Re: Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Mark,

@23-Aug-2003, 07:57 Mark said to Jonathan:

 ... What happened was that the download just stopped on previous
 Angliss emails, and required killing the Bat from the task list. I
 guess it might be an AV problem rather than a BAT problem.

It is. When the AV spots a suspected virus, it's locking the file
which leaves TB high and dry - it was in the middle of using that
file and didn't expect to have the rug pulled quite so firmly from
under its feet.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.0 Beta/3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBP0c3KDnkJKuSnc2gEQKU+ACg5jyKtFkwaqe3QqyD4BMJvi6Aev4AnRHs
VlWIOs5lDBFRlMGqwvTtrQdD
=43Cj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-22 Thread Mark
Dear Bats

For rome reason email messages from Jonathan Angliss Kill the bat
stone cold on downloading (requiring a rest). Deleted from
server, and then the next from Jonathan does the same.

Any idea why?? - I can't get one of his emails to see if the
headers are strange or anything.

Mark



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-22 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

M Any idea why?? - I can't get one of his emails to see if the
M headers are strange or anything.
All OK here. Here's the headers from one of his messages received
today...

,- [  ]
| Received: from ngfire.ngcomms.ecs.uk ([10.10.100.1]) by 
mercury.estatecomputers.co.uk with Microsoft
| SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
|  Fri, 22 Aug 2003 04:31:36 +0100
| Received: from mail pickup service by ngfire.ngcomms.ecs.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
|  Fri, 22 Aug 2003 04:31:47 +0100
| Received: from draenor.its-toasted.org ([127.0.0.1]) by ngfire.ngcomms.ecs.uk with 
Microsoft
| SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
|  Fri, 22 Aug 2003 04:31:45 +0100
| Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=draenor.its-toasted.org)
| by draenor.its-toasted.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
| id 19q2f9-0005PX-00; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 05:32:31 +0200
| Received: from netdork.net ([66.137.233.211] helo=vampire.netdork.net)
| by draenor.its-toasted.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
| id 19q2et-0005M9-00
| for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 05:32:15 +0200
| Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
| by vampire.netdork.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEF6A816A
| for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:32:12 -0500 (CDT)
| Received: from vampire.netdork.net ([127.0.0.1])
| by localhost (vampire.netdork.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
| with ESMTP id 08362-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
| Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:32:10 -0500 (CDT)
| Received: from valcor.corp.local (c-67-166-207-248.client.comcast.net
| [67.166.207.248])
| by vampire.netdork.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FE5A8169
| for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:32:10 -0500 (CDT)
| Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:34:32 -0500
| From: Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.0 Beta/3)
| Organization: Netdork Inc
| X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
| Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: Nick OHare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netdork.net
| Subject: Re: Sobig.f filtering
| X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
| Precedence: list
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| List-Id: tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
| List-Unsubscribe: http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl,
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| List-Subscribe: http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl,
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2003 03:31:45.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[E963E0B0:01C3685D]
`-
- --
Stuart

Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... As I said before, I never repeat myself.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0

iQA/AwUBP0YH19ttnLhkydF1EQLJ0gCgt8WVYm1I6xblKWj3LYZ4rQqHT7EAoMxt
iDSWe9XJdJQ5m6YkOAb15sPI
=C+MM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Estate Computer Systems Limited
Westgate House, Westgate, Sleaford, Lincolnshire, NG34 7RJ
Registered in England No 1604453. VAT No. 416 2922 63

ECS are members of the following trade organisations:
The Microsoft Certified Partner Programme, The Borland User Group, and PISCES 
(Property Information System Common Exchange Standard)

To find out more about ECS why not visit our website http://www.estatecomputers.com

The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the intended recipient 
only. If you know you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disclose 
the information in any way and please delete this email (and any attachment from your 
system).  

See http://www.estatecomputers.co.uk/email.htm for our full E-mail communication 
conditions.

(If the above URLs do not appear as links you may need to copy the details into your 
browser address line to access these pages).



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Mark,

@22-Aug-2003, 12:51 Mark [M] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

M For rome reason email messages from Jonathan Angliss Kill the bat
M stone cold on downloading (requiring a rest). Deleted from
M server, and then the next from Jonathan does the same.

M Any idea why?? - I can't get one of his emails to see if the
M headers are strange or anything.

This was mentioned earlier. His mails carry the 'SOBIG' marker of
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean. If you are filtering on that,
add a Sender: Angliss ... No filter.

If you have a live mail scanner, then you'd be better off using a
TB friendly AV program with a plug-in to let TB scan the mails
rather than have the IP data stream suddenly vanish mid-mail. The AV
you're using sounds like it could be a bit overzealous.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.0 Beta/3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBP0YTEjnkJKuSnc2gEQK5VQCgxdIP8J7njRojOJMegYxza/p1nzcAoIq1
wSP/0Y6aGn/jUq06Inox/+Wy
=dD4k
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-22 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Friday, August 22, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 This was mentioned earlier. His mails carry the 'SOBIG' marker of
 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean. If you are filtering on that,
 add a Sender: Angliss ... No filter.

It shouldn't be any more... I changed mail server and the new mail
scanner uses a different header. If it's still picking up that one,
then I've probably messed up a setting somewhere. However, if a filter
on X-Mailscanner can kill TB dead, might that be considered a big
bug?

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Remember, to a computer 1 + 1 = 10.

Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Rogue emails on this TBUDL

2003-08-22 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Friday, August 22, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

 This was mentioned earlier. His mails carry the 'SOBIG' marker of
 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean. If you are filtering on that,
 add a Sender: Angliss ... No filter.

Just because I'm nice, and don't want to kill anybody, nor get false
positives from silly admins... I've updated my server, it now reports
a different string when sending mail through my old work server. My
own mail server reports a completely different string anyway, so I've
not updated that one.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Ensign Walnut approaches Dr. Crusher with caution

Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html