recursive mark as read
Hi, is there a way to mark all messages as read in a folder and its subfolders? -- Best regards, Eilko The Bat! v1.62r/Windows XP 5.1.2600 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: recursive mark as read
Hello Eilko, is there a way to mark all messages as read in a folder and its subfolders? Select the folder. Right click on it and select Mark all Messages Read or Ctrl+M. I don't think it works on subfolders though. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: recursive mark as read
Hello MAU, Saturday, June 28, 2003, 10:20:59 AM, you wrote: is there a way to mark all messages as read in a folder and its subfolders? Select the folder. Right click on it and select Mark all Messages Read or Ctrl+M. I don't think it works on subfolders though. yes, I found this option but it doesn't do it recursively to the subfolders. -- Best regards, Eilko The Bat! v1.62r/Windows XP 5.1.2600.Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: treating an attachment as a text file
27-Jun-2003 21:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For instance, if somebody sends me a batch script as an attachement, ``opening'' the file would actually run the file. Mutt has the ability to ``open as text for viewing'' the file, as well as ``open for running'' the file. This gives the nice ability to look at a file without going through the save process With the increased number of worms and trojans floating around, that does sound like a bit of a dangerous idea to me... -- Best regards, neurowerx (http://www.neurowerx.de) Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody? TF I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in TF the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home TF as well. I started this practice when I was still using Netscape Mail, TF and that client has a nice option: Automatically send a copy of each TF message to this address: In TB, I have to add the BCC macro to TF each template. I wish I could activate such a feature on Account TF level, as I could in Netscape. TF Any seconders? Nah. It's pretty easy to add it as a macro in your 3 basic templates. I bcc: myself because I frequently get into back and forth discussions and I like seeing my messages in the inbox, chronologically, with every one else's responses. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Saved/quick searches
ON Wednesday, June 25, 2003, 4:16:33 PM, you wrote: SH Hello , SH Could someone help please? I would like to know if there is a way to SH save searches, or perform searches repeatedly with the same SH settings. Hi Steve, Previous searches (the last 9) are saved automatically. Go to Tools | search | edit | Use previous conditions. The only change you will have to make is the received after date value if you are using that option. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golf and sex are the only things you can enjoy without being good at it. Using The Bat! v1.62q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter
Hello Coyle306, On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 06:46:01 -0400 GMT (28/06/03, 17:46 +0700 GMT), Coyle306 wrote: TF In TB, I have to add the BCC macro to each template. I wish I TF could activate such a feature on Account level, as I could in TF Netscape. TF Any seconders? Nah. It's pretty easy to add it as a macro in your 3 basic templates. But. If you use AB templates (which I do a lot), you have to add it to every single template. Well, I did this when I set them up, but I still thought it would be easier on account level. But it is not really a very important point. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Der Brite gibt sein Geld pfundweise aus. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter
Hello Thomas, On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, at 18:45:10 GMT +0700 (6/28/2003, 6:45 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: But. If you use AB templates (which I do a lot), you have to add it to every single template. Well, I did this when I set them up, but I still thought it would be easier on account level. Yes. But it is not really a very important point. ;-) I think so. I have 3 main email accounts. One is for mail lists such as this one. The second is for personal email. The last is for my university account. BCC on mail list account is not needed because it should be returned. On the other hand the personal account with a BCC at the account level would be nice because simple setup and only 1 set of filters on the inbound side. On the university account I set up BCC in new and reply templates at the account level. I want to keep running dialog of all email correspondence. I think having incorporated into the interface would make it more user friendly. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter
On Fri 27-Jun-03 11:06pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote: BM I have AutoCompletion turned BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like BM to edit the outbox for testing. Maybe I'm being dense today (it's been a long day), but I don't see how having your own address in the AB facilitates any of this. Nah, I just wasn't clear in the 1st sentence and wrong in the 2nd. Without AutoCompletion turned on, wouldn't one need to type in their email address each time (w/o using the AB)? My second sentence was apparently based on a bad test. I have deferred delivery on. Local delivery appeared to be ignoring that setting - I can't duplicate that behavior today in either 1.62r or the current beta. I don't keep local delivery on because I'm the only user, on my network, using TB. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: reply as a new thread
Hello Sergey, SK Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor? Euh I cannot find 'follow-up'. Do you mean in the message editor when hitting reply ? -- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: reply as a new thread
Hallo Wilfried, On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:44:39 +0200GMT (28-6-03, 20:44 +0200, where I live), you wrote: SK Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message SK editor? WMEuh I cannot find 'follow-up'. Do you mean in the message WM editor when hittingreply ? I've heard it being mentioned, that follow-up has been renamed to/replaced by a 'references' as displayable header in the message editor in the current beta cycle. And since you're using a beta... -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: reply as a new thread
On Sat 28-Jun-03 2:44pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: SK Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor? Euh I cannot find 'follow-up'. Do you mean in the message editor when hitting reply ? Yes, under view it's called Follow-up to in 1.62r. In the beta, it's called, I think (I'm on 1.62r now), References. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: reply as a new thread
Hello Wilfried, On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, at 20:44:39 GMT +0200 (6/28/2003, 1:44 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: SK Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor? Euh I cannot find 'follow-up'. Do you mean in the message editor when hitting reply ? Per Marck's reply in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Make that Follow-up for pre-1.63 versions and you're done You are on 1.63 so it would be References. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Proxy servers
today my Internet Access has been changed from DialUp to rasPPPOE using a Ethernet Card and I need to use a proxy server. My Internet Explorer.Connection settings work fine and I can browse effortlessly but The Bat! does not connect to any pop server. Is it a matter of configuring TB! to use the proxy server. Should it not detect network settings as configured for Internet Explorer. (OE fails to retrieve mail too even though it shares proxy settings with IE). Any help is appreciated. PS: Once this is solved I'll need to look into getting my FTP client to Work. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proxy servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mean, Saturday, June 28, 2003, 11:12:48 PM, you wrote: MD today my Internet Access has been changed from DialUp to rasPPPOE MD using a Ethernet Card and I need to use a proxy server. My Internet MD Explorer.Connection settings work fine and I can browse effortlessly MD but The Bat! does not connect to any pop server. Is it a matter of MD configuring TB! to use the proxy server. Should it not detect network MD settings as configured for Internet Explorer. (OE fails to retrieve MD mail too even though it shares proxy settings with IE). It sounds like you've not configured your network correctly. The proxy settings are typically for HTTP (and FTP). It's not used for mail. I presume you're using xDSL or cable and have a modem router with it's own IP. If this doesn't run DHCP you may need to set this as your default gateway in the network settings dialogue. MD Any help is appreciated. A little more information would be helpful; e.g. what OS, modem/router, network settings etc. you are currently using. MD PS: Once this is solved I'll need to look into getting my FTP client MD to Work. I expect this isn't working for the same reason you have no e-mail. M - -- Best regards, Martin Webster The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPv4lEFv+PP8p0/caEQIHWQCfbOVda5JgcxYm19TEcsICVO8YBCcAoNsF VOrIe8r6C6q1G+uMlUhCc87A =NMEs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proxy servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mean, @29-Jun-2003, 03:42 +0530 (23:12 UK time) Mean Drake [MD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bat: MD .. Is it a matter of configuring TB! to use the proxy server. Yes. Proxy servers do not usually provide proxying for the primary mail server ports. MD Should it not detect network settings as configured for Internet MD Explorer. No. MD (OE fails to retrieve mail too even though it shares proxy MD settings with IE). Quite right. MD Any help is appreciated. If I need to access any POP3 (inbound) mail servers through my proxy here, I have to define mapped ports to translate (proxy) my local connections to port on proxy.silverstones.com to port 110 on pop3.email_isp.net. This is fairly easy if you only have one POP3 service to hit. Then you only have to use direct mapping of the local 110 port to the remote 110 port. It gets more complex when you have multiple servers to query. Then you have to start using local (mapped on the proxy server) port numbers of 5110, 6110, 7110, etc. To do any of this you need direct administrative access to the proxy server to be able to map these ports to the external servers as required. You would have to configure any email software to address the pop3 server through your proxy server on the mapped port (e.g. proxy.lan.net, port 7110). Using NAT may well make this completely unnecessary, but I have yet to get to grips with NAT, having got my proxy completely under control and working to my every whim here. MD PS: Once this is solved I'll need to look into getting my FTP MD client to Work. Again, this is about the proxy server supporting FTP proxy service. Mine does this on port 8021 and you have to tell your FTP client (which are you using?) to use a firewall/proxy on proxy.lan.net on port 8021 (or whatever). - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBPv4oUjnkJKuSnc2gEQKYbQCfZFMbOpC+28CpJXWmIZzlkezP6x4AoIof oZNCAeYxG2pbzV/BSqs1a3Ix =PP+5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proxy servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marck, [M] wrote: MD .. Is it a matter of configuring TB! to use the proxy server. M Yes. Proxy servers do not usually provide proxying for the primary M mail server ports. Yes. This is what had me stuck while I was away one year ago. My Internet access was via a LAN proxy. I had to use web mail during that period ... yuk! The only way to really check mail is if the ISP server running the proxy service also runs it's own mailserver. This was the setup for years at the University I attended. You could only use the mailservers on the ISP network. M If I need to access any POP3 (inbound) mail servers through my M proxy here, I have to define mapped ports to translate (proxy) my M local connections to port on proxy.silverstones.com to port 110 M on pop3.email_isp.net. Wouldn't this mean that you have admin rights to the proxy server software? It doesn't seem that he does. - -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA+AwUBPv4qbFfJ62ArBxfiEQJb4gCYsPYHOVF6VYFS3KBm1U5UjBCnlgCgwDaS nfE1enyOMlxF+QoQWkk+KOk= =G+ya -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Proxy servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allie, @28-Jun-2003, 18:53 -0500 (00:53 UK time) Allie Martin [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: M If I need to access any POP3 (inbound) mail servers through my M proxy here, I have to define mapped ports to translate (proxy) M my local connections to port on proxy.silverstones.com to M port 110 on pop3.email_isp.net. A Wouldn't this mean that you have admin rights to the proxy server A software? It doesn't seem that he does. By definition, a proxy server should be on a LAN. An ISP would not be running a proxy server for users. I've never heard of that setup. Of course, I could be wrong, but it makes no sense to me. What I didn't say is that similar mappings have to be set to convey port 25 access to the correct and required SMTP server. The way I have handled all of this here is to run a mail server alongside the proxy on the machine with primary internet access and TB just talks to that server, which has already collected my mail from various sources and distributes it for me (and the rest of the family) on the outbound side. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA+AwUBPv4uLDnkJKuSnc2gEQLbeQCYqPAbSQjKDU2p8oA5a6P8Od+GuACgxPcI Df1N4yyLkovVlGPNC2t9R2Y= =egrD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Change message list font
Hello TBUDL, I have modified the font used in both the message viewer pane and the folder list, and need to enlarge the font in the message list if I can as my eyes are not what they used to be. I have looked and looked and can't find any setting to do this. Is it possible, and, if so, can some kind soul point this middle aged user in the right direction please. Many thanks. -- Best regards, Peter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Proxy servers
Sunday, June 29, 2003, 5:00:18 AM, you wrote: It sounds like you've not configured your network correctly. The proxy settings are typically for HTTP (and FTP). It's not used for mail. I presume you're using xDSL or cable and have a modem router with it's own IP. If this doesn't run DHCP you may need to set this as your default gateway in the network settings dialogue. Thank everybody. Got things to work after all. Put in DNS servers manually instead of auto-detect and configured default gateway and things are up and running. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Change message list font
On Sat 28-Jun-03 11:41pm -0400, Peter Ballantyne wrote: ... need to enlarge the font in the message list if I can ... Options - Message List Colors and Font... -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
BCC to this address on Account level (was: Unexpected Behavior ofKnown Filter)
Hello Greg, On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:35:44 -0500 GMT (28/06/03, 22:35 +0700 GMT), Greg Strong wrote: I want to keep running dialog of all email correspondence. I think having incorporated into the interface would make it more user friendly. I have a seconder! :-) Now let me find this wishlist URL... -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. There is no gravity. The Earth sucks. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
