Re[2]: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hi David, On Friday, June 7, 2002, 5:08:15 PM, you wrote: David Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages. I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages. I am not an admirer of HTML messages (although sometimes I think I would like to be able to make text bold etc without using *s or whatever). But surely HTML messages are horrid because they are slow, and a security risk? Nowadays, I doubt many people are using anything less than a 28.8kbps modem and that can handle actually downloading HTML fine. I mean come off it - its 10K. :S -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: The Bat! Upgrades.
Dear Ben, Monday, June 10, 2002 at 10:07:09 AM you wrote: BK Nowadays, I doubt many people are using anything less than a 28.8kbps BK modem and that can handle actually downloading HTML fine. For me the problem is not the modem. We have ADSL. But I like to keep my messages, not all of course, but a lot of them, and then it takes up a lot of un-necessary space when there is a message.htm fil attached. -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... I appreciate the romantique gesture :-) ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60p (7Ba40-6E8D5) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hello Ben, On Monday, June 10, 2002 at 09:07:09 +0100, you wrote concerning 'The Bat! Upgrades.': ... I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages. I don't feel like going to debate about this, so if you want the pro's and con's of HTML messages look in the archives. This topic has been covered enough. -- Best regards, David ** VirusScan: MS Windows found. Delete? (Y/y) ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Recently, Ben Kennish squawked: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nowadays, I doubt many people are using anything less than a 28.8kbps Hi -- FWIW, at this moment, I connected at 21.6 . Yesterday was 19.2 . No cable, no DSL out here in rural Appalachia sigh - -- Bye Now, Robert D. Public Key located at: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x1D14AF5FBody=Please%20send%20keys The Bat!: 1.60q Windows ME 4.90.3000. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt 09 - b3 iQA/AwUBPQR70hUUkTAdFK9fEQJGoQCff831xkZ5XBF07OLuKJhjUjHXvaMAoPWU vWUTSW+7HZALpXyzEzmwv8mK =hSiO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Kennish [BK] wrote: ... BK I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages. BK I am not an admirer of HTML messages (although sometimes I think I BK would like to be able to make text bold etc without using *s or BK whatever). But surely HTML messages are horrid because they are BK slow, and a security risk? Just remember that when you send HTML, you often force the recipient to view the message in fonts and font sizes the recipient doesn't prefer or just finds plain difficult to read. I'm subscribed to a list where many of the participants post using HTML. I usually find the fonts used in the HTML formatting too small to read. I'm quite sure this is because I am running a 1600x1200 resolution. TB! isn't a browser and you can't just go into it's settings and optimize the font sizes when viewing the HTML messages where the font and font sizes have been defined as they usually are. I'm sure you've also visited web sites where even increasing the font size doesn't help much and you have to squint (*bad web page design*). With HTML mail, you take away the control from the recipient!! I think this is just as big a problem as bandwidth issues. TB!'s ability to strip the text out and present a plain text version to me is a godsend, or else I'd find it really difficult to read the messages from that list. Of course, asking that they not post in HTML would likely cause reactions like what's that guys problem anyway? as I've witnessed in the past. It's not surprising that they post viruses so often as well. These behaviours go hand in hand and stem from a common problem just ignorance. The person doesn't realise there's a problem with what they do. I know I may step on some toes here but it's true. :-)) sigh I'm not saying that HTML messages don't have a place but reconsider carefully why you're sending it and that taking away the recipient's control is worth the benefits. I'm sure those situations exist and the HTML formatted newsletters are always readable and well done. However, being able to enbolden the text is just not one of them. If I could just show you some of these messages I have, you'll be *immediately* convinced. A lot of emboldening and underlining it done, but I can't read the messages because the font sizes are usually so small!! :-) - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9BJtVV8nrYCsHF+IRAjvcAKDdQYJRYHKBgK/J3Phh2/itl5JqQQCgiPea XFvNK+EPkQF0TFquFv5Bx88= =DEgd -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
RE: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Kennish [BK] wrote: ... BK I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages. BK I am not an admirer of HTML messages (although sometimes I think I BK would like to be able to make text bold etc without using *s or BK whatever). But surely HTML messages are horrid because they are BK slow, and a security risk? Just remember that when you send HTML, you often force the recipient to view the message in fonts and font sizes the recipient doesn't prefer or just finds plain difficult to read. I'm subscribed to a list where many of the participants post using HTML. I usually find the fonts used in the HTML formatting too small to read. I'm quite sure this is because I am running a 1600x1200 resolution. TB! isn't a browser and you can't just go into it's settings and optimize the font sizes when viewing the HTML messages where the font and font sizes have been defined as they usually are. I'm sure you've also visited web sites where even increasing the font size doesn't help much and you have to squint (*bad web page design*). With HTML mail, you take away the control from the recipient!! I think this is just as big a problem as bandwidth issues. TB!'s ability to strip the text out and present a plain text version to me is a godsend, or else I'd find it really difficult to read the messages from that list. Of course, asking that they not post in HTML would likely cause reactions like what's that guys problem anyway? as I've witnessed in the past. It's not surprising that they post viruses so often as well. These behaviours go hand in hand and stem from a common problem just ignorance. The person doesn't realise there's a problem with what they do. I know I may step on some toes here but it's true. :-)) sigh I'm not saying that HTML messages don't have a place but reconsider carefully why you're sending it and that taking away the recipient's control is worth the benefits. I'm sure those situations exist and the HTML formatted newsletters are always readable and well done. However, being able to enbolden the text is just not one of them. If I could just show you some of these messages I have, you'll be *immediately* convinced. A lot of emboldening and underlining it done, but I can't read the messages because the font sizes are usually so small!! :-) Hi all. I started this thread and caused the HTML problem. I've just changed the settings in Outlook and this should now be HTML free!? Can you please confirm that I've been successful? Also, 1.60q has already hung on me a couple of times! Especially when going into sorting office. Any ideas why? Thanks all. Chris. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9BJtVV8nrYCsHF+IRAjvcAKDdQYJRYHKBgK/J3Phh2/itl5JqQQCgiPea XFvNK+EPkQF0TFquFv5Bx88= =DEgd -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote: ... I almost didn't find your text below since none of the original message was presented as a quotation and you appended your text right at the end of mine. moderator Anyway, appropriate trimming of text is a strict rule on this list. It makes reading messages a lot easier and most of all, makes the messages smaller and easier to download for those who pay a lot for their connections which are slower. /moderator WC I started this thread and caused the HTML problem. I've just WC changed the settings in Outlook and this should now be HTML free!? WC Can you please confirm that I've been successful? Yes, you have been. It's just that you need to tidy up the formatting. Text from the original message needs to made distinctly different from yours through prefixing. There should be a setting in Outlook to achieve this. WC Also, 1.60q has already hung on me a couple of times! Especially WC when going into sorting office. Any ideas why? I pass on that one. I don't know what would cause a hang while going into the filters configuration panel. :-/ - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9BKyQV8nrYCsHF+IRAg8NAKCsjOhTE94XcIE/YSbUOxNSJnvN3wCgoZqc 1/CP9Qf9GCduedI7xpFitPo= =lzVl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
RE: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote: ... I almost didn't find your text below since none of the original message was presented as a quotation and you appended your text right at the end of mine. moderator Anyway, appropriate trimming of text is a strict rule on this list. It makes reading messages a lot easier and most of all, makes the messages smaller and easier to download for those who pay a lot for their connections which are slower. /moderator WC I started this thread and caused the HTML problem. I've just WC changed the settings in Outlook and this should now be HTML free!? WC Can you please confirm that I've been successful? Yes, you have been. It's just that you need to tidy up the formatting. Text from the original message needs to made distinctly different from yours through prefixing. There should be a setting in Outlook to achieve this. Hi Allie, It was indented on my screen, but when it came back through to me, it appeared to have lost the formatting. :-( Should be better this time!? I tried using the prefixing, but I use Word to format my messages. The reason for this is that I include a lot of URL's in my mails. Instead of putting in a full address, I just add a short piece of text, i.e. The Bat! instead of http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/index.html;, therefore I can blend it into my sentences. Therefore, I've used the indent feature instead. Apologies to everyone for causing problems so far, I just wish I could use The Bat! to access my home e-mail here at work rather than having to use my work address and Outlook 2000! Thanks and further apologies, Chris. WC Also, 1.60q has already hung on me a couple of times! Especially WC when going into sorting office. Any ideas why? I pass on that one. I don't know what would cause a hang while going into the filters configuration panel. :-/ - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9BKyQV8nrYCsHF+IRAg8NAKCsjOhTE94XcIE/YSbUOxNSJnvN3wCgoZqc 1/CP9Qf9GCduedI7xpFitPo= =lzVl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ChristopherX, @10 June 2002, 06:54:09 -0700 (14:54 UK time) Weaven, ChristopherX wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, you have been. It's just that you need to tidy up the formatting. Text from the original message needs to made distinctly different from yours through prefixing. There should be a setting in Outlook to achieve this. It was indented on my screen, but when it came back through to me, it appeared to have lost the formatting. :-( Should be better this time!? No. The formatting doesn't survive. I tried using the prefixing, but I use Word to format my messages. Aha. That's probably why it's going so wrong. The reason for this is that I include a lot of URL's in my mails. Instead of putting in a full address, I just add a short piece of text, i.e. The Bat! instead of http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/index.html;, therefore I can blend it into my sentences. Therefore, I've used the indent feature instead. That won't work without the dreaded HTML to carry to formatting over. Even then it's not guaranteed. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9BLHjOeQkq5KdzaARAq4sAJ4zxWJSOckX1JaS63nrbf/VGfAR8ACg4ZGq OU2vtFnxm6PGj3pykYqYzR0= =RJFG -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote: ... WC Should be better this time!? No. It has lost it again this time, as you can well see. :-( The formatting is the same as your last message, over-quoting and all. There's no need to include my signature and the lists footers in your replies to the list. WC I tried using the prefixing, but I use Word to format my messages. Oh dear. I can't tell you not to use it, but as you can see it causes problems which isn't what you want, I'm sure. :-/ WC The reason for this is that I include a lot of URL's in my mails. WC Instead of putting in a full address, I just add a short piece of WC text, i.e. The Bat! instead of WC http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/index.html;, That's HTML. You're now trying to send plain text where you have to include the full URL's. WC therefore I can blend it into my sentences. Therefore, I've used WC the indent feature instead. But it doesn't appear in your plain text messages. WC Apologies to everyone for causing problems so far, I just wish I WC could use The Bat! to access my home e-mail here at work rather WC than having to use my work address and Outlook 2000! Outlook 2000 would work better if you use it's internal editor instead of Word. Word is for word processing and all you wish to do for e-mail is write some plain text. It seems like overkill to me, and even moreso, it doesn't work well since the formatting you wish to convey isn't transmitted when you send plain text which is what you would be sending in the majority of your e-mail messages. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9BLLbV8nrYCsHF+IRAk2aAJ40gNRTuYOZZRHowcLIY/FN9ayFhwCggc2D d/Hww0t7hKHceIXuEJb++gg= =BAbu -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hi Marck, on Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:17:38 +0100GMT (07.06.02, 18:17 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Ps. How many people are on this distribution list? MDP About 700. MDP moderator MDP Very few of whom like receiving HTLM mail. ;-) MDP /moderator Who is that?? SCNR ;-) -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Winamp currently playing: - silence - Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
On Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:08:15 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: 1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. No. When there is a new version you can only download the whole package or just the executable (from the beta site). It is possible that is his complaint. I've only seen Q as a full installation, and seem to recall that some of the Ns were that way as well. Just the executable would be a help. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
The Bat! Upgrades.
Hi, Im new to this QA thing for TB!, but now I know about it, I keep thinking of questions. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didnt work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? Until my next question, Chris. Ps. How many people are on this distribution list?
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hello ChristopherX, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 08:20:20 -0700 , you wrote concerning 'The Bat! Upgrades.': ... 1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. No. When there is a new version you can only download the whole package or just the executable (from the beta site). Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages. 2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? I never had problems with upgrading and my registration keys. AFAIK when you upgrade nothing changes in the registry so I don't know how this could happen. -- Best regards, David ** A pessimist is never disappointed. ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ChristopherX, @07 June 2002, 08:20:20 -0700 (16:20 UK time) Weaven, ChristopherX wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. No there isn't. 2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? It should always work. You should *not* uninstall before upgrading. The registration codes are held in the registry. Ps. How many people are on this distribution list? About 700. moderator Very few of whom like receiving HTLM mail. ;-) /moderator - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9ANylOeQkq5KdzaARAslyAJ4qfvbrdki5bi9PDdTJYTWWnNqVEwCfX2jr yXIIzoW1Vz/aD7Wl9nupYBI= =T+Qr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:20:20 AM, ChristopherX wrote: I'm new to this QA thing for TB!, but now I know about it, I keep thinking of questions. Chris, I know in another thread it was brought up that you are using Outlook 2000. Give this a try to turn off the HTML emails. Click Tools/Options, select the Mail Format tab. Select Plain Text in the message format dropdown. Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I seem to remember something about Exchange sending even Plain Text emails in HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... -- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60 RC/2 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Hello Dave, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:42:25 -0500 GMT (07/06/02, 23:42 +0700 GMT), Dave Gorman wrote: DG Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account DG or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I used TB with the Exchange Server at work. There is a switch that the admin can use to allow or disallow POP access, I understand. DG I seem to remember something about Exchange sending even Plain DG Text emails in HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... That's not correct, as I had asked all my collegues to turn off HTML in their OL, and it worked. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If work is so terrific, how come they have to pay you to do it? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hello Mark, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 09:54:24 -0700, you wrote concerning 'The Bat! Upgrades.': ... DvZ Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages. Actually, I didn't realize you could do this with TB without explicitly attaching a file. I didn't say you can did I? Because it's not possible with TB!. -- Best regards, David ** Kids-They're not sleeping, they're recharging! ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Hello Dave, DG Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account DG or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I seem to remember DG something about Exchange sending even Plain Text emails in DG HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... That depends on how you configure the Internet Mail Connector: you can also tell Exchange to send out every mail in plain text. Ciao, luigi Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Luigimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
--- Weaven, ChristopherX / Freitag, 07.06.2002, 17:20:20
The Bat! Upgrades.
This is a forwarded message
From: Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 7, 2002, 7:50:54 PM
Subject: Will someone please post this in TBUDL for me? TIA Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
===8==Original message text===
Hi Chris,
2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't
work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key
problems?
Upon installing/upgrading earlier versions of TB!, time and time again
I found that it was not registered once the installation/upgrade
finished.
*IF* this is what you are referring to, all you need to do is locate
the email which contains your registration key (sent to you upon
registration), click on it (you don't need to open it in a separate
window...just click on it as if you were reading it...), THEN: go to
HELP / ENTER REGISTRATION CODE. When the box comes up, your key and
everything EXCEPT the password should be in there. All you need to do
is enter your password and voila! It'll be registered again.
FWIW: I just upgraded from 1.53d to 1.60q, and did not have to enter
my registration #/code as I have had to do before. (And, IMHO, this
version is awesome! VERY different, MUCH more friendly and easier to
use. :) )
Blessings and light,
~~~Angel
--
Friday, June 7, 2002 10:42:32 AM
-={+}=-Senza fiduccia niente-={+}=-
| TheBat! 1.60q
| http://www.ritlabs.com
| on Windows 2000 5 Service Pack 2 (Win2K Pro)
| 1gHz 40Gb hard disk 512Mb RAM
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
