Re[2]: 4.1.11.17
4/25/2009 9:03 AM Hi MAU, On 4/25/2009 MAU wrote: Hold that thought. TB! already uses mail dispatcher in its UI. Hence, delayed dispatch gets my vote M Yes, but may confuse some. 'Mail dispatcher' is for incoming email M (downloading from server) while 'delayed dispatch' is for sending. Agreed. - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.4.0.34 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 4.1.11.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.1.11.17
Hello Dierk, Saturday, April 25, 2009, 10:54:00, you wrote: - Send later This is a nice idea. Maybe we should use it for a hint for a corresponding menu items. I have a feeling that send later is somehow can be confused with drafts, when you can save a message in outbox to send it later. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin Ritlabs SRL http://www.ritlabs.com/ Current beta is 4.1.11.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 4.1.11.17
4/24/2009 10:03 AM Hi Steven, On 4/24/2009 Steven P Vallière wrote: MM We are working on postponed sending in this beta, it is still in MM progress. We would like to ask your suggestion about how should we MM call this feature in the interface? “Postponed Send”? “Postponed MM Sending”? Or “Postpone sending”? SPV If it is a command/menu item, how about Send later? Excellent choice! - -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.4.0.34 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 4.1.11.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
