Re: PF-MIB for snmpd
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > Joel Knight writes: > >> Looks like there's an issue pulling the diff with lynx or curl. If you >> use Firefox or Chrome it seems to work fine. Not sure what's going on. > > looks clean when fetched with ftp(1) as well, didn't actually try > applying though. it's against a recent -current, right? Yes, you'll need a recent checkout of -current for this to apply cleanly. .joel
Re: PF-MIB for snmpd
Joel Knight writes: > Looks like there's an issue pulling the diff with lynx or curl. If you > use Firefox or Chrome it seems to work fine. Not sure what's going on. looks clean when fetched with ftp(1) as well, didn't actually try applying though. it's against a recent -current, right? - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: PF-MIB for snmpd
Looks like there's an issue pulling the diff with lynx or curl. If you use Firefox or Chrome it seems to work fine. Not sure what's going on. The diff is also on dropbox now. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34631638/snmpd.pf.diff On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Joel Knight wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the patch to bring the PF-MIB to snmpd. It provides the same > OIDs that my patches for net-snmp provide. Some differences: > > - This implementation uses the OpenBSD enterprise number (30155) > instead of a private/reserved number > - Many of the OID names have been changed to make them less ambiguous > and to avoid current or future naming conflicts (eg, "running" changed > to "pfRunning") > > I've been running this on a couple of boxes with no issues. The diff > is pretty long so I'm only going to post a link. > > Please test. > > http://www.packetmischief.ca/files/openbsd/patches/snmpd.pf.diff > > > > > .joel
PF-MIB for snmpd
Hi, Here's the patch to bring the PF-MIB to snmpd. It provides the same OIDs that my patches for net-snmp provide. Some differences: - This implementation uses the OpenBSD enterprise number (30155) instead of a private/reserved number - Many of the OID names have been changed to make them less ambiguous and to avoid current or future naming conflicts (eg, "running" changed to "pfRunning") I've been running this on a couple of boxes with no issues. The diff is pretty long so I'm only going to post a link. Please test. http://www.packetmischief.ca/files/openbsd/patches/snmpd.pf.diff .joel
