yury Yatsynovich  
> wrote:
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> I've been recently thinking about importing addresses for San Francisco, CA.
> It looks like there has been interest in this kind of import (the page 
> devoted to it was created in 2010, 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Address_Import 
> ).
> 
> So, please, consider this message as my "community buy-in": does anyone have 
> any objections related to this possible import?
> By now I've obtained a permit from the data owner 
> (https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Addresses-Enterprise-Addressing-System/3mea-di5p
>  
> )
>  and almost finished writing my code for matching buildings to address points.
> 
> If there are no objections, I'll go on with organising all documentation and 
> sharing the code/resulting .osm-files for review by OSM community.
> 
> Looking forward to receiving your feedback!
> 
> p.s. I have some experience in importing addresses (e.g., see 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/MassGIS_Addresses 
> )
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Yury Yatsynovich
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us