Re: Mails is foreign languages

2009-06-15 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas,

Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:49:55 AM, you wrote:

 Hello TBUDL,

 I know that I assigned a font for Thai to TB! a long time ago. It
 works on my home computer, charset Windows-874 is displayed correctly.

 On my work computer, it doesn't. I checked XLAT tables and all
 settings under Viewer/Editor, I just cannot find where to assign the
 font for this charset. Mails with this charset are displayed with the
 same font as English messages, which results in an illegible
 gibbledigook.

 Where do I set the font to be used for each charset?

 TIA.


Same version of windows???

-- 
Best regards,
 tracermailto:0tra...@gmail.com



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Quick Template: No wordwrap

2009-06-15 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello simbabque,

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:30:10 +0200GMT simbabque wrote:

s Another question about the quick templates:

s I need a line of words, beginning with Tags:  and followed by a list
s of tags for a photo upload to flickr. The line must not wrap or break
s automatically. I basically want a very long line.

I don't think you can do that in a QT. But in the preferences you can
set the linebreak to any value you want, so you could try to set it to
512 and you will get a line with 512 chars maximum.

s The line wrap behaviour of Thunderbird would also be fine, but TB!
s always breaks the lines for real, doesn't it?

yes, it does

s I've tried disabling the FormatAuto-Wordwrap in the template editor,
s but as I'd thought that does not do the trick at all. There seems to
s be no macro to change this behaviour.

AFAIK no. Which editor do you use? If it's microed it could be worth
trying to switch to the windows editor. This is possible by the macro
%seteditor.

-- 
Regards,
Feli:de-bb:

The Bat! 4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mails is foreign languages

2009-06-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello tracer,

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:15:13 +0700 GMT (15/Jun/09, 13:15 +0700 GMT),
tracer wrote:

 I know that I assigned a font for Thai to TB! a long time ago. It
 works on my home computer, charset Windows-874 is displayed correctly.

 On my work computer, it doesn't. I checked XLAT tables and all
 settings under Viewer/Editor, I just cannot find where to assign the
 font for this charset. Mails with this charset are displayed with the
 same font as English messages, which results in an illegible
 gibbledigook.

 Where do I set the font to be used for each charset?

 TIA.


t Same version of windows???

XP. I think I have SP3 everywhere now.

But what I am asking for is the setting in The Bat!.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.1.11
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3






Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


anti-SPAM solutions

2009-06-15 Thread Privateofcourse
Hello TBUDL,

 What do TB! users consider to be the

 1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
 2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?

 First, this isn't for me, as I manage SPAM via convoluted email practises
 and via cPanel, and so for a lot of years now I've not had much of a
 problem with SPAM - well of course I do get a few bits of SPAM every now
 and then, but only enough to be slightly irritated by them getting through.

 This question is really for friends and family that I've converted to TB!
 over the years. Many of them use their ISP mail accounts, and the like, and
 so and are after alternative solutions to dealing with SPAM. As I've not
 used any of the TB! plugins or used the external solutions, like SPAMPAL
 and Mailwasher Pro for some time, I thought I'd ask people with more
 up-to-date experiences.

 I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
 so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
 anything other than allow you to manage SPAM after-the-fact. That is, SPAM
 isn't actually blocked or stopped at all, but is managed after it has been
 received. But nonetheless, I suspect that for some this is better than
 nothing at all.

 I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.

-- 
Simon (Privateofcourse)
#18866. Her Wow Gins Oed? ¶
 
 
 TB! 4.2.4  WinXP Pro Service Pack 3





Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: anti-SPAM solutions

2009-06-15 Thread rmorris.r
Hello Privateofcourse,

Monday, June 15, 2009, 9:22:48 AM, you wrote:

 Hello TBUDL,

  What do TB! users consider to be the

  1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
  2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?

  First, this isn't for me, as I manage SPAM via convoluted email practises
  and via cPanel, and so for a lot of years now I've not had much of a
  problem with SPAM - well of course I do get a few bits of SPAM every now
  and then, but only enough to be slightly irritated by them getting through.

  This question is really for friends and family that I've converted to TB!
  over the years. Many of them use their ISP mail accounts, and the like, and
  so and are after alternative solutions to dealing with SPAM. As I've not
  used any of the TB! plugins or used the external solutions, like SPAMPAL
  and Mailwasher Pro for some time, I thought I'd ask people with more
  up-to-date experiences.

  I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
  so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
  anything other than allow you to manage SPAM after-the-fact. That is, SPAM
  isn't actually blocked or stopped at all, but is managed after it has been
  received. But nonetheless, I suspect that for some this is better than
  nothing at all.

  I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.


AntispamSniper 

-- 
Best regards,
  Raymond Morris   
TheBat! Voyager 4.1.11.1 www.ritlabs.com
AntispamSniper 3.2.0.6 for The Bat! Voyager
rmorri...@gmail.com :texasflag:

Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: anti-SPAM solutions

2009-06-15 Thread Chrille
Hello Privateofcourse,

Monday, June 15, 2009, 16:22:48, you wrote:

 Hello TBUDL,

  What do TB! users consider to be the

  1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
  2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?

  I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.


I use Antispamsniper Pro and I'm extremely satisfied with it. I believe they 
have a free edition as well.

-- 
Regards,
 Chrillemailto:numbe...@thebat.net
 Using The Bat! 4.2.6
 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3

Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Test of message from Verizon account

2009-06-15 Thread Leonard S. Berkowitz
I have been having trouble posting to the list from my primary
account. I am posting this in the hope that the problem has been
solved.

Thanks.

-- 
Leonard S. Berkowitz
leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu

Using The Bat! v4.0.28.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1




Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Test of message from Verizon account

2009-06-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Leonard,

Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:22:15 PM, you wrote:

LSB I have been having trouble posting to the list from my primary
LSB account. I am posting this in the hope that the problem has been
LSB solved.

LSB Thanks.

I have received your message on-list.

-- 
Cheers,
Thomas.



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


New scheduling option

2009-06-15 Thread Denis Olivier
Hello,

I've just tried the new feature send timing.

I prepared a message around 3:00pm, then I select the first upper zone
send on specific data/time at 2:00am for a test.

I  let  TB  opened,  the network is permanently connected, and after a
night, I still have the message in the output folder.

Any idea?

Thx
-- 
http://www.denisolivier.com
http://www.artlimited.net



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Test of message from Verizon account

2009-06-15 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Leonard,

LSB I have been having trouble posting to the list from my primary
LSB account. I am posting this in the hope that the problem has been
LSB solved.

LSB Thanks.

It certainly looks like you've solved your problem!

-- 
Jack LaRosa  mailto:jlar...@charter.net

Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now.
Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: New scheduling option

2009-06-15 Thread Rick
 Hello,

 I've just tried the new feature send timing.

 I prepared a message around 3:00pm, then I select the first upper zone
 send on specific data/time at 2:00am for a test.

 I  let  TB  opened,  the network is permanently connected, and after a
 night, I still have the message in the output folder.

 Any idea?

No, I am having the same issue. It doesn't work at all for me but for
others it works perfectly. I am having trouble keeping a discussion
going on the beta list 
-- 
Rick
Necrophiliacs need love too!

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: anti-SPAM solutions

2009-06-15 Thread Code 2
  What do TB! users consider to be the
  1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
  2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?


 AntispamSniper


Agreed. After about 30,000 e-mail messages including 1,400 spam
messages, my stats are showing 98.97% accuracy and only 0.08% false
positives.

AntispamSniper required ongoing training in the initial months, but
now it nabs the spam very reliably.

-- 





Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-15 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, June 13, 2009, 2:54:10 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:

 no, ADDHEADER adds value to header, while SETHEADER changes header, there
 is no bug here.

SETHEADER  works here on XP, but not on Vista. and yes, the syntax is 
the same on both machines.

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
  http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.6 on Windows Vista version 6,0 ()



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: anti-SPAM solutions

2009-06-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 15:22:48 +0100, Privateofcourse wrote: Hello TBUDL,
  I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
  so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
  anything other than allow you to manage SPAM after-the-fact. That is, SPAM
  isn't actually blocked or stopped at all, but is managed after it has been
  received.

I wouldn't use something that stopped or blocked SPAM for me. I don't trust
anyone else to make the decision about whether something is SPAM because I
have seen a small number, but that is too many, of emails incorrectly
classified as SPAM.

However I use a combination of Popfile and Antispam Sniper for the Bat Free.
Either by itself is very good, the combination is excellent.
-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v4.1.11
  Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2
  Popfile v1.1.0




Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html