Re: TB! offline usage

2007-07-24 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Mark,

 TB! fetching mail seems to have priority over all other programs and makes
 all other tasks wait until TB has finished doing so.

I cannot remember having seen this behaviour. TB runs all the time,
even when I have disconnected the notebook, and everything runs fine.

Is your computer really blocked when TB tries to connect to the
server, and can't? Or do I misunderstand the whole point maybe?

I once asked for an offline mode for a different reason: I am
sometimes connected over an expensive mobile dataconnection and don't
want TB to get all emails, only headers, then. So I deactivate the
check mail every XX which can be done by a commandline parameter on
startup of TB...however I installed my notebook freshly and can't seem
to find the parameter, but if you search in the archives you'll surely
find it.

-- 
Martin
TB! 3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB! offline usage

2007-07-24 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello,

 So I deactivate the check mail every XX which can be done by a
 commandline parameter on startup of TB...however I installed my
 notebook freshly and can't seem to find the parameter, but if you
 search in the archives you'll surely find it.

Found it:

To deactivate checking:

thebat.exe /ADDU=negg;AutoCheck=0


To activate checking:

thebat.exe /ADDU=negg;AutoCheck=1

Replace negg with the accountname. If you also use Check on
startup then you need to also include

CheckOnActivate=0

into the commandline (with 0 an 1 respectively).

-- 
Martin
TB! 3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Filter condition terminology

2007-07-24 Thread Uwe Steinfeld
Hello Peter,

On 2007-07-23 you wrote:

 I got an email from a list with the following header:

Mailing lists usually have a special header identifying the list,
e.g., List-Id or List-Post. Mails to this list, for example, have a
header line List-Id: tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

Why not use this for filtering with condition
Header field Name contains identifier

--
Regards,
Uwe

Using The Bat! v3.99.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Weird sorting office behaviour

2007-07-24 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello MAU,

On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

M A filters disappearing problem was reported for v3.99.7 (see for
M example mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with Subject All
M non-Common Filters gone (was: 3.99.7)) although Martin Schuster, who
M originally reported the problem, later said:

M ,- [  ]
M | Seems like it's just a matter of display/use of the filters, they
M | don't seem to really be gone.

It's happened again. I had to re start my PC and TB! again came up with
a very sparse sorting office filter set. I just don't know where it got
it from.

This time I did a Restore filters action and all of them were there
under a new sub folder of orphaned filters. However each time I closed
the sorting office they went again and I had to do the restore action
once more so, yet again, I just re installed my back up but I'm getting
a bit fed up with it. :-(

I'm going to move over to a Mac later this year and will probably leave
TB! behind (it can be used by running Parallels). TB! is a wonderful
programme but occasionally throws a really big wobbly in my direction
and could be bad. Maybe it's just too complicated for its own good?

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.99.8 with POP3 account  AntispamSniper 2.5.0.3
| Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot
| CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz
| RAM: 1024 MB

Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them?

2007-07-24 Thread MaXxX
Hello.

Do you know of a way to apply some filters before my spam filter moves
the message to the junk folder? Whitelists don't really serve my
purposes, plus I don't want to duplicate my address book's
functionality there.

Any suggestion..? Or am I using an obsolete version which doesn't have
something useful that a newer version does?

-- 
Regards,
 Sinus Pi



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them?

2007-07-24 Thread Vili
 Do you know of a way to apply some filters before my spam filter moves
 the message to the junk folder?

Spam filter comes before the filters of TB, I believe. So, I think,
there is no way.

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them?

2007-07-24 Thread Cricket
Hello Vili,

Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 2:10:43 PM, you wrote:

 Do you know of a way to apply some filters before my spam filter moves
 the message to the junk folder?

 Spam filter comes before the filters of TB, I believe. So, I think,
 there is no way.


This is correct. But a stray brain cell just fired off. You may be
able to [manually] apply the filter to the spam folder after mail is
processed and put the processed spam to a) the bit bucket or b) a
secondary spam folder.

Cheers
Cricket
-- 
Terror (n). 1:  Naked female Klingon with whip and PMS



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them?

2007-07-24 Thread Vili
 Do you know of a way to apply some filters before my spam filter moves
 the message to the junk folder?
 Spam filter comes before the filters of TB, I believe. So, I think,
 there is no way.
 This is correct. But a stray brain cell just fired off. You may be
 able to [manually] apply the filter to the spam folder after mail is
 processed and put the processed spam to a) the bit bucket or b) a
 secondary spam folder.

I  think, the spam filter and TB filter is a OR/OR choice. If the spam
filter  process  the  mail,  you  cannot  do anything more with it. Of
course,  you  can  manually  refilter that folder... I cannot check, I
dont use spam/virus filters.

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them?

2007-07-24 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
MaXxX wrote on 25/07/2007 at 05:01:33 +1100 
subject How to apply filters BEFORE a spam filter gets them? :

 Do you know of a way to apply some filters before my spam filter moves
 the message to the junk folder? Whitelists don't really serve my
 purposes, plus I don't want to duplicate my address book's
 functionality there.

 Any suggestion..? Or am I using an obsolete version which doesn't have
 something useful that a newer version does?

SPAM-Plugins have higher priority than TB-Filters.

To mark as HAM all entries of your addressbook, just use a versatile
SPAM-Plugin and set it up that way. Regula has this ability.
http://www.gaijin.at/tbpregula.php

-- 
Sincerely 
Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat! 3.99.8 and Regula Anti-Spam Plugin 2.2.6.0   on Windows 2000




___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html