Re: IMAP Howto
Hi TBUDL! Is there any howto use IMAP with TB? I want a guide which tells me what to do, to be on the bright side of life :-) I asked because I want to test IMAP with GMX and get weird behaviour. My connection center never closes and shows an IMAP GMX - IMAP in the task list. But it seems there is nothing to do. What settings from the IMAP fine tuning make sense and why? -- Regards, Raymund Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Threading: store outgoing msgs in folder sent from?
Hi Thursday, July 15, 2004, 11:10:41 AM, Cory wrote: C Hi all, C How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders C these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder) C My goal is to keep the threads complete, including my own msgs. C Thanks for your input! Perhaps you could BCC them to yourself? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP Howto
Hi, On Saturday, July 17, 2004 at 7:50:59 PM, Raymund Thomas Tump wrote: Is there any howto use IMAP with TB? I want a guide which tells me what to do, to be on the bright side of life :-) Just a thought You can download Hamster which is a NNTP/POP3/IMAP server which runs under Windows and is open-source. If you want to make some tests on local and compare the results with Mozilla Mail (which is one of the best mailreader for IMAP), it can help you. Just a thought / -- Ludovic LE MOAL (Quimper - France) URL:http://www.lemoal.org/ ICQ# 92250692 Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Latinized and Cyrillized Japanese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 15:46:53 -0400, @ @ when Paul Cartwright wrote: I... think I know what you are getting at :) Yeah. We have to be decent; the family list. :-) MM Sometimes even if you use *very same* charsets (same name, same MM cipher) they may differ. I don't know why. MM For instance an ISO-2 used in TB, will not show entirely same text in MM FoxMail. that doesn't make any sense. a character set SHOULD be the same whatever program it is used in. TB, foxmail, WORD... Yep, *should* be but... I have no enough knowledge to explain that, but it has something with programming: simply these charsets are not *interpreted* exactly/uniformly in all applications. I recall another, similar, example with Phoenix (the mailer): you would type in some ISO-2 letters (for Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian etc.) and it would be good while you are in editor, but when you open again this message for additional editing, all these letters will be trimmed to ASCII! (-: MM We can't wait for a UTF-8... and are sending multi-language MM messages as attachments. is it in the wish list?? is it a priority?? MM Dunno. But should be. so, why not add it?? I'm not sure what to ask for, or I would do it for you! https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php you tell me what you want, and I'll add it! Well, it's kind of you, but I do not belive in these whish lists. (-: But, anyway, few months ago I *really* wished a better LOG, which would record what messages are deleted from server as well, and it simply happened pretty soon after that. (-: UTF-8 is a *must have* of any more serious mailer, so I am *sure* that authors *have* this in mind. So, will be probably that some technical or similar objective problems slow down such more than valuable implementation. Even one Doubtlook Distress has such feature, which is, IMHO much more valuable and needed than an HTML editor. (-; - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFA+se59q62QPd3XuIRApHIAJ0YNzhSnOwRf9TWsHVewpFyn3D5RACdH1le W6+449O0HzSzZFqWZjeNQKI= =ecCS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Latinized and Cyrillized Japanese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 15:43:43 -0400, @ @ when subscriber2list wrote: MM Me too. Shortened: Charsetfun (like in *funny* manuals (-; ) (It's a MM paraphrase of Am. veterans' therm clusterf...) Aaah, Mica, you speak ... aah, you're der Mann! Hehe... Yep, I speak a bit, but urgency/misery make it so. If der Mann means you mean I am a man, yes, it's correct. (-: But if it's another specific therm than I don't get it. For the therm clusterf... I heard few years ago from a friend of mine living in US. snip MM We can't wait for a UTF-8... and are sending multi-language messages as MM attachments. is it in the wish list?? is it a priority?? MM Dunno. But should be. Agree wholeheartedly. Have been following the discussion between Maggie, Paul, Thomas, et al re: character sets. Been playing around, i.e., ¡ ¿ (hope those show up ..) ... alot of fun, but ... with an international group, you would think that would be way up the ladder of priorities.. MM Exactly. My sentiments exactly. Do you think we've influenced them yet? Probably ... naah ... NOT. LOL! Well, what I get, is that any producer is mostly influenced by market logic. In this sense an implementation of UTF-8 would drastically raise the level of sale/use/popularity. (I bet that most TB users are so called advanced users or even geeks, therefore ones who would need desperately such a feature as UTF-8 is.) I don't believe that work on a HTML editor is what should get some priority, in this, market, sense and in general. ... Especially for it is developed in a such way that rather produces some awkward impressions, than anything else. (This HTML editor is, for instance, a perfect antipode to the TB's Plain Text Editor, by its quality and functionality.) - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFA+sy79q62QPd3XuIRAmttAJ44dMkeAlLocKVJgjmbibJMD+vITgCfcGRi uhMdG+alBHFjvD1BcpQJHP4= =x05A -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How does one activate/use the Mailing List option that I see greyed out under the Specials Menu?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 18:57:04 -0400, @ @ when subscriber2list wrote: MM If you switch to some Yahoo group you'll see that menu completely MM inactive, since Yahoo servers are (dis)organized in a different way. LMBO! There's my bud who has a way with words! Well, a bit. We do what we can. :-) Stay away from those cluster... foos ... aaah, SNAFU's Always. That's my first thought. :-) Too much fine things around to afford myself something like that. I'm getting a better understanding of how it works. LOL! Thanks again, Mica. You're welcome, Bo. - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFA+s3z9q62QPd3XuIRAgQJAJ9C0ulM6ZsE+WMevLbuW2SEucDeBgCfQD5X U67MKHYWTK46D2vTOiXvjZs= =Hr7y -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 7:02:21 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: RO However, as I'm a plain text type and don't use the RTV except for RO testing purposes, I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RO the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RO show when you're using the plain text viewer. I've reverted to the PTV as well. Easier to read, and picture in TB header works fine. I'm glad you brought this to my attention because I thought the picture was only available in the RTV. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: User: Cut mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Arjan, on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 04:16:29 +0200GMT, you wrote: AdG Nevertheless your .sig is TOO LONG. ... AdG That's 8 (EIGHT) lines TOO MANY. I miss a smiley in your post. Good thing we're not on the usenet! :grin: - -- Cheers Peter Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. (Dick Brandon) Winamp currently playing: American Hi-Fi - Flavor Of The Weak ([XRM] - Alternative) The Bat! v2.12.00, on Win2K, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM See headers for public PGP key. ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: *Use OpenPGP for privacy and authentication* iD8DBQFA+pgOAzZSBuEHdM4RAvA3AJoDp7daEPs/qjmDpVmGs9Q2oKfdfgCfV5fO DwPNXAZ85KSqwqzd3B2cxd4= =NLHE -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Scan Alert SMC7004FW - 1st alert my IP destination, 2nd my IP source?
Hello TB'ers, Any ideals why my router firewall SMC7004FW would send an intrusion email alert on a SYN flood with a source in RU per the following URL: http://www.ripe.net/perl/whois?form_type=simplefull_query_string=searchtext=213.180.193.68Advanced+search=Advanced+search with my IP address as the source, then followed shortly thereafter with another email alert where the source is my present IP address? Trojan, WinXP security hole, etc.? I sent this to 3 TB lists, not knowing which would be the most appropriate. Here are the whole messages in both email: ,- [ 1st message with my IP as destination ] | Dear User | Your router has detected and protected you against an attempt to gain | access to your network. This may have been an attempted hacker intrusion, | or perhaps just your Internet Service Provider doing routine network | maintenance. | Most of these network probes are nothing to be worried about - these types | of random probes should NOT be reported, but you may want to report repeated | intrusions attempts. Save this email for comparison with future alert | messages. | Your router Alert Information | | Time: 07/18/2004, 11:17:23 | Message: SYN Flood to Host | Source: 213.180.193.68, 52433 | Destination:24.145.174.198, 8090 | | | Visit the UXN Combat Spam web site to get more detailed information about | the intruder - http://combat.uxn.com/ | 1. Type the intruder's IP address into the IP WHOIS search engine | 2. Click the Query Button | 3. Detailed network and administration information will be displayed `- ,- [ 2nd message with my IP as source? ] | Dear User | Your router has detected and protected you against an attempt to gain | access to your network. This may have been an attempted hacker intrusion, | or perhaps just your Internet Service Provider doing routine network | maintenance. | Most of these network probes are nothing to be worried about - these types | of random probes should NOT be reported, but you may want to report repeated | intrusions attempts. Save this email for comparison with future alert | messages. | Your router Alert Information | | Time: 07/18/2004, 11:17:48 | Message: TCP Null Scan | Source: 24.145.174.198, 32771 | Destination:63.99.224.63, 25 | | | Visit the UXN Combat Spam web site to get more detailed information about | the intruder - http://combat.uxn.com/ | 1. Type the intruder's IP address into the IP WHOIS search engine | 2. Click the Query Button | 3. Detailed network and administration information will be displayed `- Please note that my IP address can be verified per TBUDL mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent earlier today. Any ideals? TIA! -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scan Alert SMC7004FW - 1st alert my IP destination, 2nd my IP source?
Hello Greg, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 12:08:23 PM, Greg Strong wrote: GS Any ideals why my router firewall SMC7004FW would send an intrusion email alert on GS a SYN flood with a source in RU per the following URL: GS http://www.ripe.net/perl/whois?form_type=simplefull_query_string=searchtext=213.180.193.68Advanced+search=Advanced+search GS with my IP address as the source, then followed shortly thereafter with ^^ destination GS another email alert where the source is my present IP address? Trojan, GS WinXP security hole, etc.? Sorry about the error! -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scan Alert SMC7004FW - 1st alert my IP destination, 2nd my IP source?
Hello Greg, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 12:08:23 PM, Greg Strong wrote: GS I sent this to 3 TB lists, not knowing which would be the most GS appropriate. A little off topic and do apologize, so taken question elsewhere. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: POPFile POP3 port setting
Is there a reason (a) for not choosing 110, and (b) for choosing 123? Whe I sert up PopFile I went by the manual and forum advice - I can't remembver why at the moment but I'm not technical enough to have made that decision for myself - but as I say I can't remember why I did it. I have checked using the netstat command and there are no listening ports numbered 110. So maybe I should change it back to 110 do you think? And then try 2.12.00 again? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 2.11.02 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: POPFile POP3 port setting
Hello admin, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 3:25:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason (a) for not choosing 110, and (b) for choosing 123? aacu Whe I sert up PopFile I went by the manual and forum advice - I can't aacu remembver why at the moment but I'm not technical enough to have made aacu that decision for myself - but as I say I can't remember why I did aacu it. I have checked using the netstat command and there are no aacu listening ports numbered 110. aacu So maybe I should change it back to 110 do you think? And then try aacu 2.12.00 again? I did use PopFile until I started to use my ISP's (i.e. EarthLink) TLS connection. IIRC the connection was as follows: Connection: TB ==} PopFile ==} ISP's POP Server Port: ? 110 I verified this in my old rules for Kerio which shows PopFile with port 110. IIRC there was special syntax in either my email client's POP server settings or user. I don't recall which one, but I believe it is in PopFile's help. The interesting part is when I started to investigate more into WinXP Pro's security I learned of wiping of the pagefile on shutdown. I thought this would be good to wipe any passwords and such that may be it with memory swapping (i.e. just thinking out loud). The very day that I actived the pagefile wipe on shutdown my ISP's EarthLink TLS did NOT function. Thinking out loud a again I don't give a darn because I don't have anything to hide. :-þ -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Must Watch Trigger Chat?
Hello TB User Discussion List, The Watch replies in.. feature is very nice, but it appears to require a chat folder. Each time I receive a reply, a chat dialog is triggered. Is there any way to turn that chat feature off? I've tried with and without the chat folder checked under the main window's Special/Watch. Either way I get the chat dialog. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: POPFile POP3 port setting
On Mon 19 July 2004, 6:25:14 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason (a) for not choosing 110, and (b) for choosing 123? Whe I sert up PopFile I went by the manual and forum advice - I can't remembver why at the moment but I'm not technical enough to have made that decision for myself - but as I say I can't remember why I did it. I have checked using the netstat command and there are no listening ports numbered 110. So maybe I should change it back to 110 do you think? And then try 2.12.00 again? Well, I am using 110 successfully. When I had an anti-virus proxy (Norton AntiVirus) I had to change the Popfile port, because NAV wanted 110, so I think I used 1100 for TB! and Popfile to communicate on, and 110 for Popfile and NAV. Now that I don't have NAV, I just use 110. I would give it a go, it might work better. -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu) No of SETI units returned: 301 Processing time: 1 years, 244 days, 21 hours. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Disappearing of messages and rogues' issue
Konstantin Volenbovsky, [KV] wrote: After migrating from 2.11 I have such strange behaviour: (I have IMAP account, full synchronization of inbox) when I click the other folder eg sent mail, and then return to inbox I see no messages in it(especially when offline)! After restart of TB, I see my messages back. Could anyone be so kind to explain this? Do you have the inbox set to clear cached messages on exit? Check the folders properties for this setting. And, I downloaded the rogues.zip with pcwsmileys.zip, followed the instructions. Finally, I pressed the key combination and...I noticed nothing. The smileys were the same and I couldn't guess how to use the rogues feature. There's so much discussion on this already. Check the list archives and you'll see information on this. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or find the thread with subject 'Smileys and Rogues'. -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com pgp0oh3jmPNeX.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scan Alert SMC7004FW - 1st alert my IP destination, 2nd my IP source?
Hello Bob, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 7:13:24 PM, Bob Morris wrote: BM You gave me a few moments of puzzlement with this - I had just read BM your message at GRC.COM on my newsreader and then opened my e-mail to BM see the identical message. Well after I got a rather rude post on OT, I then posted to GRC and to DSLreports security group. BM I thought I was having a senior moment :) ROTFLMAO! -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Must Watch Trigger Chat?
On Sun 18-Jul-04 5:19pm -0400, Zeynel A. Öztürk wrote: Monday, July 19, 2004, 12:47:12 AM, you wrote: Is there any way to turn that chat feature off? I've tried with and without the chat folder checked under the main window's Special/Watch. Either way I get the chat dialog. To turn of chat completely for an account, Open Account properties | Chat. Open 'chat mode' dropdown box and select 'No chat'. Thanks Zeynel, I missed that completely. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter action not working
Snet, [S] wrote: After setting up a couple test filters to do what you wish: If you are wondering why I am doing this, it goes like this: I asked TB! to color code specifically annoying spam. TB! was successful @ this task. Yes. The first filter colour coded the message. I guess if the color coding is working properly I can assume that my filter is working properly, nevertheless I don't understand why TB! isn't taking this 2nd level action. Maybe it's a TB! limitation. Or a user limitation. I can't get it to work which makes me wonder that our experiences being the same adds to there being a bug. This shouldn't be a TB! limitation. TB! can be set to apply filters to messages which have been assigned a particular colour group. I can't seem to make that setting work here. TB! ignores messages with the colour group it should be matching. -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com pgpSsaRHvUx2o.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Newbie ......again
Hello tbudl, I once used tbat about 2 years ago. Well, Im back for another round. Im going to be monitoring this board and try to pick up on anything thats talked about so I can learn. If there are any tips you may have or sites that have a lot of helpful information, please pass it on to me. Ill try to absorb anything I can right now. Thanks. -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: filter action not working
Hello Allie, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 8:15:38 PM, you wrote: AM I can't get it to work which makes me wonder that our experiences AM being the same adds to there being a bug. This shouldn't be a TB! AM limitation. TB! can be set to apply filters to messages which have AM been assigned a particular colour group. I can't seem to make that AM setting work here. TB! ignores messages with the colour group it AM should be matching. It seems to be a problem with the Continue Processing Other Filters. If you Right click and pick re-filter the second filter works. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie ......again
Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:55:41 -0700 (9:55 PM EDT here) Darrin wrote: If there are any tips you may have or sites that have a lot of helpful information, please pass it on to me. Ill try to absorb anything I can right now. Thanks. The Bat FAQ: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html The Bat! Macro and Solutions Library: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html MyMacros 1.10 Home page: http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.5, MyMacros 1.10 Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie ......again
Hello Dan, Sunday, July 18, 2004, 8:12:10 PM, you wrote: DG The Bat FAQ: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html DG The Bat! Macro and Solutions Library: DG http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html DG MyMacros 1.10 Home page: http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ Thanks Dan. I appreciate it. It will help keep me from asking dumb questionsor at least not as many :) -- Best regards, Darrinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ntdll.dll error always followed by Grid Index Out of Range
Hello TB User Discussion List, I don't get this all the time, but about once a day - generally after TB! has been running smoothly for hours. Is anyone else seeing this? I found a single message, back around April, mentioning this error. I suspect it's unique to me. I accidently wiped out the contents of my root directory (Win XP Pro) on 6/19 and got things going after the dreaded Missing ntldr message, by copying ntldr and ntdetect.com from my installation CD and creating a boot.ini from an MS KB article. Here's my root now (the dates are creation dates): 6/21/2004 2:53 199 RH_A boot.ini 6/20/2004 0:24 0 RHSA MSDOS.SYS 6/20/2004 0:24 0 RHSA IO.SYS 6/19/2004 23:15 1,610,612,736 _HSA pagefile.sys 5/27/2004 19:19 1,072,746,496 _HSA hiberfil.sys 3/31/2003 7:00 233,632 _H_A ntldr 3/31/2003 7:00 47,580 _H_A ntdetect.com Did I miss something important? BTW, here's my manually created boot.ini content: == [boot loader] timeout=0 default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT [operating systems] multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT=Microsoft Windows XP Professional /nodebug /fastdetect == Thanks for any ideas. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ntdll.dll error always followed by Grid Index Out of Range
Hi Bill McCarthy - On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, at 22:43:12 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:43 PM where I live) you wrote: Hello TB User Discussion List, I don't get this all the time, but about once a day - generally after TB! has been running smoothly for hours. Is anyone else seeing this? I found a single message, back around April, mentioning this error. I suspect it's unique to me. I accidently wiped out the contents of my root directory (Win XP Pro) on 6/19 and got things going after the dreaded Missing ntldr message, by copying ntldr and ntdetect.com from my installation CD and creating a boot.ini from an MS KB article. Here's my root now (the dates are creation dates): 6/21/2004 2:53 199 RH_A boot.ini 6/20/2004 0:24 0 RHSA MSDOS.SYS 6/20/2004 0:24 0 RHSA IO.SYS 6/19/2004 23:15 1,610,612,736 _HSA pagefile.sys 5/27/2004 19:19 1,072,746,496 _HSA hiberfil.sys 3/31/2003 7:00 233,632 _H_A ntldr 3/31/2003 7:00 47,580 _H_A ntdetect.com Did I miss something important? snip Thanks for any ideas. I'm afraid I don't follow. What does this have to do with TB? -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpGV5C6x5CBJ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ntdll.dll error always followed by Grid Index Out of Range
On Sun 18-Jul-04 10:59pm -0400, Kevin Amazon wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, at 22:43:12 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:43 PM where I live) you wrote: I don't get this all the time, but about once a day - generally after TB! has been running smoothly for hours. Is anyone else seeing this? I found a single message, back around April, mentioning this error. I suspect it's unique to me. snip I'm afraid I don't follow. What does this have to do with TB? There have been several reports of the ntdll AV, and at least one report of the Grid index out of range. I'm not certain the are directly related to TB!, but I've only encountered the ntdll AV while running TB!. Also, that AV only appears to have an impact on TB!. Closing and re-opening TB! eliminates the Grid problem. Because of my mini-disaster, my system could be the problem. I was hoping that somebody might simply do a DIR and let me know if I've missed restoring a file. Anyone with XP Pro can look at the root with either CMD or 4NT by invoking the following command from the root: dir /ah-d /tc /o-d myroot.txt That simple gives a directory of hidden files by reverse creation date order. If anyone reading this, and has XP Pro installed, would email the contents of your myroot.txt, I would appreciate it. -- Best regards, Bill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
