Re: switching to sys/bus.h: the non-trivial patches
On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:21 PM, David Young wrote: For review, here are the remainder of the patches that switch the architectures with PCI support from machine/bus.h to a common sys/bus.h that includes MD machine/bus_defs.h and machine/bus_funcs.h. Please review, test, comment. Thanks. The bulk of this patch moves tons of inline bus_space(9) routines to appropriate .c files where they are not any longer inline. The changes to PowerPC involving BUS_DMA_DONTCACHE need to be reviewed. I have not included in the patch the changes to umpteen machine/types.h's that #define __HAVE_NEW_STYLE_BUS_H, or the deletion of umpteen machine/bus.h's. We aren't installing sys/buf.h anymore so why are installing bus_defs.h?
Re: switching to sys/bus.h: the non-trivial patches
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:21 PM, David Young wrote: For review, here are the remainder of the patches that switch the architectures with PCI support from machine/bus.h to a common sys/bus.h that includes MD machine/bus_defs.h and machine/bus_funcs.h. Please review, test, comment. Thanks. The bulk of this patch moves tons of inline bus_space(9) routines to appropriate .c files where they are not any longer inline. The changes to PowerPC involving BUS_DMA_DONTCACHE need to be reviewed. I have not included in the patch the changes to umpteen machine/types.h's that #define __HAVE_NEW_STYLE_BUS_H, or the deletion of umpteen machine/bus.h's. We aren't installing sys/buf.h anymore so why are installing bus_defs.h? I painstakingly got each PCI release to build, and that's what it took for alpha. *shrug* I can just let alpha break until somebody figures out why it wanted machine/bus.h in userland to begin with. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 344-0444 x24
re: switching to sys/bus.h: the non-trivial patches
I painstakingly got each PCI release to build, and that's what it took for alpha. *shrug* i really appreciate that you did all this work. it is the right way. I can just let alpha break until somebody figures out why it wanted machine/bus.h in userland to begin with. i also think this is the right thing :) thanks, .mrg.
Re: switching to sys/bus.h: the non-trivial patches
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:45 PM, David Young dyo...@pobox.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:21 PM, David Young wrote: For review, here are the remainder of the patches that switch the architectures with PCI support from machine/bus.h to a common sys/bus.h that includes MD machine/bus_defs.h and machine/bus_funcs.h. Please review, test, comment. Thanks. The bulk of this patch moves tons of inline bus_space(9) routines to appropriate .c files where they are not any longer inline. The changes to PowerPC involving BUS_DMA_DONTCACHE need to be reviewed. I have not included in the patch the changes to umpteen machine/types.h's that #define __HAVE_NEW_STYLE_BUS_H, or the deletion of umpteen machine/bus.h's. We aren't installing sys/buf.h anymore so why are installing bus_defs.h? I painstakingly got each PCI release to build, and that's what it took for alpha. *shrug* I can just let alpha break until somebody figures out why it wanted machine/bus.h in userland to begin with. Kind of experimental userspace bus_space(9) implementation which past architects envisioned?
