Re: Threading by reference
Hello Roberto, On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 at 2:02:27 AM you [RM]wrote (at least in part): [unreadable top posting repaired] >> V2 will be released this year and mainly will >> have full support for IMAP4, new filtering system, HTML Editor and >> as I know, redesigned interface. RM> Do you know anything about a port to Linux? I've been using Kylix and RM> BCB under Linux, porting Windows apps took about a day per app on RM> average. From what I understand TB is written in Delphi. Shouldn't be RM> that hard to port and would win a big market for Ritlabs. Why is this "a big market"? Don't get me wrong, I'd _LOVE_ it if I could use The Bat! with Linux natively, as wine simply su**s in this regard, but I don't get the point where the market should be!?!? Linux users are used to "Open Source". Most applications for Linux are Open Source and free in the double meaning of the word. The only applications so far successful being sold for Linux are "enterprise applications", even SAP decided not to sell it's database. Why should a Linux user, not being used to use The Bat! from his Windows, buy a licence for The Bat! with _sooo_ many free alternatives? Gnu, Emacs, Pine, Mutt, Sylpheed(-claws), KMail, Ximian, and so on [1] ... All of them are available for zero, what should a "normal user" convince to pay for The Bat!? P.S.: This topic might become OT really fast, so I suggest we respect the list charta and move on to TBOT. CC set, F-Up2 recommended and appreciated. [1] The order is pure random and does not imply anything -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Threading by reference
Hello all, Sunday, March 9, 2003, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: > In the interview > http://www.thebat.cz/interview.htm > I found this question: > ,- | >> Will v2.0 finally support threading by "References:" | >> headers only (i.e. there is no "in-reply-To:" header). > | Yes. We did not do it in the current version because of the message base format... > `- > Does anybody know what they are talking about? :) I don't know of any > problem with threading by references. Do you? this interview is 3 years old and many of features promised for V2 (like threading by reference, new msgbase format, TLS(SSL), S/MIME, viewer with proportional fonts, virus scanning etc.) were implemented already. V2 will be released this year and mainly will have full support for IMAP4, new filtering system, HTML Editor and as I know, redesigned interface. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Threading by reference
Hello Ricardo, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:55:56 -0300 GMT (09/03/03, 22:55 +0700 GMT), Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: > Will v2.0 finally support threading by "References:" > headers only (i.e. there is no "in-reply-To:" header). TF>> I think this is the thing I meant with TB not threading the reference TF>> headers from Novell Groupware correctly. > I didn't read it. Was it in TBUDL? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Black holes are where God divided by zero. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Threading by reference
Will v2.0 finally support threading by "References:" headers only (i.e. there is no "in-reply-To:" header). >>> Yes. We did not do it in the current version because of the message base format... >> Does anybody know what they are talking about? :) I don't know of any >> problem with threading by references. Do you? TF> I think this is the thing I meant with TB not threading the reference TF> headers from Novell Groupware correctly. I didn't read it. Was it in TBUDL? -- Ricardo M. Reyes | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c "The future is already here. It's just not evenly distributed yet." (William Gibson) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Threading by reference
Hello Ricardo, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:23:42 -0300 GMT (09/03/03, 22:23 +0700 GMT), Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: >>> Will v2.0 finally support threading by "References:" >>> headers only (i.e. there is no "in-reply-To:" header). >> Yes. We did not do it in the current version because of the message base format... > Does anybody know what they are talking about? :) I don't know of any > problem with threading by references. Do you? I think this is the thing I meant with TB not threading the reference headers from Novell Groupware correctly. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. And don't start a sentence with a conjunction. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
