Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is stripped off. For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to safely go back from 4.0 to 3.9. Any advice? -- jaywalker Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.62.07 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
AntiSpamSniper icons not displayed properly
Hello All, Has anyone else had a problem with the AntispamSniper icons not displaying properly? The customise item for AntiSpamSniper only shows the items 'Mark as Junk' and 'Mark as not Junk' although part of the part of the 'View log...' icon displays as shown above. I'm not absolutely sure in which version this problem started. -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v4.0.14.2 with AntiSpamSniper 2.7.1.7, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
On 2/18/08, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is stripped off. For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to safely go back from 4.0 to 3.9. Any advice? Reverted to 3.99.29 with System Restore. Seems to have worked okay. As for the problem with 4.0 and copy-paste from UNIX text, if someone confirms this, can you please post a bug notice for me (assuming it does not yet exist). Sorry, though I am still an avid Bat user, I don't get the time for beta testing these days. -- jaywalker Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.99.29 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntiSpamSniper icons not displayed properly
On Monday, February 18, 2008, 4:10:50 AM, Roger Phillips wrote: RP Has anyone else had a problem with the AntispamSniper icons not RP displaying properly? Yes, I've had the same problem. The only folder it happens in is the junk mail folder. I wrote to the author and the advice he gave me was to add 4 fixed sized icons to the AntiSpamSniper toolbar. That does fix it, but, I believe this to be a TB! bug. -- Mike Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3, v.3300 AntispamSniper v2.7.1.7 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Some issues about S/MIME and OpenPGP
Hello, TBBETA. here are some issues around PGP-S/MIME Unable to decrypt inline OpenPGP when HTML+text mode is used https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6818 Can OpenPGP and S/MIME works together? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6817 Printing encrypted message is impossible (S\MIME) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6787 Signnig sertificate doesn't saved as default while signing (using internal S/MIME) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6784 Any comments or votes? -- TIA, Ivan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper icons not displayed properly
Hello Mike, Monday, February 18, 2008, 11:41:03 AM, among other things, you wrote: RP Has anyone else had a problem with the AntispamSniper icons not RP displaying properly? M Yes, I've had the same problem. The only folder it happens M in is the junk mail folder. I wrote to the author and the advice he M gave me was to add 4 fixed sized icons to the AntiSpamSniper toolbar. M That does fix it, but, I believe this to be a TB! bug. I've tried what I think you were suggesting but the problem is still there. Can please give some more detail of what you did? Many thanks. -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v4.0.14.2 with AntiSpamSniper 2.7.1.7, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hello Ian, snipped quite a bit So I now can only have files that the MSI file contained and would have to be a matched set, but I still cannot get the spell checker to work. Since you didn't do exactly what I told you to do, I have nothing further to say. Good luck my friend. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntiSpamSniper icons not displayed properly
On Monday, February 18, 2008, 4:57:41 AM, Roger Phillips wrote: RP I've tried what I think you were suggesting but the problem is RP still there. Can please give some more detail of what you did? The attached screen shot should illustrate it more clearly. -- Mike Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3, v.3300 AntispamSniper v2.7.1.7attachment: snipertoolbar.png Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Some issues about S/MIME and OpenPGP
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, at 15:49:52 [GMT +0600] (which was 10:49 where I live) Ivan Bolhovitinov wrote: Hello, TBBETA. here are some issues around PGP-S/MIME Unable to decrypt inline OpenPGP when HTML+text mode is used https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6818 Gmail has no problems with that ;-) Can OpenPGP and S/MIME works together? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6817 I have done that in the past encrypt with PGP and sign with S/MIME I have just tested this and still works :-) I tested plain text, will test html later. Printing encrypted message is impossible (S\MIME) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6787 Signnig sertificate doesn't saved as default while signing (using internal S/MIME) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6784 I have more than one certificate (CAcert and Thawte and if I want to be sure that the right one will be used I have to reset signers. After this I am asked which certificate to use. Otherwise there is no consistency in choosing which certificate. Any comments or votes? -- TIA, Ivan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does the Bat! not remember my password for signing/encrypting/decrypting? -- grtz, Henk M. de Bruijn _ The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.22 Pro on Windows XP SP2 Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer Gossamer Spider Web of Trusthttp://www.gswot.org Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail! pgpSx2ahTLiAt.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RE: Re[3]: Moving Emails Issue
I have already been through the Maint center and ran it on all the folders. It did not seem to make a difference. I am going to take a look at XP from a systems view (MFT,Chkdsk,etc) to see if there is something up there. If not, I am truly at a loss as to why TB is so slow processing the mail. I will also delete any filters and see if that makes a difference. The fact that other mailers work fine and at light speed(fast) when reading the mail, points to something amiss with TB. Thanks for the suggestions, if you think of anything else, please let me know. Any and all appreciated. Kyle -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetVicious Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 2:21 PM To: Kyle Goodnight Subject: Re[3]: Moving Emails Issue domingo, 17 feb 2008 at 03:39, it seems you wrote: TB seems to download the mail, do an import,then delete the mail on the server. The incoming folder increments as the delete count progresses through the received mail. After mail is received, it seems to take 6-10 seconds to mark the email read and move to the next msg. I did select some coloring for the mail, I wonder if coloring the mail could be causing problems, seems unlikely, but that is the only change I have made other than updating the releases as they come out. This is weird. Try to do Folder / Maintenance Centre Click Select All Select Check ..., Purge ... , Compres ... It seems your base it's not ok. -- /\/ Using The Bat! 4.0.14.2 Professional / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 2) /\/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: AntiSpamSniper 2.7.1.7 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50 Moderator of Spanish TBUDL Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat! Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Some issues about S/MIME and OpenPGP
Hi, Henk. I have done that in the past encrypt with PGP and sign with S/MIME But you needed it or it was only for joy and\or testing ? Why does the Bat! not remember my password for signing/encrypting/decrypting? It is cached for XX minutes... Or you mean constantly ? -- VBR, Ivan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
Hello Jay, JW When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line JW is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is JW stripped off. Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying text in UNIX format please? I could not find one. -- Cheers! Stefan Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper icons not displayed properly
Hello Mike, Monday, February 18, 2008, 11:41:03 AM, among other things, you wrote: M On Monday, February 18, 2008, 4:10:50 AM, Roger Phillips wrote: RP Has anyone else had a problem with the AntispamSniper icons not RP displaying properly? M Yes, I've had the same problem. The only folder it happens M in is the junk mail folder. I wrote to the author and the advice he M gave me was to add 4 fixed sized icons to the AntiSpamSniper toolbar. M That does fix it, but, I believe this to be a TB! bug. OK, I've now got it to work. Many thanks for your reply and help. :) For some mysterious reason my own original message to which you replied has not yet arrived here!:/ -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v4.0.14.2 with AntiSpamSniper 2.7.1.7, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
On Feb 18, 2008 2:29 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: JW When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line JW is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is JW stripped off. Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying text in UNIX format please? I could not find one. Stefan, I prefer UltraEdit http://www.ultraedit.com. It is shareware, so you could easily use it for the purpose of testing this particular bug. It seems that the problem is connected with the line terminators. If you create a file (or save a file) in UNIX format with Unix line terminators and then copy text from the file into a TB 4.0 message, then _ The dog jumped over the moon. The dog jumped over the moon. The dog jumped over the moon. The dog jumped over the moon. ~ becomes... _ The dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. ~ Presumably the first line is unaffected because it was not preceded by a line terminator. NOTE: This behavior is introduced in 4.x. It does not occur in 3.x (or at least I never noticed it there, and I probably would have). It certainly does not occur in 3.99.29. -- jaywalker Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.99.29 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca. 20 QTs, that I normally set to share between all accounts. I cut out some, ca. 10, and my Voyager became MUCH faster. What is the reason? I dont get it... This thing is reproducible at me. -- Vili The Bat 4.0.14.1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
Guten Tag Jay Walker, am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 um 14:09 schrieben Sie: JW When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line JW is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is JW stripped off. Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying text in UNIX format please? I could not find one. Stefan, I prefer UltraEdit http://www.ultraedit.com. I tried it with Notepad++ which is able to do a Format in UNIX. Put it in the Clipboard with CTRL-C and pasted it here: The dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. he dog jumped over the moon. It makes no difference, if the Text is coded in UTF-8 oder ANSI. Presumably the first line is unaffected because it was not preceded by a line terminator. Agree -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.14.2 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Copy and Paste from UNIX Text File
Hello Stefan, Monday, February 18, 2008, 6:29:06 AM, you wrote: JW When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line JW is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is JW stripped off. ST Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying ST text in UNIX format please? I could not find one. Maybe this is the cause of my Activeword problem as well. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
4.00.14.2 - original text pane
I had to drop back to an earlier version. I extensively rely on the Original Text pane when replying and with the implementation of the new MicroEd, it seems to have acquired some undesirable characteristics. 1. Especially when replying to a HTML message, the mouse does not accurately select. Carefully positioning the cursor and clicking, usually starts the selection one or more characters to the left. 2. Using the keyboard to tab from the copied selection to the body of the message (as was the behavior in v 3.x) does not occur. Instead the focus goes to the headers and you have to press tab repeatedly to get to the body. I have not seen others mention this so perhaps I ma doing something wrong. Jon Using The Bat! v3.99.27.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy is an indispensable companion to all those who are keen to make sense of life in an infinitely complex and confusing Universe, for though it cannot hope to be useful or informative on all matters, it does at least make the reassuring claim, that where it is inaccurate it is at least definitely inaccurate. In cases of major discrepancy it's always reality that's got it wrong. - The Restaurant at the End of the Universe Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.00.14.2 - original text pane
Hello Jon, Monday, February 18, 2008, 9:00:35 AM, you wrote: JP 1. Especially when replying to a HTML message, the mouse does not JP accurately select. Carefully positioning the cursor and clicking, JP usually starts the selection one or more characters to the left. Confirmed. I have noticed this in other places as well. JP 2. Using the keyboard to tab from the copied selection to the body of JP the message (as was the behavior in v 3.x) does not occur. Instead the JP focus goes to the headers and you have to press tab repeatedly to get JP to the body. Also confirmed when replying to plain text. I jumps up to the To: box first and then works its way down. JP I have not seen others mention this so perhaps I ma doing something JP wrong. Don't normally use this, but thought I would check it for you. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
2/18/2008 11:36 AM Hi Vili, On 2/18/2008 Kertész Vilmos wrote: KV I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager KV slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of KV message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca. KV 20 QTs, that I normally set to share between all accounts. I cut out KV some, ca. 10, and my Voyager became MUCH faster. KV What is the reason? I dont get it... This thing is reproducible at me. Is it possible that there is a macro in one of the eliminated QTs that may be causing the problem? I have 15 QTs shared across 4 accounts with no slowdown. - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
KV I noted that by increasing the number of QTs in my TB and Voyager KV slows down when I am moving across folders. I mean, the displaying of KV message list in a folder took sometimes 1-2 seconds to show. I had ca. KV 20 QTs, that I normally set to share between all accounts. I cut out KV some, ca. 10, and my Voyager became MUCH faster. KV What is the reason? I dont get it... This thing is reproducible at me. Is it possible that there is a macro in one of the eliminated QTs that may be causing the problem? I have 15 QTs shared across 4 accounts with no slowdown. The question is, WHY does it matter, what the QTs are containing in regard of the speed/CPU use of the program? Maybe they are loaded each time I switch folders? I had LONG QTs (I mean like 50-100 lines of text), but should this matter? -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
2/18/2008 12:36 PM Hi Vili, On 2/18/2008 Vili wrote: Is it possible that there is a macro in one of the eliminated QTs that may be causing the problem? I have 15 QTs shared across 4 accounts with no slowdown. V The question is, WHY does it matter, what the QTs are containing in V regard of the speed/CPU use of the program? V Maybe they are loaded each time I switch folders? I had LONG QTs (I V mean like 50-100 lines of text), but should this matter? Good questions. I suspect it is a macro as opposed to the volume of text. Just a gut feeling. - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Some issues about S/MIME and OpenPGP
Hi Henk, on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:45:58 +0100GMT (18.02.2008, 12:45 +0100GMT here), you wrote: HMdB Why does the Bat! not remember my password for signing/encrypting/decrypting? Confirmed. I looked, and there even *is* an option to cache passphrases. I absolutely forgot about it, because TB! *always* asks for passphrases. I found my option set to the highest possible value, but you are right: it isn't cached. BTW, checking your GPG-signed HTML mail returned this: ,- | gpg: Signature made 02/18/08 12:46:02 using RSA key ID B464DD0F | gpg: Good signature from Henk M. de Bruijn | gpg: aka ... `- -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.14.2 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
Is it possible that there is a macro in one of the eliminated QTs that may be causing the problem? I have 15 QTs shared across 4 accounts with no slowdown. V The question is, WHY does it matter, what the QTs are containing in V regard of the speed/CPU use of the program? V Maybe they are loaded each time I switch folders? I had LONG QTs (I V mean like 50-100 lines of text), but should this matter? Good questions. I suspect it is a macro as opposed to the volume of text. Just a gut feeling. Ok, let's say it is a macro. I will track it down then, I am just curious WHY any used macro is important when switching folders... -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
2/18/2008 1:24 PM Hi Vili, On 2/18/2008 Vili wrote: V Ok, let's say it is a macro. I will track it down then, I am just V curious WHY any used macro is important when switching folders... I totally agree! There should be no impact until the QT dialog is opened. - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[6]: Questions for developers: number of Quick Templates and speed of TB/Voyager
V Ok, let's say it is a macro. I will track it down then, I am just V curious WHY any used macro is important when switching folders... I totally agree! There should be no impact until the QT dialog is opened. Yes, we are on the same page. I did not do anything, just deleted some QTs, and my Voyager became much faster :) -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SNIP Since you didn't do exactly what I told you to do, I have nothing further to say. Good luck my friend. I have just followed your instructions and found that the spell-checker still does not work. Ian Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Some issues about S/MIME and OpenPGP
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, at 18:26:18 [GMT +0600] (which was 13:26 where I live) Ivan Bolhovitinov wrote: I have done that in the past encrypt with PGP and sign with S/MIME But you needed it or it was only for joy and\or testing ? Hi Ivan, Because I needed it (part of a protocol). I hope this stays possible because it is possible with Thunderbird so Why does the Bat! not remember my password for signing/encrypting/decrypting? It is cached for XX minutes... Or you mean constantly ? Well if you enter 1440 minutes ;-) Caching sometimes works for outgoing messages but most of the time I have to fill in my password. -- Henk _ The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.22 Pro on Windows XP SP2 Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail! pgp3u7haAiiRM.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
Hello Ian, I have just followed your instructions and found that the spell-checker still does not work. OK, if you did (i.e uninstalled, deleted registry key, etc., and did a Custom install with only Core), let's try to pin it down a bit more. Please export your HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT key, rename it as .txt (to avoid the risk of some one double clicking on it) and either post it here or send it to me by PM so I can compare it with mine to see if there any differences that could be significant? A screen capture of of Spell Checker Options dialog would also help. As I said in a reply to Graham in this same thread, no one can assure there is nothing wrong with the SSCE engine. But the fact that it works for most makes it more difficult to find why it fails for some, specially if developers can't reproduce the failure. BTW, when you say it doesn't work, does it mean that it doesn't mark any words as misspelled? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Slow Mail Processing
Hello Kyle, Monday, February 18, 2008, 8:59:36 PM, you wrote: Well, I just do not know what else to do. I have run Maintenance on all of TheBat mail folders, Defraged my drives, Run chkdsk on all drives, Defragged and padded the MFT, and still no joy. Downloading the mail takes too long, once mail is processed, reading each message takes between 6-10 seconds from the time I select the msg until I am able to switch to a new message. As a last resort, I will delete the program, clean the registry and reinstall the program to see if that makes a difference. Are you using a spam checker? -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Slow Mail Processing
Hi BatGroup, Well, I just do not know what else to do. I have run Maintenance on all of TheBat mail folders, Defraged my drives, Run chkdsk on all drives, Defragged and padded the MFT, and still no joy. Downloading the mail takes too long, once mail is processed, reading each message takes between 6-10 seconds from the time I select the msg until I am able to switch to a new message. As a last resort, I will delete the program, clean the registry and reinstall the program to see if that makes a difference. If that does not work, then deep six for me. -- Kyle TheBat! 4.0.14.2 Windows XPPro 5 1 Build 2600 SP2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Slow Mail Processing
Hello Stuart, Monday, February 18, 2008, 10:23:22 PM, you wrote: SC Hello Kyle, SC Monday, February 18, 2008, 8:59:36 PM, you wrote: Well, I just do not know what else to do. I have run Maintenance on all of TheBat mail folders, Defraged my drives, Run chkdsk on all drives, Defragged and padded the MFT, and still no joy. Downloading the mail takes too long, once mail is processed, reading each message takes between 6-10 seconds from the time I select the msg until I am able to switch to a new message. As a last resort, I will delete the program, clean the registry and reinstall the program to see if that makes a difference. SC Are you using a spam checker? I use Bitdefender but AV is turned off for TB. Also have no TB plugins for TB -- Best regards, Kylemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.14.2 Spell Checker Issues
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, at 23:16:52 [GMT +0100] (which was 23:16 where I live) Mau wrote: ...*snip* BTW, when you say it doesn't work, does it mean that it doesn't mark any words as misspelled? Hello Miguel, I hope you don't mind stepping into this thread but this is exactly what happens on my side when I upgrade from this version. As well for the rar as for the msi versions. -- grtz, Henk _ The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.22 Pro on Windows XP SP2 Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail! pgpUM86SRjvCw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Slow Mail Processing
Hello Kyle, too long, once mail is processed, reading each message takes between 6-10 seconds from the time I select the msg until I am able to switch to a new message. I deleted some of my Quick Templates and my Voyager sped up a lot! -- Vili The Bat 4.0.14.1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 Current beta is 4.0.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
