Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Csaba, Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the viewer. Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:23:01 AM, you wrote: CK Hello, CK Adjust your Options - Preferences -Viewer - Rich Text/HTML. CK Now it should be nicer. CK I hope it helps. CK -- CK Best regards, CK CKCsaba Kiss CK [EMAIL PROTECTED] CK tel:+4687286259 CK fax:+468330498 CK CK This message was created on Thursday, February 6, 2003. CK Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:12:30 PM, you wrote: lsu Hi All, lsu I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and I'm lsu trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I believe, lsu simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it. lsu Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure and footer in a lsu light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. When I send myself a message I am lsu unable to duplicate this effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm lsu missing), or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. lsu Best regards, lsu Scott A. Blystone lsu Rochester, New York lsu I sometimes wonder if the manufacturers of foolproof items keep a fool or two lsu on their payroll to test things. - Alan Coren CK CK Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: CK http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Jurgen, Perhaps I'm not explaining myself well. I actually do not care what the text looks like as I compose it. I'm speaking about the end result, the received message after I send it. When I look at most of the posts I see on this reflector (except for the one you just sent), I see that the signatures come out in a very light greyed-out text. I wish to duplicate that effect in the messages I send out. Does this clarify what I mean? Thanks. Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:46:29 AM, you wrote: JH Hello to Rochester, JH to get this straight... Your problem is that you want to see those JH color effects (like the light grey for the sig part) in your EDITOR, JH when you actually WRITE a message? or that you can't see that effect JH when you look at messages that you wrote? JH Jürgen JH Thursday, February 6, 2003, 2:35:14 PM, you wrote: Thanks for the answer, but it answers the wrong question. I already HAVE that option selected. My changes need, I think, to be in the EDITOR, not the viewer. Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:23:01 AM, you wrote: CK Hello, CK Adjust your Options - Preferences -Viewer - Rich Text/HTML. CK Now it should be nicer. CK I hope it helps. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Question about greyed out signatures
Hi Marck, Bingo! That's it. Thanks a bunch! PS: I haven't movified THIS template yet to add the cut mark! :-) Best regards, Scott A. Blystone Rochester, New York Thursday, February 6, 2003, 8:58:15 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Scott, MDP @6-Feb-2003, 08:12 -0500 (13:12 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SAB] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SAB Most of the messages I see on this list have the signtaure SAB and footer in a light greyed out text. It looks quite sharp. SAB When I send myself a message I am unable to duplicate this SAB effect. Is this a function of The Bat! (something I'm missing), SAB or is it something out illustrious moderator is doing? Thanks. MDP Two things: MDP 1) The editor doesn't show rich text formatting, so you won't see MDPthe fancy sig display while composing a message. MDP 2) To be a signature, the signature text has to be separated from MDPthe body text by a cut mark. There's quite a good explanation MDPof the cut mark in the help file but to cut a long story short MDPgroan it is dashdashspacereturn. Like mine would have MDPbeen if PGP hadn't fooled around with it! MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP TB! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP ' MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- MDP Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) MDP iD8DBQE+Qmn4OeQkq5KdzaARAh4SAKCGmT7kLKMez7XBSO6xnTBFZJLU5ACePoNo MDP GVnw2Y52nkD/cAt22oxY6q4= MDP =dE8x MDP -END PGP SIGNATURE- MDP MDP Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: MDP http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
