Re[6]: Messages getting lost!!!!!!!!!!!

2004-06-11 Thread Alexandre Vialle
Bonjour Jan,

Le vendredi 11 juin 2004 à 15:47:13, vous écriviez :

JR> Alexandre,

JR> At 9:30 AM on Friday, June 11, 2004 you AV> wrote the following
JR> Messages getting lost!!!:

AV>> [...] Cordialement, [/...]

JR>   If you are interested in being cordial, etc. why not post your
JR>   sarcastic, unpleasant emails somewhere else. If you don't. I
JR>   have the feeling the moderators will assist you. Don't know what
JR>   you are used to but this list is very supportive, helpful &
JR>   courteous.

Jan, you must probably feel like one of the active members. I'm sorry
if I have hurt you.

I have definitely lost 2 days of mails with the bat and I think I
still have a great sense of humor...

But the moderator here seem to care much more about the appearance of
my mail rather than my problem itself. But this doesn't mean I can't
make fun of the situation... HUMOR! SMILES! :D

But as I said, don't worry all, I wont annoy anyone here anymore.
Really. I'll unsubscribe myself. I have no need of the bat. Really.
So there was no need to answer that mail.

Cordialement,

--
Alexandre



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[4]: Messages getting lost!!!!!!!!!!!

2004-06-11 Thread Alexandre Vialle
Bonjour Marck,

Le vendredi 11 juin 2004 à 11:54:55, vous écriviez :

MDP> Dear Alexandre,

MDP> @11-Jun-2004, 09:06 +0200 (11-Jun 08:06 UK time) Alexandre Vialle
MDP> [AV] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Robert:

AV>> well I thought version 2 would be better. Now I wonder what will
AV>> happen to me next...

MDP> this:

MDP> 
MDP> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
MDP> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
MDP> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Alexandre.

Why should I?

MDP> This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.

Oh, this sounds really bad. I didn't feel like I was violating this
list's rules. In fact I was much more preoccupied by my problem,
rather than any rules rape. But please accept all my excuses.

MDP> Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
MDP> message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
MDP> encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
MDP> because 

MDP> a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
MDP>top of the message

Oh it's true, using the scroll bar on the right side of a window is
such a hard thing to do. I can understand really. For my part, I
bought the Microsoft IntelliMouse with a special button rolling on the
middle that helps you for this particular purpose. It works really
great. I think this is a great thing to have to read anything, web,
pdf, mails, source codes, etc. And most of my active colleagues agree
with that.

MDP> and

MDP> b) It encourages excessive quoting.

Oh I see. For my part I was not too good at school with summaries,
this probably explains your remark. Also, I have no difficulty to type
on a keyboard. It can be endless, even to say nothing. But I'll make a
special effort for you.

MDP> We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
MDP> which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
MDP> and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
MDP> responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
MDP> part separately and follow each part with your response.

Just like I do now then.

MDP> Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
MDP> you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
MDP> respect this.

Wow, thank you, I was not seeking respect, but at least I have that.
As you can see now I sort of respect your preferences too now, most of
them, so we are all very happy now.

MDP> However, this is the format that most of the active members here
MDP> prefer and all members are expected, and are being asked to use
MDP> the format that will make most of the active membership here
MDP> comfortable reading.

I completely understand. But how active are they since they don't want
to type, and don't want to scroll? For my part I much more compare
activity with movement. No, I'm not only talking about the movement of
the eyes! Fingers can move a bit too on the keyboard and at least one
arm and one finger can move on the mouse. But the most important is
the brain activity, this means the most active members are not in a
deep coma or dead. :))

And for a comfortable reading, I recommend, silence, a pillow behind
the neck, a bucket to urinate and a perfusion of water and glucose.
:))

MDP> You'll likely get a more responsive group when you post using a
MDP> style that is comfortable for them to read and understand.

Oh since I already have the answer to my question: "The Bat is not the
reliable product I thought it was", I wont annoy anyone here anymore I
swear. I'll just uninstall The Bat, unsubscribe to this list, and let
"the most active members" between them. Oh and I forgot to thank you
very much for your respect, it goes right to my heart.

MDP> To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
MDP> private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
MDP> subscribed.

No thank you I don't care really.

MDP> :'='':''

Oh this little sign is pretty. Is it something "the most active
members" enjoy too?

MDP> Thank you.

I did nothing really. But thank you for the respect again :D

MDP> '

Do I have to sign like this too? Well maybe the most active members
do, so I'd better do it not to hurt them :))


Cordialement,

-- 
Alexandre



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Messages getting lost!!!!!!!!!!!

2004-06-11 Thread Alexandre Vialle
Ok I have no luck at all... All the files exists but are empty: 0 kB.
I am so depressed about that adventure... Thank you for this work
around anyway...

Bayesit is really shitty. I mean it's not because a product is
exciting that it must be included... Poor interface, no documentation,
and not working... I'm a developer and I would never distribute such a
product without having done minimum tests... especially when the
product has a chance to behave in such a devastating way.

And of course even if you have paid RITLABS for a licence, the licence
says: "RITLABS makes no warranty that all errors have been or can be
eliminated from the program software and, with respect thereto,
RITLABS shall not be responsible for losses, damages, costs, or
expenses of any kind resulting from using or misusing the program
including without limitation, any liability for business expenses,
machine downtime, damages experienced by you or any third person as a
result of any deficiency, defect, bug, error or malfunction."

CLEARLY RITLABS MAKES FUN OF ME. GOOD BOY YOU HAVE PAID THE LICENCE!
AND WE DON'T CARE IF OUR PRODUCT WORKS OR NOT. I REALLY LOVE TO PAY
FOR SUCH A THING!!! NEXT TIME REALLY I'LL THINK BEFORE PAYING A
LICENCE FOR A SOFTWARE... I FEEL SO STUPID. Version 1 was working so
well I thought version 2 would be better. Now I wonder what will
happen to me next...

-- 
Alexandre Vialle

Le vendredi 11 juin 2004 à 08:06 vous avez écrit:

RvdH> Hi Alexandre,
RvdH> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, at 22:45:45 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:45 where I live)
RvdH> you wrote about: 'Messages getting lost!!!'

>> What the hell is wrong? When the hell are todays and yesterdays mails?

RvdH> I have seen the same problem with Bayesit. It gets installed automaticalky
RvdH> wuith one of the 2.x versions, but apparently the version included does not
RvdH> work properly.

>> Thanks for help!!! I want my lost mails back...

RvdH> You may be lucky: I found my emails in th temp folder with a Bat*.tmp
RvdH> filename.
RvdH> You can import these in your inbox with Tools, Import, From *.MSG files.




Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Messages getting lost!!!!!!!!!!!

2004-06-10 Thread Alexandre Vialle
Hello,

I have paid to get that new version 2.0 of the bat and since then I
keep having problems... many little bugs which annoy me. So yesterday
I have decided to update to version 2.11.02. But today I have
discovered that all my new mails just disappear when I get them. It
seem that it downloads the new mails, but then I can't find them
anywhere!!! Is it totally lost? I was waiting for very important mails
today... I'm really angry.

I have made many tests from different accounts to make sure the
servers are working well and all may tests have been downloaded but
lost by the bat. I check the same with outlook express, and things
work perfectly.

Later I have disabled that plugin named BayesIt! but nothing happened.
I have closed and reopened the bat with no BayesIt pluging and then
things seem to work again...

What the hell is wrong? When the hell are todays and yesterdays mails?

Thanks for help!!! I want my lost mails back...

I don't know what that BayesIt is I have never configured it, and be
sure I have tried to find my mails in every folder I have even those
for junk mails. NOTHING!!!

Please help.

-- 
Alexandre Vialle



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html