Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Peter Ouwehand writes: Call me stupid, but what does OWA stand for ?? (yet Another Winblows Application ??) Outlook Web Access, I think ... the web-based client for Exchange. I just can't seem to rime email and some web app from M$ to be being called 'pretty nifty'. It's only necessary to separate logic and emotion, and it works. I don't consider any form of web access to e-mail to be nifty, but some people prefer it. On Lotus, yet another example: Lotus notes users replying to me. Ok, here's my answer in red (or whatever color they like, DUH ...) [Hey stupid, ever heard of _plain text_ ??? (or using an attachment)] That's a problem with a great many correspondents, not just those using Notes. I try to explain to my correspondents that plain text is always best. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello Leif Gregory everyone else, on 19-Mrz-2005 at 02:45 you (Leif Gregory) wrote: Ugggh.. That isn't good. We're finally migrating 4,000 users off Lotus Notes to Exchange, and I'm looking to keep TB instead of using OWA. Don't get me wrong. OWA is pretty nifty for a web app, but it doesn't have near anywhere the functionality I have with TB. You can still use IMAP to connect to your Exchange server - over the LAN it works pretty smooth, though you have to take care of some specialities like local vs. server-side sent mail folder, that sort of thing... -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The Salary Axiom: The pay raise is just large enough to raise your taxes. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello Peter Ouwehand everyone else, on 19-Mrz-2005 at 03:14 you (Peter Ouwehand) wrote: Call me stupid, but what does OWA stand for ?? (yet Another Winblows Application ??) Outlook Web Access. I just can't seem to rime email and some web app from M$ to be being called 'pretty nifty'. Problem is: it is not a plain web application, it requires Internet Explorer... there you go. On Lotus, yet another example: Lotus notes users replying to me. Ok, here's my answer in red (or whatever color they like, DUH ...) [Hey stupid, ever heard of _plain text_ ??? (or using an attachment)] Funny thing is that many gateways convert that Lotus Mail stuff to plain text... you think it looks horrible with the colors... nada, the plain text converted version is even worse. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Hell would be a small universe that we could explore thoroughly and fully comprehend. -- Timothy Ferris Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello Leif Gregory everyone else, on 19-Mrz-2005 at 02:45 you (Leif Gregory) wrote: We're finally migrating 4,000 users off Lotus Notes to Exchange, and I'm looking to keep TB instead of using OWA Sidenote - to use IMAP (or POP3) to connect to the Exchange server you have to butter up your Exchange admin to enable it on the server... :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Benchley's Law of Distinction: There are two kinds of people in the world, those who believe there are two kinds of people in the world and those who don't. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello Alexander, On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:51:39 +0100GMT Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK Problem is: it is not a plain web application, it requires Internet ASK Explorer... there you go. I avoid IE where ever I can and here it's possible. I can access my OWA both with firefox and mozilla. ASK Funny thing is that many gateways convert that Lotus Mail stuff to plain ASK text... you think it looks horrible with the colors... nada, the plain text ASK converted version is even worse. :-) full ack. -- Regards, Feli The Bat! 3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello tbudl, I'll be getting ready to play around with using TB to connect to MS Exchange 2003 in a few weeks (once they get their server built). Anyone played with this functionality yet? Any tips or trick or pitfalls? Thanks. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Tagline of the day: Energizer Bunny arrested, charged with battery. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hello Leif Gregory everyone else, on 18-Mrz-2005 at 22:38 you (Leif Gregory) wrote: Anyone played with this functionality yet? Any tips or trick or pitfalls? I only worked a little bit with IMAP. Using MAPI was totally horrible, TB would re-sync its folders every time I started another fetch/receive cycle... not funny with my Exchange mailbox at work that contains thousands of messages. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Physics is decidedly confused at the moment; in any event, it is much too difficult for me, and I wish I...had never heard of it. -- Wolfgang Pauli, 1925 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and MS Exchange 2003
Hi Alexander, On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, at 23:33:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 3:33 PM where I live) you wrote: ASK I only worked a little bit with IMAP. Using MAPI was totally ASK horrible, TB would re-sync its folders every time I started ASK another fetch/receive cycle... not funny with my Exchange mailbox ASK at work that contains thousands of messages. Ugggh.. That isn't good. We're finally migrating 4,000 users off Lotus Notes to Exchange, and I'm looking to keep TB instead of using OWA. Don't get me wrong. OWA is pretty nifty for a web app, but it doesn't have near anywhere the functionality I have with TB. -- Leif -:- TB Lists Moderator -:- PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F Tagline of the day: Born ugly and built to last. Roguemoticons - http://www.PCWize.com/thebat PCWSmileys- http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
