Re: Server error 5.7.1: missing or literal domains not allowed

2010-03-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leonard,

On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 01:03:40 -0500GMT (3-3-2010, 7:03 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

 I have, so far, three people with whom I correspond to
 whom I cannot reply. The message that is returned is:
 Server reports error. The response is 5.7.1. Missing or
 literal domains not allowed.

 So what happens if you compose a reply as normal, then delete the
 contents of the To: field and copy back in from the address book
 entry?

LB I just tried it, with the same result: the error quoted above.

What  if  you  create  an AB reply template for these people that uses
this macro:
%To=''%To='%ABOFromName %OFromAddr'%-
The  rest  of your address book reply template can be the same as your
regular reply template

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

!sdohtem noitpyrcne devorppa-tnemnrevog troppus I
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.35
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpHZI4nnAxJb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

LDAP

2010-03-03 Thread The Bat! support
There is a local LAN. Has three TB on it. They would like to use the
same address book. What is the best solution? Local LDAP server? Can
they add addresses to it using TB?

They

Vili



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html