Re: [update] base zlib
Ah right if it relates to lib 1.2.8 that might do ... On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 19:41, Bryan Steele wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 07:32:23PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > There have been several diffs to update this already, they have been > > rejected (upstream using some things that were not wanted iirc). > > > > -- > > Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. > > IIRC Jonas Termansen's https://sortix.org/libz/ was once proposed as a > substitute. > > -Bryan. >
Re: [update] base zlib
There have been several diffs to update this already, they have been rejected (upstream using some things that were not wanted iirc). -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 14 July 2018 19:01:51 Marc Espie wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 06:15:59PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote: Hi, Just to anticipate things, the age of the version starts to show with some third party softwares, so I was thinking if we could update to the latest while keeping just the necessary code and backporting our internal changes. Kind regards. Did you get this thru a full build, including all ports ?... How about a diff instead of a brand new tarball ?
Re: [update] base zlib
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 06:15:59PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote: > Hi, > > Just to anticipate things, the age of the version starts to show with > some third party softwares, so I was thinking if we could update to > the latest while keeping just the necessary code and backporting our > internal changes. > > Kind regards. Did you get this thru a full build, including all ports ?... How about a diff instead of a brand new tarball ?
