[Call for Action] Deprecate TCP wrappers Today!
Hey All, A gentle reminder, Today(2018-03-22) is Deprecate TCP wrappers[1] Test Day! As part of this planned Change[2]for Fedora 28, this is an important Test Day! TCP wrappers is a simple tool to block incoming connection on the application level. This was very useful 20 years ago when there were no firewalls in Linux. This is not the case for today and connection filtering should be done at the network level or completely in application scope if it makes sense Removing this package from Fedora will remove a package from default and minimal installations (removing the dependency of daemons such as SSHD). It also makes the configuration straight-forward for new users (no shared files defining access rules, poorly reporting any errors to users. Removing the dependency from all packages and retiring the package in the single release will minimize users confusion and avoids opening sensitive services after the update. Since many crucial functionalities (OpenSSH and others) depend on this, We hope to test and see, whether it's working well enough and catch any remaining issues. As always, the event will be in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-03-22_Deprecate_TCP_wrappers [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers Thanks //sumantrom ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kernel update process (failure)
On 03/22/18 09:32, Felix Miata wrote: > cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530555 > dnf update fails to move new vmlinuz and initramfs to /boot/ on installations > requiring no installed bootloader That was filed against DNF which seems not really responsible. A straight rpm -Uvh would have "failed" as well. Anyway, I've done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559203. Thanks to all for the responses / insight. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kernel update process (failure)
Ed Greshko composed on 2018-03-21 20:25 (UTC+0800): > I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks > with > greater insight my be lurking here. > In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally > determined > that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly. RPM > would > show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the > needed > files would not be in /boot. There is a scriplet error, but it is called > "nonfatal". cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530555 dnf update fails to move new vmlinuz and initramfs to /boot/ on installations requiring no installed bootloader > I feel this to be a bugzilla. So, my question is, should kernel-core require > /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf > configuration? > Or something else? -- "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kernel update process (failure)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks >> with >> greater insight my be lurking here. >> >> In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally >> determined >> that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly. RPM >> would >> show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the >> needed >> files would not be in /boot. There is a scriplet error, but it is called >> "nonfatal". >> >> I feel this to be a bugzilla. So, my question is, should kernel-core require >> /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf >> configuration? >> Or something else? > > Technically yes, the kernel should require new-kernel-pkg since it uses > it in the scriptlet. However, this might be a special case, because on > some arches we don't use grub2. But perhaps it could be conditionalized. In most cases of even where grub2 isn't used grubby currently still deals with the kernel upgrade process, although it doesn't actually have to as there's other methods that will work if installed/setup. There's been ongoing work to retire grubby and I believe that should actually take effect in rawhide RSN. Peter ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 28-20180321.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 13/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 208958 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208958 ID: 208991 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208991 ID: 208992 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208992 ID: 208994 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208994 ID: 208995 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208995 ID: 208996 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208996 ID: 209004 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209004 ID: 209007 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209007 ID: 209009 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209009 ID: 209013 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209013 ID: 209014 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209014 ID: 209015 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209015 ID: 209028 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209028 ID: 209056 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209056 ID: 209062 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209062 ID: 209075 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209075 ID: 209101 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209101 ID: 209109 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209109 ID: 209110 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209110 Soft failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 2/23 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 208972 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208972 ID: 208973 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208973 ID: 208979 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208979 ID: 208989 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208989 ID: 208997 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208997 ID: 209038 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209038 ID: 209064 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209064 ID: 209066 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209066 ID: 209086 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209086 ID: 209089 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209089 Passed openQA tests: 109/137 (x86_64), 16/23 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 7 of 162 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
workstation live media problems
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180319.n.0.iso Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180320.n.0.iso 1.5G RAM VM, PackageKit goes bezerk, crashes, systemd-coredump then spins up trying to collect crash data and runs out of memory, and all hell breaks lose. This is non-deterministic in that it differs in some way every boot, what thing gets killed off first. Usually I just get a total hang of the VM even the serial console 'virsh console' hangs and I can't extract any info from the VM. In this case, I get a complete journal capture of the problem. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559176 In this case, with a bit more memory, 2G, the above problem is avoided more often. But then anaconda is hanging on launch more often than not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559180 Both seem like blockers, but openqa has nothing like this going on with these same images. I have of course done media test, and there are no errors reported on the host. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20180321.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 17/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 208720 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208720 ID: 208736 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208736 ID: 208743 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208743 ID: 208746 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208746 ID: 208751 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208751 ID: 208752 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208752 ID: 208753 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208753 ID: 208758 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208758 ID: 208766 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208766 ID: 208770 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208770 ID: 208771 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208771 ID: 208772 Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208772 ID: 208812 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208812 ID: 208813 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208813 ID: 208819 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208819 ID: 208823 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208823 ID: 208824 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208824 ID: 208829 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208829 ID: 208832 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208832 ID: 208846 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208846 ID: 208858 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208858 ID: 208866 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208866 ID: 208867 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208867 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 208715 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208715 ID: 208729 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208729 ID: 208730 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208730 ID: 208735 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208735 ID: 208749 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208749 ID: 208750 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208750 ID: 208754 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208754 ID: 208795 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208795 ID: 208822 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208822 ID: 208850 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208850 ID: 208865 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208865 Passed openQA tests: 105/137 (x86_64), 14/23 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 7 of 162 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: kernel update process (failure)
On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks > with > greater insight my be lurking here. > > In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally > determined > that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly. RPM > would > show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the > needed > files would not be in /boot. There is a scriplet error, but it is called > "nonfatal". > > I feel this to be a bugzilla. So, my question is, should kernel-core require > /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf > configuration? > Or something else? Technically yes, the kernel should require new-kernel-pkg since it uses it in the scriptlet. However, this might be a special case, because on some arches we don't use grub2. But perhaps it could be conditionalized. I'd say file a kernel bug or perhaps just mail the ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org list to discuss. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 3rd Party software submission
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:47:50 -0400, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote: > Well the current enablement of 3rd party software is meant to include stuff in > that regards and I think the revised text that was worked on with among others > Matthew Miller tried to come up with something better than the current > screenshots. What screenshots are you referring to here? > Also in the GNOME software the licensing field do put the work > Proprietary in a bright red colour box which to me signals 'warning' since red > usually is used as the colour of negative alerts. So I do think we are > covering > this and I think that is good, No, see, it isn't good enough. What does the word "proprietary" mean to an end user that is targeted here---one that is not necessarily part of the Open source eco system and has no context? What does it say about Free Software, and its importance? What does it say about how and why the Fedora community has made a commitment to this movement? Nothing at all. So, no, the "proprietary" label is not enough. > but we should be careful not to get to the stage > where installing Chrome comes with a blinking warning saying 'You can install > this, but be aware that we morally judge your for it' :) I won't reply to this hyperbolic comment. What I will do, is quote the "Freedom" foundation from here instead: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/project/fedora-overview.html "We are dedicated to free software and content. Advancing software and content freedom is a central community goal, which we accomplish through the software and content we promote. We choose free alternatives to proprietary code and content and limit the effects of proprietary or patent encumbered code on the Project. Sometimes this goal prevents us from taking the easy way out by including proprietary or patent encumbered software in Fedora. But by concentrating on the free software and content we provide and promote, the end result is that we are able to provide: - releases that are predictable and 100% legally redistributable for everyone; - innovation in free and open source software that can equal or exceed closed source or proprietary solutions; - and, a completely free project that anyone can emulate or copy in whole or in part for their own purposes. " So, how is this new feature is coherent with this in its current form? What do the other community members think please? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 28 compose report: 20180321.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-28-20180320.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 40.08 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 40.21 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-28-20180321.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-28-20180321.n.0.s390x.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Cloud_Base vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-28-20180320.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Cloud_Base vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-28-20180320.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: anaconda-28.22.2-5.fc28 Old package: anaconda-28.22.2-4.fc28 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 22.45 MiB Size change: 5.94 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 19 2018 Martin Kolman - 28.22.2-5 - Write rootpw command to kickstart (#1557529) (mkolman) Package: php-facedetect-1.2.0-0.3.20180306gitc717941.fc28 Old package: php-facedetect-1.1.0-10.fc28 Summary: PHP extension to access the OpenCV library RPMs: php-facedetect Size: 152.18 KiB Size change: 22.54 KiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 09 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1.0-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Mar 05 2018 Adam Williamson - 1.2.0-0.1.20180305git263435f - Bump to latest git (PHP 7, OpenCV 3.x compat) - BuildRequires gcc-c++ - License change back to PHP * Thu Mar 15 2018 S??rgio Basto - 1.2.0-0.2.20180306gitc717941 - Add last commit * Thu Mar 15 2018 S??rgio Basto - 1.2.0-0.3.20180306gitc717941 - Fix the License tag Package: pulseaudio-11.1-16.fc28 Old package: pulseaudio-11.1-15.fc28 Summary: Improved Linux Sound Server RPMs: pulseaudio pulseaudio-esound-compat pulseaudio-gdm-hooks pulseaudio-libs pulseaudio-libs-devel pulseaudio-libs-glib2 pulseaudio-module-bluetooth pulseaudio-module-gconf pulseaudio-module-jack pulseaudio-module-lirc pulseaudio-module-x11 pulseaudio-module-zeroconf pulseaudio-qpaeq pulseaudio-utils Size: 17.48 MiB Size change: 11.73 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 13 2018 Rex Dieter - 11.1-16 - skip patch93, seems to cause crashes w/headphone jacks (#1544507,#1551270,#1554035) = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180321.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180320.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 130 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.01 MiB Size of dropped packages:29.14 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 6.30 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 75.29 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20180320.n.0.s390x.tar.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-ncw-acd-0-0.3.20180320git887eb06.fc29 Summary: Go library for accessing the Amazon Cloud Drive RPMs:golang-github-ncw-acd-devel Size:20.69 KiB Package: kronosnet-1.1-8.fc29 Summary: Multipoint-to-Multipoint VPN daemon RPMs:libknet1 libknet1-compress-bzip2-plugin libknet1-compress-lz4-plugin libknet1-compress-lzma-plugin libknet1-compress-lzo2-plugin libknet1-compress-plugins-all libknet1-compress-zlib-plugin libknet1-crypto-nss-plugin libknet1-crypto-openssl-plugin libknet1-crypto-plugins-all libknet1-devel libknet1-plugins-all Size:1.84 MiB Package: rust-hyper-0.11.22-1.fc29 Summary: Modern HTTP library RPMs:rust-hyper-devel Size:153.93 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: ardour2-2.8.16-29.fc28 Summary: Digital Audio Workstation RPMs:ardour2 Size:25.56 MiB Package: caribou-0.4.21-7.fc28 Summary: A simplified in-place on-screen keyboard RPMs:caribou caribou-antler caribou-devel caribou-gtk2-module caribou-gtk3-module python2-caribou python3-caribou Size:1.91 MiB Package: gnome-tweak-tool-3.27.3-3.fc28 Summary: A tool to customize advanced GNOME 3 options RPMs:gnome-tweak-tool Size:326.34 KiB Package: golang-github-ncw-go-acd-0-0.2.20171119git887eb06.fc28 Summary: Go library for accessing the Amazon Cloud Drive RPMs:golang-github-ncw-go-acd-devel golang-github-ncw-go-acd-unit-test-devel Size:85.61 KiB Package: php-pecl-redis-3.1.6-3.fc28 Summary: Extension for communicating with the Redis key-value store RPMs:php-pecl-redis Size:1.27 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: TurboGears-1.1.3-17.fc29 Old package: TurboGears-1.1.3-16.fc27 Summary: Back-to-front web development in Python RPMs: TurboGears Size: 1.37 MiB Size change: 538 B Changelog: * Wed Feb 07 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1.3-17 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Package: aether-connector-okhttp-0.17.3-1.fc29 Old package: aether-connector-okhttp-0.16.0-2.fc28 Summary: OkHttp Aether Connector RPMs: aether-connector-okhttp aether-connector-okhttp-javadoc Size: 103.55 KiB Size change: 4.33 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 20 2018 Mat Booth - 0.17.3-1 - Update to latest release Package: annobin-5.1-1.fc29 Old package: annobin-5.0-1.fc29 Summary: Binary annotation plugin for GCC RPMs: annobin Size: 467.82 KiB Size change: 2.59 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 20 2018 Nick Clifton - 5.1-1 - Do not complain about a dwarf_version value of -1. (#1557511) Package: argon2-20161029-5.fc29 Old package: argon2-20161029-4.fc28 Summary: The password-hashing tools RPMs: argon2 libargon2 libargon2-devel Size: 512.12 KiB Size change: 4.19 KiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 15 2018 Remi Collet - 20161029-5 - honours all build flags #1558128 Package: bluez-5.49-1.fc29 Old package: bluez-5.48-5.fc29 Summary: Bluetooth utilities RPMs: bluez bluez-cups bluez-hid2hci bluez-libs bluez-libs-devel bluez-obexd Size: 12.45 MiB Size change: 121.14 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 20 2018 Peter Robinson 5.49-1 - Update to 5.49 Package: certbot-0.22.2-1.fc29 Old package: certbot-0.22.0-1.fc29 Summary: A free, automated certificate authority client RPMs: certbot python2-certbot python3-certbot Size: 992.88 KiB Size change: 848 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 20 2018 Eli Young - 0.22.2-1 - Update to 0.22.2 (#1558280) Package: clang5.0-5.0.1-4.fc29 Old package: clang5.0-5.0.1-3.fc29 Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM RPMs: clang5.0-devel clang5.0-libs Size: 88.63 MiB Size change: 2.54 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 20 2018 Iryna Shcherbina - 5.0.1-4 - Update Python 2 dependency declarations to new packaging standards (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FinalizingFedoraSwitchtoPython3) Package: condor-8.6.10-1.fc29 Old package: condor-8.6.9-3.fc28 Summary: HTCondor: High Throughput Computing RPMs: condor condor-classads condor-classads-devel condor-kbdd condor-openstack-gahp condor-procd condor-vm-gahp python2-condor Size: 36.64 MiB Size change: -40.95 KiB Changelog: * Sun Feb 18 2018 Ben Cotton - 8.6.9-4 - Add
Fedora 26 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing: Age URL 237 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ccb5c8d1e7 docker-distribution-2.6.2-1.git48294d9.fc26 69 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66b885ae3c keycloak-httpd-client-install-0.8-1.fc26 56 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4f8a78a5ef squid-4.0.23-1.fc26 49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c7c6160e65 thunderbird-52.6.0-1.fc26 31 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-db5041e661 bro-2.5.3-1.fc26 27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fc47f3c85d glibc-arm-linux-gnu-2.26-4.fc26 24 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c1f73debee drupal7-7.57-1.fc26 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-70c191d84a ntp-4.2.8p11-1.fc26 18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c967cee830 dovecot-2.2.34-1.fc26 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-122ea355a7 memcached-1.4.39-2.fc26 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6143b1d911 calibre-3.19.0-1.fc26 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d809bd2fd6 php-simplesamlphp-saml2_1-1.10.6-1.fc26 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4ab4d96f9 php-simplesamlphp-saml2-2.3.8-1.fc26 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f2097d8937 php-simplesamlphp-saml2_3-3.1.4-1.fc26 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5673d070df ImageMagick-6.9.9.38-1.fc26 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-505e83d30e webkitgtk4-2.20.0-1.fc26 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a0cca16ec6 exim-4.90.1-3.fc26 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1d3d0e6f2e monitorix-3.10.1-1.fc26 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c1769746da python-paramiko-2.2.3-1.fc26 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b0f6a5bdbc glpi-9.1.7.1-2.fc26 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e03a17fa61 mosquitto-1.4.15-1.fc26 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0c2141fcbc apache-commons-compress-1.13-3.fc26 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c188d3f09a unboundid-ldapsdk-4.0.5-1.fc26 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a233dae4ab tomcat-8.0.50-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f26d891469 libvorbis-1.3.6-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f0c97206ba kernel-4.15.11-200.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a46b358764 slf4j-1.7.22-5.fc26 The following Fedora 26 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c7c6160e65 thunderbird-52.6.0-1.fc26 34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ddd1e5c30a iproute-4.14.1-5.fc26 15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bac26576fe lxpanel-0.9.3-7.D20180305gitb85c71a6.fc26 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6b73fc22f3 breeze-icon-theme-5.44.0-1.fc26 extra-cmake-modules-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-attica-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-baloo-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-bluez-qt-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-frameworkintegration-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kactivities-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kactivities-stats-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kapidox-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-karchive-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kauth-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kbookmarks-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kcmutils-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kcodecs-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kcompletion-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kconfig-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kconfigwidgets-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kcoreaddons-5.44.0-2.fc26 kf5-kcrash-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdbusaddons-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdeclarative-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kded-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdelibs4support-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdesignerplugin-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdesu-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdewebkit-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdnssd-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kdoctools-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kemoticons-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kfilemetadata-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kglobalaccel-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kguiad dons-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-khtml-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-ki18n-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kiconthemes-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kidletime-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kimageformats-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kinit-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kio-5.44.0-2.fc26 kf5-kirigami2-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kitemmodels-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kitemviews-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kjobwidgets-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kjs-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kjsembed-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kmediaplayer-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-knewstuff-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-knotifications-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-knotifyconfig-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kpackage-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kparts-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kpeople-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kplotting-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kpty-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kross-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-krunner-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kservice-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-ktexteditor-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-ktextwidgets-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kunitconversion-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kwallet-5.44.0-1.fc26 kf5-kwayland-5.44.0-1.fc26
Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 10:58:22 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Sure, suggestions for better wording are very welcome. This is the best > we've managed to come up with so far. Could the software sources can be divided into a few categories maybe? For example: - Fedora defaults "These are default Fedora repositories. Keep them enabled to get the latest updates from Fedora" - Extra Free/Open source software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide Free/Open source software from other sources, such as COPRs" - Extra Proprietary software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide proprietary software that is not free/open source" - Other repositories "These are other repositories that have been configured, such as user-enabled repositories" Maybe there could be a colour scheme too to signify each category's status, like Blue for Fedora repositories, Green for Workstation-free, Red for Workstation-nonfree, and a Yellow for user-enabled ones. How does that sound? I don't know how much work it'll take, of course. > > Yes. I believe mattdm wanted to have a new docs.fedoraproject.org page > with end-user facing text that we can link to from gnome-software. Great. Thank you for following this up. :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
kernel update process (failure)
I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks with greater insight my be lurking here. In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally determined that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly. RPM would show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the needed files would not be in /boot. There is a scriplet error, but it is called "nonfatal". I feel this to be a bugzilla. So, my question is, should kernel-core require /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf configuration? Or something else? -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Atomic 27-20180321.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
