Log viewer bug

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Ohlström
Sometimes, when my SMTP server does not respond (or probably does
respond, but not as supposed), I see something like the below in my
account.log file:

,-
|  2004-10-25, 14:40:40: SEND  - sending mail messages - 1 messages in queue
| !2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - Server reports it is not ready, reply: ð
È¿àÖH€ˆN´HN´   °È¿S/€ ·   F  ¾B€àÈ¿rÔA€ˆN´È¬ È¿ 
ýてÈA€È¬0È¿ ¬¦ÈA€F  Û¦B€HN´
|  2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - connection finished - 0 messages sent
|  2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - Some messages were not sent - check the log for 
details
`-

A few minutes later, the server is up and running again and I can send
my messages. All fine so far.

The problem is TB!'s account log viewer cannot view my log file when
it's mangled up like above. I can see all entries before 2004-10-25
14:40:53, but not what has happened afterwards. TB! keeps logging, the
status bar gets updated and the account.log file too, it's just that I
cannot view the entire log within TB!. If I try to, the last line I see
is:

,-
| !2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - Server reports it is not ready, reply: ð
È¿àÖH€ˆN´HN´
`-

Now, if I report this to the BT, I suppose I cannot use Notepad to
extract the faulty lines. Any suggestions of what to use to preserve all
characters correctly. UltraEdit? Or can I use Notepad to delete the
entries above and below and trust it not to modify the relevant parts?
(I do - by integrity reasons - not want to post my hole log to the BT)

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Confirmed.

2004-10-26 Thread Sergey Uvarov

JT At this point, for me, TB! tries to connect to Yahoo servers on port
JT 445 and 139.  Can anyone confirm?

Port 445. TB freezes until I give any answer to firewall/
Firewall - Norton Internet security 2003 v 6.0.4.35 OEM (came with
Giabyte mobo)

-- 
Best regards,

Sergey Uvarov

OS:  Windows XP  Service Pack 1
TheBat!: 3.0.1.33
CPU :x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 9
Memory : 512
MyMacros 1.07attachment: Clipboard02.jpg
 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, at 06:53:55 [UTC+0200] (Tuesday, October
26, 2004 06:53 my local time) Martin Schoch wrote:

 At this point, for me, TB! tries to connect to Yahoo servers on port
 445 and 139.  Can anyone confirm?

 Yes - confirmed - my firewall says that it is a ping request.

Did you click on any active link in this message? There are some in it.

-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows 95 4.0 Build  b)



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Sorry - wrong picture.

2004-10-26 Thread Sergey Uvarov
Right picture here

Comments -
on slow connection
after I clicked on a 00..1.msg

TB opens a new window
freezes for a while (5-10 sec)
firewall ask we what to do
TB does nit respond for 5 sec
TB opens a message

-- 
Best regards,

Sergey Uvarov

OS:  Windows XP  Service Pack 1
TheBat!: 3.0.1.33
CPU :x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 9
Memory : 512
MyMacros 1.07attachment: Clipboard02.gif
 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread NTL World
Hello John,

  A reminder of what John Thomas typed on:
  26 October 2004 at 18:51:30 GMT -0700

 At this point, for me, TB! tries to connect to Yahoo servers on port
 445 and 139.  Can anyone confirm?

 I can confirm it, thought TB wasn't supposed to do that?


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
    
 The Bat! v3.0.2.1   26/10/2004 at 09:57 UTC   2ØØ3 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Williams
On 26/10/2004, Martin Schoch wrote:
 Yes - confirmed - my firewall says that it is a ping request.

pings dont go to ports 139 and 445 - these are netbios ports. There
are some ping requests just before the other ports are connected to.
There is definitely something wierd here. I've just run ethereal (a
network sniffer) on the network activity the bat generates on this
message and what something like firefox generates on the same html.
Its quite different.

In fact I'd hazard a guess that the network trace the bat generates
looks horribly like the one Internet explorer generates when it views
the message. I didnt think the bat used the MS html component?

I'm going to dig around a bit more

Marcus

-- 
Marcus Williams -- http://www.quintic.co.uk
Quintic Ltd, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
  This message is private [ ] public [*]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Martin,

  A reminder of what Martin Schoch typed on:
  26 October 2004 at 06:53:55 GMT +0200

 AND: When I don't allow the connection TheBat! gets confused - an
 empty Connection window is opened and I have to kill TheBat! with
 the Task Manager.

 Nothing crashed or froze here, TB just paused while Kerio waited form me to
 allow/deny the outgoing connections... I denied all requests and TB opened
 the mail without a single whinge.

 The above sequence of events are perfectly normal, I was however under the
 impression The Bat wasn't supposed to get as far as even attempting an
 outgoing connection unless specifically requested to by the user, clicking
 a URL for example.


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
    
 The Bat! v3.0.2.1   26/10/2004 at 10:07 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Williams
On 26/10/2004, I wrote:
 In fact I'd hazard a guess that the network trace the bat generates
 looks horribly like the one Internet explorer generates when it views
 the message. I didnt think the bat used the MS html component?

Whilst it does look like this, its not because it uses the html
component (thank god). If you look at the html closely theres an image
in there that looks like:

img width=1 height=1 
src=//us.csc.adserver.yahoo.com/l?/SIG=11aa7evr7/D=alertrem/S=37992800:LREC/EXP=1098786821/A=-1/F=x/B=5/R=1098700421119114_9dacab9a

I suspect this is what is causing the problem - its a UNC
path which would cause the netbios lookups that are occuring.

The bat really should not do this - This is a bug as it is trying to
get something from the internet.

I think that yahoo have missed off the http: because I cant believe
they'd be serving up content this way.

Marcus
-- 
Marcus Williams -- http://www.quintic.co.uk
Quintic Ltd, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK
  This message is private [ ] public [*]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: most used PGP

2004-10-26 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Chris,

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:37:19 -0400GMT (26-10-2004, 0:37 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

C Is the most used pgp program for the bat the free version located at
C http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html or is there something
C else better?  I am new to PGP and have only been using the bat for
C about a month.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Next to PGP, which I use for keysigning, I also use Gnupg
http://www.gnupg.org/ for signing my messages.

-- 
cheers,
Henk.
__
The Bat!™ Natural Email System v3.0.1nl Professional on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey request: see headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/

pgpsYQ6ufGSzR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Open with option not working

2004-10-26 Thread Foster, Graham
Hello tbbeta

  I have an attachment, its a text file but the supplied extension is
  .PRO  When I try to open the attachment, I was expecting a dialogue
  to ask me which application to use. This doesn't appear.. in fact
  nothing happens at all (other than the usual warning do you wish to save
  this file )

  I'm sure this used to work.. anyone confirm?
  
-- 
regards,
 Graham   

Using The Bat! 3.0.2.1
assisted by  [Bayes Filter Plugin v1.5.6]
under Windows XP 5.1 
(Build 2600, Service Pack 1)



--
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of 
Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or 
its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck 
Sharp  Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary 
copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail 
and then delete it from your system.
--


 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Log viewer bug

2004-10-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marcus,

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:47:07 +0200GMT (26-10-2004, 9:47 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

MO The problem is TB!'s account log viewer cannot view my log file when
MO it's mangled up like above. I can see all entries before 2004-10-25

On the TB-forum somebody has the same issue
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=373MID=1374#message1374read.php?FID=4TID=373MID=1374#message1374


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

and that is how we know the Earth is banana-shaped.

The Bat! 3.0.2.1
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpQxWV7HRPVM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Foster, Graham
Hello Marcus
 The bat really should not do this - This is a bug as it is trying to
 get something from the internet.
Clicking on the original message of this thread caused my TB! instance
to lockup completely.. I'd appreciate it if TB! didn't do this either.
Easy Denial Of Service attack on TB! then :-)

-- 
regards,
 Graham  
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.1
assisted by 
under Windows XP 5.1 
(Build 2600, Service Pack 1)



--
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of 
Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or 
its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck 
Sharp  Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary 
copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail 
and then delete it from your system.
--


 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Log viewer bug

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 12:28, Roelof Otten wrote:

MO The problem is TB!'s account log viewer cannot view my log file
MO when it's mangled up like above. I can see all entries before
MO 2004-10-25

 On the TB-forum somebody has the same issue
 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=373MID=1374#message1374read.php?FID=4TID=373MID=1374#message1374

Not quite the same, but thanks anyway. I see those mangled characters
when I open account.log in a text editor as well, besides, the problem
goes away if I delete account.log or when enough new information has
been added to the log to make the faulty line disappear. Chris problem
seems to be the log viewer not being able to display anything correctly,
mine is the log viewer stops displaying lines below the mangled ones.

I've seen this for a long time, it's not a 3.0 problem, if that's of any
help.

I'll report into the BT later, haven't got the time now.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Log viewer bug

2004-10-26 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Hello, Marcus.

You wrote 26.10.2004 @ 16:47  in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional

MO status bar gets updated and the account.log file too, it's just that I
MO cannot view the entire log within TB!. If I try to, the last line I see
MO is:

MO ,-
MO | !2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - Server reports it is not ready, reply: ð
È¿àÖH€ˆN´HN´
MO `-

Unfortunately can't confirm. I just copied your lines into the log and The Bat!
shows them as far as the next records without a problem.

May be this text was changed because of different encoding? I suggest that the
server answered on some unicode (which looks like UTF8, but it is also looks
like nonsense if you decode it). May be some trash symbol caused The Bat! thinks
that it is the very end of the log - and skip the rest.

-- 
Sincerely,
 Alexey.
Using TB 3.0.1.33 on WinXP Pro SP2 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) 
..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold)  antispam filter BayesIt! 0.7.5

   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread MAU
Hello Marcus,

 Whilst it does look like this, its not because it uses the html
 component (thank god). If you look at the html closely theres an image
 in there that looks like:
 
 img width=1 height=1
 src=//us.csc.adserver.yahoo.com/l?/SIG=11aa7evr7/D=alertrem/S=37992800:LREC/EXP=1098786821/A=-1/F=x/B=5/R=1098700421119114_9dacab9a
 
 I suspect this is what is causing the problem - its a UNC
 path which would cause the netbios lookups that are occuring.
 
 The bat really should not do this - This is a bug as it is trying to
 get something from the internet.

I agree with you. An probably TB misses it because it is not HTML code
but done with a js document.write.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4





 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Moving, Deleting Printing a thread...

2004-10-26 Thread Christian Grams
Maybe i´m too stupid or this feature is actually missing:

I have kept around 50 E-Mails in one folder and want to print them all
out. Of course there is more than one thread in this folder. If i mark
all threads and then say print - TB! only prints the first (actually
marked message)! I have to collapse all threads and then mark all
messages to actually print them all.
Same is also when i move / delete threads.

Now i find this pretty dumb and nerving, i my case having to collapse
around 20 different threads sometimes up to 10 levels deep.

So my request - Please change this so that a complete thread can be
handled in one go!
-- 
Christian Grams

##
Harlekin's-EDV
Christian Grams

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
E-Mail Disclaimer: http://www.harlekin-edv.de/email/email.html
PGP-Key: http://pgp.upb.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0xD775BF12

benutze/using: TheBat! 3.0.2.1
Windows XP Build: 2600 with Service Pack 2





 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Tony Boom
Hello MAU,

  A reminder of what MAU typed on:
  26 October 2004 at 13:01:48 GMT +0200

 I agree with you. An probably TB misses it because it is not HTML code
 but done with a js document.write.

 Would it not be just a matter of finding out the extension and adding it to
 these reg entries?  Notice that .JS is already included!

ProtectDisableOpen=*.EXE,*.COM,*.BAT,*.CMD,*.VBS,*.PL,*.BAS,*.JS,*.JAVA,*.REG,*.SHS,*.PIF,*.SCR,*.DLL,*.SSH,*.CHM,*.HLP,*.LNK,*.{*},*.CPL
ProtectAllowOpen=*.JPG,*.JPEG,*.PNG,*.GIF,*.BMP,*.ICO,*.WMF,*.EMF,*.VCF,*.EML,*.MSG,*.ARJ,*.ZIP,*.RAR,*.TIF,*.ACE,*.LZH,*.WAV

Saying that though, shouldn't this reg entry have trapped it anyway?

ProtectWarnOpen=*.*

 


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
    
 The Bat! v3.0.2.1   26/10/2004 at 12:05 UTC   2ØØ3 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Moving, Deleting Printing a thread...

2004-10-26 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Christian,

Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 1:03:32 PM, you wrote:

 I have kept around 50 E-Mails in one folder and want to print them
 all out. Of course there is more than one thread in this folder. If
 i mark all threads and then say print - TB! only prints the first
 (actually marked message)! I have to collapse all threads and then
 mark all messages to actually print them all. Same is also when i
 move / delete threads.

You can use CTRL-* (numpad) to expand all threads in the current
folder at once - after that, press CTRL-A to mark all, then
print/move/copy... whatever.

(AFAIK there is no keyboard shortcut to collapse them all again, but
if you change folders the threads will be closed anyway).

(http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt)


 So my request - Please change this so that a complete thread can be
 handled in one go!

I'd say the above keyboard shortcut should be added as Expand all
together with a new Collapse all entry to the messagelist context
menu's subentry Threads


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 13:08, Tony Boom wrote:

  Would it not be just a matter of finding out the extension and adding
  it to these reg entries?  Notice that .JS is already included!

 ProtectDisableOpen=*.EXE,*.COM,*.BAT,*.CMD,*.VBS,*.PL,*.BAS,*.JS,*.JAVA,*.REG,*.SHS,*.PIF,*.SCR,*.DLL,*.SSH,*.CHM,*.HLP,*.LNK,*.{*},*.CPL
 ProtectAllowOpen=*.JPG,*.JPEG,*.PNG,*.GIF,*.BMP,*.ICO,*.WMF,*.EMF,*.VCF,*.EML,*.MSG,*.ARJ,*.ZIP,*.RAR,*.TIF,*.ACE,*.LZH,*.WAV

 Saying that though, shouldn't this reg entry have trapped it anyway?

 ProtectWarnOpen=*.*

No, these categories only applies when you open a document with an
external tool. Here, you don't, you view the html within TB! and then
the lists above is not considered. It's definitely a bug, but it's not
related to the lists you mention.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Log viewer bug

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 12:10, Alexey N. Vinogradov wrote:

MO status bar gets updated and the account.log file too, it's just
MO that I cannot view the entire log within TB!. If I try to, the last
MO line I see is:

MO ,-
MO | !2004-10-25, 14:40:53: SEND  - Server reports it is not
MO ready, reply: ðÈ¿àÖH€ˆN´HN´
MO `-

 Unfortunately can't confirm. I just copied your lines into the log and
 The Bat! shows them as far as the next records without a problem.

 May be this text was changed because of different encoding?

Probably. I will extract the relevant lines and publish them in a .rar
file on my site later for anyone to test. The keyword is 'later', still
don't have time to do it, sorry about that.

 May be some trash symbol caused The Bat! thinks that it is the very
 end of the log - and skip the rest.

That's my guess as well.

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Moving, Deleting Printing a thread...

2004-10-26 Thread Marcus Ohlström

On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 13:32, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

 You can use CTRL-* (numpad) to expand all threads in the current
 folder at once - after that, press CTRL-A to mark all, then
 print/move/copy... whatever.

 (AFAIK there is no keyboard shortcut to collapse them all again, but
 if you change folders the threads will be closed anyway).

Try ctrl-shift-* (again, numpad).

-- 
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc






 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Klimov Vova
Hello!


 No. I have the preview window on - as soon as I click on the message
 001.msg the request is sent.
The same (


Klimov Vova [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.starsoft.org Sisoftware Russian localisation 
team
 Ritlabs Russian localisation 
team
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.1  Professional
on Windows XP (5. 1) Build 2600 Service Pack 2


pgph2WWkjFC38.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: HTML Renderer Trying to Access Internet

2004-10-26 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Marcus,

  A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on:
  26 October 2004 at 13:48:03 GMT +0200

 It's definitely a bug, but it's not related to the lists you mention.

It was just a thought. if it was then ProtectWarnOpen=*.* would have
trapped it.


-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
    
 The Bat! v3.0.2.1   26/10/2004 at 13:29 UTC   2ØØ4 - AWB




 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: most used PGP

2004-10-26 Thread Allie Martin
On Monday, October 25, 2004 at 5:37:19 PM [GMT -0500], Chris wrote:

 Is the most used pgp program for the bat the free version located at
 http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html or is there something
 else better?  I am new to PGP and have only been using the bat for
 about a month.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

I use PGP as well, though I have GnuPG/GPGShell installed. I just find
PGP to be less of a problem to use. However, your mileage may vary
from mine so I'd suggest trying both. They can both coexist perfectly
well on your system without one interfering with the other. I tend to
switch back and forth between one or the other, but eventually settle
with using PGP most of the time.

-- 
-= Allie =-
. Food is an important part of a balanced diet.
__
IMAP [ Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.1.33 | Server: MDaemon Pro ]
OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)




 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


filtering attachments

2004-10-26 Thread Chris
Hello All,

I hope I am not asking questions that shouldn't be here and please
tell me if I am but how would I filter attahcments with different
extensions?

example I want to move all messages with .exe attachments to a
different folder.  Is this possile?

-- 
Thanks,

Chris

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: batskin.ini file format

2004-10-26 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ!

Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 01:25, MaXxX wrote:
 I would like to vote a big no to the idea above. With many
 available file formats appropriate for this task - XML, for example -
 I would strongly advise against creating a yet another TB! proprietary
 format for users to learn...

A no from me too.

I vote too for XML.

-- 
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.1 Professional  PopFile v0.22.0
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
+---+
| Get Firefox - Take back the web!  |
| http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=22411amp;t=1 |
+---+
   
 










 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


RE:batskin.ini file format

2004-10-26 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Thorvald,

Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 5:14:22 PM, you wrote:


 I would like to vote a big no to the idea above. With many
 available file formats appropriate for this task - XML, for example -
 I would strongly advise against creating a yet another TB! proprietary
 format for users to learn...

 A no from me too.

 I vote too for XML.

aye, same here!

-- 
regards,
:eu-flag3: :de-bw: :safaribears:

Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder...

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1, Opera v7.54.3865 on WinXP Home v2600 SP2

* PGP key available on request: send mail with subject 'PGP key request'

pgpc6TVbmiM1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: batskin.ini file format

2004-10-26 Thread Mike Pesce
On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:14:22 AM, Thorvald Neumann wrote:

TN A no from me too.
TN I vote too for XML.

I have to agree with that as well.

-- 
Mike
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: On S/MIME -- perhaps old news

2004-10-26 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2004-10-26 at 04:41:21 hggdh wrote:

 Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
 run openssl to do something like this).

Where is this nice generator hidden?  At least, I can't seem to find
the magical sequence of commands to enable the Generate button in
the address book properties dialog.


pgpFURsCQe5jR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: On S/MIME -- perhaps old news

2004-10-26 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2004-10-26 at 21:28:44 Dimitry Andric wrote:

 Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
 run openssl to do something like this).

 Where is this nice generator hidden?  At least, I can't seem to find
 the magical sequence of commands to enable the Generate button in
 the address book properties dialog.

Duh, I just found it... Never mind. :)  I'm not sure why I didn't
think of the account properties sooner.  Probably because you do seem
to have to do all other certificate stuff via the Address Book
interface.  A small hint in the help file indicating this would be
nice, I guess.


pgpkA0BUDp1aQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: On S/MIME -- perhaps old news

2004-10-26 Thread hggdh

Hello Dimitry,

Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 14:36:50, you wrote:

DA On 2004-10-26 at 21:28:44 Dimitry Andric wrote:

 Now, I had never used the TB! S/MIME certificate generator (usually I
 run openssl to do something like this).

 Where is this nice generator hidden?  At least, I can't seem to find
 the magical sequence of commands to enable the Generate button in
 the address book properties dialog.

DA Duh, I just found it... Never mind. :)  I'm not sure why I didn't
DA think of the account properties sooner.  Probably because you do seem
DA to have to do all other certificate stuff via the Address Book
DA interface.  A small hint in the help file indicating this would be
DA nice, I guess.

Well, Dimitry, now I do not feel so bad, after my rather dumb mistake.

Also, you have to use the internal implementation, *not* the MS Crypto
API for this to work.

But there is still some more work to do here... I am not quite happy
with the interface and the options... later I should have more to say
on it.

-- 

 ..hggdh..

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 and BayesIt! 0.7.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build  2195
Service Pack 4

pgpqOUZJFLGfh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: filtering attachments

2004-10-26 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Chris,

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:36:33 -0400GMT Chris wrote:

C example I want to move all messages with .exe attachments to a
C different folder.  Is this possile?

yes, should be easy. Create a new filter with the condition File
matching mask exe is attached and under actions choose the directory
or the folder where you want to store the mail.

-- 
Regards,
Feli

The Bat! 3.0.2.1 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
BayesIt! 0.7.3



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Feature wish- allow user to permanently permit session with incomplete SSL/TLS server certs

2004-10-26 Thread Army RedLeg
Hello hggdh,

Sunday, October 24, 2004, 5:46:31 PM, you wrote:

h Hello Army RL,
h Sunday, October 24, 2004, 14:58:59, you wrote:
h (snip)

h OK. Let me rephrase this. First of all you can add a rootless public
h certificate in the base. The expectation is that you will, eventually
h (and before actually using this certificate) add in the missing roots.

The only reason I would/should need to add any certificate to the base
is because I am concerned with authentication, ensuring what I have on
file is what is presented to me each time I reinitiate comms with the
server.  I don't necessarily need that with a particular server, I
simply want an encrypted channel for transporting my mail securely
(hence privately:) from me to them.  I use PGP for true message security
and privacy anyways- especially since the storage of the message until
retrieved by the recipient and how that user retrieves it may make all
my transport prerequisites null and void anyways.

back to your point- doing this, adding the rootless public to the base
does nothing- the popup remains the same- with the same unselectable
buttons- user is still forced to just OK or Cancel it...

h Secondly, the security/privacy attained by the use of encryption is
h also dependent on guaranteeing the integrity of the certificate (and,
h by extension, of the public/private key pair it uses).

not quite-

you mix potatoes with tomatoes here... ;)

althoughy all closely related I do admit, and in most settings all
*should* be considered for perfection. but please correct me if I am
wrong...

Security, Privacy, and Authentication, while they are all very desirable
together they *are* three separate functions

as well they are all very familiar to those of us who use PGP, GPG, and
dabble a bit in PKI/x509's (our dreaded certificate conversation again;)

Security is at my box and at the server. When the server and client
establish an encrypted transport, privacy is afforded enroute. this
message is also secure from tampering...

authentication, on the other hand (hence the potato/tomato line) is
*very* nice almost to the point of should be required, however it is
not a requirement- nor a standard as you will see from the quote I
provide in response to your text below.

h If you cannot safely confirm the public certificate, it follows that
h you cannot trust the resulting generated symmetric keys, and encrypted
h sessions using them.

not so, at least in my case- I trust the algo and other details of the
encrypted session- the only worry I would have is in knowing exactly
*who* I have set up a session with.  Once my personal requierments have
been met- then all should be good... for me, the user... (errrm, not
1_user either;)

h When you receive a certificate (on SSL negotiation) you do NOT trust
h this certificate. What you trust, want it or not, is that it's
h signature can be verified by a known authority -- known to you, and
h accepted as such by you. This known authority is represented by the
h root certificates you accepted to use. Your trust on the certificate
h you received is transitive: you trust it because a know root confirms
h it. And *THIS* root is trusted by you not to mess up. As such, if
h there are missing intermediate root certificates, then there is no
h trust transitivity, and the certificate you received is, by default,
h tainted.

sigh

I understand- and agree...  *If* I want that handshake to provide me
proof of who it is I establish the session with... *If* I desire
authentication, then yes- waht you have said above and most folks are
saying is true.

But, this particular user doesn't require authentication in this
circumstance- call it sacriledge- but I don't.

and by the RFC's and FAQs I can find on the matter it doesn't say this
is required- only that the session must fail if authenticating the
entity thru their session based certificate is requested.

again, I simply want TB! to give me that option- if I don't want to
authenticate, perhaps, thengive me plenty of warnings- but let me
permanently accept that particular cert for future sessions- not force
me to amnually OK it each time I connect to the server(s) in
question

(power to the people!! ;)

AR This is not *always* so. If I was concerned with the entire PKI or
AR hierarchy of it- then yes. If all I want to do is communicate via secure
AR transport with a mail service and can verify the servers cert, as well
AR other factors like the IP of the server, published info about the cert
AR on the website, etc then I can be satisfied. My personal standard has
AR been met in this case- and it may not always *require* having placed my
AR trust completely in the CA or Intermediaries.  Why must I trust them
AR anyways?

h Please let me give you an example of an issue here. Let's say your
h mail server is at address 10.10.10.10, and it's fully qualified name
h is mail.dummyserver.info. This means that you could query DNS on
h 10.10.10.10, and would get mail.dummyserver.info as a 

access violation when moving filter

2004-10-26 Thread Chris
Hello All,

I hold down alt while dragging a folder from incoming folder to read
folder.  Anyone else repro this?

-- 
Thanks,

Chris

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


what is the 2 for in screencap?

2004-10-26 Thread Chris
Hello All,

Please look at screencap.  What does the 2 mean?  I never seen before
this version.

-- 
Thanks,

Chris

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2attachment: screen.png
 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/