Re[2]: Account for common virtual folders

2008-01-28 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
Hello MFPA,

Monday, January 28, 2008, 1:31:41 AM, you wrote:

 Here, if I create a new message when the selected folder is a
 common virtual folder I get a dialog box to select the account
 before a new message window opens. I also get this if I click a
 mailto: link.

Do you have a default account defined (check under the account settings/general 
if the box at this is the default account for mailto: url's is checked on any 
account)?

I get this dialog box when clicking on a mailto: - link without having a 
default account defined. But when creating a message from a virtual folder I 
don't get it.

The version I am currently using is 4.0.0.15 alpha, but the behaviour was the 
same with 3.99.x.

-- 
Best regards,
 Carsten



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 128518 * IMAP configuration

2008-01-28 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Peter,

 i use TB v.3.0.1.33.
 Well, TB IMAP is still not perfect but is better in the later versions.

This might be very much in the eye of the beholder. At least in
v3.0.1.33 I don't have to restart TheBat a couple of times each day
when I notice that server checking has stopped and new messages are no
longer recognized.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp1YSa6Lr00o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: 128518 * IMAP configuration

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Fjelsten
monsell,

On 28-01-2008 08:57, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Actually, since this is not my personal email but it is our company
 email, I want all messages to be downloaded, just like the POP
 interface and what i do is store the the IN messages in a different
 folder called X and the SENT messages are stored in another folder
 called Y. I store messages upto 5 months old.

Well, this should pose no problem. You can do this with filters,
server-side or local.

The beauty of IMAP is that if you need your mail from another computer
or via webmail, all your mail (also old mail) is there, in the folders
you have created for it.

 This is very important especially during after office hours or during
 a week end. I check mail leaving them on the server, during this
 period and once in office, down load them all and clear the server due
 to restricted space allocation on the server.

Well, you can have folders on the server in which you can store you
mail. When you have fully synchronized them (so the full message is
local), you can move them to a local folder freeing up space on the
server.

 Let me get this straight, once the IMAP is configured and your server
 comes online, the IN box is filled with messages as appearing on your
 server, but the IN box does not have the messages downloaded?

It depends on your synchronization settings. Please review them: they
should be fairly self explanatory.

 Is it a copy of the messages that appears in your IN box?

No it _is_ the messages on the server. Delete one - and it's gone on the
server (after you purge).

  Then, how do i
 activate the filters for this IN box if the messages are itself not
 physically downloaded?

You can have server-side filtering and local filtering. If you retrieve
message structures with message headers you can filter on some thing but
in order to filter on contents in the text of the mail you need to
synchronize Headers and text. This way you can filter as with POP3.

  do i have to move the messages from IN box to X
 box and then run the filters from here?

You can have filters moving messages from the inbox to any folder (local
or server-side).

 do you mean that the folders in the server should be created or the
 desktop client that i use?

To get the full use of IMAP you should create folders on the server.
Again, you _could_ do a full sync. and just move the messages to a local
folder, but then you're not really working with IMAP as it is intended.

 in our server it got only IN,OUT,SENT and TRASH but in my desktop
 client (TB), i got a lot of folders, sub-folders, filters and
 sub-filters since i use POP interface.

You can have folders on IMAP servers, too. Maybe not sub-folders - I
think this depends on the server.

 Sorry, but the IMAP is still a bit complicated for me, but would
 really want to set it up to run smoothly.

I think you should google a bit for IMAP in order to understand what
that protocol entails. I know it's a little difficult since it's
different from POP but to me it's really much better than POP.

 i use TB v.3.0.1.33. May be this is an old version but would like to
 stick with it since i dont want any problems trying to install newer
 versions and lose all what i got, incase of a problem.

Well, TB IMAP is still not perfect but is better in the later versions.

-- 
greeting Best regards /greeting  
author Peter Fjelsten /author 
thebat version 3.99.24 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras
env. 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier)  1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 200K+ msgs. /env.
os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 /os  




Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


128518 * IMAP configuration

2008-01-28 Thread monsell
Hi Mr Peter,

On 28-01-2008 08:57, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Actually, since this is not my personal email but it is our company
 email, I want all messages to be downloaded, just like the POP
 interface and what i do is store the the IN messages in a different
 folder called X and the SENT messages are stored in another folder
 called Y. I store messages upto 5 months old.

Well, this should pose no problem. You can do this with filters,
server-side or local.
++
I tried the configuration once more of the IMAP interface (actually
this is my 3rd time that i am configuring since i deleted the account
on previous two occasions as i did not understand the settings and
working out of the IMAP). works fine now. just to double check with
you, 1. once the mail is moved from the IN box and this IN box folder
is purged (Folder  purge+compress), the messages are automatically deleted
from the server. 2. tried a filter. once received in the IN box it
does not get filtered. but after some time when manual filtering is
done, it works fine. how can i solve this problem? could it be
configured to automatically go into the filter folder when the message
appears in the In box itself (like the POP interface)?

my situation is that i dont delete any mail, but move them to the back
up X (IN) and Y (SENT) folders respectively whilst others are
automatically moved into the filter folders.
+++


The beauty of IMAP is that if you need your mail from another computer
or via webmail, all your mail (also old mail) is there, in the folders
you have created for it.

 This is very important especially during after office hours or during
 a week end. I check mail leaving them on the server, during this
 period and once in office, down load them all and clear the server due
 to restricted space allocation on the server.

Well, you can have folders on the server in which you can store you
mail. When you have fully synchronized them (so the full message is
local), you can move them to a local folder freeing up space on the
server.
+
i do not wish to have folders on the server but i have instead set to
view full messages which means, i guess, is that the entire message is
down loaded and ofcourse later on i move them to the X folder at the
end of the day.

in the manage IMAP folders (account--imap commands--manage imap
folders) where you set the IN box to synchronize
(this option is selected), i have accidentally deleted the sub-folders
coming under the INBOX which is OUT, SENT and TRASH. will this cause a
problem? since the IN box synchronization is selected under ALL
MESSAGES, it is only this box that works with the server directly,
right?



  do i have to move the messages from IN box to X
 box and then run the filters from here?

You can have filters moving messages from the inbox to any folder (local
or server-side).

as said previously, i triggered one filter to check with IMAP but it
is not automatically moved into filtered folder but only after
sometime that when manually done, it is moved. what may be the reason
for this?


will be pleased to hear from you and thank you in advance for same.

-- 
best regards
rizvi



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 128518 * IMAP configuration

2008-01-28 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Monsell,
  A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on:
  Monday, January 28, 2008 at 20:15:10 GMT +0530

mmic as said previously, i triggered one filter to check with IMAP but it
mmic is not automatically moved into filtered folder but only after
mmic sometime that when manually done, it is moved. what may be the reason
mmic for this?

Under Account Properties/Mail Management/IMAP Fine Tune do you have 
Auto-Filtering selected?

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Using The Bat! v4.0.0.13 (ALPHA)
 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: IMAP vs POP

2008-01-28 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Stuart,
  A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
  Monday, January 28, 2008 at 11:59:42 GMT -0600

PK Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
PK the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.

SC Here is a paper on it, although there must be better sites for the 
SC topic.

Ooops.

http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computing/email/imap-pop.html

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Using The Bat! v4.0.0.13 (ALPHA)
 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


IMAP vs POP

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello tbudl,

Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.

Thank you.



-- 
Best regards,
 Peter

The BAT 3.99.29,
Windows XP, Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: IMAP vs POP

2008-01-28 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Peter,
  A reminder of what Peter Kerekes typed on:
  Monday, January 28, 2008 at 12:42:34 GMT -0500

PK Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
PK the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.

Here is a paper on it, although there must be better sites for the 
topic.

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Using The Bat! v4.0.0.13 (ALPHA)
 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


(OT) Passing of Kevin Coates

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Dear all,

as I learned today, Kevin Coates has passed away. After years of
battling cancer, he finally succumbed.

Here is what Mike Daigle said on the GSWoT list (Gossamer Spider Web
of Trust, where Kevin was also a member):

,-
| It is with heavy heart that I announce the passing of Kevin Coates.
| 
| Kevin and I had been virtual acquaintances since the forming of the
| GSWoT. We would chat almost daily, and even had our local mail servers
| set to send mail to each other's PC directly. We often experimented with
| new software. Two heads are better than one, after all. Kevin will be
| dearly missed.
`-

I can only sign this. It was much alike here, albeit in 2003-2005
relating to The Bat! and PGP issues.

Many of you will also remember him, as he was very active on PGP
issues as well as The Bat!'s development.

- -- 

Sad regards
Peter

xpost2pgp-basics,tbudl,tbbeta,tbot
'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.51
Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication

iD8DBQFHnj6zAzZSBuEHdM4RAx9/AKC+WUCko4+qmfF8Cf2ZUN4PCCxzwgCfSmV6
a9Jb4VDRcAPwjfV6zyxb4hw=
=rLLe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Account for common virtual folders

2008-01-28 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Monday 28 January 2008 at 9:07:42 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
wrote:

 Do you have a default account defined

No. I want to choose the account each time I write a message.

 (check under the account settings/general if the box at this is
 the default account for mailto: url's is checked on any
 account)?

Is there really nowhere to just look/set what is the default
without searching the properties of each account individually?

 I get this dialog box when clicking on a mailto: - link without
 having a default account defined.

I also get it if I have a password-protected account defined as
the mailto: default (provided TB! is not open at the time with
that account expanded).

 But when creating a message from a virtual folder I don't get
 it.

If you put a password-protected account at the top of the list in
your account tree, I would expect you to get the pop-up when
creating a new message while viewing a virtual or a common folder
(as long as that account is not expanded). I have a dummy account
there with no server settings - this must be why!

 The version I am currently using is 4.0.0.15 alpha, but the
 behaviour was the same with 3.99.x.

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

My mind works like lightning... one brilliant flash and it's gone





Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Which spam filter for The Bat?

2008-01-28 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Saturday 26 January 2008 at 6:03:35 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Costas Papadopoulos
wrote:


 One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
 spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend
 for me to use with The Bat.

I just use The Bat!'s own filters system. Needs only occasional
tweaking. No automated figures available but I would guess 95% to
99% effective. Very few falsely moved to spam folders once you get
the filters right. I generally get very little spam (1-5 per day)
but every few months I will get a deluge of about 3000-4000 spread
over a few days. My filters usually only miss about 25-30 of this
deluge, just means my spam is predictable. Somebody using Regular
Expressions could probably achieve greater accuracy.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Don't cry because it is over - smile because it happened

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: IMAP vs POP

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Stuart,

Monday, January 28, 2008, 1:38:21 PM, you wrote:

Stuart Hello Stuart,
Stuart   A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Stuart   Monday, January 28, 2008 at 11:59:42 GMT -0600

PK Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
PK the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.

SC Here is a paper on it, although there must be better sites for the 
SC topic.

Stuart Ooops.

Stuart http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computing/email/imap-pop.html


Thanks for the link. I read it, interesting. For the time being I will stay
woth POP since using only a single computer. However that may change in the
future.

I presume I can use theBat for IMAP accounts.

Thanks again for the instructive document.

-- 
Best regards,
 Peter

The BAT 3.99.29,
Windows XP, Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: (OT) Passing of Kevin Coates

2008-01-28 Thread Maggie Meister

Hi Peter,

Thank you for the notice, Peter. Kevin was a very helpful and honorable person 
and he will be missed. 


On Monday, January 28, 2008 at 3:45:29 PM you wrote:

PM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
PM Hash: RIPEMD160

PM Dear all,

PM as I learned today, Kevin Coates has passed away. After years of
PM battling cancer, he finally succumbed.

PM Here is what Mike Daigle said on the GSWoT list (Gossamer Spider Web
PM of Trust, where Kevin was also a member):

PM ,-
PM | It is with heavy heart that I announce the passing of Kevin Coates.
PM | 
PM | Kevin and I had been virtual acquaintances since the forming of the
PM | GSWoT. We would chat almost daily, and even had our local mail servers
PM | set to send mail to each other's PC directly. We often experimented with
PM | new software. Two heads are better than one, after all. Kevin will be
PM | dearly missed.
PM `-

PM I can only sign this. It was much alike here, albeit in 2003-2005
PM relating to The Bat! and PGP issues.

PM Many of you will also remember him, as he was very active on PGP
PM issues as well as The Bat!'s development.


  

-- 

Regards,
  Maggie


If I do not speak in a language that can be understood, there is little chance 
for a dialogue. -bell hooks

Emailing with The Bat! 3.99.29



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: IMAP vs POP

2008-01-28 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Stuart,

Monday, January 28, 2008, 12:59:42 PM, you wrote:

Stuart Hello Peter,
Stuart   A reminder of what Peter Kerekes typed on:
Stuart   Monday, January 28, 2008 at 12:42:34 GMT -0500

PK Cab anyone direct me to a website or somewhere where I can learn what is
PK the advantage of IMAP compared to POP, and how to use it.

Stuart Here is a paper on it, although there must be better sites for the 
Stuart topic.


Thanks, but I think you missed (or I cannot see) the link.


-- 
Best regards,
 Peter

The BAT 3.99.29,
Windows XP, Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Which spam filter for The Bat?

2008-01-28 Thread Tom

Saturday, January 26, 2008, 6:03:14 PM, you wrote:


  I would ideally like to isolate spam for inspection rather
 than have it automatically deleted.

Mailwasher does not automatically delete on the server. Instead you
run it as a separate program and it shows you all incoming email
before you retrieve these emails to your email programs. It has a
leaning filter but you can inspect all flagged emails prior to
processing. Once you process, then good emails are either downloaded to
your pc into your email program or deleted on the server and never
make it onto your pc.


-- 
Tom
using TheBat! 3.99.29 on XP



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


128518 * IMAP configuration

2008-01-28 Thread monsell
Hello Stuart,

Monday, January 28, 2008, 10:45:26 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Monsell,
   A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on:
   Monday, January 28, 2008 at 20:15:10 GMT +0530

mmic as said previously, i triggered one filter to check with IMAP but it
mmic is not automatically moved into filtered folder but only after
mmic sometime that when manually done, it is moved. what may be the reason
mmic for this?

 Under Account Properties/Mail Management/IMAP Fine Tune do you have 
 Auto-Filtering selected?


There is no auto-filtering item under the above. I use an older
version of TB. Pleased to hear

-- 
Best Regards
Rizvi



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Retrieving a deleted account

2008-01-28 Thread monsell
Hello TBUDL,


I have successfully configured to work with IMAP. Works fine now.
However, once the IMAP was configured I had moved all files and
everything was ok, so I deleted the POP account, but i noticed that
all my quick templates were stored in the POP account which was shared
and now it is also deleted.

I shall be thankful if you would assist me to retrieve this account or
atleast the QTN file.

-- 
best regards
rizvi



Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html