Re: Server error 5.7.1: missing or literal domains not allowed
Hallo Leonard, On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 01:03:40 -0500GMT (3-3-2010, 7:03 +0100, where I live), you wrote: I have, so far, three people with whom I correspond to whom I cannot reply. The message that is returned is: Server reports error. The response is 5.7.1. Missing or literal domains not allowed. So what happens if you compose a reply as normal, then delete the contents of the To: field and copy back in from the address book entry? LB I just tried it, with the same result: the error quoted above. What if you create an AB reply template for these people that uses this macro: %To=''%To='%ABOFromName %OFromAddr'%- The rest of your address book reply template can be the same as your regular reply template -- Groetjes, Roelof !sdohtem noitpyrcne devorppa-tnemnrevog troppus I http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.2.35 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpHZI4nnAxJb.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Server error 5.7.1: missing or literal domains not allowed
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:51 AM, MFPA expires2...@ymail.com wrote: Hi On Wednesday 24 February 2010 at 3:09:09 PM, in mid:8189c7c31002240709h558abcf2i84ac2a921a51e...@mail.gmail.com, Leonard Berkowitz wrote: I have, so far, three people with whom I correspond to whom I cannot reply. The message that is returned is: Server reports error. The response is 5.7.1. Missing or literal domains not allowed. I can send e-mail to these people directly out of my address book to exactly the same address. My work around is to compose a response as I normally do and then copy and paste the text into a new message. This is a pain. So what happens if you compose a reply as normal, then delete the contents of the To: field and copy back in from the address book entry? I just tried it, with the same result: the error quoted above. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Reply to leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Server error 5.7.1: missing or literal domains not allowed
I have, so far, three people with whom I correspond to whom I cannot reply. The message that is returned is: Server reports error. The response is 5.7.1. Missing or literal domains not allowed. I can send e-mail to these people directly out of my address book to exactly the same address. My work around is to compose a response as I normally do and then copy and paste the text into a new message. This is a pain. If the problem spreads to other people's addresses, it will be a big pain. I will appreciate any wisdom that can be shed on this problem. Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Reply to leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Server error 5.7.1: missing or literal domains not allowed
Hi On Wednesday 24 February 2010 at 3:09:09 PM, in mid:8189c7c31002240709h558abcf2i84ac2a921a51e...@mail.gmail.com, Leonard Berkowitz wrote: I have, so far, three people with whom I correspond to whom I cannot reply. The message that is returned is: Server reports error. The response is 5.7.1. Missing or literal domains not allowed. I can send e-mail to these people directly out of my address book to exactly the same address. My work around is to compose a response as I normally do and then copy and paste the text into a new message. This is a pain. So what happens if you compose a reply as normal, then delete the contents of the To: field and copy back in from the address book entry? -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com ETHERNET(n): device used to catch the Ether bunny Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
