Re: any work on port of rtw89? (realtek 8852 AE/BE/CE)
Mikhail Pchelin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:17:32AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > >I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding > > >these drivers to save double effort. > > > > Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double > > effort"? And how's that going. > > Linux80211 is a wrong approach to anyone who has ever cared about > software stability, but I don't care about those decisions, this layer > is sponsored work with specially appointed person, I can only wish a > good luck to him. For decades I've been hearing that FreeBSD wireless is better.
Re: any work on port of rtw89? (realtek 8852 AE/BE/CE)
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:17:32AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding > >these drivers to save double effort. > > Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double > effort"? And how's that going. Linux80211 is a wrong approach to anyone who has ever cared about software stability, but I don't care about those decisions, this layer is sponsored work with specially appointed person, I can only wish a good luck to him.
Re: any work on port of rtw89? (realtek 8852 AE/BE/CE)
>I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding >these drivers to save double effort. Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double effort"? And how's that going.
any work on port of rtw89? (realtek 8852 AE/BE/CE)
I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding these drivers to save double effort.