Re[4]: Virus checking on outgoing mail
Joseph- Thanks. I was going to add that, too, but forgot about it in the process of writing the other points. It's very easy to add something to a tagline signature... - This message has been checked by my superduper virus checker. It doesn't have one. Don't you feel better now? - -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Virus Plugins
I can do that in Mailsite also Mike. I can have it deliver the infected e-mail or deposit it in a folder on the server or do both. I just prefer downloading it every day. Just a preference of mine. -- Happy New Year, Timbo Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZDC Area 5 Rep. 703.606.2379 NATCA National Communications Chairman NatcaNet Administrator Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 7:52:57 PM, you wrote: > Can I just ask - what surprises me in what you have said is that you > don't have a sheep dip server dealing with the mail first? That would > enable all virus loaded files to remain on that computer and only > notifications to be sent to the Postmaster. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Virus
Eric, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, at 06:42:41 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:12 AM where I live) you wrote: EM> I explained in a message above that AVP warned when a temp file was EM> created and when The Bat! tried to convert it in a message (wich EM> contains an attachment which is executable)... and AVP detected it. I also got the message and AVG did not detect it. However let me add that Ihave configured TB to keep attachments in the message body and Mcafee also did not detect. So my question Have you configured to attachments outside message body. When you say AVP- u mean Anti Virus Programme or any specific package. -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw Replied on Monday, December 03, 2001 using TB Ver 1.54/10 on Windows NT -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[4]: Virus
2 Dec 2001, Kenneth S. Rhee In Regards to Virus KSR> Hello Kevin, KSR> 2 Dec 2001, 3:02:05 PM, you wrote: KC>> The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a KC>> Dangerous one which goes through the address book KC>> and Emails all contacts, i believe this is what KC>> has happened. KSR> I'm familiar with it and my NAV 2002 has that within its definition. KSR> What I'm saying is that I have not received any e-mail sent by KSR> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thats OK, i see a few users have, and i suspected it was on the list, which it obviously has turned out to be. Regards, Kevin Conlin -- Kevin Conlin. http://www.DarkServ.Net BT Operator - UK Running The Bat 1.54 Beta/14 on Windows NT 5.0 -- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[4]: Virus
"David, On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, at 11:05:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:35 PM where I live) you wrote: DRA> But then Norton AV found me to be clean, too. What gives> Like Nick suggested may be its time to get a second opinion. Maybe try out one of the online Virus Scan available. -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Replied on Thursday, September 06, 2001 using TB Ver 1.53d -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
