date:20170119

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2017-01-19 Thread Kanika Murarka

On 19 January 2017 at 17:15, Kamil Paral  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
> The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
> The repo includes following:-
> 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
> 2. There are 5 levels of priority:
>
>1. Blocker
>2. Critical
>3. Major
>4. Minor
>5. Trivial
>
>
> I'd personally simply use:
> 1. critical
> 2. normal
> 3. wishlist
>
> Thoughts? Or do we need the full set of priorities to convert existing
> tickets properly? (If we can influence it, blocker+critical would go to
> critical, major+minor+trivial would go to normal).
>
> We will go for this then. Starting with Migration :)

>
>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 22:30 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> Adam,
> 
> You know what. . . I figured out what the problem was.  I ws using my
> email address instead of my FAS username.  I should have read the
> output a little closer. . . . self.login(self.username,
> self.password. . . . . that should have been a clue!

Ah, great! Glad you got it figured out :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Jonathan Calloway

Adam,

You know what. . . I figured out what the problem was.  I ws using my email 
address instead of my FAS username.  I should have read the output a little 
closer. . . . self.login(self.username, self.password. . . . . that should have 
been a clue!

Jonathan




> On Jan 19, 2017, at 9:49 PM, Adam Williamson  
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 19:50 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to mark an update to 
>> Geary as failed, as the database is not pre-loading emails older than 2 
>> months:
> 
> Hum, that looks like it's failing to authenticate properly, I think. It
> may be that something's changed in the authentication path and easy-
> karma can no longer auth properly.
> 
> I can try and take a look into this in a bit, or there are other folks
> reading who could also do so, I'm sure.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 19:50 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to mark an update to 
> Geary as failed, as the database is not pre-loading emails older than 2 
> months:

Hum, that looks like it's failing to authenticate properly, I think. It
may be that something's changed in the authentication path and easy-
karma can no longer auth properly.

I can try and take a look into this in a bit, or there are other folks
reading who could also do so, I'm sure.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: a couple of issues with Lmod and 'man' bash completion

2017-01-19 Thread Viorel Tabara

On Wed Jan 18 2017 05:45:17 GMT-0700 (MST) Patrick O'Callaghan 
 wrote:
> Since you're running F25, the appropriate forum is the Users list, not the
> Test list.

I'm not looking for user support, rather I want to confirm a bug [1].

> The Test list is for unreleased versions.

Actually there have been plenty of discussions on this list about current 
Fedora releases. Now back to the point in question -- I run one Rawide 
installation, where I first noticed the issue. To reliably test/troubleshoot I 
needed two machines running an identical OS version.

-- 
Viorel

[1]:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
- us...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Community support for Fedora users
- test@lists.fedoraproject.org  -- For testing and quality assurance of Fedora 
  releases 
:wq
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Jonathan Calloway

This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to "Pass" an update to 
Network Manager:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
karma)
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

result = method(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
270, in comment

'csrf_token': self.csrf()})
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

result = method(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
315, in csrf

self.login(self.username, self.password)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", 
line 289, in login

openid_insecure=self.openid_insecure)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidproxyclient.py", 
line 141, in openid_login

data=output['response'])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
518, in post

return self.request('POST', url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
475, in request

resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
585, in send

r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 
462, in send

raise RetryError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.RetryError: 
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='bodhi.fedoraproject.org', port=443): Max 
retries exceeded with url: 
/dologin.html?janrain_nonce=2017-01-20T00%3A32%3A57ZAcrbg7 (Caused by 
ResponseError('too many 500 error responses',))



Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway


On 01/19/2017 06:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:06 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:

Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?

Oh! Yes, sure, please do. Sorry, I completely missed the thing about
'strange Python errors'. I haven't had time to run easy-karma in a
while...

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Jonathan Calloway

This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to mark an update to 
Geary as failed, as the database is not pre-loading emails older than 2 
months:


Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
   fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
   karma)
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
   res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

   result = method(*args, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
270, in comment

   'csrf_token': self.csrf()})
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

   result = method(*args, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
315, in csrf

   self.login(self.username, self.password)
 File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", 
line 289, in login

   openid_insecure=self.openid_insecure)
 File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidproxyclient.py", 
line 141, in openid_login

   data=output['response'])
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
518, in post

   return self.request('POST', url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
475, in request

   resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
585, in send

   r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 
462, in send

   raise RetryError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.RetryError: 
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='bodhi.fedoraproject.org', port=443): Max 
retries exceeded with url: 
/dologin.html?janrain_nonce=2017-01-18T02%3A43%3A07ZcRMbTF (Caused by 
ResponseError('too many 500 error responses',))



I will send another example from F24 shortly.

Jonathan Calloway

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Adam Williamson 
 wrote:

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:06 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:

 Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?


Oh! Yes, sure, please do. Sorry, I completely missed the thing about
'strange Python errors'. I haven't had time to run easy-karma in a
while...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . 
net

http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:06 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?

Oh! Yes, sure, please do. Sorry, I completely missed the thing about
'strange Python errors'. I haven't had time to run easy-karma in a
while...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Jonathan Calloway

Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?

Thanks!

Jonathan 

> On Jan 19, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson  
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 17:22 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> Is anyone using Fedora Easy Karma?  I realize that Bhodi is the
>> preferred method of testing updates, but I really like the CLI
>> interface and the factt that it just ‘finds’ updates that have been
>> installed and presents them for testing. 
>> 
>> I have been wanting to start doing update testing again, and have an
>> F24 and an F25 VM devoted to this, but I keep getting strange Python
>> related errors on both. 
>> 
>> If I need to start using Bhodi I will, just wanted to ping the list
>> first!
> 
> Easy karma sends the feedback you enter to Bodhi, so you're really
> using both :) Many of us use easy-karma, it is absolutely an 'approved'
> way of doing update feedback, and much easier than the web interface
> for quickly providing feedback on multiple updates.
> 
> The only problem I have with it is we've never gotten around to
> updating it for Bodhi 2.x multiple feedback items, we really ought to
> do that...
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 17:22 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Is anyone using Fedora Easy Karma?  I realize that Bhodi is the
> preferred method of testing updates, but I really like the CLI
> interface and the factt that it just ‘finds’ updates that have been
> installed and presents them for testing. 
> 
> I have been wanting to start doing update testing again, and have an
> F24 and an F25 VM devoted to this, but I keep getting strange Python
> related errors on both. 
> 
> If I need to start using Bhodi I will, just wanted to ping the list
> first!

Easy karma sends the feedback you enter to Bodhi, so you're really
using both :) Many of us use easy-karma, it is absolutely an 'approved'
way of doing update feedback, and much easier than the web interface
for quickly providing feedback on multiple updates.

The only problem I have with it is we've never gotten around to
updating it for Bodhi 2.x multiple feedback items, we really ought to
do that...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Easy Karma

2017-01-19 Thread Jonathan Calloway

Hello!

Is anyone using Fedora Easy Karma?  I realize that Bhodi is the preferred 
method of testing updates, but I really like the CLI interface and the factt 
that it just ‘finds’ updates that have been installed and presents them for 
testing. 

I have been wanting to start doing update testing again, and have an F24 and an 
F25 VM devoted to this, but I keep getting strange Python related errors on 
both. 

If I need to start using Bhodi I will, just wanted to ping the list first!

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem in F25 shutdown process

2017-01-19 Thread Joerg Lechner

Hi Stan,
I have already filed Bug 1414809 -   problem in F25 shutdown process to 
Kernel. In my eyes its a major bug. I have just done the same on F24 with 
another disk - no problem. Also if You don't have a USB-disk, if You compare 
shutting down in F24 and F25, You should see the -only viewing shut down in F25 
desktop version, no logging -  lines of code displayed and the the time needed 
for shutting down, and You can compare this this with the shut down procedure 
in F24.
Kind regards

 

 

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: stan 
An: test 
Verschickt: Do, 19 Jan 2017 5:52 pm
Betreff: Re: problem in F25 shutdown process

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 01:04:39 -0500Joerg Lechner  wrote:> Hi> 
is use external disks (USB) to collect TV films and TV shows.> Yesterday I 
forgot to eject the external disk before shutting down> F25. Result 
ratarata.. of the external disk during the shut down> process. Currently I 
have no access to this disk (sata, 1TB) via F25,> F24 and Windows I did not try 
so far. The shut down process of F25> takes a lot more time, then the shut down 
process of F24/F23.> Shutting down F25 a lot of code is displayed. I didn't 
make any> modification, the system is as originally installed, with the last> 
updates. This very long lasting shut down process seems to have been> the same 
since Alpha. With F24/F23 I could shutting down the PC> without destroying an 
external disk. My system Acer Laptop> E5-571G-50K9, F25 Desktop Version 64bit, 
the external disk is> connected with an USB adapter, it's a used internal disk. 
I don't> know whether the disk has had an error previously or not, but I could> 
save on it about 100GB films before shutting down without of the> "ticking" of 
a moribund disk. Kind regardsI don't have a usb disk, so I'm not familiar with 
this.  But, are yousaying that shutting down F25 with a usb disk attached 
destroyed theusb disk?  I think that at shutdown, all buffers are flushed to 
disk,so that the disk is left in the correct state.  I can't see how thatwould 
trash a disk.  If it did, that's a major bug, and you should opena bugzilla 
documenting your experience as above.  I'm not sure whichcomponent does that, 
unfortunately.  Probably the kernel, but systemdis in charge of shutdown, so 
you could choose either kernel or 
systemd.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/___test
 mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to 
test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20170119.n.0 compose check report

2017-01-19 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 25/103 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170117.n.0):

ID: 55158   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55158
ID: 55159   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55159
ID: 55162   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55162
ID: 55173   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_firewall_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55173
ID: 55190   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55190
ID: 55191   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55191
ID: 55197   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55197

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20170117.n.0):

ID: 55164   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55164
ID: 55166   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55166
ID: 55170   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55170
ID: 55174   Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55174
ID: 55175   Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55175
ID: 55178   Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55178
ID: 55179   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55179
ID: 55180   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55180
ID: 55188   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55188
ID: 55192   Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55192
ID: 55193   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55193
ID: 55200   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55200
ID: 55204   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55204
ID: 55205   Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55205
ID: 55206   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55206
ID: 55244   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55244
ID: 55246   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55246
ID: 55247   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55247
ID: 55249   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55249
ID: 55251   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55251
ID: 55252   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55252
ID: 55256   Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55256
ID: 55257   Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55257
ID: 55258   Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55258
ID: 55263   Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55263
ID: 55265   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55265
ID: 55266   Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55266
ID: 55268   Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55268
ID: 55269   Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55269
ID: 55270   Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55270
ID: 55272   Test: i386 universal install_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55272
ID: 55273   Test: i386 universal install_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55273
ID: 55274   Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55274
ID: 55277   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit

Re: problem in F25 shutdown process

2017-01-19 Thread stan

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 01:04:39 -0500
Joerg Lechner  wrote:

> Hi
> is use external disks (USB) to collect TV films and TV shows.
> Yesterday I forgot to eject the external disk before shutting down
> F25. Result ratarata.. of the external disk during the shut down
> process. Currently I have no access to this disk (sata, 1TB) via F25,
> F24 and Windows I did not try so far. The shut down process of F25
> takes a lot more time, then the shut down process of F24/F23.
> Shutting down F25 a lot of code is displayed. I didn't make any
> modification, the system is as originally installed, with the last
> updates. This very long lasting shut down process seems to have been
> the same since Alpha. With F24/F23 I could shutting down the PC
> without destroying an external disk. My system Acer Laptop
> E5-571G-50K9, F25 Desktop Version 64bit, the external disk is
> connected with an USB adapter, it's a used internal disk. I don't
> know whether the disk has had an error previously or not, but I could
> save on it about 100GB films before shutting down without of the
> "ticking" of a moribund disk. Kind regards

I don't have a usb disk, so I'm not familiar with this.  But, are you
saying that shutting down F25 with a usb disk attached destroyed the
usb disk?  I think that at shutdown, all buffers are flushed to disk,
so that the disk is left in the correct state.  I can't see how that
would trash a disk.  If it did, that's a major bug, and you should open
a bugzilla documenting your experience as above.  I'm not sure which
component does that, unfortunately.  Probably the kernel, but systemd
is in charge of shutdown, so you could choose either kernel or systemd.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 15:22 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> So I can believe it is an Xwayland/GDM type thing
> – can it be GNOME Shell at this stage of the booting sequence?

Yes it can, because gdm is actually just a special case of GNOME Shell,
these days.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 06:45 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
> > The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
> > The repo includes following:-
> > 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
> > 2. There are 5 levels of priority:
> > 1. Blocker
> > 2. Critical
> > 3. Major
> > 4. Minor
> > 5. Trivial
> 
> I'd personally simply use: 
> 1. critical 
> 2. normal 
> 3. wishlist 
> 
> Thoughts?

I honestly don't care :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

2017-01-19 Thread Russel Winder

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 13:50 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> 
[…]
> 
> I debugged this a bit in the morning and it was gnome-shell crashing
> on
> startup in the mozjs code. It should be fixed with latest mozjs31
> build,
> mozjs31-31.5.0-1.fc26 which should be in tormorrow's rawhide. Or just
> grab
> the rpms directly from
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=834907
> 

Apologies for being late to this. The last upgrade I did to my Rawhides
(which I guess was 2017-01-17, but there is a difference between me
trying an update and anything coming from the Fedora repo :-) Since
then the boot sequence works fine but no GDM, instead just a bit on
line noise character sequence at the end of the boot sequence on the
screen. However the kernel has booted and is working fine, I can SSH in
from another machine. So I can believe it is an Xwayland/GDM type thing
– can it be GNOME Shell at this stage of the booting sequence?  I
haven't been able to investigate further than just this cursory thing,
but I can tomorrow if that helps.

--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

2017-01-19 Thread Kalev Lember

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bowen Wang 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> After I upgraded to the 20170117 snapshot, I cannot boot up fedora
> rawhide. I can see the loading screen with the fedora logo, but after
> that, the screen just switch to the text mode, the last line in the text
> mode is:
> Started Virtualization  daemon. Dispatcher Service...nge
> transactions
> Then screen just went black, no other information. I can't see the login
> screen of the GNOME.
> Does anybody have the same issue?
>

I debugged this a bit in the morning and it was gnome-shell crashing on
startup in the mozjs code. It should be fixed with latest mozjs31 build,
mozjs31-31.5.0-1.fc26 which should be in tormorrow's rawhide. Or just grab
the rpms directly from
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=834907

-- 
Hope this helps,
Kalev
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2017-01-19 Thread Kamil Paral

> Hi,

> The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
> The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
> The repo includes following:-
> 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
> 2. There are 5 levels of priority:

> 1. Blocker
> 2. Critical
> 3. Major
> 4. Minor
> 5. Trivial

I'd personally simply use: 
1. critical 
2. normal 
3. wishlist 

Thoughts? Or do we need the full set of priorities to convert existing tickets 
properly? (If we can influence it, blocker+critical would go to critical, 
major+minor+trivial would go to normal). 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

2017-01-19 Thread updates

The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  29  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c614315d29   
squid-4.0.17-1.fc25
  23  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb   
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-87dc28b1a0   
w3m-0.5.3-27.git20161120.fc25
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c756d37779   
ikiwiki-3.20170111-1.fc25
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e02ec160d8   
wordpress-4.7.1-1.fc25
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fff6e1af37   
fedmsg-0.18.2-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d50418723d   
xemacs-packages-extra-20170114-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-da50adf63e   
boomaga-0.8.0-6.git97f52c1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cc0e0daf0f   
groovy-2.4.5-10.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c1ae4335e5   
pdns-recursor-4.0.4-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cb88734094   
ansible-2.2.1.0-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f87674ad41   
ed-1.14.1-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b953d4d3a4   
qemu-2.7.1-2.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cbd5501d31   
pdns-4.0.3-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0d9bdbd9dd   
opus-1.1.3-2.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b015aa1d33   
webkitgtk4-2.14.3-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-090a9c11db   
libnl3-3.2.29-2.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7c569d396b   
python-crypto-2.6.1-13.fc25


The following Fedora 25 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
  53  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-940ecb5c59   
wpa_supplicant-2.6-1.fc25
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-70547b9af8   
python-productmd-1.4-1.fc25
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-78dbca9c0a   
python-2.7.13-1.fc25 python-docs-2.7.13-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fb3ef36678   
libinput-1.5.902-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-94b97e80d7   
pyatspi-2.20.3-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-efa9e9cd40   
gtk3-3.22.7-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0d6e19964f   
gdk-pixbuf2-2.36.4-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-26ef1f6e18   
libgtop2-2.34.2-1.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b43f73858a   
libappstream-glib-0.6.7-2.fc25 gnome-software-3.22.5-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-766da1b4ef   
libxkbcommon-0.7.1-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a3339bdd44   
flatpak-0.8.1-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d117622795   
pungi-4.1.12-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-090a9c11db   
libnl3-3.2.29-2.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b015aa1d33   
webkitgtk4-2.14.3-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-98726ef1ea   
xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.5-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-252ce2f03f   
kernel-4.9.4-201.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0d9bdbd9dd   
opus-1.1.3-2.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2adfb69272   
linux-firmware-20161205-69.git91ddce49.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cadae3ffee   
dnf-1.1.10-5.fc25 hawkey-0.6.3-6.1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2e72a58eb8   
libpsl-0.17.0-1.fc25 publicsuffix-list-20170116-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bd56fddcc6   
balsa-2.5.3-1.fc25.2 gpgme-1.8.0-8.fc25 kde-runtime-16.08.3-4.fc25 
kdepim-16.08.3-2.fc25 kdepim-addons-16.08.3-2.fc25 
kdepim-apps-libs-16.08.3-2.fc25 kdepim4-4.14.10-27.fc25 
kdepimlibs-4.14.10-17.fc25 kf5-gpgmepp-16.08.3-3.fc25 
kf5-libkleo-16.08.3-2.fc25 kf5-mailcommon-16.08.3-2.fc25 
kf5-messagelib-16.08.3-2.fc25 kget-16.08.3-2.fc25 kleopatra-16.08.3-2.fc25 
ostree-2016.15-1.fc25.1 trojita-0.7-4.fc25.1
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e42b513012   
firefox-50.1.0-3.fc25 nss-3.28.1-1.2.fc25 nss-softokn-3.28.1-1.0.fc25 
nss-util-3.28.1-1.0.fc25


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 25 updates-testing

GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2017.01-1.fc25
abcde-2.8-1.fc25
acpid-2.0.28-2.fc25
aime-8.20170111-1.fc25
atomic-1.15.1-1.fc25
balsa-2.5.3-1.fc25.2
brightnessctl-0.2-1.fc25
cacti-0.8.8h-3.fc25
clang-3.8.1-1.fc25
compiler-rt-3.8.1-1.fc25
converseen-0.9.6-1.fc25
dnf-1.1.10-5.fc25
docker-1.12.6-5.git037a2f5.fc25

Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

2017-01-19 Thread Kanika Murarka

Hi,

The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
The repo includes following:-
1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
2. There are 5 levels of priority:

   1. Blocker
   2. Critical
   3. Major
   4. Minor
   5. Trivial

3. The keywords, component and type are mentioned as TAGS.

4. I have updated few tickets (#471, #472, #489, #491, #493, #494, #495,
#496) for demo.
[1]https://stg.pagure.io/test-fedoraqa-2

Feel free to suggest or report if anything seems wrong.

Regards
Kanika (a2batic)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: a couple of issues with Lmod and 'man' bash completion

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

Fedora Easy Karma

Re: problem in F25 shutdown process

Fedora Rawhide-20170119.n.0 compose check report

Re: problem in F25 shutdown process

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

21 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information