Strange filtering/message tossing issue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello All, I've been noticing a peculiar problem with The Bat!. Messages coming in for my 5 accounts get tossed into whatever mailbox strikes the program's fancy... Doesn't matter what account or what mailbox. For example, when I fired up my laptop a short while ago and started The Bat!, it pulled in some 50 or 60 messages for 3 of the 5 various accounts. (Picked up from 3 different mail servers, of course.) They were tossed into random mailboxes. Most of them landed in the JUNK folder of the first account. Others were randomly dispersed; some correct, some wrong. This problem has been with the program for quite a while now; I've reported it to the bug submission address, but some software engineer type person at Ritlab marked the problem solved - no comments, no solutions, no nothing. Does anyone have any ideas on this? It's a really annoying but non-fatal. Has anyone else run into it? (BTW, it happens on any machine. I have copies of The Bat! installed on 2 machines and the same quirk shows up.) Thanks! - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * Message not valid without my PGP signature. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQEVAwUBQq5mlQHUq78/EfsHAQG+qQgAtvqdy2hzQjXae1alF1vpmLI7Tvz/EUrv RV13r0x21iAcFZz73FUNP+LhkGbFzuckPGa8Zw/sE45YAGsp/FM9OnGW9mmHQvbz L9snc4REZrPPLto6iIMT7o3VVP5Tz+gdFkmjaNo+NIjpQ6zDoO3/8x9eqJ98NbU6 Bk9gTxiaIYCVIhO1oj0bVV1XAMF70ZQi8WfLwKMQxdox1K1NTGH1qn1R5ENzKDuf Ao66YaGYAt541HuDH8z93bgol+QHghP13/AiGJqvd7LZJF6DF1jur4pRCnkAMoMv qNqgY92NjkqFrcWCu6BUBpFO7t9XX8jWWe+BXJNICLKPi77g6mQzAw== =NgCw -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MAPI and message.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello All, Tuesday, March 22, 2005, 6:48:26 AM, Stephen Longhurst wrote: SL Hi all, SL We've just had our office email switched over to Microsoft Exchange, so I've SL switched to using the Exchange support (via MAPI) in TB! (3.0.1.33 Prog We use Exchange at work also, but I've never dared change over to MAPI; doing it via POP. I wonder though if MAPI will work when I'm pulling mail from an off-premisis location. (?) SL ... God please help me love you Interesting tag line. Same one my friend, the Metropolitan Archbishop (Orthodox)uses. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * Message not valid without my PGP signature. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: Original PGP 2.6.3 for OS/2 iQEVAwUBQkF+mgHUq78/EfsHAQEa1ggAj3PH7FayZPnuC3GpQWTT72QBgEApgTbt G/CXe4VEfjVIMSGXZMAVxhtSfAkuoIdf6ojsSh+NTXjtnp21bPnWGSq1ZrbA8XAO lyBTUOUXSJ5XS1+4dEbzureQYBEAwp1fAEwdlfxVZc1XCQ1uKfEB+jJVmZjQmd2J UTkFMBlsJcPvVcdEqbDFMeey0SZ4K50MTWXvEUrX/Q3U3n6Xw9sUquAQvDE3M6dp XnZZbknGUkOymo59P6tTzrnocG+9tia61d4/UOMsqyCKVK9TPfvrPWFRRXVDOCpL t2NPFzHo2Myf8rSGUJKj9WPMxAc98APPkt/530vnCjNrfcEKByyUEA== =2rWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.4 - Release Date: 3/18/2005 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Pretending to use The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello All, Friday, February 18, 2005, 9:48:12 AM, MAU wrote: M As many of you know, blaming The Bat! for spam is not an new issue. Look M what I got yesterday: MDaemon has indentified your message as spam. It will not be delivered. From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject : [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 06.50/05.00] (Archive Copy) [EAME_Newsletter] Issue 57 - Thursday, February 17, 2005 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP!] What's the rest of the header look like? I didn't see anything identifying MUA or MTA in the section you quoted. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * Message not valid without my PGP signature. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQEVAwUBQhYWVwHUq78/EfsHAQHutgf/XgQdDD/DOgPwf8nNtt8GF0jQ5poHq6OT rLuTkZX1ywkiQYQNWtM/0rLbKsbkBDVP2YQ1oB3Bd1mz3XLuX6S+u79DQHQ12vMt YgG6kP2kzsVdHlsKgAYRSn4Ka3XDMseUKGJE3gveKk9ggJP35jT1Nf38Ct3jLwxp 76gKNE+QkYtk1g7WajdlRf0sO77TKtm0ySxYG7jvI1NQpuvXVSUIyNE8tT2hzSrg 3hOSs31FVJCHkmUYAcf6pad4OpaKwJlFZm2g1GwJDMW8W7xz4jJ0kZiAjtOZo8ub /WxLp+j5+jgzXKsAeXMrvsRZbAwiYZOtecrWXZNykmatqmDBqIccIw== =zAnG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 265.8.9 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Smileys? Mail Chat?? What's becoming of The Bat!?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Friday, June 4, 2004, 2:18:40 PM, Bob wrote: B Smileys and Mail Chat- can anyone tell me why Ritlabs has added these B silly features to its awesome mailer? [...] Microsoftitis. Tragic, usually fatal corporate disease. B I know I'm venting a bit and am inviting flames here, but I'd like to B know if anyone else agrees with me on this. 100% agreement here, Bob. B I certainly hope this isn't an indication of what's to come for B The Bat!. Yes, all we need is another e-mail client with a 100 megabyte executable and 20 .dll files to load. big frown - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * Message NOT valid without my PGP signature. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQMHX+vku/tz1Eg1XEQLtPACgpkhkksIHjzzQir0QCk98fgcrgCYAniV7 KkwFbNjJ0KayfV+hsBq8NR21 =+PVD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: OT: AV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ketil, Monday, May 31, 2004, 9:36:43 PM, Ketil Thorsen wrote: ML And yes, the FreeWare ML version works with The Bat! through the plug-in. KT Do you have the link to the plugin ? ftp://ftp.grisoft.cz/pub/softw/thebat - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA+AwUBQLzRK/ku/tz1Eg1XEQLQZACfWzTUx+ROZo34NdVofNU4eJBIuLYAmMxW Bt+CN+XVmNCEZCaWCZzje2s= =PQFw -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Tag line manager?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Didn't I see a post here about a tag line manager for The Bat!? (In case you're not familiar with the term tag line, it's a carry-over from BBS networks like FidoNet; it's a short line (usually preceeded by three periods (...)) with a witty expression or statement. It always appears after the signature line or signature block. (See below for an example. I'd like to find an auxillary program to pipe a selectable tagline into the message... Anyone know of one? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * ... No legacy is so rich as honesty. -- Shakespeare -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQL0BBPku/tz1Eg1XEQL6ZACePy3tYOO+QD8e/VWFBXelQm/Xw6AAn30n HlcJiWgB2IQRJy+5U82Dw4KS =nEHZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: AV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Monday, May 31, 2004, 5:08:05 PM, malexander wrote: m AVG or Kaspersky. I'm not registered with TBOT and need a quick vote, m so I hope the Moderators will allow me this quick post as I'm short m of time (Thanks, Guys, I hope g) m So, if anyone sees this - votes please for one or the other ;-) AVG carries my vote. Though I use the Professional version on this machine, I have 2 other machines that use the FreeWare version... with excellent results and *very* good protection. And yes, the FreeWare version works with The Bat! through the plug-in. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLvqn/ku/tz1Eg1XEQIezQCgpsSxQJyf5wTfExc2mLtVcmK6gfEAnA9f R4BjywIxmmkUJ4ZVjcRO+BKG =Cse0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: signature delimiter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Cyrille, Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 4:16:07 AM, Cyrille wrote: C This means that there must be a ISP in the *outgoing* chain of my usual C *SMTP* server who strips my end of line spaces away. There is a convention about _trailing_ spaces being not kosher, but you should not have a trailing space. It's ASCII32 + ASCII13. That's definitely *not* a trailing space. If they're stripping away the CR at the end of that line, their software is daft. Call it to their attention. Unless your messages contain harmful or deletrious data, they've got no business altering it. It would foul the message security and void the PGP signature. In fact, you can perhaps send yourself a message PGP signed and see if the signature verifies when you receive it back. If not, the ISP is tampering with your data. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLTRKfku/tz1Eg1XEQJHzQCg4DCKGQsYBaO5KDHIgFyQSM9uN9YAoNGU MmNJb5J5LHbGq5O2/Fu+I1w0 =ZKUw -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Mod: Top posting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 11:23:24 AM, Pete Holsberg wrote: Microsoft made a grand mistake. When you reply to an email using one of their email programs, you get the flashing cursor at the top of the text. [...] I don't know if it's Microsoft that started it but it's certainly not only Microsoft e-mail clients that does this. PH Don't most of them givve you an option to control that? Yes, but like most mikrosift programs, it's lame at best. When your first interface to on-line communications with people came from FidoNet (and other BBS networks), you learn REAL quick that posting on top of someone else's message (or even worse _overquoting_) was moderator material. It was (and, IMHO is still) logical and practical. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLU40vku/tz1Eg1XEQID3ACgtnvmKEvK4+IqK9M8sBWwC1PJ99kAoPFv FiRExmHiPmaJ9ueWjaLc6zus =qOA1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AVG anti-spam update and restarting TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerard, Monday, May 24, 2004, 1:20:48 PM, Gerard wrote: ML URL for this plugin update? G That is either automatic are you have he press the update button on G the AVG console. You need to have the AVG anti virus system G installed, not just the plugin. I am using Version7 which is the G paid for version, but you can download version6 which is free and I G am assuming will use the same plugin. Perhaps you didn't understand the question: You mentioned a new plug-in for AVG. I wasn't concerned with an update for the AVG7 program itself (which is quite automatic - at least on this workstation.) The plug-in is, TTBOMK, a separate entity from the AVG program itself; an interface module for TB! to use. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLNzqfku/tz1Eg1XEQKifgCg6rpqex0vudPxdgBIVCTCDVWIfpgAmgLv XIzH6Xf+UYm/zpIzuEM3B3Pb =CHhT -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: the bat! and its plug-ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Claude, Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 11:57:31 AM, Claude Renaud wrote: CR I would like to know if on the internet, on the Ritlabs' website, CR or anywhere else, there is a page which gathers all plug-ins which CR have been developped for The Bat!. If no, do you think it could be CR a good idea to create such one so that we could have a unique CR place where to go in order to know about their development, CR information about various projects etc ? On the Ritlabs web site choose the Knowledge Base for The Bat!. There you'll find links to various plugins and macros that other folks have written. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLOBN/ku/tz1Eg1XEQK3qgCgxe90YAyMkNsCmO0rT9BykxLNd+8AoPAv 2XLW/IoNm5XRexRcGKAQnZ1G =PKM1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Reply Address - How To Insert From Template Using HTML
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Leif, Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 2:59:31 PM, Leif Gregory wrote: LG Here's an a href LG E-mail me baby! Though the coding didn't carry through on this reply, the E-mail me baby! appeared as a active link in the message at this end. Mouseover revealed [EMAIL PROTECTED]. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBQLOpS/ku/tz1Eg1XEQL+ugCeIYUB2pIKpN4gBQTf52BJaEPBbWkAnj2W 4/PVlNvGtDDUQgw2wFMil2cN =Lgel -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Mail download problem)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Monday, May 24, 2004, 9:23:21 AM, Leif Gregory wrote: LG Hello Britt, LG Sunday, May 23, 2004, 6:36:25 AM, you wrote: Britt -- Britt Have a nice Sunday, Britt Britt Henrikson [snip!] LG Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists LG of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. LG This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without LG the signature and list footers since everything below and including LG the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting. What is wrong with the delimiter in the quoted data above? I see this canned moderator message quite frequently. Perhaps it's generated by a filter of some sort? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLIUk/ku/tz1Eg1XEQIe0QCbBNtKnM5C+NLZPomioTvNhnIkSocAn3ul sVD2eQwIWDvDILQdUlbrCJZr =8iLL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AVG anti-spam update and restarting TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerard, Monday, May 24, 2004, 10:36:46 AM, Gerard wrote: G ON Thursday, May 20, 2004, 7:39:35 AM, you wrote: LG My main concern is that the version number for the AVG plug in does not LG get updated when I install a new virus definition file [...] G You should be able to check this. There has just been a new plugin update. G We are at version 7.0.245 now URL for this plugin update? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLIcZfku/tz1Eg1XEQJzjwCfY453skQ2zOqOwa66bEM3FUeE/4YAoMns w1rsP+7gLy6Uvsg1wxLb2Nex =EB+u -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Sunday, May 23, 2004, 11:07:05 AM, Allie Martin wrote: ML I don't recall seeing a .dll file for PGP v8 available from ML Ritlabs either. AM The support is integrated in the executable, i.e., support for v5-8. Ahhh, so I see. Thanks for the pointer. ML Also, I prefer to clearsign my messages; I was wondering if there ML was a way for me to have TB! default to OFF for PGP/Mime, instead of ML Auto. Perhaps an .ini file entry? AM You can use the macro %nopgpmime in your templates. There's no global AM switch for disabling PGP/MIME. I'll give this a try; again, thanks. AM Why do you wish to clearsign? Compatibility? AM Nowadays, I only clearsign when I'm uncertain that my recipients have AM a PGP/MIME capable clients and know that they plan to check the AM signature. Yes, specifically for compatibility with 'text-only' systems. They give fits with the mime encoded attachment of a message body. And to one of the moderators: Is the following signature delimiter correct? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLEcfPku/tz1Eg1XEQK27wCfUriooIsa+VhUjWaKOV66QqjWuL4An0M7 TgDGlbHkXudaJlW2sUCct1Tu =CSy3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Participant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Sunday, May 23, 2004, 11:13:48 AM, Allie Martin wrote: [snip] ML PGP sez Invalid Key. I don't know enough about PGP yet ML to really evaluate this. Why do you suppose it tells me that? AM The key not being valid means that you haven't assigned any trust to AM it. One of the issues with PGP security is ensuring that you have the AM correct public key for the key the sender used to sign.[snip] I'm getting a better picture of what's what with PGP. Still on the learning curve though. [Unrelated comment] I'm in love with this semi-GUI text editor! I can use my keyboard! Ctrl-T, Ctrl-Y, etc! And the blocking! Haven't had blocking this good since DESQview! [End Comment] - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLEe7Pku/tz1Eg1XEQLuQgCg56RUyiaIVU+HETVRTdMigKz1vKkAn2bh WosR+efGr6xv33fyLRi+Dclj =/lOt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, Sunday, May 23, 2004, 4:55:16 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: ML And to one of the moderators: Is the following signature delimiter ML correct? MDP Yes - perfect ... but .. MDP FYI - the bad wrapping above is caused by allowing PGP to reformat the MDP message when signing. For the best results, turn off wrapping in the MDP PGP preferences[...] Before shutting it off completely, I've reset the margin in PGP to 78 instead of 70. If it still fouls things I'll shut it off. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLEkAvku/tz1Eg1XEQL+fQCgzbwrf0FF+W92+2b4/JPKWv+bsRUAni77 zvvynYrXWcqtfqSKs4saKcLm =MKlW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
New Participant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? Thanks in advance! - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 5.5.3i iQA/AwUBQK+n4fku/tz1Eg1XEQIr7wCfQY4+eFvvi97d3+IETS7T9XbX5gkAoJQf 4NUwSHsmtvH3lPPzdR12jcG3 =DDBO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Participant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:37:00 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: ML I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. RO Welcome. ML Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? RO you should have received the welcoming message of the moderator RO team automatically. Hm. I'll have to check again. RO For the rest: RO Trim your quotes RO No top posting RO Don't annoy and don't be easily annoyed. ;-) Geez, sounds like FidoNet. :-) I'm quite used to those rules... Especially the one about top posting. (My biggest annoyance with internet e-mail.) Thanx. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 5.5.3i iQA/AwUBQK+tY/ku/tz1Eg1XEQJIUgCg1I/+MHJCWqzshorqi47Yxv0B/sQAn3iV 0oKVqSXr6HWLNd/87d5ebtaG =rcAG -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 8:43:33 PM, Michael L. Wilson wrote: MLW OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am MLW running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I MLW know that 6 is as good, does not use services and uses lest memory, MLW so I am going to try 6.5 also and see which is better for me. Looking at the PGP page for v8, I see that it says it will not work within any mail programs. I don't recall seeing a .dll file for PGP v8 available from Ritlabs either. Sounds to me that 6.5 would be better. I too am running XP and PGP 5.5; it does work AFAICS. This brings up questions here... When I click on the LS icon to verify someone's signature, isn't PGP supposed to go to one of the listed key servers to check? Or am I not understanding something about the keys; do I have to have a copy of every public key I want to verify? Also, I prefer to clearsign my messages; I was wondering if there was a way for me to have TB! default to OFF for PGP/Mime, instead of Auto. Perhaps an .ini file entry? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 5.5.3i iQA/AwUBQLAc1/ku/tz1Eg1XEQJUZACg6YplTuSLiaj8oVula/6Tm4TWuKsAoN5b MOWPuB//8JjlDObq5x0votCK =tC3W -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Participant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:56:56 PM, Sean Rima wrote: SR Hi Marc, wonder where I know you from :) Where could it be?! grin Great to run into you here, Sean. Earlier on I wrote a message about PGP; I just installed v6.5.8. I note that when I went to the public key server and imported your key that PGP sez Invalid Key. I don't know enough about PGP yet to really evaluate this. Why do you suppose it tells me that? I've really got a good deal to learn about TB! as well as its associated applications! - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLAt9Pku/tz1Eg1XEQJDuQCfS9yAXecscb2UOUcp96VlQugN5MgAnAqI smdyYjFuf0DmSEv5TjSJUAtd =bWiy -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Participant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:39:24 PM, Mark Partous wrote: MP See the URL at the bottom of this message... No URL there. (?) MP Had a BBS (PCBoard) for years. Ahh, yes, some of my good friends still run PCB. MP I don't know if there are still sysems online here in Belgium... More than likely. Now again I'll touch on PGP... As with Sean Rima, I told TB! to verify the key; it did so and PGP says Invalid Key. I'm beginning to wonder. Is it something in PGP 6.5.8 or something with the way that your and Sean's keys were generated that make them Invalid? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting deprecated? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLA26Pku/tz1Eg1XEQKxEwCgzI23RW/3Wtna3ZtMROgOYL6GfecAn28D 8xbFlxS2g+BNU2ThUTL7tJYy =omaM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Participant
Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:36:32 PM, Peter Meyns wrote: PM gpg: Good signature from Marc Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! PM gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. PM Primary key fingerprint: D0C9 5213 8892 3197 62FF 507F F92E FEDC F512 0D57 What's this mean? I somewhat recognise the Hex fingerprint numbers. How does one do this certification? My original key was generated on my OS/2 machine (still in use!) with PGP 2.62i and sent to the various public key servers. Have I missed something somewhere along the line? -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? pgpuA2mBqKSsL.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
