Re: Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-16 Thread sacksa
I would like to thank Thomas Fernandez and everyone else who wrote in 
regarding the virus warning I received upon downloading mail.  (For those 
who are keeping track, I posted the problem from my other e-mail address 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).)  Because my eTrust AV program works so well, it caught 
the virus  on an incoming e-mail and didn't allow the virus laden e-mail 
into my in-box.  It remained, however, in the Temp folder and on the 
server.   Deleting the e-mail from the Temp file was only half the job. By 
going out to the server (I chose to use webmail to get a direct look at 
what was on the server) I was able to spot the offending message and 
delete it. The fixed the problem. Again, thanks for the help.   [Now, 
could someone PLEASE help with the other problem I posted to the list the 
other day regarding copying the prgram to my laptop?]

-- 
Avi
Avram Sacks
Chicago, IL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

using The Bat ver. 1.62r with WinXP Professional.

Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello All,

a eTrust EZ Antivirus real-time protection has found that
a C:\DOCUME~1\AVRAM\LOCALS~1\Temp\bat653.tmp is HTML.ObjectDataHTA
a dropper
.
a However, I continue to get warning messages each time I download
a e-mail.  The message is always the same, except that the number
a changes.
.

TF See above. It is a good idea to exclude the temp folder from AV
TF scanning, or at least exclude bat*.tmp files within that folder from
TF the real-time scan.
I'm not sure that helps (in all cases)
It probably depends on the AV but some programs don't just scan the
files but the POP3/MAPI data stream. So the AV kick into action even
before the virus gets written to disk.
So excluding the scanning directory won't help.
A 'solution' could be not to scan e-mail at all.
The virus will just wait to get activated by Reading the e-mail or
something. At that time the other part of your AV should kick in.
But I don't like that solution because I want to kill the virus asap.

TF Oh, and referring to another thread: This problem doesn't exist with
TF plug-ins. That's the other advantage of AV plug-ins for TB.
Thread will get mixed up now; but the info in both threads apply to my
original question.
I can understand the use of a plug-in when using encrypted
connections.
But I have less positive thoughts about your .bat explanation.
I use an AV that outclasses (IMO) many others, including some with
plug-ins.
And I don't like TB! forcing me to change AV.

-- 
Best regards, Tony  

An empty stomach is not a good political adviser.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread achdut
Hello Thomas,

Sunday, June 13, 2004, 12:35:20 AM, you wrote:

I wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:48:46

a eTrust EZ Antivirus real-time protection has found that
a C:\DOCUME~1\AVRAM\LOCALS~1\Temp\bat653.tmp is HTML.ObjectDataHTA
a dropper

[snip]
a However, I continue to get warning messages each time I download
a e-mail.  The message is always the same, except that the number
a changes.

TF Of course. As TB hasn't successfully downloaded and imported the mail,
TF it will try to do so at every mail check. This will not stop unless
TF you delete the message on serever using TB's mail despatcher, or turn
TF off your over-eager AV program.


If I understand correctly, what happened is that when The Bat attempts to
download e-mail, it is first downloaded to the Temp directory.  If the
message has a virus, then my AV software (My eTrust by Computer
Associates) will prevent the e-mail from going into a mail folder.
(Assuming, of course, that the signature files for the AV software
recognize the virus.) However, the virus-laden message still remains
on the server because The Bat would only direct the server to delete
the message AFTER the message finds its way into a Bat folder.
Because the message was only able to go as far as the Temp
subdirectory, The Bat did not instruct the server to delete the
offending e-mail. Is this correct.

Based on this, and not being familiar with mail despactcher I
assumed that I needed to delete a virus-laden message off of the
server. So, using webmail, I went out to the server using my web
browser and deleted two suspicious messages, both of which had
attachments.


How do I delete the message on the server using TB's mail despatcher.
And, just exactly, what IS TB's mail despatcher (dispatcher?) It would
appear that these files are in the Temp subdirectory.

Ahhh, but your note gave me an idea.  I turned off AV just long
enough to highlight and delete the bat*.tmp files.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread achdut
Hello Thomas,

Sunday, June 13, 2004, 2:11:14 AM, you wrote:


a And, just exactly, what IS TB's mail despatcher (dispatcher?)

TF It's a utility with which you can manage mails on the (POP) server:

TF Account / Despatch Mail on Server / All messages.

a It would appear that these files are in the Temp subdirectory.

TF The despatcher shows you the mails on the server, before they even
TF get to the temp directory.


If I use this utility, will I be able to identify which messages to
delete, or will it automatically delete all of them before I get a
chance to say yes or no?

-- 
Avram
Avram Sacks
Chicago, Il
using The Bat ver. 1.62r on Win XP Pro



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Thomas,

.

T At that time the other part of your AV should kick in.

TF The AV should kick in when I ask it. That's how I have set it: It I do
TF want to open an attachment, I ask the doctor (PC-Cillin): Does this
TF file contain a virus?
I *will* forget to ask the doctor for sure :(
That's why I have set everything to automatic.

T But I don't like that solution because I want to kill the virus asap.

TF I do that with the del key.
But only after you started reading your incoming mail.
As you said there is no problem opening a virus mail on a non MS
client.
I'm on other high volume lists where a large percentage uses Outlook
(express)
All people with good intentions. But sometimes a virus pops up.
The sender just forwarded an infected mail to the list.
I know it's a 'that happens once in a lifetime' example.
My point is just that IMO it the duty of every Internet user is to stop
spreading viruses the best s/he can. Even if her/his own system is immune
to it.

T And I don't like TB! forcing me to change AV.

TF It isn't. You only need to adjust your settings to your environment
TF and your desired behaviour.


-- 
Best regards, Tony  

Why the sun lightens our hair, but darkens our skin?



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Melissa,

MR Hi William,

MR On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 12:52:08 AM PST, you wrote:

 I don't have this problem using NOD32 independently.

 It flags an incoming virus-laden message, I delete it, end of story.

MR I've been using NOD32 for a few years now (since v1.x), and I really
MR like the way v2 is working (no more need to configure that old POP3
MR scanner module). I don't use a TB! plug-in, and messages aren't
MR repeatedly downloaded to the temp folder. Once I delete an infected
MR message at the point NOD32 detects it (during new message download), I
MR delete it, and never hear from it again. :-)

Good news! I'm a NOD32 supporter myself.

Melissa watch out for NOD32!
You are in it's virus base :D

-- 
Best regards, Tony  

Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Thomas,

TF The AV should kick in when I ask it. That's how I have set it: It I do
TF want to open an attachment, I ask the doctor (PC-Cillin): Does this
TF file contain a virus?

T I *will* forget to ask the doctor for sure :(
T That's why I have set everything to automatic.

TF Then don't complain about it nanny-ing you, or alternatively download
TF the mind-reading plug-in.

.
TF outlaw OE/OL and you have the main problem fixed. Why are we
TF discussing this here, by the way?

Mmmm, sounds like I somehow touch a sore spot.
Better stop this discussion...

-- 
Best regards, Tony  

Expressing anger is a form of public littering. 



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus Scan msg on mail check - Exploit-MIME.gen.exe

2003-06-10 Thread Maurice McAdam
Hello Marck,

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:38:55 +0100 GMT
(10.06.2003, 11:38 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:

Snip
MDP 3) Get shot of McAffee and instead use an AV solution
MDP that has a TB plug in and won't interfere with normal
MDP operation. NOD32 is generally acknowledged as the best
MDP while Kaspersky is also known to be good. I personally
MDP use AVG, although many don't rate it very highly.

I have been quite happy with AVG (the free version), but on
two recent occasions it detected viruses which arrived,
through one of the children using Kazaa.

Each time, I received a msg saying that my computer had a
virus and that I should run AVG. Which I did. However, I was
never given the opportunity to put the infected file in the
vault, or to disinfect it. AVG continued to tell me my
computer was infected. But could do nothing about it.

Do you think that's because I had the free version?

Regards,
Maurice

-
Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows XP 5.1 Pro
 on a Pentium 2 with 512MB.



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus Scan msg on mail check - Exploit-MIME.gen.exe

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello David,

Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 2:26:49 PM, you wrote:
DB 6.02.3000.1

DB Thanks for the info. I've found the message on my server and deleted
DB it.

DB Won't excluding the bat*.temp files within McAffee cause an infection
DB if I do receive dodgy mail?

I actually use the HAWK feature of McAfee to scan e-mails. And, if
McAfee found a virus by scanning the temp files, then sure it would be
unwise to exclude them. I didn't have a problem with them, so I never
excluded them in McAfee.

-- 
Best regards,
 Daniel 



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Virus checking on outgoing mail

2003-01-27 Thread Mark Wieder
Basically what Allie said here. Not that I can resist adding my own
two cents...

IMNSHO scanning outgoing email is a useless function.

Here's the reasoning:

1. If your virus scanner is doing its job (and you have it enabled to
check incoming emails as well as doing realtime checking when you
insert a floppy or some such action) then your system won't contract a
virus. The Bat! also prevents you from doing some stupid things that
might endanger your system.

2. Your virus checker should be checking your system in real time to
ensure that there isn't a virus in memory. If you're not running your
system with a virus hiding in memory somewhere, then your outgoing
mail won't be infected any more than the files you save onto your hard
disk.

3. If there *is* a virus in your system's memory that your virus
checker hasn't caught (because it's not in its current virus
definitions table) then it won't catch it when you send out emails,
either.

That said, I run NOD32 on my server and Norton on my client systems
just to be doubly safe (with outgoing email checks turned off). NOD32
has caught several parasites coming in on emails and nothing has
penetrated as far as the NAV checks, but one can never be too
paranoid.

-Mark Wieder

 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
-- 



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Virus Plugins

2003-01-17 Thread Olivier Dutertre
Hello 3w,

Does anyone on this forum heard about compatibility issue between the
bat 1.61 and Kaspersky AV plugin ?
I made a deinstall-reinstall procedure and the problem still remains.
Any comment ?

Le Thursday, January 16, 2003, à 7:53:40 AM, vous avez écrit:

3 Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 6:58:20 PM, you wrote:

   What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?

3 I used the following software in the past 2 years, each of it for a
3 longer period of time, all full versions:

3 G Data Antiviren Kit 11
3 Great software, test winner in c't and several other journals. Finds
3 almost everything, uses pop.server for mail client. TB! hung several
3 times (every 3rd time or so) when more than 1 account had mail.
3 Several demands to support only produced 'help for dummies' - they
3 just wouldn't believe that their software didn't work as expected.
3 The system-performance is MUCH SLOWER because of the OnAccess scanner
3 (I had it always on). Had problems once with a virus test, Marck
3 helped me out (thanks for that ;-)).

3 Kaspersky Professional
3 Works with plugin, great scanner, system slow, really confusing
3 interface if you're used to other software e.g. G Data.

3 Norton AV
3 IMHO: Just forget about them, didn't made me lucky at any time.

3 AVG
3 The only one that's free!!! for personal use. Doesn't slow down
3 the system too much, what I almost prefer most. Works with plugin for
3 TB! (and works fine on my systems!). Maybe not the best scanner
3 (following the test results), but in my experience and the ones of
3 many others on this list it catches quite a lot.

3 This was a bit of a longer answer, but I thought it could be helpful
3 for you. I recommend AVG and the use of 'your brain', the best AV-tool
3 on the market. ;-)))

3 3w


3 
3 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
3 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



-- 
Cordialement,
 Oliviermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Virus Plugins

2003-01-15 Thread Timothy Casten
I have tried NAV 2002 and 2003 and have a problem with timeouts due to its e-mail 
scanning.

The problem is that I maintain both of NATCAS big Internet servers.

One we use as a e-mail server running mailsite and the other as a web server.

We use sieve filters for virus protection in the e-mail system, and the way that they 
work is that when they find a suspicious e-mail it blocks the e-mail and sends it to 
the postmaster account on the mailserver.

I then have to download the postmaster account via the bat and this just drives Norton 
crazy, as every e-mail contains a virus and Norton ends up causing the connection to 
timeout.  I have the need to download and inspect the emails to insure the sieve 
filters are working properly.

I do the same thing for spam i have sieve filters for it also.

I talked to Norton about the problem and they advised they know of the problem but 
they don't have the fix. :(

So I'm looking for an alternative, preferably one with a good log file.

I am trying the free version of AVG but can't find the log file or it doesn't seem to 
produce one for e-mail scanning.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Virus filtering

2002-06-12 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]


ACM However, TB! will search only the headers and text body for
ACM matching strings.

Yes, but Allie, those infected attachments are referenced in the header by the
strings that Mitja defined. It's for those references that Mitja was
setting up a filter.

Looking at the source of some infected messages that just came in, I
find strings like: name=Rescue.bat and name=Wyugm.pif.

Best,

-Daan-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re[2]: Virus filtering

2002-06-12 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]


Hi Allie,

ACM on examination of the source, if I look *after* the message body
ACM where TB! doesn't search,

Now I see! I'm still used to a different representation of internet
headers (from using Compuserve for years, where they are translated and put
below the message body, along with any kludges and attachment headers).

I thought I'd found an easy way to sort viruses to the trashcan.. oh
well :)

I've decided not to do any POP scanning. I prefer to have as few tasks
running in the background as possible. I couldn't get NOD32 to work
with the beta NOD32.BAV plugin (and it didn't impress me as a fully
developed program), so I think I'll stick with good old Kaspersky and
switch to their AV toolkit v4 which is said to have a TB plug-in. Is
anyone on the list using KAV and their plugin to good (or bad) effect?

Thanks,

-Daan-

--no strings attached :)



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-03 Thread Raj

Syafril,

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, at 19:16:07 [GMT +0700] (which was 5:46 PM where I live) you
wrote:

SH AFAIK  AVP  from  Kaspersky  Labs  can  detect  viruses  even  we  set
SH attachment  inline message body (not in separate directory/folder). My
SH Av on Mail Server also using Kaspersky Labs AV Engine.

Honestly I found this a little tough to configure. A very steep learning curve.

I  likes  AVGMcafee  (with  TB) because they do not check for Viruses while
downloading  (if  TB is configured to keep attachments in the body).

TB  will not allow me to open a file with multiple secondary names forcing me to
save it. Which is when the Av programme does its work.

So   downloads   of  mail  can  be  done  w/o  manual  assistance  and  I  have
adequate protection.

-- 
Warm regards,
Raj

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why is it that to stop Windows Operating System, you have to click on Start?


Replied on Monday, December 03, 2001 using TB Ver 1.54/10 on Windows NT


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Kevin Conlin

Sunday, December 02, 2001, Kenneth S. Rhee
In Regards to Virus 


KSR Hello Kevin,

KSR 2  Dec 2001, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote:


KSR What virus?  I don't think I have received such e-mail lately.



The  Virus  is  the  W32.Badtrans  Virus,  Quite a
Dangerous  one which goes through the address book
and  Emails  all  contacts, i believe this is what
has happened.


Regards,

Kevin Conlin

-- 

Kevin Conlin.
http://www.DarkServ.Net
BT Operator - UK
Running The Bat 1.53t on Windows NT 5.0

-- 



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Eric Malausséna

Hi Jan,

On dimanche 2 décembre 2001 at 23:34:24, you wrote :

Eric I confirm. With AVP, the message couldn't be
Eric downloaded and I had to delete it on the server.
Eric It is I.Worm.BadrtransII as registered by AVP.

JR   Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the
JR   message from downloading to your machine?

Not exactly. AVP prevented message to arrive in the Incoming Box.

When The Bat! download the message, a batxx.tmp file is created before
in temp directory and then converted in real message incoming box.
AVP warned when the batxx.tmp file was created and prevented The Bat!
access to it. So The Bat! was unable to put this message in Incoming
Box.

I just had tmp files (inoffensive) created in TEMP directory.
In the same time, this message was not deleted from the POP server
probably because the process was interrupted by AVP.

So, I had to delete it whith the Server Manager. Until that, The Bat!
was trying to re-download it each time it was collecting POP3... and
each time, a new temp file was created...

-- 
Regards,
 Ericmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.54/10 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600 


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Virus On Mail Check

2001-12-01 Thread -=Too.!=-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Que tal Marcel,

...and erase your windows\temp directoy

- --


  |\  /^~~^\  /|
 -qqQ-\O||O/-Qpp---=Siguiendo el tema=---
   \oo/
~~
 El Viernes 30 de Noviembre de 2001 a las 22:40:53 GMT (osease, a las 3:40
PM en mi México lindo), Marcel en el mensaje con tema: Virus On Mail
Check comento (por lo menos en parte y quiza acotado por mi):

M So Markus was right.
M After you've found out that an infected message is sent, delete it
M from the server manually, either by webmail, or the mail dispatcher.
Yes :-)


- --d--b-=Fin de la copia del mensaje=-
()
   \()/
\/
- --

 -=ToÑo.!=-

'Lo horrendo de los verdaderos infiernos es que tienen una ventana por la
que se ve el paraíso' (Enrique Solari)


,,, (^;^) ,,,__

 -=ToÑo.!=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ-UIN:50036143
Llave PGP http://a_mi_go_.4d2.net
__w__w_



The information contained in this transmission, which may be
confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended
recipients.
Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone
or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this
transmission
and the reply from your electronic mail system.
///
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.

¢

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: Apasionate y Apasiona

iQCVAwUBPAkUkIPdrd6lx+FTAQG4OQQArtTBvaHguKhr+iMI/8bP1YyaluyjyzUD
uq7OH290owiB1XO2wLGqW+yhr8S3HKkMN6EhkifzNKfMCnm0hOBydl2dOV25tfT8
X/SSB8eqtqZshA5g8IU7LqljRHb+k41qlDqocdIDOuJJtdGn5xT7To2EOZPtoupG
BgajlChoRZ8=
=NJPk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re[2]: Virus

2001-09-05 Thread Raj

Nick,

On Wed, 05 Sep 2001, at 17:20:55 [GMT -0700] (which was 5:50 AM where I live) you
wrote:

 looks like an error in CAI's virus-signature file ...

NA Why are you so sure it's in error? Perhaps you really *are* infected. I
NA would run another Anti-Virus Program... sort of second opinion if you
NA will. 

For  everybody information : I just ran Mcafee on TB specifically and my entire Hard 
Disk.
Glad to report that no Virus was detected in TB (or my machine)


-- 
Warm regards,
Raj

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Replied on Thursday, September 06, 2001 using TB Ver 1.53d


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[2]: Virus checking turning OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

2000-06-08 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk

Hello Thomas and Batmans,

THANK UU, my savior !

 Hi Alexander,

 On 8 Jun 2000 14:33:08 +0500GMT (08/06/2000, 17:33 +0800GMT),
 Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:

AAG   I can't endure it anymore ! Please tell me where i can turn off
AAG   question box concerning viruses in attaches ?!

 In the registry, look for Current_User/Software/Ritlabs/TheBat, and
 look at ProtectAllowOpen, ProtectWarnOpen, and ProtectDisableOpen.

 I have killed these warnings here too - I do look at the file
 extension before I click onto anything, and I get many Word and Excel
 files every day. I KNOW a .doc file can contain a virus, and I DON'T
 run anything called Happy99.exe. Besides, it would be easy to just
 rename the virus.



Regards, Your sincerely registered
3AHO3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]|2:5012/18.2

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: Virus checking turning OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

2000-06-08 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk

Hello Patrick and Batmans,



AAG   I can't endure it anymore ! Please tell me where i can turn off
AAG   question box concerning viruses in attaches ?!

AAG Regards, Your sincerely registered
AAG 3AHO3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]|2:5012/18.2
^^^
is this still FIDO? god bless you! ;)

 ...i remember the time... (la la la la la) ;)

U Do ? Oh great !  It still working :) I don't no what for :)))





Regards, Your sincerely registered
3AHO3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]|2:5012/18.2

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org