Re[2]: Incoming email with garbled characters

2008-01-10 Thread Lawrence Johnson
Hello Marek,

Tuesday, January 8, 2008, 4:38:40 PM, you wrote:

 I have not such message to check it, but there is following bugfix in
 4.0.0.1 aplhaversion:

 [-] English messages with  _ks_c_5601-1987_ or _euc-kr_ character sets
 could be displayed as hieroglyphs.

Setting Character Set - auto-detect did not affect the message but
setting to Character Set - Western European (ISO) or pretty much
anything else allowed the message to be displayed correctly.

I had several such messages from past communication with the vendor.
The character set had to be set individually on each.

-- 
Best regards,
 Lawrence Johnsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Incoming email with garbled characters

2008-01-10 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Thursday, January 10, 2008, Lawrence Johnson wrote:

 I have not such message to check it, but there is following bugfix in
 4.0.0.1 aplhaversion:

 [-] English messages with  _ks_c_5601-1987_ or _euc-kr_ character sets
 could be displayed as hieroglyphs.

 Setting Character Set - auto-detect did not affect the message but

Autodetect supports cyrillic charsets yet only.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.0.0.8 (ALPHA)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 
2.7.1.5

Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM


 




Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Incoming email with garbled characters

2008-01-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Lawrence,

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:27:39 -0600 GMT (10/01/2008, 15:27 +0700 GMT),
Lawrence Johnson wrote:

 [-] English messages with  _ks_c_5601-1987_ or _euc-kr_ character sets
 could be displayed as hieroglyphs.

LJ Setting Character Set - auto-detect did not affect the message but
LJ setting to Character Set - Western European (ISO) or pretty much
LJ anything else allowed the message to be displayed correctly.

This is true for the version you are using, The Bat! (v3.99.29)
Professional.

It is supposed to be fixed in the current alpha series. I'm still
waiting for a message from Korea to verify this. Please hang on until
the next release, or join TBBETA.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Why do you need a driver's license to buy liquor when you can't drink
and drive ?
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.0.6 (ALPHA)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


suppress addresses in distribution list

2008-01-10 Thread Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hello,
Is there any way to send a message to a mailing list and have all
the email addresses in the the list not appear in the header?

Thanks



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
Charset: us-ascii

wj8DBQFHhg48qrjyIUpt6bgRAl06AKDYF/Gfs5CPGNE9Yt33zrVqefGw3ACgnZ/z
aHJ0nITeQfOZxxaKVs7T+Mw=
=tMAF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: suppress addresses in distribution list

2008-01-10 Thread Marten Gallagher
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1


 Hello,
 Is there any way to send a message to a mailing list and have all
 the email addresses in the the list not appear in the header?

Any reason you cannot put list in the BCC field?

And you address on its own in the To field?

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.99.29
with K9
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello,

Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the
text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer.

TIA.

-- 
 Nick

 TheBat!: v3.99.3 on Windows XP



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Christopher W .

Nick Dutton @ 2008-1-10 12:31:44 PM
Signatures in plain-text viewer. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the
 text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer.

You need to use the rich text viewer/HTML viewer, not the plain text
viewer to get these options. You can then set The Bat! to display HTML
messages as plain text:
http://www.chriswarrington.com/rich-text.png

-- 
Christopher

Using The Bat! v3.99.25 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000.
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Is the glass half empty, half full, or twice as large as it needs to
be?

pgptbl6C1eOC7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, January 10, 2008, 5:31:44 PM, Nick Dutton wrote:

 Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the
 text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer.

Not in the plain text viewer.  If you de-select Use Plain Text View in
the right click menu of the Message Viewer then the signature text
will be whatever is specified in
Options|Preferences|Viewer/Editor|HTML/Windows Editor.

I use the plain text editor, but view in Windows mode to get the
text styles.

Julian

-- 
  Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

 



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html