Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Roelof Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 4:26:04 PM, you wrote: RO In that case you could create a filter that exports a message to a RO file with a template that adds a reply-to header and that imports the RO message in the right folder via 'execute external program' Interesting approach :) I thought I was missing a simple way to do it, but apparently not. I'll give Nick's suggestion a whirl and come back to this if it doesn't work. Thanks Roelof. Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Nick Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 5:05:16 PM, you wrote: NA Hmmm? I think I misread your Posting... sorry for confusing you. I too NA have one such List that I had to create a Folder level Template to NA overcome this. As Roelof mentioned, you have to fool around with your NA To: address. Here is how I changed mine to work: NA %TO=%TO=GnuPG Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this a folder template or address book? And just to make sure, there *are* supposed to be two TO's in there, right? (unusual syntax, with the apparently unbalanced quotation marks :)) Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Roelof Thursday, November 20, 2003, 10:06:23 AM, you wrote: RO A folder template. damn :) RO There must be two %To macros, but if you look again, you'll see that RO the quotation marks are balanced. RO The %To macro adds an address to the To: header, the only exception is RO when you're using %To=, that clears the To: header. RO What the macro above does, could be placed on two lines: RO %TO=%- RO %TO=GnuPG Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] RO First you clear the To: header, then you add an address. ah ok..now it makes sense. The two quotation marks after the first %To are meant to represent an empty field. The way it was written, it wasn't clear. Thanks! Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Roelof Thursday, November 20, 2003, 10:08:28 AM, you wrote: RO That would be my way too, but you insisted on 'no folder templates'. RO ;-) Well, all Marck's admonitions on how evil they are were bound to have some effect! Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Nick Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 3:31:19 PM, you wrote: NA Use the following macro in your AB Template to force the Reply-To header NA to reflect the List Address... use for both New Messages and Replies: NA %ReplyTo=Actual List Address I've already tried that. Didn't work, I'm afraid. Would you know why? Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: setting reply-to for a particular mailing list
Hi Edgar Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 4:57:55 PM, you wrote: E - Is the mailing list address in the original header? Yes, it's in the To address field. E - Is there a sort of mark in the subject like [group]? I looked for that too but there isn't. Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
