Re: Fedora-21-Standard-x86_64[i386]-DVD.iso
On 10.09.2014 01:21, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 01:12 +0200, poma wrote: On 13.12.2013 12:37, Rejy M Cyriac wrote: ... I differ with you on this point. There are still so many places in the world with limited/expensive/slow, or even no network connectivity at all. In fact, it is only in the developed countries that broadband is prevalent like water, and in the rest of the world, just like water, it is a limited resource. On a related note, folks in the developed world might be surprised to know that 32-bit processors are still very much in use. I work with the Free Media project of Fedora, and I know of so many instances where providing the Fedora DVD (32 and 64 bit) has empowered the lives of people and small organisations. http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/20/Fedora/x86_64[i386]/iso/ Fedora-20-x86_64[i386]-DVD.iso Fedora-21-Standard-x86_64[i386]-DVD.iso Whence disappeared in Fedora.next!? F21 will not have any generic DVD image. It will have a DVD-type (I'm trying to call them 'offline' now) image for Server which contains only the Server package groups. The question of having or not having the DVD was kicked back and forth quite a bit, I'm not sure why you decided to just quote one random mail from one thread about it from ten months ago. QA can't really change that decision, it's a FESCo choice in the end. All together should read what the man wrote till the moment of the comprehension of the essence of the written. Fedora is a great project, perhaps too great for those who have invented it. poma -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 21 at omen.com
On 09/09/2014 07:22 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 22:42 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: Copying Xvnc from the Heisenbug partition to the Fedora 21 partition does seem to prevent the remote desktop freezes. Could you please try this update?: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10143 Thanks, Tim. */ The latest tigervnc via yum update seems to have solved the screen stall problem. No stalls despite vigorous exercising things that wedged the previous version. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 19 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 319 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 131 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 82 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7496/readline-6.2-8.fc19 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7570/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc19 80 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6774/claws-mail-3.10.1-1.fc19,claws-mail-plugins-3.10.0-1.fc19,libetpan-1.5-1.fc19 80 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7610/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc19 71 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7939/lzo-2.08-1.fc19 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-8771/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-1.fc19 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9162/xulrunner-31.0-1.fc19 25 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9427/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc19 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9602/polkit-qt-0.112.0-1.fc19 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9619/ca-certificates-2014.2.1-1.0.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9830/glibc-2.17-21.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9703/cups-1.6.4-10.fc19 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9624/GraphicsMagick-1.3.20-3.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10491/torque-3.0.4-4.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10569/kernel-3.14.18-100.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10359/procmail-3.22-36.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10366/icecream-1.0.1-8.20140822git.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10573/not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc19 The following Fedora 19 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 267 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22326/fedora-bookmarks-15-5.fc19 193 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3245/testdisk-6.14-2.fc19.1,ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-1.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9830/glibc-2.17-21.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9828/btrfs-progs-3.16-1.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9862/langtable-0.0.27-1.fc19 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9703/cups-1.6.4-10.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10569/kernel-3.14.18-100.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10326/elfutils-0.160-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10441/libbluray-0.6.2-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10359/procmail-3.22-36.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10478/firefox-32.0-1.fc19,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc19,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc19,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc19 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 19 updates-testing ansible-1.7.1-1.fc19 backupninja-1.0.1-4.fc19 ceph-0.80.5-10.fc19 docker-registry-0.8.1-2.fc19 kernel-3.14.18-100.fc19 lensfun-0.2.8-3.fc19 libreswan-3.10-3.fc19 not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc19 php-pecl-gearman-1.1.2-1.fc19 php-pecl-http-2.1.1-1.fc19 php-xcache-3.1.1-1.fc19 systemtap-2.6-1.fc19 trustedqsl-2.0.3-6.fc19 wine-1.7.26-1.fc19 Details about builds: ansible-1.7.1-1.fc19 (FEDORA-2014-10588) SSH-based configuration management, deployment, and task execution system Update Information: Update to 1.7.1 ChangeLog: * Thu Aug 14 2014 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com 1.7.1-1 - Update to 1.7.1 backupninja-1.0.1-4.fc19 (FEDORA-2014-10557) Lightweight, extensible backup system Update Information: backupninja: fix rsync action handler ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 8 2014 Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com - 1.0.1-4 - Fix rsync action handler * Sat Jun 7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.0.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1139253 - [rsync] badly quotes the --delete option https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139253
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 131 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7551/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc20 80 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7613/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc20 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9281/drupal6-6.33-1.fc20 25 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9641/polkit-qt-0.112.0-1.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9621/ca-certificates-2014.2.1-1.0.fc20 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9706/rubygem-activerecord-4.0.0-5.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/geary-0.6.3-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10458/torque-3.0.4-5.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10479/knot-1.5.2-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10322/apache-poi-3.10.1-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10371/openstack-glance-2013.2.3-5.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10445/qemu-1.6.2-8.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10586/not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10468/icecream-1.0.1-8.20140822git.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10357/procmail-3.22-36.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10497/haproxy-1.5.4-1.fc20 The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9673/cups-1.7.5-4.fc20 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9609/firewalld-0.3.11-3.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10571/usbmuxd-1.0.9-0.6.c24463e.fc20,libusbmuxd-1.0.9-4.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10585/p11-kit-0.20.6-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10467/elfutils-0.160-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10421/libbluray-0.6.2-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10410/orc-0.4.22-2.fc20 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts-1.000-4.fc20 adobe-source-han-sans-twhk-fonts-1.000-3.fc20 ansible-1.7.1-1.fc20 backupninja-1.0.1-4.fc20 ceph-0.80.5-10.fc20 docker-registry-0.8.1-2.fc20 fwsnort-1.6.5-1.fc20 kactivities-4.13.3-6.fc20 lensfun-0.2.8-3.fc20 libreoffice-4.2.6.3-1.fc20 libreswan-3.10-3.fc20 libusbmuxd-1.0.9-4.fc20 not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc20 owncloud-7.0.2-2.fc20 p11-kit-0.20.6-1.fc20 perl-MooX-Options-4.009-1.fc20 perl-Tangerine-0.03-1.fc20 php-doctrine-dbal-2.4.2-6.fc20 php-horde-Horde-Core-2.14.0-1.fc20 php-pecl-gearman-1.1.2-1.fc20 php-pecl-http-2.1.1-1.fc20 php-xcache-3.1.1-1.fc20 python-XStatic-Angular-Cookies-1.2.1.1-2.fc20 python-XStatic-D3-3.1.6.2-2.fc20 systemtap-2.6-1.fc20 trustedqsl-2.0.3-6.fc20 usbmuxd-1.0.9-0.6.c24463e.fc20 wine-1.7.26-1.fc20 Details about builds: adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts-1.000-4.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-10582) Adobe OpenType Pan-CJK font family for Simplified Chinese Update Information: Work around monospace English characters issue. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 9 2014 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com - 1.000-4 - Work around monospace English characters issue adobe-source-han-sans-twhk-fonts-1.000-3.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-10582) Adobe OpenType Pan-CJK font family for Traditional Chinese Update Information: Work around monospace English characters issue. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 9 2014 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com - 1.000-3 - Work around monospace English characters issue ansible-1.7.1-1.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-10556) SSH-based configuration management, deployment, and task execution system Update Information: Update to 1.7.1
jackson-annotations update problem via yum
When trying to update jackson-annotations via yum I continue to receive the following errors: http://mirrors.mit.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.ptd.net/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.nexcess.net/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.solfo.com/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. https://mirror.dmacc.net/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] curl#36 - Offset (43452) was beyond file size (42348) Trying other mirror. http://mirror.symnds.com/distributions/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/fedora.redhat/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] curl#36 - Offset (43452) was beyond file size (42348) Trying other mirror. http://mirror.cc.vt.edu/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://fedora.bhs.mirrors.ovh.net/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.uoregon.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.cat.pdx.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/fedora.redhat/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.metrocast.net/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.seas.harvard.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] curl#7 - Failed to connect to mirror.nexicom.net port 21: Connection refused Trying other mirror. http://mirror.cs.pitt.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. Error downloading packages: jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. If I go to one of the ftp mirrors and download the package and then also download the package from pbone.net they are different sizes. The version from pbone.net installs using a local install. I didn't try to install the version downloaded by hand from the ftp mirror since yum seems to indicate that it's not a valid package. Interestingly, the package that I downloaded from pbone.net is size 43452 which is specifically one of the errors that yum complains about when trying to download from the ftp mirrors: [Errno 14] curl#36 - Offset (43452) was beyond file size (42348)
yum error during update (Fatal Error TypeError)
yum clean all doesn't help, I'll start with that. The following error occurred with yum update today: Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback bound method RPMTransaction.callback of yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x7f5fbbc3cb00 failed, aborting! I saw this yesterday as well so decided to try to update each package one at a time to see which package this error occurs for. Interestingly, it's more than one: === Package Arch Version Repository Size ===Updating: plexus-containers-component-javadocnoarch1.5.5-18.fc21 rawhide 19 k Transaction Summary ===Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 19 k Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 1 package(s) (19 k) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. plexus-containers-component-javadoc-1.5.5-18.fc21.noarch.rpm | 19 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback bound method RPMTransaction.callback of yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x7f96fb7ca200 failed, aborting! === Package Arch Version Repository Size ===Updating: seedx86_643.8.1-4.fc22 rawhide192 k Transaction Summary ===Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 192 k Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 1 package(s) (192 k) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. seed-3.8.1-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm | 192 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback bound method RPMTransaction.callback of yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x7fb7d4c1b830 failed, aborting! === Package Arch Version Repository Size ===Updating: setuptool x86_64 1.19.11-9.fc22 rawhide65 k Transaction Summary ===Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 65 k Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 1 package(s) (65 k) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. setuptool-1.19.11-9.fc22.x86_64.rpm | 65 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback bound method RPMTransaction.callback of yum.rpmtrans.RPMTransaction instance at 0x7fcf0c7541b8 failed, aborting! === Package Arch Version Repository Size ===Updating: sgpio x86_64 1.2.0.10-14.fc22 rawhide18 k Transaction Summary ===Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 18 k Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 1 package(s) (18 k) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. sgpio-1.2.0.10-14.fc22.x86_64.rpm | 18 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback bound method
why does perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker depend on systemtap-sdt-devel?
possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages installed. i ask since i'm working with a software package that fails to configure properly if the header file sys/sdt.h is installed on the development system, but it needs the MakeMaker package, so i'm in a bit of a dilemma. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 21 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10171/apache-poi-3.10.1-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10153/torque-4.2.8-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10211/geary-0.7.2-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10142/procmail-3.22-36.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10531/xen-4.4.1-2.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10617/xerces-j2-2.11.0-22.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10600/pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10507/knot-1.5.2-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10544/not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc21 The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9900/lorax-21.21-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9990/lz4-r122-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10215/libbluray-0.6.2-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10190/python-blivet-0.61.1-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10261/orc-0.4.22-2.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10125/ppp-2.4.7-4.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10624/selinux-policy-3.13.1-79.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10605/anaconda-21.48.5-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10608/usbmuxd-1.0.9-0.6.c24463e.fc21,libusbmuxd-1.0.9-4.fc21 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 21 updates-testing anaconda-21.48.5-1.fc21 automake-1.14.1-5.fc21 cockpit-0.23-1.fc21 csmock-1.4.1-1.fc21 fwsnort-1.6.5-1.fc21 gettext-commons-0.9.6-12.fc21 ghc-rpm-macros-1.2.15-1.fc21 hyperestraier-1.4.13-21.fc21 libreoffice-4.3.1.2-4.fc21 libusbmuxd-1.0.9-4.fc21 mustache-java-0.8.16-1.fc21 nodejs-xmlbuilder-2.4.4-1.fc21 opencryptoki-3.2-1.fc21 openlmi-networking-0.3.0-1.fc21 openlmi-providers-0.5.0-2.fc21 openlmi-storage-0.8.0-1.fc21 pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc21 perl-Archive-Zip-1.38-1.fc21 perl-Date-Manip-6.47-1.fc21 perl-Locale-Codes-3.32-1.fc21 perl-Net-GitHub-0.68-1.fc21 perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.19-1.fc21 perl-XXX-0.28-1.fc21 pgp-tools-1.1.5-6.fc21 python-XStatic-Angular-Mock-1.2.1.1-2.fc21 python-XStatic-Hogan-2.0.0.2-2.fc21 python-XStatic-JQuery-Migrate-1.2.1.1-2.fc21 python-XStatic-JQuery-quicksearch-2.0.3.1-2.fc21 python-XStatic-JSEncrypt-2.0.0.2-2.fc21 python-XStatic-Jasmine-1.3.1.1-2.fc21 python-XStatic-QUnit-1.14.0.2-2.fc21 python-msgpack-0.4.2-4.fc21 python-retrying-1.2.3-3.fc21 rubygem-domain_name-0.5.21-1.fc21 rubygem-rhc-1.29.7-1.fc21 selinux-policy-3.13.1-79.fc21 skf-1.99.9-1.fc21 texstudio-2.8.4-1.fc21 tnef-1.4.12-1.fc21 usbmuxd-1.0.9-0.6.c24463e.fc21 xerces-j2-2.11.0-22.fc21 Details about builds: anaconda-21.48.5-1.fc21 (FEDORA-2014-10605) Graphical system installer Update Information: Revert productName repo name change (#1128474) (bcl) Use first part of Product for UEFI entry (#1128474) (bcl) ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 9 2014 Samantha N. Bueno sbueno+anaco...@redhat.com - 21.48.5-1 - Revert productName repo name change (#1128474) (bcl) - Do not try to disable no firstboot services (#1139621) (vpodzime) - Let finding install classes be more flexible for Fedora (#1138820). (clumens) * Thu Sep 4 2014 Samantha N. Bueno sbueno+anaco...@redhat.com - 21.48.4-1 - Use first part of Product for UEFI entry (#1128474) (bcl) - Use first part of Product as repo name (#1128474) (bcl) - makeupdates: Report git diff errors (bcl) References: [ 1 ] Bug #1128474 - Adjust anaconda for new format of .buildstamp with Product name included https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128474 [ 2 ] Bug #1139621 - Anaconda doesn't check if f.e. firstboot is present and blindly calls systemctl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139621 [ 3 ] Bug #1138820 - Fedora Server default filesystem should be XFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138820 automake-1.14.1-5.fc21 (FEDORA-2014-10599) A GNU tool for automatically creating Makefiles
Re: why does perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker depend on systemtap-sdt-devel?
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages installed. i ask since i'm working with a software package that fails to configure properly if the header file sys/sdt.h is installed on the development system, but it needs the MakeMaker package, so i'm in a bit of a dilemma. When in doubt: $ echo n | sudo yum install --releasever=21 --installroot=/tmp/empty foo And then examine the output. In this case, perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker → perl-ExtUtils-Install → perl-devel → systemtap-sdt-devel. Which appears to have been so since December 2010: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/661553 - ajax -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Secure Containers F21
libvirt-sandbox Secure Containers (virt-sandbox-service) are seriously broken on Fedora 21 as of TC6 plus today's updates: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135762 Any chance of this being fixed sooner rather than later? libvirt-sandbox-v0.5.1-4 works fine on F20 (after applying the patches for this problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133686). Gene -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: why does perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker depend on systemtap-sdt-devel?
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages installed. i ask since i'm working with a software package that fails to configure properly if the header file sys/sdt.h is installed on the development system, but it needs the MakeMaker package, so i'm in a bit of a dilemma. When in doubt: $ echo n | sudo yum install --releasever=21 --installroot=/tmp/empty foo And then examine the output. In this case, perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker → perl-ExtUtils-Install → perl-devel → systemtap-sdt-devel. Which appears to have been so since December 2010: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/661553 gotcha ... only skimmed that bugzilla thread but, until i read further, i still think that dependency is just plain weird. grrr ... rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria
On 09/04/2014 04:50 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: I think the language you have is functional, it just needs a delimiter establishing our purview. Although, I'd suggest the size of the distribution doesn't matter, if we nerf someone's system because of something we're not doing correctly I think we should block on that. So are we fine with the Windows and OS X criteria as originally proposed? Adam, would these be better as beta blockers or as final blockers? The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can boot into both Windows and Fedora. The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an existing clean OS X installation and install a bootloader which can boot into both OS X and Fedora, OR the installer must prominently warn the user that he may be unable to boot OS X after installation, allowing the user to cancel installation and reboot to OS X. For the Linux criterion, how about this: The installer must be able to install into free space alongside existing GNU/Linux installations supported by the upstream software for detecting previously-installed operating systems, and install a bootloader which can boot into each previous installation. The intent of this is that if upstream os-prober supports it and (a) Fedora breaks it or (b) it's unexpectedly broken due to a regression (my language here is kind of ambiguous; not sure if that's good or bad), then that's a blocker. It also implicitly applies to cases where multiple GNU/Linux systems are installed. We would then replace this criterion in the future if BLS is adopted. I am entering this discussion a little late but better late than never. As far as booting other linux installation, I would be happy if it would boot other *Fedora* or *RHEL* installation*!!!* Currently, /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober is broken as far as other Fedora 21 installations because of the change to using linux16 and initrd16 for non-uefi systems. This is something *unique* to Fedora and RHEL and, thus, is ignored by upstream grub support. The problem is described here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108296 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108344 The resolution of the problem requires a change to os-prober and grub2. os-prober has been updated but not grub2. Question: Why isn't this an alpha blocker. RHBZ#1108296 has a patch which fixes the problem. Note: without the fix you may be able to boot Umbuntu but not a second Fedora 21. This makes not sense to me! Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create /etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to chain-load other configuration files. Gene -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400 Gene Czarcinski wrote: Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create /etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to chain-load other configuration files. Me too, which is why I really really wish I could tell anaconda to create the grub2 directory and cfg file, but not try to actually install grub and screw around with the MBR and such. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Why is tigervnc in F21 so out of date?
Why is the tigervnc in mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os almost a month old when there was a major bug fix yesterday? -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Why is tigervnc in F21 so out of date?
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:33:05 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: Why is the tigervnc in mirrors.kernel.org::fedora/development/21/x86_64/os almost a month old when there was a major bug fix yesterday? Because we are in Alpha freeze, so only things that actually fix accepted blocker bugs or freeze exceptions go into the base repo. Was the major bug fix addressing something that would be blocking the alpha release? There is a version just pushed into updates-testing: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/21/SRPMS/t/tigervnc-1.3.1-11.fc21.src.rpm But I'm not sure if that includes the major bug fix you are mentioning. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2014-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review - Minutes
== #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review == Meeting started by roshi at 16:07:39 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-09-10/f21-blocker-review.2014-09-10-16.07.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (roshi, 16:07:40) * Introduction (roshi, 16:14:53) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi, 16:14:53) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:14:57) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (roshi, 16:14:59) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:15:02) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi, 16:15:04) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi, 16:15:07) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:15:09) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Beta_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:15:13) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:15:16) * (1139015) F21 Workstation Alpha TC6 network install fails with crash, hang, reboot or pane is dead - caused by anaconda segfault (roshi, 16:16:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139015 (roshi, 16:17:00) * Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW (roshi, 16:17:03) * AGREED: - 1139015 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of the Alpha Criteria Installer must run (roshi, 16:19:49) * (1135516) freeipa-client needs python-backports-ssl_match_hostname (roshi, 16:20:03) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135516 (roshi, 16:20:05) * Proposed Blocker, freeipa, VERIFIED (roshi, 16:20:08) * AGREED: - 1135516 - AcceptedBlocker - This clearly violates the Alpha Criteria: It must be possible to join the system to a FreeIPA or Active Directory domain at install time and post-install, and the system must respect the identity, authentication and access control configuration provided by the domain. (roshi, 16:23:56) * (1138746) virt-manager needs to split the version filed of the .treeinfo file on _ and - not just - (roshi, 16:24:01) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138746 (roshi, 16:24:04) * Proposed Blocker, virt-manager, ON_QA (roshi, 16:24:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138746#c1 - virt is generally Beta (amita, 16:26:55) * AGREED: - 1138746 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't violate any of the alpha criteria and workarounds exist. (roshi, 16:39:20) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136990 (pwhalen, 16:41:17) * (1136990) - TypeError: must be an interface (roshi, 16:41:55) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136990 (roshi, 16:42:08) * Proposed Blocker, glibc, NEW (roshi, 16:42:45) * AGREED: - 1136990 - AcceptedBlocker - This clearly violates the following Alpha Criteria: When using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces. (roshi, 16:47:42) * (1133394) [abrt] cheese: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a(): cheese killed by SIGSEGV (roshi, 16:50:08) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133394 (roshi, 16:50:11) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, cheese, ON_QA (roshi, 16:50:14) * AGREED: - 1133394 - AcceptedFreezeException - cheese is a highly visible and commonly tested app for live images, worth fixing (roshi, 16:58:07) * (1140165) Cockpit 0.21 is broken with Docker 1.2.0 (roshi, 16:58:18) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140165 (roshi, 16:58:18) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, cockpit, MODIFIE (roshi, 16:58:18) * AGREED: - 1140165 - AcceptedFreezeException - This bug touches cockpit and docker interoperability which are both key features for F21. It's worth breaking freeze to get these changes into a more polished image. (roshi, 17:09:16) * (1116316) gnome-initial-setup not coming up after Live Workstation install (roshi, 17:09:30) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116316 (roshi, 17:09:33) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-initial-setup, NEW (roshi, 17:09:36) * AGREED: - 1116316 - AcceptedFreezeException - g-i-s provides a useful workflow that we want to have tested before release. (roshi, 17:20:45) * (1139475) cannot select from full list of keyboard layouts (roshi, 17:21:06) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139475 (roshi, 17:21:06) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-initial-setup, NEW (roshi,
Re: why does perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker depend on systemtap-sdt-devel?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:56:58PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Adam Jackson wrote: In this case, perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker → perl-ExtUtils-Install → perl-devel → systemtap-sdt-devel. Which appears to have been so since December 2010: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/661553 gotcha ... only skimmed that bugzilla thread but, until i read further, i still think that dependency is just plain weird. grrr ... Not really since December 2010; at least if you can believe in comments to bug 661553. At that time the bug was acknowledged and apparently fixed. The trouble is that it resurfaced. I think that a new bug report is needed with an explicit reference to a closed 661553. Michal -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria
On 09/10/2014 03:25 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400 Gene Czarcinski wrote: Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create /etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to chain-load other configuration files. Me too, which is why I really really wish I could tell anaconda to create the grub2 directory and cfg file, but not try to actually install grub and screw around with the MBR and such. As long as my system has more than one disk drive ... I fake it. With /dev/sda the normal bios boot drive, I tell anaconda to install grub2 into the MBR of /dev/sdb. I have previously updated /etc/grub.d/40_custom to add a configfile entry for the new system. BTW, I have proposed to change/replace the os-prober functionality with something that uses configfile to chain load other Fedora installs. Ran the flag up the pole but nobody saluted. Naturally, you need to regular chainload for windows. I have delved into anaconda code before, maybe I will look at creating a patch have anaconda NOT install grub2 in the mbr. Mmmm ... I wonder if no mbr is also appropriate for syslinux/extlinux. Gene -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2014-09-08 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 15:01:34 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-09-08/fedora-qa.2014-09-08-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll call (adamw, 15:01:43) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:05:41) * FranciscoD or amita or roshi to write GNOME Test Day post for Fedora Magazine - Amita did this, see http://fedoramagazine.org/gnome-wayland-test-day-2014-08-28/ , thanks to her! (adamw, 15:07:13) * adamw and apeter to sync up on trialling moztrap for l10n test day adamw took a look at an appropriate moztrap schema for this and sent some notes to apeter, also exposed some more limitations in Moztrap, see http://piratepad.net/FedoraMozTrap (adamw, 15:07:57) * Fedora 21 status (adamw, 15:11:25) * LINK: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10210 -- that's the .91 update (kalev, 15:38:20) * AGREED: notional bug include GNOME 3.13.91 in 21 Alpha bug is granted freeze exception status, bureaucracy can be applied later (adamw, 15:49:59) * LINK: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist (adamw, 15:53:07) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:8 (adamw, 15:56:02) * open floor (adamw, 16:05:11) * ACTION: adamw to try and expedite discussion of the OS X / Windows multiboot criteria revision (adamw, 16:10:47) * ACTION: adamw to file and marked as approvedFE the GNOME 3.13.91 bug (adamw, 16:11:11) Meeting ended at 16:14:31 UTC. Action Items * adamw to try and expedite discussion of the OS X / Windows multiboot criteria revision * adamw to file and marked as approvedFE the GNOME 3.13.91 bug Action Items, by person --- * adamw * adamw to try and expedite discussion of the OS X / Windows multiboot criteria revision * adamw to file and marked as approvedFE the GNOME 3.13.91 bug * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * adamw (98) * amita (27) * jreznik (18) * kalev (17) * sgallagh (13) * roshi (9) * tflink (8) * satellit_e (7) * danofsatx (5) * zodbot (4) * Toledo|sat6bomga (2) * satellit (2) * handsome_pirate (2) * dgilmore (2) * randomuser (1) * Southern_Gentlem (1) * mdolezel (1) * pwhalen (1) * pschindl (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 19 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 320 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 132 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 83 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7496/readline-6.2-8.fc19 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7570/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc19 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6774/claws-mail-3.10.1-1.fc19,claws-mail-plugins-3.10.0-1.fc19,libetpan-1.5-1.fc19 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7610/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc19 72 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7939/lzo-2.08-1.fc19 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-8771/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-1.fc19 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9162/xulrunner-31.0-1.fc19 26 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9427/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc19 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9602/polkit-qt-0.112.0-1.fc19 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9619/ca-certificates-2014.2.1-1.0.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9830/glibc-2.17-21.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9703/cups-1.6.4-10.fc19 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9624/GraphicsMagick-1.3.20-3.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10491/torque-3.0.4-4.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10359/procmail-3.22-36.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10366/icecream-1.0.1-8.20140822git.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10649/xerces-j2-2.11.0-15.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10569/kernel-3.14.18-100.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10628/pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10640/libreoffice-4.1.6.2-8.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10573/not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc19 The following Fedora 19 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 268 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22326/fedora-bookmarks-15-5.fc19 194 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3245/testdisk-6.14-2.fc19.1,ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-1.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9830/glibc-2.17-21.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9828/btrfs-progs-3.16-1.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9862/langtable-0.0.27-1.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9703/cups-1.6.4-10.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10326/elfutils-0.160-1.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10441/libbluray-0.6.2-1.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10359/procmail-3.22-36.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10478/firefox-32.0-1.fc19,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc19,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc19,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10569/kernel-3.14.18-100.fc19 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 19 updates-testing libreoffice-4.1.6.2-8.fc19 lis-1.4.59-1.fc19 pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc19 perl-Date-Manip-6.47-1.fc19 rubygem-domain_name-0.5.21-1.fc19 skf-1.99.9-1.fc19 texstudio-2.8.4-1.fc19 tnef-1.4.12-1.fc19 xerces-j2-2.11.0-15.fc19 Details about builds: libreoffice-4.1.6.2-8.fc19 (FEDORA-2014-10640) Free Software Productivity Suite Update Information: CVE-2014-3575 arbitrary file preview disclosure via ole2 objects The vulnerability allows an attacker to send a document which when opened will trigger the prompt to Update Links but if the user cancels that prompt may still generate and insert into the document an OLE2 preview image of a file on the victims filesystem, Data exposure is possible if the updated document is then distributed to other parties. ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 9 2014 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com - 1:4.1.6.2-8 - Resolves: rhbz#1139592 CVE-2014-3575 arbitrary file preview disclosure via ole2 objects References: [ 1 ] Bug #1139592 - CVE-2014-3575 libreoffice: openoffice: Arbitrary file disclosure via crafted OLE objects [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139592
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
132 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
81
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7551/asterisk-11.10.2-2.fc20
81
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7613/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc20
33
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9281/drupal6-6.33-1.fc20
26
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9641/polkit-qt-0.112.0-1.fc20
20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9621/ca-certificates-2014.2.1-1.0.fc20
18
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9706/rubygem-activerecord-4.0.0-5.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/geary-0.6.3-1.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10458/torque-3.0.4-5.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10479/knot-1.5.2-1.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10322/apache-poi-3.10.1-1.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10371/openstack-glance-2013.2.3-5.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10468/icecream-1.0.1-8.20140822git.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10357/procmail-3.22-36.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10497/haproxy-1.5.4-1.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10626/xerces-j2-2.11.0-17.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10632/pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10642/libreoffice-4.2.6.3-2.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10586/not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.15-1.fc20
The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
Age URL
13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9673/cups-1.7.5-4.fc20
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9609/firewalld-0.3.11-3.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10467/elfutils-0.160-1.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10421/libbluray-0.6.2-1.fc20
1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10410/orc-0.4.22-2.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10571/usbmuxd-1.0.9-0.6.c24463e.fc20,libusbmuxd-1.0.9-4.fc20
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10585/p11-kit-0.20.6-1.fc20
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing
automake-1.13.4-6.fc20
eclipse-cdt-8.3.0-2.fc20
fedora-dockerfiles-0-0.12.gitf6cd84c.fc20
libreoffice-4.2.6.3-2.fc20
lis-1.4.59-1.fc20
pdns-recursor-3.6.1-1.fc20
perl-Date-Manip-6.47-1.fc20
perl-Net-GitHub-0.68-1.fc20
pgp-tools-1.1.5-6.fc20
python-XStatic-Angular-Mock-1.2.1.1-2.fc20
python-XStatic-Hogan-2.0.0.2-2.fc20
python-XStatic-JQuery-Migrate-1.2.1.1-2.fc20
python-XStatic-JQuery-quicksearch-2.0.3.1-2.fc20
python-XStatic-JSEncrypt-2.0.0.2-2.fc20
python-XStatic-Jasmine-1.3.1.1-2.fc20
python-XStatic-QUnit-1.14.0.2-2.fc20
python-retrying-1.2.3-3.fc20
rubygem-domain_name-0.5.21-1.fc20
rubygem-net-scp-1.2.1-1.fc20
skf-1.99.9-1.fc20
socket_wrapper-1.1.1-1.fc20
texstudio-2.8.4-1.fc20
tnef-1.4.12-1.fc20
xerces-j2-2.11.0-17.fc20
Details about builds:
automake-1.13.4-6.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-10638)
A GNU tool for automatically creating Makefiles
Update Information:
update config.{guess,sub} to gnuconfig git HEAD
ChangeLog:
* Wed Sep 10 2014 Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com - 1.13.4-6
- update config.{guess,sub} to gnuconfig git HEAD
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #1139354 - update config.* to version with ppc64le support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139354
eclipse-cdt-8.3.0-2.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-10650)
Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin
Update Information:
Fixes NPE in CDT Formatter/Indexer Preferences UI
ChangeLog:
* Tue Sep 9 2014 Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com 1:8.3.0-2
- Fix rhbz#1138994 (NPE in Formatter preferences page)
References:
[ 1 ] Bug
Fedora 21 Alpha karma requests
Hi folks! It's that time again - as we're in the Alpha freeze, updates that fix freeze exception and blocker bugs need karma so we can push them to stable. Here's the list of updates that needs karma: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10605/anaconda-21.48.5-1.fc21 - this isn't in TC6 so you'd have to build a custom image or 'yum update' it on a live image to test right now, but it or a later build should be in TC7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10178/oxygen-gtk3-1.4.0-4.fc21 - this is KDE's default GTK+ theme, so KDE users can test it by running some GTK+ 3 apps and checking everything looks good. In particular, check that checkboxes work properly. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10190/python-blivet-0.61.1-1.fc21 - this one was in TC6, so if TC6 partitioning works for you (at least no worse than previous TCs), +1 it Thanks folks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: why does perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker depend on systemtap-sdt-devel?
On 09/10/2014 08:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical
connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages installed.
i ask since i'm working with a software package that fails to
configure properly if the header file sys/sdt.h is installed on the
development system, but it needs the MakeMaker package, so i'm in a
bit of a dilemma.
Coincidence of events. I hit the same issue yesterday when trying rt-4
on f21 for the first time ;)
When in doubt:
$ echo n | sudo yum install --releasever=21 --installroot=/tmp/empty foo
And then examine the output. In this case, perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker →
perl-ExtUtils-Install → perl-devel → systemtap-sdt-devel. Which appears
to have been so since December 2010:
Yes, it's perl-devel which pulls in systemtap-sdt-devel
But, I think there are a couple of bogus deps on perl-devel in some of
the perl package's sub-packages, which are causing the dependency bloat e.g:
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
perl-ExtUtils-Embed
perl-ExtUtils-Install
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
perl-Module-Build
I don't think any of these should R: perl-devel
(f21-patch enclosed below).
Ralf
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 642f6ab..c2aca19 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -745,7 +745,6 @@ Epoch: 1
Version:2.49
Requires: %perl_compat
Requires: %{name}-Encode = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
-Requires: perl-devel
BuildArch: noarch
%description Encode-devel
@@ -799,7 +798,6 @@ License:GPL+ or Artistic
Epoch: 1
# real version 0.280210 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#Dot_approach
Version:0.28.2.10
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -815,7 +813,6 @@ Group: Development/Languages
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Epoch: 0
Version:1.30
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -829,7 +826,6 @@ Group: Development/Languages
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Epoch: 0
Version:1.59
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -844,7 +840,6 @@ Group: Development/Languages
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Epoch: 0
Version:6.66
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
Requires: perl(Data::Dumper)
Requires: perl(DynaLoader)
@@ -875,7 +870,6 @@ Group: Development/Languages
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Epoch: 0
Version:1.63
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
Requires: perl(File::Path)
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -892,7 +886,6 @@ License:GPL+ or Artistic
# Epoch bump for clean upgrade over old standalone package
Epoch: 1
Version:3.18
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
BuildArch: noarch
Obsoletes: perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps
@@ -1223,7 +1216,6 @@ Requires: perl(Archive::Tar) = 1.08
Requires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.110420
Requires: perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) = 0.15
Requires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS) = 1.02
-Requires: perl-devel
Requires: %perl_compat
# Optional run-time needed for generating documentation from POD:
Requires: perl(Pod::Html)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 21 Alpha karma requests
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 18:45:05 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10190/python-blivet-0.61.1-1.fc21 - this one was in TC6, so if TC6 partitioning works for you (at least no worse than previous TCs), +1 it Would any successful install to hard drive from a live iamge be a good enough test, or would it need to involve custom partitioning? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
