Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote: RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do you mean by recycles? The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page, but never stops doing this. Have since added an extra filter to handle the additional condition, and this works fine; have then added a second condition to that filter and there is no problem. So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. Using the extra filter seems to overcome the problem, as long as I don't touch that corrupted filter. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...I am a nutritional overachiever. Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote: RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do you mean by recycles? Further work: Taking out 11 conditions and putting them in the new second filter leaves only 16 conditions in the troublesome filter. If I now try to add a new condition, the box that opens to hold it is 2-lines deep, so seems best to stop at 16. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Memory is a thing we forget with. Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:14:04 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else, ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:04 you (Paul Berger) wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy paste the filter here for others to try it. Have since reduced this filter to 16 conditions, still has that fault. Here it is: TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [6B667C54.01C5F852.0DC8958A.325A55B4] Name: Wecocme Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@westpac.com.au\0D\0A1`0`0`shareScene.com\0D\0A1`0`0`adventurevictoria.org\0D\0A1`0`0`commsec.com.au\0D\0A1`0`0`asx.com.au\0D\0A1`0`0`virtualvillage.com\0D\0A1`0`0`investorweb.com.au\0D\0A1`0`0`melbpc.org.au\0D\0A1`0`0`optusnet.com.au\0D\0A1`0`0`thebat.dutaint.com\0D\0A1`1`0`spammotel.com\0D\0A} MoveMessage folder \5C\5COptus\5CInbox\5CWelcome IsActive Ignore endFilter -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Do Lipton Tea employees take coffee breaks? Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Alexander, RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I RO live), you wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy paste the filter here for others to try it. RO He could copy and paste it to a text editor, delete the filter from RO the sorting office, close and open TB and paste it back. Thanks, tried this and also your first idea: Creating a backup and restoring it might solve that. No success. However, if I never touch that filter and use the second new one, all is well - a work around. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...My mind works like lightning... one brilliant flash and it's gone Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Alexander, RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I RO live), you wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy paste the filter here for others to try it. RO He could copy and paste it to a text editor, delete the filter from RO the sorting office, close and open TB and paste it back. Thanks everyone for all the prompt help. It seems that it is best to limit each filter to 16 conditions. For additional conditions, use additional filter(s). Then there is no problem. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time. Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 11:31:12 PM, you wrote: PM Hi Paul, PM on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here), PM you wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do you mean by recycles? PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page, PB but never stops doing this. PB Have since added an extra filter to handle the additional condition, PB and this works fine; have then added a second condition to that filter PB and there is no problem. PB So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 PB conditions in it. PM I remember a problem with (too) many conditions in a filter and PM searched the archive. In TBBeta I found the thread from July 2005 PM starting with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The conclusion PM was that too many conditions cripple the filter, and there was nothing PM to be done about it. I didn't know that the problem persists. If you PM wish I can send you the thread by PM. Thanks Peter. Would appreciate that item. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Change is inevitable except from a vending machine Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Friday, January 19, 2007, 12:26:21 AM, you wrote: TF Hello Paul, TF On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT), TF Paul Berger wrote: PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page, PB but never stops doing this. TF It does, eventually. Just be patient. Once the cycling finishes, you TF can add the new condition, and the filter works perfectly. Thanks Thomas. That explains it all nicely. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...If marriage were outlawed, only outlaws would have in-laws. Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 8:27:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else, ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:30 you (Paul Berger) wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy paste the filter here for others to try it. Here it is: ASK I tried to paste it into my S.O. but the entire conditions part remains ASK empty. Dunno whats wrong with it. Thanks for trying this, Alexander. Not to worry. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Your conscience may not keep you from doing wrong, but it sure keeps you from enjoying it. Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting office
Miguel, Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I can then share them with the relevant accounts? The only way I know so far is Copy (Cut) Paste . Is there a way to copy and paste multiple filters? Or do I have to do them one at a time, which will be very painful. -- Thanks PJ Using TB! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting office: actions: Export message to file
On Friday, November 14, 2003 at 1:00 PM, Simon wrote: Does anyone know about this feature? Is it not supposed to do what I am attempting to do with it? All I want to do is export the messages to .msg files as they are filtered into their TB! folder. I would have thought that this would be a sequential process. Does anyone know if this feature ever worked like this? Hi Simon, Perhaps the /EXPORT command will help. See TB's Help file index under Export Messages. You may be able to utilize this to accomplish what you'd like to do. It may be that you can write a batch file that is triggered on a filter that calls the /EXPORT command. I've never tried it and haven't used the command line functions of TB, so I could be completely wrong. :) Sorry I couldn't be of any more assistance. -- Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello Jonathan list, On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 13:18:05GMT -0600 (which was 2:18 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss murmured: Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? JA If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the JA order in which they are applied. That could have a JA disastrous affect in some situations. Perfect example is a friend who has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as his address. He is definitely not a spammer, so I sort his mail FIRST with a filter for his exact mail address. The spam filter comes later, with 'SEX' as the trigger ANYWHERE in the message! If I resorted my filters, the order could be changed and my IMPORTANT messages from my known correspondent could be trashed! Sorting the Sorting Office - NOT a good idea. That is why they have the MOVE UP and MOVE DOWN buttons! Use with caution though, as the net effect could be NOT EXACTLY what you intend!! -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8 m/sec/sec. - Marcus Dolengo -- Flying in the stratosphere with The Bat! V1.61 on Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:18:05 PM, you wrote: On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote... Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous affect in some situations. If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, I wouldn't mind. But, I definitely wouldn't want the filter sorting change the order of the filtering. It would be nice to at least have a search capability. But, I just couldn't imagine someone having around 100 filters under incoming and trying to manage them. Just my 2 cents. -- Best regards, Daniel Rail Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello, Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:17:23 PM, you wrote: If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, I wouldn't mind. But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of affect? You'd then have to tag each filter with an order number, and have that displayed somewhere too, and allow sorting by that, and make it easily modifiable. My guess is that a field representing the order of the filters already exist, it's just not displayed. It would be nice to at least have a search capability. A sort in the search would be fine... because that truly would only be a name listing of the filter, and sorting on it would be just like sorting on a search result from a mailbox. That would be fine as well. -- Best regards, Daniel Rail Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hi Thomas, If you could sort them, perhaps hierachically, or hiding some elements, you could have a better overview of the Rule set that you created, and easier to maintain, and update. I'm referring to their user display, not internal rule list. TF Oh please, no. The order of the display *must* be the same as the TF order in which the filters are processed. This is the first time I am TF against even an option to make soemthing happen. I want to glance at my filter list and know that they're being executed in same order. I can give my filters descriptive names if I want to. I vote for leaving it the way it is too. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hi St,
Now that I can see what you had in mind - I like it!
Actually, I'd prefer a plain external text file
with the rules in execution order.
(Makes sharing of rules very easy to do.)
TB reads the text file and presents the default view
which would be execution order. It'd have a couple
buttons to sort the view different ways...and an associated
account preference so the same view is always presented, if
altered from the default by the user.
But then again, I'm not a programmer so I have no idea
how expensive it would be make any changes at all, let
alone our cosmetic wantings.
I get Korean spamwith weird characters in it.
It's very easy to copy/paste those characters into
a filter. Filtering on foreign characters isn't
something I've had good success with using other
user agents.
I vote for leaving it the way it is too.
SMN I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
SMN in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice
SMN if one could group related rules:
SMN - VirusShield
SMN VirusShield Spamvestigater (Virus)
SMN VirusShield SpamCop detected viruses
SMN - Whitelisted Addresses
SMN Whitelist: E-MU Systems
SMN Whitelist: E-MULetter
SMN Whitelist: Editors - Tritonhaven.Com
SMN Whitelist: Faq - Tritonhaven.Com
SMN Whitelist: ISP - BigBiz.Com
SMN - Mailing Lists (As host)
SMN [sub] Mailing List - E-MUsaic Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Korg Trinity Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Korg Triton Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Roland Variphrase Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Roland VS-1680 Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Whosh Mailing List
SMN [sub] Mailing List - Whosh Steering Committee Mailing List
SMN - Mailing List (As subscriber only)
SMN Independent - BigFishAudio.Com News
SMN Independent - Symantec.Com News
SMN Independent - Doctor Audio Mailing List
SMN Independent - Jokequeen
SMN - JunkShield (Anti-spam)
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater (General - Kludges)
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater (General - Anywhere)
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater ('inkjet')
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater ('satellite')
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater ('no address')
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater ('search engine')
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater (known spammers)
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater (if 'relay' and no '4703')
SMN JunkShield Spamvestigater (if 'bomber' and no 9773055435')
SMN - Main Addresses
SMN St - Musaic.Net
SMN St - Tritonhaven.Com
SMN St - Whosh.Net
SMN which again in a colapsed display would show up something like
SMN + VirusShield
SMN + Whitelisted Addresses
SMN + Mailing Lists (As Host)
SMN - Mailing List (Subscriber Only)
SMN Independent - BigFishAudio.Com News
SMN Independent - Symantec.Com News
SMN Independent - Doctor Audio Mailing List
SMN Independent - Jokequeen
SMN + JunkShield (Anti-spam)
SMN + Main Addresses
SMN Ok? Just like folders and files in Explorer. And don't forget,
SMN TB already have a sort of hierarchy:
SMN + Incoming Mail
SMN + Outgoing Mail
SMN + Read Messages
SMN + Replied Messages
SMN + Selective Download
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello St - Musaic.Net, On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 05:38:13GMT +0100 (which was 11:38 PM in the tropics where I live) St - Musaic.Net opined: SMN I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted SMN in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice SMN if one could group related rules: 8 [SNIPPED] to prevent massive overquoting ;-) I like the way this idea was presented. It would tend to assist those trying to figure out HOW to use filters, and perhaps suggest a BEST method to order them for maximum effect and minimum effort. When I first started out 15 months ago, I fiddled for DAYS on end to get my filters to execute in the proper order. Now I have something VERY similar to the arrangement you detailed, with the exception of the Virus scanning, which I don't do :^) -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was. -- Flying in the stratosphere with The Bat! V1.61 on Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 3:38:36 PM, you wrote: Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking to make it bigger, just re-sizeable. You could keep it as small as you wanted for yourself. DAC It is not the size which I find lacking, but the lack DAC of ability to search. Yes to both! Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello Allie, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 05:17:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:17 in my TimeZone) you wrote: While we are on the subject of resizing, this is related, but in the Losest terms. (!) Why is it that windows with two or more scroll windows all move when you use a scroll button on the Mouse or keyboard??? THat is very annoying! -- Best regards, Michael http://.thompsonmike.co.uk/ Nothing is more conducive to peace of mind than not having any opinions at all. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office
Hello Allie, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 16:00:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 22:00 in my TimeZone) you wrote: ACM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Michael Thompson [MT] wrote:' MT While we are on the subject of resizing, this is related, but in MT the Losest terms. (!) Why is it that windows with two or more MT scroll windows all move when you use a scroll button on the Mouse MT or keyboard??? THat is very annoying! ACM Try clicking in the window you wish to scroll and the others should ACM stop scrolling. I thought of that, it dos'nt. It is'nt the mouse drivers either. I have used both M$ Intellipoint and Logitech Drivers. (Different MOuse) I have also noticed this behaviour under 2k as well as XP... But I dont think it is a Bat thing, as the code should not allow this to happen. (Both windows are seperate items) so I think this is maybe a OS Code thingie... I dont know about the XP codebase, or the latest version of Delphi, as I stopped using Delphi long ago.. -- Best regards, Michael http://.thompsonmike.co.uk/ I am a computer, dumber than any human and smarter than an administrator. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorting Office/Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 11:37:55 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: If i understand you right, you want to colour code your messages based upon the sender (or whatever). For that you first define the colour groups you need, then create filters in the sorting office. Correct. I have created a color group and then I pick that color group in the Actions tab area. check it, choose your colour group. Set the filter active and automatic. Okay, I have the filter set as Active in the Rule is part of the first tab...is there a separate setting for automatic? I was a bit wrong in my last message...I don't have to hit re-filter to get a message to show up in the correct color group. It seems that as soon as a message is marked read that it will show up correctly...which still isn't quite what I'm looking for. I hope I am right. Yes, you are. Thank you for trying to help. - Frederick Fisher Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOvA8yZ0uckyq6787EQLQ7ACfbrjbrz1sH1lHLq08zgBmLU9BFMQAoKXF pOhtd3KIRGvOWQcgBtnEGYhs =Lef0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Sorting Office/Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 11:58:13 AM, Jan Rifkinson wrote: Assuming that you are creating a filter under the 'incoming' folder rather than the 'read' folder, then how about the following: Inbox is the source folder listed in my filter. StringsLocation Presence [EMAIL PROTECTED]kludges yes I have Location set as Anywhere. Would that make a difference? Place this filter @ the top of the list of filters. I've only created two filters so far...until I figure out what this problem is I'm not going to create any more. But the particular one I'm testing is the first one of the two. Thanks for your help. - Frederick Fisher Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOvBAXp0uckyq6787EQLnSwCglZny6o3AYxRUv8EMgM8eEnupDD4AoOPp SWx/dSAxjUaIvu+5JyZkeE4s =bkBF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Sorting Office/Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 12:45:57 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote: On the whole Jan made the process much more efficient; where I used two filters for any filtering criterion he used one. Should have thought of it myself. No problem, at least you're trying to help. :-) As for automatic: Un-check (if checked) Rule is Manual only. Well, I've got it set correctly then. So far it looks like I have the correct settings but it's not working like I thought it would... - Frederick Fisher Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOvBLK50uckyq6787EQLaqgCg65ydK559nX98zr+k0GSq98HETrkAn3Q4 uM6sZxuWDIXKXVt5TtmwScWZ =G2zR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Sorting Office/Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 19:37:05 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Sorting Office/Filters': Marck In that case the problem is in the colour group definition in that Marck there are *two* colour settings - one normal (the surface definition) Marck and one for unread (the secondary tab). Check there Hmmm. Didn't even think of that. Guess that's why you get the big bucks. :-) - -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! v1.52 Beta/12/WinMe/PGP Key ID: 0x3F14A060 ICQ 41116329 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBOvBW6fvZew4/FKBgEQISrgCgujavsexQD4GZtopzbzlNTnLDdxwAoIU6 FGEKQ09+vHuf7Wp/DMsqiVvG =+xF8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Sorting Office/Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 1:37:05 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: Hi Frederick, In that case the problem is in the colour group definition in that there are *two* colour settings - one normal (the surface definition) and one for unread (the secondary tab). Check there. This tip did the trick. Thank you for your help. I also want to thank the other people who tried to help...thank you for your effort. - Frederick Fisher Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBOvBbWZ0uckyq6787EQKIMgCfZvpMT9EqXLte1cb/pBRCX7iZImsAniNe 23Wgh2EE8VF6AkTvZvi7wzQt =ZL6f -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
