Re: RFC-822 Headers
am Sonntag, 23. März 2008 um 18:46 schrieb Rick Grunwald: In the preview pane if you right click on the message you have the choice of showing RFC-822 Headers. Click it and they show However if you move to another message they no longer show even though a right click will show that RFC-822 Headers still has a check mark next to it Confirm anyone? Can not Confirm, it works in the same Folder it was activated as expected. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.18.5 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.18.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC-822 Headers
Hello Rick, Sunday, March 23, 2008, 7:46:14 PM, among other things, you wrote: RG In the preview pane if you right click on the message you have the RG choice of showing RFC-822 Headers. Click it and they show RG However if you move to another message they no longer show even RG though a right click will show that RFC-822 Headers still has a RG check mark next to it RG Confirm anyone? Not confirmed here!:\ -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v4.0.18.5 POP3 with AntiSpamSniper 2.7.1.7, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.18.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC-822 Headers
Hello Rick, A reminder of what Rick Grunwald typed on: Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 13:46:14 GMT -0400 RG In the preview pane if you right click on the message you have the RG choice of showing RFC-822 Headers. Click it and they show RG However if you move to another message they no longer show even RG though a right click will show that RFC-822 Headers still has a RG check mark next to it RG Confirm anyone? Sorry not confirmed here, using PTV or RTV. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.18.5 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 4.0.18.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC-822 Headers
Hello Rick, A reminder of what Rick Grunwald typed on: Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 13:46:14 GMT -0400 RG In the preview pane if you right click on the message you have the RG choice of showing RFC-822 Headers. Click it and they show RG However if you move to another message they no longer show even RG though a right click will show that RFC-822 Headers still has a RG check mark next to it RG Confirm anyone? Sorry not confirmed here, using PTV or RTV. It is working. in plain text it changes the message in HTML there is no apparent change but it either adds it to the TEXT tab or adds another tab called HEADERS. I guess I'm a little slow today :) -- Rick Republican Tax Cuts for the wealthy Look where it has got us so far! Lets do it some more! v4.0.18.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.18.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC-822 Headers Don't Print Bug
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 18:42, Thomas Fernandez wrote: If I hit ctrl-K on a message and then hit print, I would like it to be printed with the headers. I think this was the case in earlier versions of TB. Time for a wish-list entry? Yes, indeed. Why not create a new macro, something like %printwhatscurrentlyviewed (there is better names, but you get the picture), and adjust the default print template to use this one? -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/40 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 2.03 Beta/40 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC-822 Headers Don't Print Bug
Hello MAU, On Monday, January 19, 2004, 1:19:17 PM, you wrote: M I believe headers will only be printed id you use the %HEADERS macro in M your print template, and they are printed independently if headers are M visible or not. %HEADERS certainly works (worked) exactly as you said . . . independent of visibility. As a work around, I found forward will include the headers if the headers are visible. Just thought I remembered it working differently. -- Best, Richard Richard M. Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat!2.03 Beta/40 under Windows XP 5 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 on a Pentium 4 1.99GHz - Visit our website @ http://www.newmangroup.com and win the prize! Current beta is 2.03 Beta/40 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC 822 headers and forwarding - bug or feature?
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 12:21, Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote: In beta 9 and 10 I see new bahavioru of forwarding message. Turn on RFC 822 headers in message panel and forward it - in forward message there will be NO RFC 822 headers. No matter: mime or standard forward. Question: is it bug or feature? A while ago, this was discussed as a possible feature to implement to avoid people including the headers by mistake (or by not knowing better). IMO it's a big mistake to change the way this has been working since including headers has far more advantages than disadvantages. I doubt people who does not know when to include and when not to include headers even use the view-headers-feature. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 1.63b10 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RFC -822 headers view option is obsolete IMO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 6:16:31 AM you wrote: I vote NO too, at least until the source has the Windows cursor, so that it can be read by a screenreader. Another No from me. - -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.53bis Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Das Gegenteil von Liebe ist nicht Haß sondern Angst. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom! iQA/AwUBOyhN7fTo1oA8g8dLEQL1TwCdHkeVLdiMpr9g6v5c4tXfFT2Wl0AAnj/V v7MkjeZw3LMo60OYEYeHQkvV =mlWf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC -822 headers view option is obsolete IMO
Hello MaXxX, On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:43:06 +0200GMT (14/06/2001, 03:43 +0800GMT), MaXxX wrote: Since we can now view the source of the messages by pressing F9, don't you think that View-RFC-822 headers menu entry (and maybe the part of the code that is attached to it) should be taken out? After all F9 is quicker then Ctrl+Shift+K and shows the same thing, only in a better way :) M So this is my NO vote for this one. I vote NO too, at least until the source has the Windows cursor, so that it can be read by a screenreader. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53bis under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 with a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC -822 headers view option is obsolete IMO
Hello Silviu, SC Since we can now view the source of the messages by pressing F9, SC don't you think that View-RFC-822 headers menu entry (and maybe SC the part of the code that is attached to it) should be taken SC out? SC After all F9 is quicker then Ctrl+Shift+K and shows the same SC thing, only in a better way :) No, Max and Stefan should NOT remove the Ctrl-Shift-K ! For example: When filing a spam complaint, it is required to send ALL the headers of the offending message to the mail abuse department. So before I forward a message to the responsible abuse account, I press those keys to have the new message composed in the way I need it. I do: Ctrl-Shift-K and click on the forward icon. If this useful keystroke is taken out, I will have to press F9, copy the relevant text from the pop-up window and then paste the headers into the new message. This would be worse (more clicks and keystrokes), don't you agree? I would agree changing the Ctrl-Shift-K to another keystroke, but NEVER to remove it. Cheers, Ulrich -- TheBat! 1.53bis on Windows NT 5.0 -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
