Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-04-07 Thread Maurice Snellen

On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 03:35:41 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:35
where I live) John Galvin wrote:

JG The only disadvantage i see with this, is when i go to compose a
JG normal window, and i click on the AB to insert someones email
JG address, I am confronted with all the spammers addresses.

This can easily be avoided. Assuming you use only one addressbook for
your autocomplete and don't depend on information in the LDAP-styled
address books, you can simply create a new Address Book for the
spammers and define a group 'Spammers' there. Then in the filter you
can refer to that group (you need the group because the filter works
with groups, not address books).

In Options-Preferences-System you set autocomplete to work only from
the standard addressbook (assigned to the account) and optionally
include the input history.

--
Greetings,
Maurice

ICQ: 15724776 | WWW: http://www.kiap.org/
Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-04-01 Thread Dave Goodman

Gene Gough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   ...  What I have
 found best is having a filer for each of the various list groups I
 listen to that looks at the TO field to divert them to the associated
 folder.  Then next to the last filter is one that requires only that
 the sender be in my address book and if so, that mail goes into the
 standard INBOX.  The final filter is the inverse of that.  Any message
 this far down the chain and not in the address book goes to the
 Unknown or spam filter.  ...

I do something similar.  But a question...

Your last two filters work like this:

  1) filter all mail with recognized addresses to the inbox.
  2) filter anything else to the spam box.

What is your thinking in using these double filters as opposed to:

  1) filter all mail with unrecognized addresses to the spam box,
 while all other mail falls off the end of the filter list
 into the inbox.

Just wondering if I've missed some subtlety here... :)

-- 

Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 98



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-04-01 Thread Gene Gough



I think it works just as well.  I wasn't exactly sure how well the
filters were working as I had one fall through that never should have.
I set up the double check and have just left it that way.




Monday, April 1, 2002, 3:49:37 PM, Dave wrote:

 1) filter all mail with unrecognized addresses to the spam box,
  while all other mail falls off the end of the filter list
  into the inbox.

 Just wondering if I've missed some subtlety here... :)




-- 


Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-03-31 Thread Gene Gough



I did similar to what you are doing but soon realized that the change
the sending ID very often just to defeat that method.  What I have
found best is having a filer for each of the various list groups I
listen to that looks at the TO field to divert them to the associated
folder.  Then next to the last filter is one that requires only that
the sender be in my address book and if so, that mail goes into the
standard INBOX.  The final filter is the inverse of that.  Any message
this far down the chain and not in the address book goes to the
Unknown or spam filter.  About 90 percent of the mail that ends up in
that filer truly is spam.  The remaining are senders that I don't have
in my address book and won't put there but not really spam.  For that
reason I have to give a casual glance at the folder contents prior to
trashing them.  This has worked very well and I don't have to continue
to added ID's to a spam filter.




Sunday, March 31, 2002, 9:35:41 PM, John wrote:

 Hello Ottar,

 Saturday, March 30, 2002, 1:32:18 PM, you wrote:

OG Another strategy is to make an address book group for all your
OG spammers. You just highligh the spam message, rightclick and select
OG specials, add to addressbook, and select the spam-group.
OG Then you can have a filter that look for @ in sender (every mail
OG messages contains this) but under advanced you scroll down and tick
OG the box Address must be listed in address book, and select the
OG Spam-group.
OG This makes makes blocking new spammers as easy as the function in
OG Outlook Express (but less precise than the former strategy).

 A  nice  suggestion(I  am  always  looking  for  tricks  at  making spam
 disappear).  I  have  one  question  about  this method. I have set up a
 filter, which will add spammers addresses to a group called Spam(what an
 imagination,  eh??). The only disadvantage i see with this, is when i go
 to  compose  a  normal  window, and i click on the AB to insert someones
 email  address, I am confronted with all the spammers addresses. It is
 a  tad annoying and i was wondering if there was any feature which could
 exclude a group from the AB when i am composing a regular email.


 Also,  to  everyone,  I have been using TB for quite a while now. I have
 messed around with lots of settings and things. One thing I haven't been
 able  to  find,  is  a  facility  which  will  allow  TB  to  dial up my
 connection,  download  new  mail,  AT  a  certain time. Not every X time
 period. Is this possible to achieve with TB?




-- 


Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-03-31 Thread Ottar Grimstad

Hello John,

Monday, April 1, 2002, 4:35:41 AM, you wrote to TBUDL:

JG if there was any feature which could exclude a group from the AB
JG when i am composing a regular email.

Group properties, tick Hide items if not explicitly selected

-- 
Best regards,
  Ottar Grimstad, Norway
http://home.online.no/~ottgrims
Using The Bat! 1.60c on Windows 98 version 4,10



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-03-30 Thread Ottar Grimstad

Hello Daf,

Saturday, March 30, 2002, 11:12:01 AM, you wrote to TBUDL:

D What I've been doing is to highlight the unwanted e-mail in my
D inbox, then go to Specials  create filter - then check box
D that says sender - Then use for incoming - then send to
D trash. But this does not appear to be working correctly for me.
D As a test I set one up to work with this list and I still get the
D list in my inbox.

If you study the headers, you will see that the From-field for
TBUDL-messages contains the original emailaddress of the sender, not
the list address. This is contained in the Reply-to field. Therefore
you have made a filter that sends not all mail from TBUDL to trash,
but only mail from the writer of the message you highlighted.

This strategy also creates a separate filter for each spammer, and
this can make your filter list very long.

Consider making a filter called Spam and make trash the destination
folder.
Open the Sorting Office (Ctr-Shift-S)
With Incoming mail highlighted, press New
Give it name, select destination folder, and enter the filtering
string.
When you shall add another spammer, click the Alternatives set and
click Add new.
For each new spammer you just add a new alternative.

Consider checking out all of the haeders in the offending mail
(Ctr-Alt-K) and use the emailaddress in Reply-to field or even
domain-name in recieved from, instead of only the From-address (which
is often faked and replaced with a new address the next time). Then
you must select Kludges instead of Sender in the filter. Kludges looks
for the string in all of the headers.

Another strategy is to make an address book group for all your
spammers. You just highligh the spam message, rightclick and select
specials, add to addressbook, and select the spam-group.
Then you can have a filter that look for @ in sender (every mail
messages contains this) but under advanced you scroll down and tick
the box Address must be listed in address book, and select the
Spam-group.
This makes makes blocking new spammers as easy as the function in
Outlook Express (but less precise than the former strategy).

-- 
Best regards,
  Ottar Grimstad, Norway
http://home.online.no/~ottgrims
Using The Bat! 1.60c on Windows 98 version 4,10



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-03-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ottar,

@30 March 2002, 13:32:18 +0100 (12:32 UK time) Ottar Grimstad wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This makes makes blocking new spammers as easy as the function in
 Outlook Express (but less precise than the former strategy).

Of course, spammers seldom originate from the same address twice these
days.

The simplest and most effective spam filter is the Sherlock (process
of elimination) method as originally suggested by Steve Lamb and
explained by Allie Martin:

- ---8
The easiest way to get rid of spam is by first excluding all mail that
is legitimately for you and then simply considering the rest spam.
With this method you hardly ever get legitimate mail ending up in the
spam folder or spam ending up in the inbox.

Order is important since TB processes filters from the top down.

First create filters for all your regular legitimate mail.

Then create a filter to place all other messages addressed to you in
the inbox or some other created 'sundry' folder.

Then create the spam filter, which should be the last filter in the
list. Set it up to place the rest of messages that do not satisfy any
of the other previous filter rules in a spam folder.

Typically this will be:

String: e, location: Kludges, Presence: Yes.

With this setup I assure you that your inbox will be clean. Very few
spammers address messages directly to you and that's the reason why
this method works so well. If the message is not from x, y, z, etc or
it's not addressed directly to me, then it MUST be spam. :)

You can very likely add some general spam filters for spam messages
addressed to you based on subject content.
- ---8

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60c-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
ยท
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE8pbT2OeQkq5KdzaARAnzuAJ4qf+d8d/eLT8h6doStilnrxRQhEgCg1Aqm
RuVBswwktT4z6IPGEpJY8Fw=
=evNS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]