Re: 5.0.0.128 - Filters
Hello Tony, Friday, January 14, 2011, 7:18:38 PM, you wrote: Hello Maxim, Thursday, January 13, 2011, 2:24:40 PM, you wrote: The Bat! 5.0.0.128 BETA is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb500128.rar The following message should be caught by the first filer and not match the second filter yet the first filter does not match and the second filer does match. Snip... I have nearly got to thew bottom of this. 'Test Filters' ignores whether the filter is Incoming, Outgoing or even Active! (I suspect also Read and Replied are ignored) so all filters types are applied for the test. I have Incoming and Outgoing filters of the same name to store complete conversations in the same folder. This lead me to report the filter error. I still have a filtering problem but now cannot test the action of filters in the same circumstances that TB does when new messages arrive. Reported: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8365 -- Best regards, Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
filter works half
Hallo tbbeta, I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) but with .131 that's broken. -- Groetjes, Roelof Can I write former Moderator in my job application? http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE disabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpI4VR5mwCM6.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 12:15:45 PM you wrote: I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) but with .131 that's broken. Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] The Bat 5.0.0.131 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info upon request Strogatz's First Law of Doing Math: When you're trying to prove something, it helps to know it's true. [Steven Strogatz] Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Dierk, Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 11:45:03 AM, you wrote: Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 12:15:45 PM you wrote: I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) but with .131 that's broken. Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. Confirmed for Mark as Read action. -- Best regards, Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 5.0.0.131
Hi Maxim, On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:40:27 +0200 UTC(1/18/2011, 12:40 PM -0600 UTC my time), Maxim Masiutin wrote: M The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA is available at M http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb500131.rar For some reason, I find this version extremely slow. By this I mean, any new message selected opens extremely slow. I have TB set to IMAP on the server on my LAN side, not WAN, so historically is very fast to open any size message. Now, they all open very slow. Even a 29K HTML email takes a few seconds to open, -- Gary Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 6:15:45 AM, you wrote: RO I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as RO read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) RO but with .131 that's broken. I have a similar filter and it hasn't marked anything as read since v4.x -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangr...@gmail.com === Using The Bat! v5.0.0.131 BETA on Windows XP6 Build 7600 Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Q: About Filtering IMAP
Hi, i have a question about the filtering inside TB. My problem is that i have some filters and they work only one time. As example: I Start TB and one filter start working. There are 15 new messages who should be filtered. 5 of them willbe moved as described into filter rules, the rest stay in the INBOX. If i do nothing, TB does nothing with that. I have to do a Refilter folder and after that alle messages will be sorted as i set the rules. On a testaccount on fastmail it is the same (and fastmail is one of the best imap provider i know) Thats the question: Are these filter-rules active or passive or something ? Is it possibel to get an option to rerun rules evers XXX seconds ? Are i am alone with that problem ? Account is a mailbox on my private webspace at a german webhoster. regards Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[v5 b131]: View Modes, VFs
Hello TBBETA Members! View Modes are still not remembered, as isn't the main window split. And emptying a universal VF still does not put the messages into the universal Trash. Actually the last one can be seen as a feature, at least for Junk and Trash, since now I only have to empty once, Junk Mail, instead of twice [first Junk Mail, then Trash]. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] The Bat 5.0.0.131 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info upon request Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. [Benjamin Franklin] Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bat didn't run anymore
Hallo tbbeta, My Bat died. Scared me quit a bit. Installed quite a few additional IMAP accounts today. (On two servers) And after I had copied some (3-4000) messages (this club I'm member of is switching servers and I'd take care of message moving from the old accounts to the new accounts) I decided to test whether the split mode would be saved after restarting, so I moved the border between the message list and the account tree pane to the left. Closed TB and started it again. That's to say I tried to start it, but I got this Windows thingie that told me TB wouldn't start. After OK-ing that I tried again and again. No luck. Rebooted my computer, no luck. Started TB with a different (empty) registry-set, yes, it started I switched it to my mail directory, it recognized my accounts (it missed three or four of the new imap accounts) and stopped running. So I deleted all new imap accounts from my mail directory, started TB again (with the original registry setting) a couple of new (empty) imap accounts were created, but TB ran again. Attached the exceptions.log for today and the ex_log I don't know whether it's a beta issue or not, my copy of 4.2.36.4 wouldn't run either. BTW The split mode was remembered exactly as I changed it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderators - I guess evryone has to get off welfare sometime http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE disabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM thebat_Exceptions.log Description: Binary data ÿþv 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 2 : 2 5 : 4 1 . 4 4 8 I M A P _ C m p : 7 E I m a p U n e x p e c t e d S o c k e t C l o s e d N o E r r o r C o n n e c t i o n u n e x p e c t e d l y c l o s e d v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 3 : 5 2 : 0 8 . 2 5 3 I M A P _ C m p : 7 E I m a p U n e x p e c t e d S o c k e t C l o s e d N o E r r o r C o n n e c t i o n u n e x p e c t e d l y c l o s e d v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 4 : 2 8 : 2 6 . 9 5 4 I M A P _ C m p : 7 E I m a p U n e x p e c t e d S o c k e t C l o s e d N o E r r o r C o n n e c t i o n u n e x p e c t e d l y c l o s e d v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 5 : 0 4 : 1 2 . 0 1 3 G U I D E F : I t e m [ m F o l d e r V i r u s C h e c k ] i s l i n k e d t o u n k n o w n p r o p e r t y [ F o l d e r V i r u s C h e c k ] v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 5 : 0 4 : 1 2 . 0 1 3 G U I D E F : C a n n o t b i n d l a y o u t i t e m [ M s g C t l ] . [ m I m a p S y n c A l l F o l d e r s ] v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 5 : 0 4 : 1 2 . 0 1 3 G U I D E F : C a n n o t b i n d l a y o u t i t e m [ M s g C t l ] . [ m I m a p S y n c A l l F o l d e r s ] v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 5 : 3 5 : 1 7 . 6 3 3 I M A P _ C m p : 7 E I m a p U n e x p e c t e d S o c k e t T i m e o u t T h e s e r v e r d i d n ' t s e n d u s a n y t h i n g i n 3 1 m i n u t e s a m i d t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e I D L E c o m m a n d v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 6 : 0 7 : 4 1 . 4 3 3 I M A P _ C m p : 7 E I m a p U n e x p e c t e d S o c k e t C l o s e d N o E r r o r C o n n e c t i o n u n e x p e c t e d l y c l o s e d v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 8 : 3 5 : 5 7 . 3 2 3 R e c o r d s : F o l d e r D B . F r e e E x c e p t i o n T D a t a C o n t a i n e r . D e s t r o y - - - A L R E A D Y D E S T R O Y E D ! ! ! v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 8 : 3 5 : 5 7 . 3 3 8 R e c o r d s : F o l d e r D B . F r e e E x c e p t i o n T D a t a C o n t a i n e r . D e s t r o y - - - A L R E A D Y D E S T R O Y E D ! ! ! v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 8 : 4 2 : 2 3 . 5 0 1 G U I D E F : I t e m [ m F o l d e r V i r u s C h e c k ] i s l i n k e d t o u n k n o w n p r o p e r t y [ F o l d e r V i r u s C h e c k ] v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f 1 9 - 1 - 2 0 1 1 1 8 : 4 2 : 2 3 . 5 0 1 G U I D E F : C a n n o t b i n d l a y o u t i t e m [ M s g C t l ] . [ m I m a p S y n c A l l F o l d e r s ] v 5 . 0 . 0 . 1 3 1 B E T A B A S I L I S K / R o e l o f
Re: full list
Hello Maxim, Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 9:50:47 AM, you wrote: As I wrote before about Smartermail, it replies to UID STORE +FLAGS by sequence numbers rather than by UIDs as required by RFC. Please contact Smartermail developers to fix this bug ASAP. For example, on a command 00031 UID STORE 92853 +FLAGS (\Seen) the server should reply * 14 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 92853) The server instead replies by sequence number, not by UID, which mades flag changes by UID impossible. I finally received a reply from Smartermail. SmarterTools replied and said they use UID by default with the IMAP protocol. The issues with Outlook are because it has invlaid UID errors, nothing to do with SmarterMail. Can you try connecting with the email client that's having the issue and let me know when you have and what the exact error is? I can then check the logs and give this to SmarterTools. I looked in the log after I tried changing some flags and I see this: 1/19/2011 3:04:20 PM C: 00010 UID STORE 487 +FLAGS (\Flagged) 1/19/2011 3:04:20 PM S: * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\SEEN \FLAGGED) UID 487) 1/19/2011 3:04:21 PM S: 00010 OK UID completed 1/19/2011 3:04:24 PM C: 00011 FETCH 6 (UID) 1/19/2011 3:04:24 PM S: * 6 FETCH (UID 491) 1/19/2011 3:04:24 PM S: 00011 OK FETCH completed 1/19/2011 3:04:36 PM C: 00012 UID STORE 486 +FLAGS (\Flagged) 1/19/2011 3:04:36 PM S: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\SEEN \FLAGGED) UID 486) 1/19/2011 3:04:37 PM S: 00012 OK UID completed 1/19/2011 3:04:38 PM C: 00013 UID STORE 488 +FLAGS (\Flagged) 1/19/2011 3:04:38 PM S: * 3 FETCH (FLAGS (\SEEN \FLAGGED) UID 488) 1/19/2011 3:04:39 PM S: 00013 OK UID completed 1/19/2011 3:04:41 PM C: 00014 UID STORE 491 -FLAGS (\Seen) 1/19/2011 3:04:41 PM S: * 6 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 491) 1/19/2011 3:04:41 PM S: 00014 OK UID completed Do you still have access to the account I set up for you. If so can you retest to see what might be wrong. Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:45:03 +0100, Dierk Haasis Dierk.Haasis- iv1mdsmtiix7xf7qfc6g36honnlkz...@public.gmane.org says... Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. There is a problem with coloring too. None of my filters is able to color my outgoing messages. I had to create manual filter for read messages and trigger it manually in destination folder for coloring to work. -- br, Zurek Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: full list
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 22:19, Rick rick.grunwald.groupm...@gmail.comwrote: * Hello Tbbeta, Could you please make a full list what's left to do to make a release? * Are not the folder compacting and folder purge and compact descriptions redundant? * * No, they aren't. Compact removes deleted messages from a folder permenantly. Purge delete messages from folders, according to rules set in Folder Properties/General (Maximum Number of stored messages Keep messages in the base for X days). Purge Compact, first purges then compacts the folder. Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
