Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
Hello Ian, Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 1:40:29 PM, you wrote: IAW I need to use MSGTAG when I send business e-mails and it would be nice IAW to be able to turn it on or off from a macro. Does anyone know if IAW there is a plugin for MSTGAG and The Bat!? I use it. There's no need for a plugin. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.26.3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
Hello Ian, Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 2:15:36 PM, you wrote: IAW I was wondering if there was a plugin that would it to be turned on or IAW off based on a macro in a template. At the moment if I turn it on and IAW forget to turn it off, I am certain that there would be comments on it IAW in these lists. It happened to me (not the comments, but forgetting to turn it off). I don't know what version you are using but in the Status version you can add email addresses, email domains or groups to tagging off so that, even with MSGTAG switched on, those messages would be sent without tagging. AAMOF I have now added thebat.dutaint.com to the tagging off group and will be sending this message with MSGTAG turned ON. We'll see if that works. :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.26.3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Move message on exit
Hello Roelof, Monday, July 21, 2008, 4:06:47 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Jack, RO On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:43:26 -0500GMT (21-7-2008, 19:43 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: JSL I've set up a folder for all incoming messages from my wife so JSL that I can save her some time and print what she sends me. I JSL have a daughter folder under her folder to permanently store JSL everything she sends me after I've printed the contents. RO Just wondering. RO Why don't you print everything automatically on receipt with the same RO filter that moves the message. That way you don't have to print and RO move the message manually. RO Eight years ago I switched to TB because it was the only mail client I RO could find that was able to print messages on a filter action. Ordinarily that would be a good idea and I thank you for it but, each message from her may contain simple text, HTML, a Word document or MS Excell or all of the above. Therefore, each 'message' has to be handled individually and usually differently from the previous. Miguel's suggestion works out best so far. When I'm finished processing all the messages I select all and click the trash can which moves them to the daughter folder. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using TB! v3.99.3 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
Hello, Citing myself once more: MP AAMOF I have now added thebat.dutaint.com to the tagging off group and will MP be sending this message with MSGTAG turned ON. MP We'll see if that works. :-) It seems to have worked. The little arrow in the tray icon starts to move, but immediately stops with a sound while the message is sent. -- Best wishes, Mark __ Message made with The Bat, 4.0.26.3 started replying on dinsdag 22 juli 2008 at 14:44:30 -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.26.3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox Synchronization in IMAP with TB
Hi Bob, Is there a way to have TB synchonize THAT MESSAGE the moment I select it? I believe that is how Evolution is set by default. It is already supposed to work this way. There is an option in IMAP fine tune named When browsing, receive only msg text. Make sure this is disabled, it has never worked and causes excactly what you are seeing. You can manually force reloading a single message by selecting it and choosing Reload from the context menu. Apart from this, welcome to IMAP TheBat Style. A second question - if my synchronizing is set at message headers and text, will it also at least alert me that there is an attachment, so I will know to then do a full synchronization for that message? In theory, yes, and you will not have to synchronize manually because the new message should be retrieved automatically on selection. Again, in theory. -- Mit freundlichem Gruß Alto Speckhardt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp8UgbnLFJET.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2008 um 14:42 schrieb Mark Partous: AAMOF I have now added thebat.dutaint.com to the tagging off group and will be sending this message with MSGTAG turned ON. What exactly does MSGTAG do? In my fantasie, i would guess it only adds a special Null-Graphic to HTML Mails to track the opening of Mails? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.26.3 AntiSpamSniper 2.8.1.1 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
Hello Jens, Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:39:40 PM, you wrote: JF What exactly does MSGTAG do? In my fantasie, i would guess it only adds JF a special Null-Graphic to HTML Mails to track the opening of Mails? Yes, although one can also choose to show a message stating MSGTAG was used to track the reading. I'll send you a message in a PM in which the message is shown. Of course if the addressee doesn't use html viewing, nothing the sender still has no confirmation... -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.26.3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox Synchronization in IMAP with TB
Hi Alto (do you sing in the opera?), Please forgive my humor! The great Marian Anderson was an alto. I think Christa (Krista?) Ludwig from Germany (as I recall) was an alto, also. On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:37:44 -0600, you wrote: Hi Bob, Is there a way to have TB synchonize THAT MESSAGE the moment I select it? I believe that is how Evolution is set by default. It is already supposed to work this way. There is an option in IMAP fine tune named When browsing, receive only msg text. Make sure this is disabled, it has never worked and causes excactly what you are seeing. I will double-check that - thanks. You can manually force reloading a single message by selecting it and choosing Reload from the context menu. Apart from this, welcome to IMAP TheBat Style. Thank you. BTW, on a tip from (another) friend in Germany, I just installed and tried Opera's G2 mailer in IMAP. It is the easiest to set up of all - even simpler than Evolution - and it works great Try it. Its implementation seems brilliant and user-friendly. A second question - if my synchronizing is set at message headers and text, will it also at least alert me that there is an attachment, so I will know to then do a full synchronization for that message? In theory, yes, and you will not have to synchronize manually because the new message should be retrieved automatically on selection. Again, in theory. Ok. Thank you. These little glitches and detailed settings in TB (and even more so in Mulberry) makes it less user-friendly than some (like Evolution and Opera M2). Thunderbird is equally complex to properly set up. Thanks for writing. Bob -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
Hello Ian, Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 12:05:44 AM, you wrote: IAW Are you saying that both parties must use HTML viewing for MSGTAG to IAW work? It's just that in my testing I have received MSGTAG receipts IAW when sending and viewing text only e-mails. No, only the receiver must use HTML viewing. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.26.3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008 um 00:02 schrieb Ian A. White: I see the Status version has the grouping function and I may go to that. The issue I have though is that it becomes a little redundant to do this in yet another program, although that may be what has to be done. I was hoping to be able to do it in The Bat! with a macro in a template. Thanks for the info. Do a feature Request to the Guys of MSGTAG, The_Bat! could start external application an could insert it's output into the Message :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.26.3 AntiSpamSniper 2.8.1.1 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008 um 00:05 schrieb Ian A. White: MP Of course if the addressee doesn't use html viewing, nothing the MP sender still has no confirmation... Are you saying that both parties must use HTML viewing for MSGTAG to work? It's just that in my testing I have received MSGTAG receipts when sending and viewing text only e-mails. Yes, both must use HTML Viewing and of course must be able to HTML View. If your To: is using Mutt on UNIX, you will get no confirmation! And: We tested this right now, if i do block the URL http://ts.msgtag.net in URLmanager of The_Bat! the Message will not be confirmed never... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.26.3 AntiSpamSniper 2.8.1.1 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat and MSGTAG
am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008 um 00:15 schrieb Mark Partous: IAW Are you saying that both parties must use HTML viewing for MSGTAG to IAW work? It's just that in my testing I have received MSGTAG receipts IAW when sending and viewing text only e-mails. No, only the receiver must use HTML viewing. Ah, i was wrong - you are right! Only receiver must have HTML View. And for me its Time to go to Bed now - i really see this :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.26.3 AntiSpamSniper 2.8.1.1 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
