Re: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Charlie,

On 07 January 2001 at 09:38:32 + (which was 09:38 where I
live) Charlie (ceejay) wrote and made these points:

Cc ... I can almost brew up while v1.49 chugs along in it's
Cc attempt to bring the spell checker to life!

ACM Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot
ACM when I installed the language pack.

Cc I have the British English version installed. Timed the checker
Cc this morning (it's initial opening), it took 35 seconds. It's a
Cc minor issue. My post was made out of curiosity really, just
Cc wondered if it was a common problem or was there perhaps a
Cc setting I could alter.

British  English,  language  pack installed, automatic checking = 1
second  to  do  a manual check. I haven't noticed any degradation in
spell  check  speeds. PIII 750 128mb OS as below. Charlie, you don't
say what spec you're running with.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs   ]

TB! v1.49 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOlhDkTnkJKuSnc2gEQIjRACg+MwzGikhI4AcV5Aq1UezQYHzgUQAn3b3
3y0YoM4HFGp60oUuHgiRTAYA
=cWK0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 19:54:13 -0800, George graced us with these
comments:

ACM Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot when
ACM I installed the language pack.

GFS Shouldn't think I'd need it on the English version.!?

I use English as well   British English. :=)

- --
@~@@~@
 | A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA]  |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOlhIBVfJ62ArBxfiEQI1owCghA0kK9VAyrNacmyCx0KZaxQQFngAoN4y
8nciwCpqo5XuH86TfQezOfxu
=7NZB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Tony Boom

This message: 07/01/2001 09:56 GMT.

Hello Charlie,


  A reminder of what Charlie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
  07 January 2001 at 01:15:41 GMT +

Cc Does the checker load and as quickly when entering it's first
Cc spelling error when composing your *own* messages

 I have mine set to auto check each word as I type rather than waiting to
 check the whole doc when I've finished. It tells me if a word is wrong
 as soon as I hit the space bar, well before I can start typing the next
 word.

 In Spell Check Options, there is a setting for accuracy and speed. The
 more accurate you want it, the slower it is. I have mine set to "Slow
 but accurate" and it's still faster than I can type.

 It can be a bit slow when right clicking to correct a word but that's
 because, depending on how wrong the word is spelt, the amount of
 combinations it checks against. The more accurate you want it, the more
 suggestions it comes up with so the slower it will be.

 On my P233 it seemed to take an age, now I have a P550 it seems almost
 instantaneous. You don't say what PC you have so that may have something
 to do with it as well.

Cc I have the British English version installed. Timed the checker this
Cc morning (it's initial opening), it took 35 seconds.

 I just typed out a new, reasonably long message with auto check off.
 Clicked on "Check entire text" and it was booted up an on the first
 wrong word faster than I could blink, well within a second.



-- 
Best regards,Tony.[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.49 S/N A27A5E65
 Windows 98 ME 4.90 Build 3000 
 Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPkeyrequest

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:23:12 +, Marck thoughtfully wrote the
following:

MDP British  English,  language  pack installed, automatic checking =
MDP 1

Same here for me.

MDP second to do a manual check. I haven't noticed any degradation in
MDP spell check speeds. PIII 750 128mb OS as below. Charlie, you
MDP don't say what spec you're running with.

35 seconds is an extremely long time to sit waiting for the spell
check to function. Something is very wrong. I think this goes beyond
just machine specs although info on the machine specs are in order.

- --
@~@@~@
 | A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA]  |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOlhSq1fJ62ArBxfiEQIhYgCfaPd6ypHIj6ZjU3YO6CJ+U+ZU94kAoJhi
yBGoz6EkC58SUHnQt7ByHMn2
=UoFg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)

Hello!


Sunday, January 07, 2001, 2:27:38 PM, A. Curtis Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

ACM 35 seconds is an extremely long time to sit waiting for the spell
ACM check to function. Something is very wrong. I think this goes beyond
ACM just machine specs although info on the machine specs are in order.

I could assume that something is wrong with the IPC (Inter-process
communication). However currently it's the whole help I can provide to
you. Sorry Martin :-(

IIRC the same weirdness comparable to this issue was in 1.043. When user
tries to browse the folder list from the filter manager window, the
thebat.exe process freezes deeply for 30-40 sec causing the Browse
Folder List button to be pressed, the whole process stops responding
etc. Maybe it was some faulty TB! thread, maybe something else even in
the user's system - I couldn't remember exactly.


-- 

Yours sincerely,

Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.msk.ru/

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Fred Weissman

NA If I'm not mistaken, TB!'s spell checker has 3 settings, with the 3rd being
NA the most comprehensive, but also taking the longest time. Perhaps you have 
NA inadvertently chosen door #3. ;o)

 I have it set at: Moderately fast and accurate. I go along with
 accurate description, but moderately fast is being generous to say the
 least. The problem is far more pronounced at the initial firing up of
 the checker, and generally improves as editing goes on.

I have noticed an extreme slowdown a few versions ago, but I switched from
"moderately fast and accurate" to "fast but less accurate" and immediately
saw a speed up.  But my initial symptoms were the same: -very- slow at the
initial firing up of the spell checker the -first- time in each new
message/reply.  "Fast but less accurate" has made the problem less
pronounced.

-- 
The things that come to those who wait are what's left behind
by those who got there first.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.ne.mediaone.net/phred13



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread A . Curtis Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:13:57 +, Charlie wrote these words of
wisdom:

Cc Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the wait after
Cc initial selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each
Cc new version. I can almost brew up while v1.49 chugs along in it's
Cc attempt to bring the spell checker to life!

Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot when I
installed the language pack.

- --
@~@@~@
 | A. Curtis Martin  [List Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA]  |
 | PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@   (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS)   @_@
__
TB! v1.49 | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.

iQA/AwUBOlfh5FfJ62ArBxfiEQJSxwCeIInMib5WJOpe7JoKTv9YoWhttlQAoNi9
QCKRLwjbOIuMCRVrdg8nps78
=g5kU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Nick Andriash

On January 6, 2001, at 7:26:28 PM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:

ACM Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot when I
ACM installed the language pack.

Allie, is the language pack you refer to the file intpack.exe, or lng.rar,
both of which are available on the RITLabs FTP Server?


Nick


N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49 Beta 2 | PGP 7.0.2 | Win 98 SE ]
   Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID:  0x7BA3FDCE  
__

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)

Hello!


Sunday, January 07, 2001, 6:54:13 AM, George F. Schoelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

ACM Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot when I
ACM installed the language pack.

GFS Shouldn't think I'd need it on the English version.!?

As someone told here in the past, "an odd problems may have an odd
solutions" 8-)


-- 

Yours sincerely,

Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.msk.ru/

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org