Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-29 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Knappi,

Friday, May 28, 2010, 12:40:17 AM, you wrote:

 Tim Hamm schrieb:
 I am
 convinced it definitely has to do something with TB on my computer but
 what that is is very annoying to say the least.

 www.sysinternals.com

 do get process monitor and check what's going on.



 
 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Wow, that's a lot of information... what utility do you think I should
try to try and figure my TB issue?

-- 
Best regards,
 Timmailto:timh...@cox.net



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-29 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Tim,

Saturday, May 29, 2010, 9:34:02 AM, you wrote:

 Hello Knappi,

 Friday, May 28, 2010, 12:40:17 AM, you wrote:

 Tim Hamm schrieb:
 I am
 convinced it definitely has to do something with TB on my computer but
 what that is is very annoying to say the least.

 www.sysinternals.com

 do get process monitor and check what's going on.



 
 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


 Wow, that's a lot of information... what utility do you think I should
 try to try and figure my TB issue?


Never mind... that's what happens when you don't have your coffee in
the morning... duh

-- 
Best regards,
 Timmailto:timh...@cox.net



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-28 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello Rick,

Thursday, May 27, 2010, 8:30:26 AM, you wrote:

 That said, I always put messages in the Outbox and do not use
 immediate sending, so I don't care whether it takes 15 seconds. ;-)

 I am wondering if this isn't the normal behavior. I send some things
 out via Outlook Express. I watch the sent box and nothing appears
 immediately, it all takes a few second. The difference is there is no
 clock to watch.

 I would guess that even with email programs where the email seems to
 go immediately (The Bat does this too), it is still taking a few
 seconds to get out the door


This is bewildering and can't find a solution... as stated before,
Outlook and PocoMail send immediately but TB takes exactly 15 seconds
before processing the outgoing mail. I have tried this with only one
email address and no attachments and it still takes that long. I am
convinced it definitely has to do something with TB on my computer but
what that is is very annoying to say the least.

-- 
Best regards,
 Timmailto:timh...@cox.net



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-28 Thread Knappi

Tim Hamm schrieb:

I am
convinced it definitely has to do something with TB on my computer but
what that is is very annoying to say the least.


www.sysinternals.com

do get process monitor and check what's going on.




Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tim,

On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:21:35 -0700GMT (27-5-2010, 3:21 , where I
live), you wrote:

TH   When sending mail with smtp, why does mail take so long to queue
TH   before sending... Average length of time is over fifteen seconds for
TH   a single email.

I can't confirm that behaviour. Over here my messages disappear almost
instantaneously.  The  best  way to find the problem would be to check
the  logs.  Either TB's log or your server's log. I don't know whether
you've  got  access  to  the  latter  (most people don't), but you can
enable  protocol  logging for an account, send a message and check the
log.
You can enable protocol logging via the menu:
 Account  -  Properties  -  expand  the 'Transport' tree - Protocol logging 
- enable logging for the sending protocol
I've done that myself and for a single test message I'm getting this:
,- [  ]
| [10:21:31]  C: Connected to mail.otten.tv, port ***
| [10:21:31]  S: 220 otten.tv Ready for action (Mailtraq 2.16.0.2848/ESMTP)
| [10:21:32]  C: EHLO [192.168.1.12]
| [10:21:32]  S: 250-otten.tv
| [10:21:32]  S: 250-XFROMIP
| [10:21:32]  S: 250-SIZE
| [10:21:32]  S: 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5
| [10:21:32]  S: 250 AUTH=LOGIN
| [10:21:32]  C: AUTH CRAM-MD5
| [10:21:32]  S: 334 ***
| [10:21:32]  C: 
| [10:21:32]  S: 235 OK authenticated
| [10:21:32]  C: MAIL FROM:* SIZE=465
| [10:21:32]  S: 250 receiving from *
| [10:21:32]  C: RCPT TO:*
| [10:21:32]  S: 250 will send to *
| [10:21:32]  C: DATA
| [10:21:32]  S: 354 send the message, terminate with .
| [10:21:32]  C: Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:21:31 +0200
| [10:21:32]  C: From: Roelof Otten *
| [10:21:32]  C: Organization: E-mailaholics International
| [10:21:32]  C: X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
| [10:21:32]  C: Message-ID: 999769558.20100527102...@otten.tv
| [10:21:32]  C: To: Roelof Otten *
| [10:21:32]  C: Subject: tijd meten
| [10:21:32]  C: MIME-Version: 1.0
| [10:21:32]  C: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
| [10:21:32]  C: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
| [10:21:32]  C: 
| [10:21:32]  C: Hallo Roelof,=20
| [10:21:32]  C: 
| [10:21:32]  C:   Even de tijd meten.
| [10:21:32]  C: 
| [10:21:32]  C: --=20
| [10:21:32]  C: Groetjes, Roelof
| [10:21:32]  C: http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
| [10:21:32]  C: 
| [10:21:32]  C: .
| [10:21:32]  C: {470 bytes sent}
| [10:21:32]  S: 250 received the message, thanks
| [10:21:32]  C: RSET
| [10:21:32]  S: 250 clearing sender and recipient list, go ahead
| [10:21:32]  C: QUIT
| [10:21:32]  S: 221 have a nice day (SMTP Closing)
`-
I made some things unreadable with asterisks.
As  you  see,  the full message is included in the log, that's why you
shouldn't keep this setting enabled for a long time, the protocol logs
aren't trimmed automatically, so they might grow a lot.
Best way is to enable it, send a message, disable the logging again.
If  you don't see anything odd in the log, you could post it here, but
keep  in  mind  that  everything that's transmitted between server and
client  will  be  included,  so  you'd  better  garble  passwords  and
addresses before posting it on a public log.

I hope this helps.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Windows! The magic of turning a 486 into a Gameboy!
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.36.4
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgp83cdbiBpkt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-27 Thread Jim Kyle
 Test for On---
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, at 8:21:35 PM, Tim Hamm wrote:

 When sending mail with smtp, why does mail take so long to queue before
 sending.

I see similar behavior, but only when I have a fairly large file attached
to the message. Attachments have to be encoded before the message can be
sent to the server, and that long delay is the time it takes to do the
encoding. 

-- 
Jim Kyle

Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3 on VMWare Server 2 under Xubuntu 8.04.3
with AntiSpamSniper Version 3.0.1.2



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tim,

On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:21:35 -0700 GMT (27/May/10, 8:21 AM +0700 GMT),
Tim Hamm wrote:

TH   When sending mail with smtp, why does mail take so long to queue
TH   before sending...

It takes long over here only if there are many recipients. Apparently,
each domain is checked whether it exist, and only if all domains
exist, the mail is sent.

I don't know whether this is some setting on my SMTP server, or
whether it's TB!, and whether this is expected behaviour. Your DNS
server may be slow to check all these domains, too.

That said, I always put messages in the Outbox and do not use
immediate sending, so I don't care whether it takes 15 seconds. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.33.9
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3





Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-27 Thread Rick
 That said, I always put messages in the Outbox and do not use
 immediate sending, so I don't care whether it takes 15 seconds. ;-)

I am wondering if this isn't the normal behavior. I send some things
out via Outlook Express. I watch the sent box and nothing appears
immediately, it all takes a few second. The difference is there is no
clock to watch.

I would guess that even with email programs where the email seems to
go immediately (The Bat does this too), it is still taking a few
seconds to get out the door

-- 
Rick
It is a good rule in life never to apologize.
The right sort of people do not want apologies, and the wrong sort take a mean 
advantage of them.
- P. G. Wodehouse

v4.2.36.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Why TB Takes So Long To Queue Messages

2010-05-26 Thread Tim Hamm
Hello TBUL,

  When sending mail with smtp, why does mail take so long to queue
  before sending... Average length of time is over fifteen seconds for
  a single email. I've asked this question before but I never received
  any responses. I can use Outlook or PocoMail and send messages with
  smtp almost instantaneously but no so with TB. This has nothing to
  do with my mail server... something going haywire in TB. My settings
  are set to send immediately with no time delay.

-- 
Best regards,
 Tim  mailto:timh...@cox.net



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


So long.

2004-09-01 Thread Christopher Brown
Hi List.
In my experience, this list has been by far, the most professional, most 
enjoyable, most helpful, and most informative mailing list I've been a 
subscriber to.

Thanks for easing the pain. Unfortunately, even you all can't make up 
for current events.

So, I installed Thunderbird, and ran filters (filters!) on my IMAP inbox 
 without trouble. I was giddy. From my current perspective, it is a 
pleasingly boring program. And to quote Glen Frey, I'm already gone.

Thanks again, you all are a great group. Good luck, and so long!
--
Chris
using Thunderbird 0.7a

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html