New spam plugin
I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
Hello tb, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko plugin today. Where's the SDK? Don't any of the existing solutions work for you? -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.03.47 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
Dear Tb, @28-Jan-2004, 15:08 -0600 (28-Jan 21:08 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [T] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: T I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided T to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? T And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? Wrong list. Please refer to the TBUDLInfo page in the footer for details of the TBDEV list for plug-in developers. Also on that page is the link to the archive, where you can find details of the SDK. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03.47 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Wednesday, 28. January 2004, at 15:08:00 [GMT -0600] you wrote: I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin today. A new Spam Plugin? There are several which work perfectly. By the way, IMO the list for Plugin development is TheBat! DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ciao Thomas Mailer: TheBat! 2.03.47 OS: Windows XP Service Pack 1 PGP:PGP 8.0 | Key: 0xABBB7287 HP: http://www.thebatworld.de Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 3:11:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello tb, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko plugin today. Where's the SDK? Don't any of the existing solutions work for you? Almost but not quite, and I have tried many. This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, allowing some spam authors to author spam in such a way as to trip up TB's Kludge tokenization. The end result being filters will not catch X-Spam-Flag in spam which takes advantage of this parser shortcoming. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message New spam plugin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, allowing some spam authors to author spam in such a way as to trip up TB's Kludge tokenization. The end result being filters will not catch X-Spam-Flag in spam which takes advantage of this parser shortcoming. Have you reported this as a bug? -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Darn Lies, and Statistics. Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New spam plugin
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 6:02:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message New spam plugin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, allowing some spam authors to author spam in such a way as to trip up TB's Kludge tokenization. The end result being filters will not catch X-Spam-Flag in spam which takes advantage of this parser shortcoming. Have you reported this as a bug? I used to report bugs, but eventually I stopped receiving replies and was then accused of not having licensed TB, when I have in fact over-licensed. Now my bug reports receive no replies. Everything changed after TB 2. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html