Re: Tater on the Cafe

2009-03-22 Thread ljtom

And I agree with Val and Nelson, but wonder jest when you might find
the time to do it, the gig/workshop calendar is looking mighty full
these days.  It was great to read about all your projects, love the
ones with the Mississippi connection.  Has anyone done the numbers on
the size of the bluegrass market, usa and world, and what portion of
that market are likely to make book purchases?  I think I would want
to know that before getting my pencil out.  With the marketing numbers
known, one can then begin to consider how much an effort might bring
in.  There are lots of books on the market already, I wonder, how well
they sell, if money is being made or ..not.  Mike your writing style
is delightful, fresh, clear, direct, and friendly.  I think most books
are improved by having a good editor, yours would not have to work too
hard. G

On Mar 22, 9:47 pm, Val Mindel vmin...@gmail.com wrote:
 I agree with Nelson on the book idea, Mike, but I think you should do
 the writing. You've got a great written voice, and it would be a shame
 to dilute it ... val

 On Mar 22, 1:11 am, Nelson nelsonpeddyco...@knology.net wrote:

  Tater,

  I am going to revoice an early statement.  We are due a book from
  you.  The Monroe Style, Elements of The Monroe Style, My Take on
  Monroe, Analysis of Monroe's Style are all titles that get my idea
  across.

  In the golf world, lots of guys make good money writing books and
  doing TV work analyzing the golf swing of Ben Hogan, arguably a
  Monroish influence on the modern golf game.  I think such a book from
  you would sell well, and become the authoritative work on the
  subject.  It could even be developed with a workbook (sold separately)
  that you could structure lessons from or a DVD (also sold separately)
  that illustrate the points you make in the book.  Given the short
  amount of time that I have spent in lessons with you makes me wish I
  had a comprehensive text on the subject of the elements of Monroe's
  playing.

  Given your history with Hartford, too, it could lead the way for a
  road stories and playing philosophy book on your own style.

  I might even know a very good candidate for a ghost writer if you were
  to go that route and need to interview some for the task.

  I know at least one or two others out here agree with me.

  Nelson

  On Mar 21, 11:30 pm, Don Grieser adobeinthepi...@gmail.com wrote:

   Thanks, Mike. Doesn't sound controversial to me, but then I'm just an
   enthusiast. As always, thoughtful and eloquent. Good on ya!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Tater on the Cafe

2009-03-22 Thread JakeyLee

Wow, I'm disappointed that Bill abbreviated the list of upcoming
projects in his published article.  I had no clue about the work with
EC.  I was able to find a clip of a Letterman performance with EC,
Rosanne Cash, Larry Campbell, and Todd Phillips: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF1txVDFDck

Looking forward to checking out your additions to his upcoming album.
Was this your second time working with T Bone Burnett as a producer?
You must be on his short list of go-to mandolin players after your
tasty playing on the Oh, Brother... soundtrack.

All of the projects you mention sound really exciting.  Can't wait to
hear em!

-Jake


On Mar 21, 11:06 pm, mistertaterbug taterbugmu...@gmail.com wrote:
 And do you suppose, Mr. Sandstone, that my professional reputation
 should be able to stand repeated forays into the hinterlands of
 telling the truth as I see it? I mean, there IS such a thing as
 karma. There seems to be a point where it all is meaningless in the
 scheme of things anyway, and all the motions made outside applying
 one's trade for the sheer joy of it are only an exercise in going
 backwards.

 I suppose I could publish my answers without the questions. No harm
 there. Very well...

 Bill,
 Thanks for your questions. I'll make an effort to be economical in my
 answers...

 1) So far, the main obstacle or roadblock as you called it, to
 learning Monroe style seems to be the right hand technique of the
 style. Many people have a hard time using tremolo as the main exponent
 to creating melody, to keeping the right hand moving and not giving in
 to the temptation to playing somewhat erratic right hand patterns. I
 have found that the fiddle kinship with Monroe's right hand technique
 seems to require that the right hand keep moving and making the
 motions, even when the string is not struck, sort of a phantom stroke
 to keep the notes emphasized the right way. The tendency in people not
 used to using this technique is to change pick direction only on the
 next note in the melody. There is sort of a going backwards in time
 that needs to be done, back to the time in string bands when fiddles
 were the main instrument of choice rather than electric guitars, when
 a bow stroke or tremolo was the means of playing a sustained tone
 rather than striking a note once and counting on an amplifier to do
 the rest.

 One of the other primary changes in thinking needs to come with an
 understanding of using chord voicings to find melody and harmony
 rather than using a more linear approach, playing more out of boxes
 rather than running lengthwise up and down the fingerboard. But to me,
 the hardest part and also the smartest part of the style is how Monroe
 could suggest passages to the listener without actually spelling the
 idea out. Dealing with abstract melodic ideas is a bit more
 challenging to understand I think.

 As far as mastering the style, I don't know that it's possible to
 really accomplish that feat in one lifetime. There's so much to know
 and really, I've only begun to scratch the surface myself.

 2) I think that Monroe would be very proud to know that his music has
 maintained so much interest in the modern day that entire camps are
 devoted to better understanding and use the style he created.

 3) You have made a number of references to blues licks in your
 questions so far. Sure, there is a lot of blues in Monroe's music. I
 think that it's one of the ingredients that I like the best, if not
 the one that effects me strongest. You refer to modern players as
 being very smooth and polished and I'll agree with your comments. I
 will say that I do not agree that Monroe was always ragged and
 without polish. I suggest you listen to a lot more Monroe. There are
 plenty examples of his work that show impeccably clean technique. What
 you will NOT find is careful music. I do not think that perfection is
 necessarily the object of expression. Squeaky clean and careful music
 bores me anyway. I would rather have music that shows commitment and
 emotional content than all the spit and polish in the world. To each
 his own, I guess, but I'd rather the music I listen to be
 unpredictable.

 I wouldn't presume  to know what was going through Monroe's head when
 he played. I'm sure that some of the Bluegrass Boys could more
 accurately describe his thought processes and intentions than I could.
 I'm sure Kenny Baker could. He's quoted as saying he knew what Bill
 was trying to do. I'd sure like to know what that is myself. I do
 think that Bill allowed his muse to take him wherever it led, that his
 take on melody was that of an impressionist and that he presented the
 melody the way he felt at any given time rather than working up a solo
 and recreating it note for note every time. There is ample evidence
 that there were outlines that he went by, but I think that he just
 used the outlines as a guide. His output is chock full of random
 phrasing, whether it be from day to day or show to show or 

High tech making the most of lessons.

2009-03-22 Thread Robin Gravina
Hi there
I guess I may be behind the curve here, but this may help someone: I got the
Cam Studio thing that Steve suggested working, and it produces about 500 mb
of avi video for one Tater class. I've been fiddling around with this and
you can then pretty much do whatever you want with it - all with Freeware -
so that you can relive every embarassing second of your lesson, or even work
on the difficult bits:

There's a program called 'Handbrake' which will convert the avi file into a
file suitable for putting on your video compatible ipod, and there's a
program called 'Switch' which can convert the avi file from the lesson into
a wav file.

Once you have the wav file, you can use 'Audacity' to edit out the nasty
bits where you are utterly failing to get the intro to Roanoke, or talking
about the dodgy behaviour of some Bluegrass Boys,  and just keep the meat
from the class. Once you have done that, and 'normalised' it to get the
volume up a bit,  you can use 'Switch' again to convert your edited wav file
to an Mp3, and get it onto your ipod, or use the Windows Media Player to
slow it down. If you then add a backing track from a Hypnotherapy
Practitioner you will be able to put the essence of Taterbuglesson on
repetition all night and wake up knowing it all...

I think all these programs are easy to find and use, but if anyone needs a
hand, please shout. Also this is all for Windows. Probably on a Mac you just
plug in your mandolin and it learns it for you..

Best
Robin

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: anyone record a vinyl record?

2009-03-22 Thread mistertaterbug

Oh lordy, does this mean that I don't have to sell my lps? Personally,
I prefer the sound of lps even with pops and clicks and such. As for
turntables, I've checked around. Some of the modern gear is fetching
phenominal prices.

mistertaterbug

On Mar 17, 12:46 pm, 14strings perrypale...@gmail.com wrote:
 Vinyl is on its way back!

 the number of bands releasing their latest on cd and vinyl is on the
 rise
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Samuel Bayard Books on Ebay

2009-03-22 Thread mistertaterbug

An update:
There are four copies of Dance to the Fiddle, March to the Fife on
AbeBooks ranging from $223.33(odd price) to $385. Over and out.
mistertaterbug

On Mar 10, 11:54 am, Don Grieser adobeinthepi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'd jump in a time machine today if I could go back and listen to
 Sarah Armstrong play some tunes.

 On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:48 PM, mistertaterbug taterbugmu...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

  Oh, I think you'll live, Perry.
  I hear that musical literature is a legitimate business expense,
  especially if you use the material you learn from the book onstage. Go
  look at some of the early group pages. Lots of book listings there.
  There's one by a fellow named Ira Ford that's pretty good too, but Mr.
  Ford was best at writing books on various topics rather than Bayard,
  who was a full-blown academic. You oughta look into some of R. P.
  Christesen's books too. One that's interesting reading is Rantin'
  Pipe and Tremblin' String by George S. Emerson.

  I think that Sarah Armstrong comes under the heading of research,
  don't you Don? G

  Tater

  On Mar 9, 9:04 am, 14strings perrypale...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks Tater...
  I now have a another habit to keep me away from my day job...rare
  fiddle tune book collecting.

  Perry

  On Mar 8, 10:32 pm, Don Grieser adobeinthepi...@gmail.com wrote:

   Yes, Brother Don has both of them along with some other tunebook gems.
   If you can't pony up the $ it'll take to bake the Tater, there's a pdf
   of the Hill Country Tunes book on the outernet here (with a nice
   picture of Sarah Armstrong, our favorite tune purveyor):

  http://www.mne.psu.edu/lamancusa/tunes/hct/

   This hasn't seemed to hurt the price of the actual books any so I wish
   they'd do this with more out-of-print tune books.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Tater on the Cafe

2009-03-22 Thread Trey Young
+1 on the idea of a book from Mr. Tater.  I think it would be very cool to have 
an instructional book combined with stories from the road with Mr. Hartford 
and stories about experiences with Mr. Monroe.  
 
 





From: JakeyLee fortpo...@gmail.com
To: Taterbugmando taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 11:06:54 AM
Subject: Re: Tater on the Cafe


Wow, I'm disappointed that Bill abbreviated the list of upcoming
projects in his published article.  I had no clue about the work with
EC.  I was able to find a clip of a Letterman performance with EC,
Rosanne Cash, Larry Campbell, and Todd Phillips: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF1txVDFDck

Looking forward to checking out your additions to his upcoming album.
Was this your second time working with T Bone Burnett as a producer?
You must be on his short list of go-to mandolin players after your
tasty playing on the Oh, Brother... soundtrack.

All of the projects you mention sound really exciting.  Can't wait to
hear em!

-Jake


On Mar 21, 11:06 pm, mistertaterbug taterbugmu...@gmail.com wrote:
 And do you suppose, Mr. Sandstone, that my professional reputation
 should be able to stand repeated forays into the hinterlands of
 telling the truth as I see it? I mean, there IS such a thing as
 karma. There seems to be a point where it all is meaningless in the
 scheme of things anyway, and all the motions made outside applying
 one's trade for the sheer joy of it are only an exercise in going
 backwards.

 I suppose I could publish my answers without the questions. No harm
 there. Very well...

 Bill,
 Thanks for your questions. I'll make an effort to be economical in my
 answers...

 1) So far, the main obstacle or roadblock as you called it, to
 learning Monroe style seems to be the right hand technique of the
 style. Many people have a hard time using tremolo as the main exponent
 to creating melody, to keeping the right hand moving and not giving in
 to the temptation to playing somewhat erratic right hand patterns. I
 have found that the fiddle kinship with Monroe's right hand technique
 seems to require that the right hand keep moving and making the
 motions, even when the string is not struck, sort of a phantom stroke
 to keep the notes emphasized the right way. The tendency in people not
 used to using this technique is to change pick direction only on the
 next note in the melody. There is sort of a going backwards in time
 that needs to be done, back to the time in string bands when fiddles
 were the main instrument of choice rather than electric guitars, when
 a bow stroke or tremolo was the means of playing a sustained tone
 rather than striking a note once and counting on an amplifier to do
 the rest.

 One of the other primary changes in thinking needs to come with an
 understanding of using chord voicings to find melody and harmony
 rather than using a more linear approach, playing more out of boxes
 rather than running lengthwise up and down the fingerboard. But to me,
 the hardest part and also the smartest part of the style is how Monroe
 could suggest passages to the listener without actually spelling the
 idea out. Dealing with abstract melodic ideas is a bit more
 challenging to understand I think.

 As far as mastering the style, I don't know that it's possible to
 really accomplish that feat in one lifetime. There's so much to know
 and really, I've only begun to scratch the surface myself.

 2) I think that Monroe would be very proud to know that his music has
 maintained so much interest in the modern day that entire camps are
 devoted to better understanding and use the style he created.

 3) You have made a number of references to blues licks in your
 questions so far. Sure, there is a lot of blues in Monroe's music. I
 think that it's one of the ingredients that I like the best, if not
 the one that effects me strongest. You refer to modern players as
 being very smooth and polished and I'll agree with your comments. I
 will say that I do not agree that Monroe was always ragged and
 without polish. I suggest you listen to a lot more Monroe. There are
 plenty examples of his work that show impeccably clean technique. What
 you will NOT find is careful music. I do not think that perfection is
 necessarily the object of expression. Squeaky clean and careful music
 bores me anyway. I would rather have music that shows commitment and
 emotional content than all the spit and polish in the world. To each
 his own, I guess, but I'd rather the music I listen to be
 unpredictable.

 I wouldn't presume  to know what was going through Monroe's head when
 he played. I'm sure that some of the Bluegrass Boys could more
 accurately describe his thought processes and intentions than I could.
 I'm sure Kenny Baker could. He's quoted as saying he knew what Bill
 was trying to do. I'd sure like to know what that is myself. I do
 think that Bill allowed his muse to take him wherever it led, that his
 

Re: High tech making the most of lessons.

2009-03-22 Thread Robin Gravina
at least it was only his car

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM, mistertaterbug taterbugmu...@gmail.comwrote:


 Thanks for the Bluegrass Boy filter, Robin. I'm sure Bill would've
 used one of those himself if he'd had access to one. G. Yes, the Mac
 does learn all this by itself thanks to plug and play. You don't
 think I *really* know how to play any of this music, do you? Now if I
 could just get it to put it all in notation it would save me about 500
 more entries.

 You know, our own Brian Ray might be responsible for this handy
 feature. You know he worked at Apple and was in charge of tearing
 things up. I think he used to have to go out and polish Steve Jobs'
 Mercedes with his tongue on lunch break. :-D

 mistertaterbug

 On Mar 22, 11:01 am, Robin Gravina robin.grav...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi there
  I guess I may be behind the curve here, but this may help someone: I got
 the
  Cam Studio thing that Steve suggested working, and it produces about 500
 mb
  of avi video for one Tater class. I've been fiddling around with this and
  you can then pretty much do whatever you want with it - all with Freeware
 -
  so that you can relive every embarassing second of your lesson, or even
 work
  on the difficult bits:
 
  There's a program called 'Handbrake' which will convert the avi file into
 a
  file suitable for putting on your video compatible ipod, and there's a
  program called 'Switch' which can convert the avi file from the lesson
 into
  a wav file.
 
  Once you have the wav file, you can use 'Audacity' to edit out the nasty
  bits where you are utterly failing to get the intro to Roanoke, or
 talking
  about the dodgy behaviour of some Bluegrass Boys,  and just keep the meat
  from the class. Once you have done that, and 'normalised' it to get the
  volume up a bit,  you can use 'Switch' again to convert your edited wav
 file
  to an Mp3, and get it onto your ipod, or use the Windows Media Player to
  slow it down. If you then add a backing track from a Hypnotherapy
  Practitioner you will be able to put the essence of Taterbuglesson on
  repetition all night and wake up knowing it all...
 
  I think all these programs are easy to find and use, but if anyone needs
 a
  hand, please shout. Also this is all for Windows. Probably on a Mac you
 just
  plug in your mandolin and it learns it for you..
 
  Best
  Robin
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: High tech making the most of lessons.

2009-03-22 Thread mandoholic
I'm thinking I've got a defective MAC, mine has a really hard time teaching my 
mandolin anything.  I've even tried duck taping it to the MAC overnight .  I'm 
not giving up.  I wave the thing all over the place, shake it 'til I'm blue in 
the face.  oh wait, that's the wrong piece of wood. 



Clyde Clevenger 
Just My Opinion, But It's Right 
Salem, Oregon 
Old Circle 


- Original Message - 
From: mistertaterbug taterbugmu...@gmail.com 


snip 

. Yes, the Mac 
does learn all this by itself thanks to plug and play. You don't 
think I *really* know how to play any of this music, do you?  



snip
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: High technology

2009-03-22 Thread Chris Thomas

I use SightSpeed. (www.sightspeed.com) The program is free, however,
the recording capability cost $50 per year.  Well worth it.  It is
simple to use.  BTW, they have live technical support, they have
been helpful each time.

Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Tater on the Cafe

2009-03-22 Thread mistertaterbug

Deep,
Since you've married, you're a man of many fewer words...  :-D

I tried your fish curry recipe. KILLER.
taterbug

On Mar 22, 12:58 pm, diptanshu roy diptanshu@gmail.com wrote:
 loved the article...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Italian Mandolin

2009-03-22 Thread Mike Hoffmann

Found this record called The Music of Gay Italy - Italian Mandolin in
a Salvation Army this weekend.  I thought it would be cheese, but
didn't know it would be cheese of this quality.  I uploaded a track
from it tonight.

http://cdn2.libsyn.com/samjessin/Trieste_Waltz.m4a?nvb=20090323025151nva=20090324030151t=00b07eb58622f7c4a25d3

Mike Hoff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Taterbugmando group.
To post to this group, send email to taterbugmando@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
taterbugmando+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---