RE: Bug in MAILTO link handling
Hello Alexander, Saturday, November 12, 2005, 11:09:41 AM, you wrote: Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else, I now filed the bugreport for this problem: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5332 merci bien -- Best regards, Jürgen :eu-flag3: :de-bw: :safaribears: In Europe you have watches but in Africa we have time Using The Bat! v3.62.14 , Opera v8.5.7700 on WinXP Home v2600 SP2 * PGP key available on request: send mail with subject PGP key request pgpNiMOnhn8Bl.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Help with IMAP
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:12:16 +, The Janitor wrote: NOD32, www.eset.com. Thanks for that. For the moment I've decided to stick with POP and AVG, if only for the reason that I've recently paid for 12 months of AVG professional so I intend to get my money's worth. And, the one machine I was trialling IMAP on caught an email virus within hours; I guess because AVG couldn't cope with IMAP? -- Best regards Barry Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bug in MAILTO link handling (was: preventing TB from deleting URL when doing 'send link by mail' in browser?)
Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else, I now filed the bugreport for this problem: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5332 Description: The mailto: implementation allows passing a pre-defined body text to the mail client. Please see http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol5/html_no17.htm for a description and example, as well as a link that can be used to demonstrate the bug. Opera for example uses it for its send link as email function. This is working in TB, but when you change the recipient, or account, to one that has its OWN template, the text passed from the MAILTO link is lost because the new template replaces the body text. TB should protect the content of MAILTO links in the editor, just as it protects your previously typed text if you manually create a new message and change the recipient or account (to one that has a different template). -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Oxygene Part 2 (3:36) by Señor Coconut from the album 'Fiesta Songs' Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB to work in a network
hello list, could TB be also in a network? say A, B C computers have TB installed. could the A computer be the main server? does this mean that all outgoing/incoming mail has to pass through A computer? do we update only the A computer regularly with addresses etc.. and could same be viewed in computers B C? how does one set up the network? your assistance is greatly appreciated. thanks in advance -- with best regards vernon Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB to work in a network
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:31:05PM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could TB be also in a network? Yes. say A, B C computers have TB installed. could the A computer be the main server? Yes. does this mean that all outgoing/incoming mail has to pass through A computer? You can set up The Bat! in a mode that enables this kind of workflow, albeit The Bat! does *not* act only as a regular mail server, like the one you know fromyour ISP, but more as the account holder. do we update only the A computer regularly with addresses etc.. and could same be viewed in computers B C? Don't know what you mean here ... how does one set up the network? Options / Network Administration. There you can choose - on A: The Bat! working as Server - on B C: The Bat! acting as client I don't know about stability of TB! acting as Workgroup-Server in the current release version, I do only know in the past there were problems here and there. If anyhow possible I'd go for a small real mail server, which acts as SMTP and IMAP server in your local network, fetches the mail from the internet and passes outgoing mail to your ISPs SMTP. The Bat! is a superb mail user agent, but for mail transfer agent stuff I'd rely on somthing that's specialized for this kind of stuff. -- Ciao, Peter Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Strange server error
I am trying to send a message to a discussion list to which I have had no issues in sending in the past. The error is the same whether I reply to a posting or use my address book: The server reports error, The response is: 5.7.1 Missing or literal domains not allowed The address to which I am sending the message is, variously, Ravnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the problem here, and how can I fix it? Thanks. Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat, version, 2.12.00 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Strange server error
Hello Leonard, On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:21:41 -0500 GMT (13/11/2005, 10:21 +0700 GMT), Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: LSB The server reports error, The response is: 5.7.1 Missing or literal LSB domains not allowed http://www.google.com/search?q=5.7.1%20Missing%20or%20literal%20domains%20not%20allowed There is quite some info. Maybe some of it helps. -- Cheers, Thomas. Remember in prayer the many who are sick of our church and community. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.62.14 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Strange server error
On Saturday, November 12, 2005, 10:40:16 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF There is quite some info. Maybe some of it helps. Thanks. I will follow up on this. Leonard Leonard S. Berkowitz -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
