Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: The Bat slowing down.)

2005-10-13 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Wednesday 5 October 2005 at 6:26:08 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Plunket wrote:


 Presently, the list rules only say, place the sig delimiter before
 your signature,

[...]

 thx,
 -tom!

A cut mark above your signature would stop the above two lines
being quoted...

Or save the person replying the need to delete manually  ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Keep them dry and don't feed them after midnight

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: Cut mark (was: The Bat slowing down.)

2005-10-04 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello K.,

Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 3:47:04 AM, you wrote:
 Thanks for the tips. We will indeed try folder maintenance and see the 
 results.
 Cheers,
 Shantanu

 
 Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



   
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out K..

  '

Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
the signature and list footers since everything below and including
the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting.

You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in
your templates.

Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added
to your signature by the list server.

... and, no, we can't add the cut mark to the list footer on the
server because when there are 2 cut marks in a message, only the last
is used. So that would penalize those that *do* correctly use a cut
mark

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator


-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

I tried switching to gum but I couldn't keep it lit.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: The Bat slowing down.)

2005-10-04 Thread K. Shantanu
* Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [051004 11:38]:
 Hello K.,
 moderator
 Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
 just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
 instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out K..

Opps. My new vim macro removed that. Thanks for the notice.
Shantanu
-- 


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: The Bat slowing down.)

2005-10-04 Thread Tom Plunket
Leif Gregory wrote:

 Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
 of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
 This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
 the signature and list footers since everything below and including
 the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting.

As this comes up over and over and over again, perhaps it's time to
edit the list rules to include the statement that sig delimiters are
mandatory despite the fact that any individual poster may not have
what they consider to be a signature that's being delimited?

Presently, the list rules only say, place the sig delimiter before
your signature, which then means that every single new reader of this
list will get the same moderator's message.  Seems like the straight-
forward solution would be to simply put this /requirement/ in the
rules?

For reference, the appropriate place to make the edit is likely in
rule 'g'.

thx,
-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html