Re: MAXTSIZ removal?
In article <20201125210311.7wofo3mtipvfb...@yt.nih.at>, Thomas Klausner wrote: >There was a commit by christos that made MAXTSIZ optional, but >at least the amd64 vmparam.h still defines it. > >Any reason not to remove it? > >(I still can't start emulators/mame with a GENERIC without that change) > Thomas Nope I'll remove it, christos
MAXTSIZ removal?
There was a commit by christos that made MAXTSIZ optional, but at least the amd64 vmparam.h still defines it. Any reason not to remove it? (I still can't start emulators/mame with a GENERIC without that change) Thomas