Re[2]: BCC

2003-02-17 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Jonathan,

Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 4:52:58 PM, you wrote:

JA (if you're interested, I can give you all the technical docs on this).

My problems with BCC's are over, but I'm still interested though, if
it's not too difficult and as far as you're talking about digital docs
:-)

-- 
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62i



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: BCC

2003-02-17 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Peter,

Friday, February 14, 2003, 10:17:09 AM, you wrote:

PP As bad as the result is to you, I'm somehow glad to know:
PP there seems not to be a bug in The Bat! regarding this issue
PP :-)

I now no longer have any problem with the BCC's, so I can close this
thread completely.

I do have some other minor problems, but since they are not related
to this subject I will talk about them in other messages.


PP Yes :-) No ... _I_ missed a character :-)

Who did you miss?  :-)


-- 
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62i



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: BCC

2003-02-13 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Peter,

Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 3:17:53 PM, you wrote:


PP 2.) I don't see any mention of OE, Pocomail or any other MUA in your OP,
PP   could you please enlighten us when those stepped in and what the
PP   realtion to your original question?

A few months ago, when I sent a message to myself with a BCC to the
kids  my wife, (same account, two mailboxes, each with 3 aliasses (1
alias not used in this example)) everyone received at least one
message. At that time I used OE (and Pocomail).
That doesn't work anymore but it seems this has nothing to do with The
Bat, but rather with the changed settings on my provider's server:
it doesn't work with OE and Poco either, nowadays.

PP All in all I guess there's either something you did wrong while
PP addressing the e-mail or the server you used to send ot the mail mixed
PP up some things, I've _never_ had any problems with BCC in e-mails while
PP using The Bat!. As I've never read somebody else has chances are low you
PP stumbled over a bug in The Bat! handling BCC while sending the message;
PP chances are high it would have been already reported.

It's not a major problem, it's only BCC's to our own addresses that do
not work. When I send the messages separatly (with Roelof's example of
a Quick Template), everyone receives his/her copy.

Only one more problem though, but I have to check something first (in
order to be specific enough when explaining it) before bothering anyone
with it.

PP So either be clear and answer the questions people trying to help you
PP ask, or solve the problem yourself. But you can spare responses as in
PP the mail I'm replying to: You should try harder and Anyone can see I
PP meant (mention: ment, not said ... I'll take a look for my crystal
PP ball for better seeing what soembody meant ...).

Obviously it wasn't clear to you that I was merely laughing at myself
for writing such unlogic sentences by ommitting (not deliberatly)
words.

OTOH, now I must admit you got me confused with:

PP meant (mention: ment, not said ...

I mean I meant
You mean   You meant
He means   He meant
......

Am I missing something??


-- 
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: BCC

2003-02-05 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Roelof,

Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 1:47:42 PM, you wrote:


MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP is no problem.

RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.

You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant:   :-) (1)

When I send such an Email with OE or Pocomail...  etc. (2)

(1) Could it be The Bat automatically destroys any reference to OE ?
(2) It's been a while, I'll test it again ASAP

-- 
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: BCC doesn't work, How to filter bounces clear the to field

2002-12-16 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Johannes,


 I expect to get all sorts of bounces soon but would like to never
 see one of them.

JP Why?

Repercussions of fighting spam.

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPf38il3LB35+TCg0EQLJkgCfZxKSgQUnxS8JlROXpss2n3i6GYwAn00B
XlLQGCrk1p+RrcDXfpafocjx
=MJSb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html