Re: [Fedora QA] #187: proven tester request for iarnell
#187: proven tester request for iarnell --+- Reporter: iarnell | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by mcloaked): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: OK I have now sponsored you - hope you enjoy testing as a proventester. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/187#comment:3 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
groupinstall Window\ Managers
# yum groupinstall Window\ Managers ... Warning: Group window-managers does not have any packages. No packages in any requested group available to install or update is this the expected behaviour? -- The end is important in all things. -- *Yamamoto Tsunetomo* / *Hagakure* / *Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai* The beginning is the most important part of the work. -- *Plato * -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
rawhide report: 20110424 changes
Compose started at Sun Apr 24 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires hal callweaver-javascript-1.2.1-8.fc16.x86_64 requires libjs.so.1()(64bit) camcardsync-0.1.1-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) couchdb-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libjs.so.1()(64bit) cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit) db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0 dbmail-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit) dbmail-auth-ldap-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit) dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper emerillon-0.1.2-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.8.so.1()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.8.so.1()(64bit) exaile-0.3.2.1-1.fc16.noarch requires hal file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit) 2:gimp-2.6.11-8.fc16.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) glunarclock-0.34.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnomad2-2.9.4-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-music-2.5.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sshmenu-3.18-3.fc15.noarch requires ruby(panelapplet2) gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.8-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-3.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgweather.so.1()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires hal-devel = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(hal) gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires hal-devel = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(hal) gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires libhal.so.1 gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires hal = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires hal = 0:0.5.10 gnome-netstatus-2.28.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotdconduit.so.3()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotd.so.5()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotdcm.so.4()(64bit) gnome-python2-applet-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-burn.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-media.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-evince-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libevview.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-evince-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libevdocument.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-evolution-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit) gnome-python2-gdl-2.25.3-22.fc15.x86_64 requires libgdl-1.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-totem-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit) gnome-rdp-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient) = 0:2.0.0.0 gnotime-2.3.0-8.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit) gnubiff-2.2.13-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gold-2.1.12.2-5.fc15.noarch requires perl(Data::Properties) gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.6.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.6.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.2.0-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libgdl-1.so.3()(64bit) gyachi-plugin-libnotify-1.2.10-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit) hal-info-20090716-4.fc15.noarch requires
Re: Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 07:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: GNOME 2.0 came out in 2002, so we had that interface for nine years. It's not like no-one gave it a chance. Quite the contrary, people seem to like it and are confused when things that work are replaced with things that don't. Chris Adams upthread was on to something when he observed that GNOME3 isn't an upgrade over GNOME2, it is something new and different. Had it been honestly pitched that way everyone interested in GNOME could have known their favorite desktop project's maintainers had abandoned them over a year ago and made the decision to either step up and maintain it or put the effort into picking a new one. More importantly for the topic of a Fedora mailing list, had Fedora evaluated it as two events, the abandonment of the GNOME project and a new effort based on parts of the GTK and GNOME libs (kinda like XFCE) it is doubtful, as a new and immature effort at reinventing the desktop, it would currently be the default desktop for the Fedora project. As just another desktop spin there would be zero controversy over GNOME3. There would of course have been a major bikeshedding flameorama over which of the existing desktops would have been promoted to the new default. Viewed from an outsider's perspective the root of this problem seems to be too many of the dreamers behind GNOME3 are in RedHat and too deeply connected to the Fedora maintainers, also mostly walking the same cubefarm at RedHat. It would have been easier to tell some outside group they were getting kicked to an alternate spin and would have to compete to regain the default position purely on merit. Whether GNOME3 is a good idea for GNOME depends on whether there really is this mythical pool of new users they keep tossing their existing users over the side of the boat in a quest for. As someone who deals with public library users (currently on GNOME2) in a deeply rural area I can tell ya there aren't many totally virgin users left in the USA, so perhaps they are going for the third world. Perhaps they really are on the brink of bringing about 'the year of the Linux Desktop.' Either way, good for them because they are doing what they want to do and will either change the world or learn an important lesson. What isn't really debatable is that GNOME3 isn't a good fit for Fedora as very few Fedora users are going to be inexperienced new users. Few existing fedora users are looking for what GNOME3 is selling. Some might end up accepting it, but that isn't the same thing. Fedora should not be buying into a policy of chasing off existing or experienced users in the hope there are newbies waiting to jump in because that isn't Fedora's stated mission. The problem appears to be that there was never a debate so none of these questions were even asked until the release calendar had already imposed a commitment to ship GNOME3 as the default. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...
--- On Sun, 4/24/11, John Morris jmor...@beau.org wrote:
From: John Morris jmor...@beau.org
Subject: Re: Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 11:16 AM
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 07:50 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
GNOME 2.0 came out in 2002, so we had that interface
for nine years.
It's not like no-one gave it a chance.
Quite the contrary, people seem to like it and are confused
when things
that work are replaced with things that don't.
This is deja vu all over again with
sed -i 's|Gnome 3|KDE 4|'
People liked KDE 3.X too, but movement to 4.X was in the works and it happened
:)
I have had the opportunity to learn new things and new ways of doing things
with Gnome 3. I put it to the test with High School students. Some like it and
say that it is just different :)
Tomas M from Slax has written in his blog some interesting things about Gnome 3:
http://www.tomas-m.com/blog/18160-Gnome-3-better-than-KDE.html
He preferred KDE before now it is being challenged :)
I honestly think that each desktop has its place. I use many of them on my
machines
four use KDE, four use Gnome 3, two use XFCE two use LXDE. This are for some
of my machines at school.
While people are discussing the differences, it seems that we will have more
complaints coming like the KDE 4 series on Fedora 9 and now (not too many
people are complaining about KDE 4)*
Some things I have figured out on my own, like adding apps to the activities
section, moving windows to maximize and to split them (ala windows 7 and KDE
4.X), starting programs automatically(thanks to several kind folks), how to
shut down (press alt), this one seems strange, but I don't mind since I have
most of my machines automatically shutdown at 4:25 end of school day via a cron
job:) .
The people that have more say are paying customers of RHEL and some of them
might be here watching behind the scenes :)
Since the KDE disaster^{1} many people moved to Gnome :)
Now it seems that it could go the other way? or to XFCE? Interesting things
are going to happen. Some might even embrace the new refreshing Gnome 3
desktop.
Regards,
Antonio
{1} Fedora 9 testing cycle
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Multiple F15Beta bugs in under an hour
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:51 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: It's even easier than that. Click on the black title bar in the Display capplet and move it to the monitor you want it to appear on. Does that actually change the primary display or just move the bar? In other words, do other applications that want to pop things up on the primary display follow the bar when you drag it? Even if they aren't GNOME and or read gconf/dconf? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
GNOME 3 != KDE 4 (was Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...)
On 04/24/2011 02:11 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: This is deja vu all over again with sed -i 's|Gnome 3|KDE 4|' I keep seeing this comparison made, and I don't think that it's accurate. It's certainly true that the release of KDE 4.0 was terribly mismanaged, and the buggy/incomplete state of the code caused huge pain for KDE users. But releasing a product which is buggy and incomplete and telling users that they'll just have to wait to get their old functionality back is not the same as deliberately removing functionality and discoverability with no intention of ever restoring it. As incredibly (and unnecessarily) painful as the KDE 3.5-to-4.x transition was, the current incarnation of KDE is actually very usable. I can think of only one KDE 3.5 feature that I used that isn't present in KDE 4.6 -- different wallpapers per virtual desktop -- and I think it may actually be possible to achieve that by using activities. By comparison, if one believes the statements that have been made by GNOME developers in various blogs, mailing lists, etc., most of the features that people miss from GNOME 2.x are never coming back. This is very different. This is drifting well off-topic for this list, but the whole GNOME 3 == KDE 4 meme has been bugging me for a while. I feel so much better now. :-) -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Give Gnome 3 a chance!
Give Gnome 3 a chance! My first impression of Gnome 3 was awful. I came close to remove Fedora 15α on account of Gnome 3. However, I continued testing and gaining familiarity with the new program. Today, after almost two months using Gnome3 I find it quite nice. As a matter of fact, when I switch to Fedora 14(Gnome2) I miss many of the new Gnome features. True I also miss some of the Gnome 2 also. Keep trying you may get to like it. Give Gnome 3 a chance! -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-15 Branched report: 20110424 changes
Compose started at Sun Apr 24 13:16:25 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit) db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0 dbmail-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit) dbmail-auth-ldap-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit) dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper eog-plugins-2.91.90-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.10.so.0()(64bit) eog-plugins-2.91.90-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.10.so.0()(64bit) 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_regex.so.1.44.0 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.44.0 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_regex.so.1.44.0()(64bit) 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_system.so.1.44.0()(64bit) 1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0()(64bit) file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::ScrolledWindow) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Dialog) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Toolbar) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::TreeView) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::MenuBar) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::VBox) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Window) gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::MessageDialog) glunarclock-0.34.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-music-2.5.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sshmenu-3.18-3.fc15.noarch requires ruby(panelapplet2) gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.8-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-3.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) 1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgweather.so.1()(64bit) gnome-netstatus-2.28.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotd.so.5()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotdcm.so.4()(64bit) gnome-pilot-conduits-2.32.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgpilotdconduit.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-applet-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-media.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libbrasero-burn.so.1()(64bit) gnome-python2-evince-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libevview.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-evince-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libevdocument.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-evolution-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.19()(64bit) gnome-python2-gdl-2.25.3-22.fc15.x86_64 requires libgdl-1.so.3()(64bit) gnome-python2-totem-2.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnome-media-profiles.so.0()(64bit) gnome-rdp-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Data.SqliteClient) = 0:2.0.0.0 gnome-themes-2.32.0-5.fc15.noarch requires gtk-theme-engine-clearlooks gnomeradio-1.8-9.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtk-3.0.so.0()(64bit) gnomeradio-1.8-9.fc15.x86_64 requires libgdk-3.0.so.0()(64bit) gnotime-2.3.0-8.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit) gnubiff-2.2.13-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnustep-back-0.18.0-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.2()(64bit) gnustep-back-0.18.0-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.20()(64bit) gnustep-examples-1.3.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.20()(64bit) gnustep-examples-1.3.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.2()(64bit) gnustep-gui-0.18.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.20()(64bit)
Fedora 13 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-openssl-1.0.0-0.7.beta4.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SimGear-2.0.0-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mojolicious-0.25-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.2.16-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.35.1-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtiff-3.9.5-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/polkit-0.96-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-server-utils-7.4-17.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krb5-1.7.1-19.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fail2ban-0.8.4-27.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-feedparser-5.0.1-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-1.16.4-58.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.6.2.17.3-1.fc13 The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.4-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/polkit-0.96-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-penmount-1.4.1-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ethtool-0.7-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtiff-3.9.5-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pygtk2-2.17.0-9.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dosfstools-3.0.9-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libimobiledevice-1.0.6-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/usbmuxd-1.0.7-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-2.8.5-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.35.1-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-13.2-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-5.1.4-7.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-7.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lldpad-0.9.26-2.fc13 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing n2n-2.0.1-3.fc13 perl-DateTime-0.5300-3.fc13 plowshare-0.9.4-0.6.svn1414.fc13 root-5.28.00c-1.fc13 rubygem-net-http-persistent-1.7-1.fc13 rubygem-test-unit-2.3.0-1.fc13 xrootd-3.0.3-1.fc13 Details about builds: n2n-2.0.1-3.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-5921) A layer-two peer-to-peer virtual private network Update Information: n2n is a layer-two peer-to-peer virtual private network (VPN) which allows users to exploit features typical of P2P applications at network instead of application level. References: [ 1 ] Bug #691027 - Review Request: n2n - A layer-two peer-to-peer virtual private network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691027 perl-DateTime-0.5300-3.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-5922) Date and time objects Update Information: This update incorporates the latest DateTime::TimeZone release, based on version 2011f of the Olson database. ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 24 2011 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1:0.5300-3 - update DateTime::TimeZone to 1.33 (Olson 2011f) plowshare-0.9.4-0.6.svn1414.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-5925) CLI downloader/uploader for some of the most popular file-sharing websites Update Information: Update to svn revision 1414 by request of Elder Marco by mail ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 24 2011 Pavel Alexeev pa...@hubbitus.info - 0.9.4-0.6.svn1414 - Update to svn revision 1414 by request of Elder Marco by mail. root-5.28.00c-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-5920) Numerical data analysis framework
Re: groupinstall Window\ Managers
On 04/24/2011 05:18 PM, cornel panceac wrote: # yum groupinstall Window\ Managers ... Warning: Group window-managers does not have any packages. No packages in any requested group available to install or update is this the expected behaviour? Yes If you would try this on any F11 ~ F14 system it would be the same... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 15 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-openssl-1.0.0d-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.4.6-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtiff-3.9.5-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdenetwork-4.6.2-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SimGear-2.0.0-5.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-1.16.4-58.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.8.3.3-1.fc15 The following Fedora 15 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libpcap-1.1.1-3.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.28-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gobject-introspection-0.10.8-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-3.fc15,xorg-x11-server-1.10.1-11.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lldpad-0.9.41-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/report-0.20-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcoe-utils-1.0.18-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wimax-tools-1.4.4-1.fc15,wpa_supplicant-0.7.3-6.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-cirrus-1.3.2-8.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mtools-4.0.16-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.11.0-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libfprint-0.4.0-1.fc15,fprintd-0.4.1-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.4.0.901-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ethtool-0.7-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.37.1-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-nss-0.11-2.fc15 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing evolution-rss-0.2.90-22.20110424git.fc15 gausssum-2.2.5-1.fc15 libguestfs-1.10.2-1.fc15 lm_sensors-3.3.0-2.fc15 mingw32-cairo-1.10.2-1.fc15 mingw32-libsoup-2.34.0-1.fc15 mingw32-pixman-0.20.2-1.fc15 perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07010-1.fc15 perl-DateTime-0.6600-6.fc15 perl-Devel-EnforceEncapsulation-0.50-3.fc15 pgadmin3-1.12.3-1.fc15 postgis-1.5.2-1.fc15 python-networkx-1.4-1.fc15 root-5.28.00c-1.fc15 vrq-1.0.83-1.fc15 xrootd-3.0.3-1.fc15 Details about builds: evolution-rss-0.2.90-22.20110424git.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-5938) Evolution RSS Reader Update Information: Update to latest upstream snapshot. Update to 0.2.90 20110323 Update to 0.2.90 20110307 ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 24 2011 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.2.90-22.20110424git - new git snapshot * Fri Apr 8 2011 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.2.90-21.20110408git - new upstream git snapshot * Wed Mar 23 2011 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.2.90-20.20110323git - new upstream git snapshot * Mon Mar 7 2011 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.2.90-19.20110306git - new upstream git snapshot * Sun Mar 6 2011 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.2.9-18.20110306git - drop all patches - fixed upstream - require webkit gtk3 build - new upstream git snapshot gausssum-2.2.5-1.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-5944) A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Update Information: Minor bugfix update to 2.2.5. ChangeLog: * Mon Apr 25 2011 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org - 2.2.5-1 - Update to 2.2.5. References: [ 1 ] Bug #698588 - gausssum-2.2.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698588 libguestfs-1.10.2-1.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-5937) Access and modify virtual machine disk images Update Information: - New upstream stable version 1.10.2. ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 24 2011 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1:1.10.2-1 - New upstream stable branch 1.10.2.
Re: Well, I've tried GNOME 3 now...
On 04/25/2011 02:16 AM, John Morris wrote: Few existing fedora users are looking for what GNOME3 is selling. Some might end up accepting it, but that isn't the same thing. I love Gnome 3 and am very happy with it. So obviously you're only talking for yourself and not "most of fedora users". I think the main issue is really how you introduce it to people (and how you look at it yourself). There are a lot of existing new tech in gtk3 and in gnome-shell, backed up up by a team of people (the GNOME Project) who have been successful in the past. I get to do things a lot faster than before most of the time (so it was worth spending 20 minutes to learn new stuff) and am trying to give my feedback for what I have issues with. Distribution such as openSUSE or Debian are also very excited by the project and working hard to bring GNOME3 as one of their major desktops offering (if not the main one). At the end of the day maybe 3.0 is a too early version for you, you should keep using Fedora 14 until GNOME 3.2 comes out (F16). Or you can take part in the project and help to improve it. Fred -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
