Re: Memory Leak

2007-12-05 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Ethan,

Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote:

EJM Can anyone verify this problem? 

I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also
uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 3.99.25 
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 20:38:44) on
Uno AMD Duron




 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 17:36:10, Tim Casten wrote:

 Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and
 installing xp on it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac. 

The only way you could do that would be with something like VMWare
Fusion.

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.99.27 on Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5.2.3790.Service Pack 
2]

Social innovations tend to the level of minimum tolerable well being.
   -- Albrecht's Law



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Bob,

   -- Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007, 18:57:47:


 This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here
 a lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with
 the brokenness that will appear in betas.

 I agree that the Beta list has taken on an unproductive and I think
 unnecessarily negative tone lately. Let's also try to look at all
 the development from RitLab's point of view - they have to be able
 to develop and market an improved product, and they don't have an
 infinite amount of time to deal with particular gripes from
 individuals on this list.

By agreeing on your post I just want to add to my previous comment
that my words should not diminish the positive development of the
product TB!. Nor want I in any way ignore the hard work of the RITlabs
Team. I am very much convinced of that product - honest!


-- 
   best regards   | Using The Bat! 3.95.6
www.EddieCastelli.com | on Windows 2000 5.0
   Eddie  | Build 2195 Service Pack 4
  on Tour | 



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Gleason,

Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 8:33:55 AM, you wrote:

 This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a
 lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the
 brokenness that will appear in betas.

I agree that the Beta list has taken on an unproductive and I think
unnecessarily negative tone lately. Let's also try to look at all the
development from RitLab's point of view - they have to be able to
develop and market an improved product, and they don't have an
infinite amount of time to deal with particular gripes from
individuals on this list.

-- 

Take Care,

 Bob   

-- 

Using The Bat! 3.99.29 (beta) on Windows XP 2600 Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Tim Casten
Wife just received new IMAC 24 inch with the Intel Core 2 Duo. 

Of course I have turned her into a Bat user. 

Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and installing xp on 
it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac. 

Thanks in advance. 

--

TIm Casten
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 19:35:18, Vilius Šumskas wrote:

 I'd recommend Parallels.

I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's
higher price.

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

[The Bat! v3.99.27 on Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5.2.3790.Service Pack 
2]

In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.
   -- Klipstein's Law of Specifications



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Gleason Pace

Eddie,

 Sounds to me like some sort of awful mickeysoft bells and whistles
 program.  But then again maybe it won't be as bad as it all
 sounds.

 But if a new Version shall be released, why is the TB!beta ML not
 involved in giving their view? When I recall it from the previous
 versions and years being on this list, more or less all major
 development was discussed together with RITlabs on this list.

This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a
lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the
brokenness that will appear in betas.


-- 
 Gleason

 Using 3.99.29 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600.
 IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software.



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


RE: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Vilius Šumskas
  Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and
  installing xp on it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac.
 
 The only way you could do that would be with something like VMWare
 Fusion.

I'd recommend Parallels.

-- 
  Best Regards,

  Vilius Šumskas
  LNK TV IT manager
  http://www.lnk.lt



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Tim Casten
Hello Jernej,

Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 4:13:14 PM, you wrote:

 I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's
 higher price.
Thank you very much.


-- 
Best regards,
 Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jernej,

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

JS I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's
JS higher price.

Do you know anyone who's running it using Crossover? I gather TB version
2 worked faultlessly with it but TB 3 doesn't have a rating. I'm going
to switch to Macs from Windows in the New Year and would love to keep TB
going but don't want to go the Parallels or VMWare route.

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.99.29 with POP3 account  AntispamSniper 2.7.1.5
| Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot
| CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz
| RAM: 1024 MB

Holiday in France: http://perso.orange.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html




 Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html