[tdf-test] Subject with Umlauts: äöüß

2013-05-06 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Text in body is fine, but some spam got there with subject ??? ???
(just questionmarks) - was it a broken mail, or is it a flaw in
moderation-handling?

This subject should read: Subject with Umlauts: äöüß

ciao
Christian

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: test+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-test] Test with image attachment

2013-05-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

let's see what the list does with an attachment - will that be sent to
moderators or dropped?

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 68 (315-316)

2011-10-17 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Sunday, October 16, 2011, wrote:

 Topics (messages 315 through 316):

 [tdf-test] Starting testing again
  315 - Alexander Werner a...@documentfoundation.org javascript:;

 [tdf-test] Starting testing again
  316 - Alexander Werner a...@documentfoundation.org javascript:;


Now I can reproduce the gmail-digest problem:
Gmail Offline for Chrome browser has a bug and doesn't display the content
neither in view mode, nor in reply mode.
But it is in beta anyway, and no sane person would use that mode to do
massive amount of mail reading/replying anyway (as it doesn't support
keyboard shortcuts and defaults to rich text/html reply that cannot be
turned off)

So just for mentioned for completion.

ciao
Christian

--
This mail was parsed by pymime,
and was sent from Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com to 
test@documentfoundation.org test@documentfoundation.org.



Re: [tdf-test] testlisten test :-)

2011-07-27 Thread Christian Lohmaier (klammer)
Mit klammer = Absender in 

Wer das hier liest ist doof.

--
This mail was parsed by pymime,
and was sent from Christian Lohmaier (klammer) 
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com to test@documentfoundation.org.



[tdf-test] Re: testlisten test :-)

2011-07-27 Thread Christian Lohmaier (klammer)
nochmal

--
This mail was parsed by pymime,
and was sent from Christian Lohmaier (klammer) 
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com to Libreoffice test-ML 
test@documentfoundation.org.


Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 43 (201-202)

2011-06-17 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi again,...

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 15/06/2011, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
 damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
 e-letter schrieb:
 On 12/06/2011, Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de
 wrote:

 This does not occur with gmail; all messages are _not_ received as
 attachments but as a single message

 So *GMAIL IS BUGGY*.

 No, the description is wrong of course the messages are /received/ as
 attachments, they are received as everybody else does. There are no
 special messages crafted for gmail users, the original source is the
 same for all.
 But gmail /*displays*/ them as a single message. Whether you consider
 this as a bug or feature is up to you :-)

 So gmail is breaking the (rfc?) convention? That makes this inline
 display behaviour a bug, in my opinion but probably a feature by
 others.

No. Read again. How it displays them is up to gmail. And whether or
not you consider this a bug of a feature is a matter of taste.

What definitely /IS/ a bug/lacking functionality though is the
possibility to treat the seperate messages as seperate, as would be
needed to properly reply in order to not break the thread.

 Interestingly, this message shows the original message content after
 activating the reply hyperlink; looking at the header and comparing
 with the digest mode message header, maybe the from address being
 test... is the cause.

No - you cited another one from test previously that according to your
description showed the problem.

 [request single message before replying]
 And this is the only way of not breaking the thread with gmail. That's
 the other reason why it is pointless to try to fix something here
 that is not broken on our end.

 In other mailing lists the thread is maintained if the subject text is
 copied, but may be broken if there is a small change in space
 characters.

No, it is not. It is for *you*, but only you, but not for those who
actually track threads by the proper headers.

When changing subject in gmail, it will always throw away all
References and In-Reply-to headers.

 Using gmail for mailinglists were you reply to is anti-social as
 written before, as you don't have a chance of keeping the thread. You
 will always break the thread on reply, messing the lists up for
 everyone, those who read it later in one of the archives, anyone who
 uses a threaded reader (and that also includes gmail, where threaded
 is more like collected by summary).

 Isn't relying on threads also weak when threads become long and may
 continue beyond the normal 1 month categories of mail archives?

That's the point of keeping the thread, to be able to continue reading it.
And mail-archives are out of the question here, how they handle
threading and display is up to them. 1month categories does men
absolutely /nothing/ to gmane or mail-archive.com

The month-categorization by classic archives just is a help for the
reader to be able to quickly locate a message when the user knows when
the mail was written. But with search becoming more powerful (and
affordable in terms of disk-space requirements and computing power
on the server that hosts the archives), this is no longer a real
issue.

But even if it was: Those who take part in the discussion are
affected, not only the archives.

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 43 (201-202)

2011-06-13 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi for the last time in this topic.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/06/2011, Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:

 From gmail view, I would expect them to say mailing list managers for
 R, gnuplot, claws-mail, imagemagick, etc do not delete the digest-mode
 message content when the reply hyperlink is activated. We suggest LO
 programmers investigate their choice of mailing list manager.

Again this is bullshit. Sorry, no nice words anymore as I've written
the same stuff often enough now.
* There is nothing wrong with the digests
* GMail does not strip anything when I reply in gmail.

Whatever the problem, it is at your end.
It definitely is nothing wrong with the messages sent from the LO
list. And it is not a general problem with gmail either. At least I
did never had a problem, not even with the digest-message of this list
you used as example.

 Noone at LO
 has indicated the type of mailing list manager used

mlmmj - but this has been written already in numerous places, and you
could just have asked for it.

 in order to make a
 comparison with other mailing lists and therefore it is a false
 conclusion to claim LO mailing list manager is 100 % perfect (didn't
 know such perfect software existed, but that is another discussion).

Let gmail display the original source, then you can inspect the message.
Should you be able to spot the slightest technical failure, I promise
I'll work my ass off to fix it.

But again: There is none.

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 42 (188-200)

2011-06-10 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Here, reply from gmail, without edits.

So it isn't even a problem of gmail, but only for you using gmail, as
my gmail doesn't have a problem replying with the content. Check
your labs or whatever settings.

ciao
Christian
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:00 AM,  test+h...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 Topics (messages 188 through 200):

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      188 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [tdf-test] Re: mlmmj administrativa
      189 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com
      190 - Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
      191 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com
      192 - Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
      193 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com
      194 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 41 (187)
      195 - Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      196 - Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      197 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      198 - Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      199 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [tdf-test] mailing list behaviour failure, Re: Digest of 
 us...@libreoffice.org issue 296 (6534-6563)
      200 - Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com



 Below is verbatim copy of the reply dialogue text box; note the
 disappearance of the messages!

 On 08/06/2011, users+h...@libreoffice.org users+h...@libreoffice.org wrote:
 Topics (messages 6534 through 6563):

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: sheet name font size
       6534 - T. R. Valentine trvalent...@gmail.com
       6550 - T. M. Hind II t.m.hi...@t-online.de

 [libreoffice-users] Latest 3.4 does not work on Server 2008 SP2
       6535 - Joe Siebenmann joes0...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Problem Copy Image From Website
       6536 - Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl

 [libreoffice-users] text frame
       6537 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] text frame
       6538 - Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de

 [libreoffice-users] text frame
       6539 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Recalculate/SUMPRODUCT takes too much time in
 Libreoffice 3.4
       6540 - pkatsoulis pkatsou...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Manager disc usage
       6541 - Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
       6544 - djfw davidjwhe...@yahoo.com

 [libreoffice-users] Latest 3.4 does not work on Server 2008 SP2
       6542 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Latest 3.4 does not work on Server 2008 SP2
       6543 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Re: SVG embedding in LibreOffice
       6545 - NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net

 [libreoffice-users] Error in libreoffice 3.4
       6546 - Wolfgang Maron wolfg...@wolfgangmaron.de

 [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Manager disc usage
       6547 - Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl

 [libreoffice-users] Install errors
       6548 - BudScan buds...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Release dates/versions
       6549 - plino pedl...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Installed 3.4.0, opens with document recovery...
       6551 - Darrell Gambrell drgambrell@hotmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Manager disc usage
       6552 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Installed 3.4.0, opens with document recovery...
       6553 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Installed 3.4.0, opens with document recovery...
       6554 - Darrell Gambrell drgambrell@hotmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: SVG embedding in LibreOffice
       6555 - Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: sheet name font size
       6556 - T. R. Valentine trvalent...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: SVG embedding in LibreOffice
       6557 - Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: sheet name font size
       6558 - Scott Castaline skotch...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Re: Re: SVG embedding in LibreOffice
       6559 - planas jsloz...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] help package installation failure
       6560 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] Any way to keep with previous in Writer?
       6561 - Wayne Stidolph wa...@stidolph.com

 [libreoffice-users] New Member
       6562 - Klaibson Ribeiro klaib...@gmail.com

 [libreoffice-users] help package installation failure
       6563 - Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com




 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org

Re: [tdf-test] test

2011-01-24 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@gmail.com wrote:
 test

Immer so geheimnisvoll, ohne Hinweis was Du gerade testest :-)

Immer noch die domain-keys?

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



[tdf-test] Re: debugging mail-archive-links

2011-01-19 Thread Christian Lohmaier
all good things...

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
 list-post address should not include  and 

 let's see...


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



Re: [tdf-test] Test: please ignore!

2010-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Randy,

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
 It may be redundant to say test.

 I'm trying to learn how to use the new (or older) archive headers, like
 Archive At,

If you want to use them for your own mailinglists, then refer to
http://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#listserver - there is described
how to create the hash.
It basically is a concatenation of msg-id and list-address, hashed
with sha1 and encoded with base64

 so I want to receive a few posts from this list.

As you're posting with gmail, you'r very likely in need for mails by
others, as you'll only see your mail as it left gmail, not as you
received it back from the mailinglist, so here we go :-)

In gmail, you have to use the show original mail feature to see the
header with the URL.

 I may
 have to ask someone else to post one, but I'll do that later if I have
 to.

When using gmail to send/read, yes, you need to ask someone else to post.

But if you're only interested in receiving some URLs: All the
libreoffice and documentfoundation mailinglists now have that header
added (the only list that does not is the developer list that is run
at freedesktop.org)

ciao
Christian

-- 
Dies ist ein Testfooter. Er enthält Umlaute und Sonderzeichen.
äüß ÖÄÜ

E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/test/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



Re: [tdf-test] Test: please ignore!

2010-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Randy,

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks very much! :-)  And for the other good information in your email!

 Randy Kramer

 PS: I was going to try to find out which list server software these
 lists use, but if you can tell me, it will save me some digging.  (I
 understand that Mailman supports RFC-5064.)

We use mlmmj - http://mlmmj.org/ but that by itself doesn't really
support hooking it up with the archive-at header and also has other
major limitations (as it will not handle cases where the footer
contains characters not available in the postings charset), thus we
use (used from the beginning) an additional filter in between
(pymime):
pymime can be foundhere: https://github.com/tdf/pymime

HTH,
ciao
Christian

-- 
Dies ist ein Testfooter. Er enthält Umlaute und Sonderzeichen.
äüß ÖÄÜ

E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/test/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



Re: [tdf-test] Wieder mal ne Testmail

2010-12-01 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Alex, *,

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Alexander Werner
a...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 Dies ist ein Test öäüß

Da antworte ich doch gleich mal drauf :-)

ciao
Christian


-- 
Dies ist ein Testfooter. Er enthält Umlaute und Sonderzeichen.
äüß ÖÄÜ

E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/test/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



[tdf-test] Changing the subject in gmail (was: test)

2010-11-23 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 test

Abusing this to double-check whether gmail is still removing the
references, or whether it just sorts the messages in the UI itself to
different threads/conversation groups

ciao
Christian


-- 
Dies ist ein Testfooter. Er enthält Umlaute und Sonderzeichen.
äüß ÖÄÜ

E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/test/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



Re: [tdf-test] noch ein testfooter

2010-11-21 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Alex, *,

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 幹得好!

Ja, wirklich gut gemacht :-) das Hangul/Koreanisch war google-Translator?

Der Abstand des Footer scheint mir ein bisserl groß, fügt da sowohl
pymime als auch der footer Selbst Zusätzlichen Abstand ein?

oder hattet ihr unter euren Postings schon alle selber 'ne Leerzeile?

ciao
Christian


--
Dies ist ein Testfooter. Er enthält Umlaute und Sonderzeichen.
äüß ÖÄÜ

E-mail to test+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/test/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted