Fedora-IoT-34-20200902.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0): ID: 653697 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653697 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0): ID: 653701 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653701 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0): ID: 653691 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653691 Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: clevis-luks-askpass.service System load changed from 0.28 to 0.16 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/651105#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653692#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: clevis-luks-askpass.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/651104#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653694#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Rawhide-20200902.n.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200831.n.0): ID: 653514 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653514 ID: 653618 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653618 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200831.n.0): ID: 653545 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653545 ID: 653551 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653551 ID: 653577 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653577 ID: 653587 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653587 ID: 653645 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653645 Soft failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200831.n.0): ID: 653481 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653481 ID: 653487 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653487 ID: 653503 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653503 ID: 653549 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653549 ID: 653550 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653550 ID: 653560 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653560 ID: 653581 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653581 ID: 653582 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653582 ID: 653583 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653583 ID: 653588 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653588 ID: 653646 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653646 Passed openQA tests: 148/181 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200831.n.0): ID: 653513 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653513 ID: 653571 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653571 ID: 653572 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653572 ID: 653578 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653578 ID: 653579 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653579 ID: 653593 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653593 ID: 653603 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653603 ID: 653604 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653604 Skipped gating openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64) New skipped gating tests (same test not skipped in Fedora-Rawhide-20200831.n.0): ID: 653521 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653521 ID: 653522 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653522 ID: 653524 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653524 ID: 653527 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653527 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 11 of 181 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.05 to 0.19 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/651357#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653468#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.31 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/651358#downloads Current test data:
Re: making a /boot partition into fs-type btrfs gives "unrecognizable file system" message from grub2
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:42 PM George R Goffe via test wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm playing around with FC34 ina VM and have backed up /boot; put a btrfs fs > on the partition; restored from the backup, updated fstab but grub2 still > goes into rescue mode. This tells me that there's something I don't know > which is entirely possible. Could it be a missing driver in the initfs (name > btrfs)? > > Is there a quick answer? Can I get some doc links to rtfm? Please? Yes the UUID of /boot has changed, so grub.cfg is looking for the wrong grub root (which is normally /boot). BIOS firmware you need: grub2-install /dev/sdX - whatever is the whole drive block device. This adds a btrfs driver to GRUB core.img so it can read /boot grub2-mkconfig -o /etc/grub2.cfg - this will add the UUID of /boot UEFI firmware you need just the 2nd command but it needs to be /etc/grub2-efi.cfg Their real locations are: ls -l /etc ... lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root22 Aug 21 08:30 grub2.cfg -> ../boot/grub2/grub.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root31 Aug 21 08:30 grub2-efi.cfg -> ../boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg Make sure whether you have UEFI or BIOS though. One way is run efibootmgr. If there's an error, it's BIOS. If multi-line output it's UEFI. You do not want to run grub-install on UEFI. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
making a /boot partition into fs-type btrfs gives "unrecognizable file system" message from grub2
Hi, I'm playing around with FC34 ina VM and have backed up /boot; put a btrfs fs on the partition; restored from the backup, updated fstab but grub2 still goes into rescue mode. This tells me that there's something I don't know which is entirely possible. Could it be a missing driver in the initfs (name btrfs)? Is there a quick answer? Can I get some doc links to rtfm? Please? Best regards, George... ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: MariaDB Broken?
On 9/2/20 1:11 PM, Ifejika Somtochukwu Noble wrote: After i updated my Fedora Rawhide, mariadb stopped working. i uninstalled it and trying to reinstall again, but i keep running into error. [root@noblecontracts noble]# mysql_install_db Installing MariaDB/MySQL system tables in '@MYSQL_DATADIR@' ... 2020-09-02 19:22:30 0 [Warning] Can't create test file /usr/@MYSQL_DATADIR@/noblecontracts.lower-test /usr/libexec/mysqld: Can't change dir to '/usr/@MYSQL_DATADIR@/' (Errcode: 2 "No such file or directory") 2020-09-02 19:22:30 0 [ERROR] Aborting Installation of system tables failed! Examine the logs in @LOG_LOCATION@ or @MYSQL_DATADIR@ for more information. Looks like something changed in the mariadb build system and substitutions aren't happening. I don't see any ongoing builds, so I suggest filing a bug. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
MariaDB Broken?
Hello Everyone, After i updated my Fedora Rawhide, mariadb stopped working. i uninstalled it and trying to reinstall again, but i keep running into error. [root@noblecontracts noble]# mysql_install_db Installing MariaDB/MySQL system tables in '@MYSQL_DATADIR@' ... 2020-09-02 19:22:30 0 [Warning] Can't create test file /usr/@MYSQL_DATADIR@ /noblecontracts.lower-test /usr/libexec/mysqld: Can't change dir to '/usr/@MYSQL_DATADIR@/' (Errcode: 2 "No such file or directory") 2020-09-02 19:22:30 0 [ERROR] Aborting Installation of system tables failed! Examine the logs in @LOG_LOCATION@ or @MYSQL_DATADIR@ for more information. The problem could be conflicting information in an external my.cnf files. You can ignore these by doing: shell> /usr/bin/mysql_install_db --defaults-file=~/.my.cnf You can also try to start the mysqld daemon with: shell> /usr/libexec/mysqld --skip-grant-tables --general-log & and use the command line tool /usr/bin/mysql to connect to the mysql database and look at the grant tables: shell> /usr/bin/mysql -u root mysql mysql> show tables; Try 'mysqld --help' if you have problems with paths. Using --general-log gives you a log in @MYSQL_DATADIR@ that may be helpful. The latest information about mysql_install_db is available at https://mariadb.com/kb/en/installing-system-tables-mysql_install_db You can find the latest source at https://downloads.mariadb.org and the maria-discuss email list at https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Please check all of the above before submitting a bug report at http://mariadb.org/jira Has anyone run into this recently? Could this be evidence of a regression? Regards -- FAS: noblesomto IRC: noble Running Fedora Rawhide ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 31 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 31 Security updates need testing: Age URL 101 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fcd5fd47bd qutebrowser-1.11.1-1.fc31 54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-218ab035b1 knot-resolver-5.1.2-1.fc31 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-126a0dd319 curl-7.66.0-3.fc31 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c83556709c lua-5.3.5-8.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9a0b272cc1 libX11-1.6.12-1.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3689b67b53 xen-4.12.3-4.fc31 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd8b8f887b dovecot-2.3.11.3-4.fc31 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b2d6cffc6f selinux-policy-3.14.4-54.fc31 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-95f2c5cc25 geary-3.34.2-2.fc31 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b190375a37 golang-1.13.15-1.fc31 The following Fedora 31 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 95 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-03e14f6120 dracut-050-61.git20200529.fc31 79 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5ccd452c8e gnutls-3.6.14-2.fc31 28 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a07ca7ca52 ethtool-5.8-1.fc31 21 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-72bc7df001 libunwind-1.3.1-7.fc31 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c83556709c lua-5.3.5-8.fc31 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-126a0dd319 curl-7.66.0-3.fc31 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-724817ea52 python-productmd-1.27-1.fc31 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f82325860d vim-8.2.1484-2.fc31 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d2537f11b0 python3-3.7.9-1.fc31 python3-docs-3.7.9-1.fc31 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-44ece22b25 kernel-5.7.17-100.fc31 kernel-headers-5.7.17-100.fc31 kernel-tools-5.7.17-100.fc31 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8f69c7534c iproute-5.4.0-2.fc31 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fc8c9ab641 libcap-ng-0.7.11-1.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9a0b272cc1 libX11-1.6.12-1.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3689b67b53 xen-4.12.3-4.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-fa3b6f1396 samba-4.11.12-0.fc31 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-70b012d07b tracker-2.3.5-1.fc31.1 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b2d6cffc6f selinux-policy-3.14.4-54.fc31 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e92fb4bd29 rsync-3.2.3-1.fc31 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f3f3449c4 hwdata-0.339-1.fc31 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8376ce7a88 perl-5.30.3-455.fc31 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 31 updates-testing bpytop-1.0.22-1.fc31 buildbot-2.8.4-1.fc31 cockpit-podman-23-1.fc31 emacs-blacken-0-0.2.20200626git784da60.fc31 erlang-22.3.4.10-1.fc31 firefox-80.0.1-1.fc31 golang-github-acarl005-stripansi-0-0.1.20200902git5a71ef0.fc31 golang-github-brocaar-chirpstack-api-3.7.7-1.fc31 groonga-10.0.6-1.fc31 logiops-0.2.2-1.fc31 mozilla-privacy-badger-2020.8.25-1.fc31 nfs-utils-2.5.1-3.rc4.fc31 perl-Locale-Codes-3.65-1.fc31 podman-2.0.6-1.fc31 python-apprise-0.8.8-1.fc31 python-chirpstack-api-3.7.7-1.fc31 python-cmarkgfm-0.4.2-2.fc31 python-hstspreload-2020.9.2-1.fc31 rubygem-sequel-5.36.0-1.fc31 setzer-0.3.1-1.fc31 wine-5.16-1.fc31 wordpress-5.5.1-1.fc31 Details about builds: bpytop-1.0.22-1.fc31 (FEDORA-2020-96b5dd8649) Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor Update Information: Update to latest version ChangeLog: * Wed Sep 2 2020 Artem Polishchuk - 1.0.22-1 - Update to 1.0.22 * Tue Aug 25 2020 Artem Polishchuk - 1.0.21-1 - Update to 1.0.21 buildbot-2.8.4-1.fc31 (FEDORA-2020-8a7817580f) Build/test automation system Update Information: * Fix 100% CPU on large installations when using the changes API * Work around incomplete support for codebases in `GerritChangeSource`. This avoids an internal assertion when the configuration file does not specify any codebases.
Fedora-33-20200902.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 33/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200901.n.0): ID: 653087 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653087 ID: 653090 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653090 ID: 653091 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653091 ID: 653092 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653092 ID: 653096 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653096 ID: 653107 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653107 ID: 653116 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653116 ID: 653129 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653129 ID: 653139 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653139 ID: 653142 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653142 ID: 653145 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653145 ID: 653148 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653148 ID: 653158 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653158 ID: 653165 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653165 ID: 653177 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653177 ID: 653182 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli_cloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653182 ID: 653187 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653187 ID: 653201 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653201 ID: 653238 Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653238 ID: 653239 Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653239 ID: 653246 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653246 ID: 653266 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653266 ID: 653267 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653267 ID: 653268 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653268 ID: 653269 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653269 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200901.n.0): ID: 653156 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653156 ID: 653162 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653162 ID: 653194 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653194 ID: 653204 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653204 ID: 653205 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653205 ID: 653235 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653235 ID: 653262 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653262 ID: 653263 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653263 Soft failed openQA tests: 70/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20200901.n.0): ID: 653085 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653085 ID: 653086 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653086 ID: 653088 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653088 ID: 653089 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653089 ID: 653093 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653093 ID: 653097 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653097 ID: 653098
Fedora-IoT-33-20200902.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200901.0): ID: 653316 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653316 ID: 653317 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653317 ID: 653321 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653321 Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 33 compose report: 20200902.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-33-20200901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:235.88 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 259.37 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -8.64 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-33-20200902.n.0-sda.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: jaf-1.2.1-3.module_f33+7821+c2c8f5c9 Summary: JavaBeans Activation Framework RPMs:jaf jaf-javadoc Size:149.62 KiB Package: xrdhttpvoms-0.2.5-8.fc33 Summary: VOMS security extractor plugin for XrdHTTP RPMs:xrdhttpvoms Size:86.25 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: directory-maven-plugin-0.3.1-1.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: directory-maven-plugin-0.3.1-1.module_f33+7821+c2c8f5c9 Summary: Establish locations for files in multi-module builds RPMs: directory-maven-plugin directory-maven-plugin-javadoc Size: 287.27 KiB Size change: 233.38 KiB Package: ee4j-parent-1.0.1-1.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: ee4j-parent-1.0.1-1.module_f33+7821+c2c8f5c9 Summary: Parent POM file for Eclipse Enterprise for Java projects RPMs: ee4j-parent Size: 10.37 KiB Size change: 62 B Package: javamail-1.6.5-2.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: javamail-1.6.3-4.module_f33+7821+c2c8f5c9 Summary: Java Mail API RPMs: javamail Size: 684.54 KiB Size change: 8.08 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jun 16 2020 Jie Kang - 1.6.5-1 - Update to upstream 1.6.5 * Wed Aug 12 2020 Alex Macdonald 1.6.5-2 - Fix the mvn alias on javax.mail:mail Package: jmc-7.1.1-6.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: jmc-7.1.1-3.module_f33+8736+077e070a Summary: JDK Mission Control is a profiling and diagnostics tool RPMs: jmc Size: 205.38 MiB Size change: -9.47 MiB Changelog: * Wed Jul 29 2020 Alex Macdonald - 7.1.1-4 - Update symlink script with path to jakarta-activation * Fri Aug 07 2020 Alex Macdonald - 7.1.1-5 - Update symlink to match javamail version in rpms/javamail - Version 1.6.5 is compatible with 1.6.3 according to the upstream compatibility notes * Fri Aug 28 2020 Jie Kang - 7.1.1-6 - Update to latest upstream - Drop javax dependencies - Clean spec Package: jmc-core-7.1.1-4.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: jmc-core-7.1.1-3.module_f33+8736+077e070a Summary: Core API for JDK Mission Control RPMs: jmc-core jmc-core-javadoc Size: 2.47 MiB Size change: 315.17 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 28 2020 Jie Kang - 7.1.1-4 - Update to latest upstream 63ec7d0ee8d9 Package: owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-3.module_f33+10053+6a6e5cb9 Old package: owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-2.module_f33+7821+c2c8f5c9 Summary: Collection of high-performance low-overhead contextual encoders RPMs: owasp-java-encoder owasp-java-encoder-javadoc Size: 347.77 KiB Size change: 236.97 KiB Changelog: * Tue Aug 18 2020 Alex Macdonald - 1.2.2-3 - Remove osgi metadata patch0 that previously added a manifest - Include patch (courtesy of jkang) to package as a bundle instead of a jar - Update maven-compiler-plugin source/target version for builds in f33 Package: perl-4:5.30.3-455.module_f33+10047+8c6c443b Old package: perl-4:5.30.3-454.module_f33+9369+dac0eadc Summary: Practical Extraction and Report Language RPMs: perl perl-Attribute-Handlers perl-Devel-Peek perl-Devel-SelfStubber perl-Errno perl-ExtUtils-Embed perl-ExtUtils-Miniperl perl-IO perl-IO-Zlib perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple perl-Math-Complex perl-Memoize perl-Module-Loaded perl-Net-Ping perl-Pod-Html perl-SelfLoader perl-Test perl-Time-Piece perl-devel perl-interpreter perl-libnetcfg perl-libs perl-macros perl-open perl-tests perl-utils Size: 49.82 MiB Size change: 50.35 KiB Changelog: * Wed Aug 05 2020 Petr Pisar - 4:5.30.3-455 - Do not use a C compiler reserved identifiers - Fix SvUV_nomg() macro definition - Fix ext/XS-APItest/t/utf8_warn_base.pl tests - Fix IO::Handle::error() to report write errors (GH#6799) - Fix running actions after stepping in a debugger (GH#17901) - Fix a buffer size for asctime_r() and ctime_r() functions - Prevent from an integer overflow in RenewDouble() macro - Fix a buffer overread in when reallocating formats (GH#17844) - Fix a number of arguments passed to a BOOT XS subroutine (GH#17755) - Fix an IO::Handle spurious error reported for regular file handles (GH#18019) - Re-enable LTO - Fix inheritance resolution of lexial objects in a debugger (GH#17661) - Fix a misoptimization when assignig a list in a list context (GH#17816) - Fix handling
Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release > criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial > setup experience. So let's add a new requirement for that. How about > something like: > > "If an initial setup utility is run or intended to be run after the > first boot of the installed system, then it must start successfully and > each page or panel of the initial setup utility should withstand a > basic functionality test." > > OK that's pretty basic, but it gets the point across. I think this can > be a final requirement, not necessarily important enough to be a beta > requirement. Bikeshed away! > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870476 Hey Michael, all criteria proposals should definitely (also) go to the test list, adding into CC. Just to put everyone on the same page, we already have this Basic criterion: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria#Expected_installed_system_boot_behavior That means that user creation is already guaranteed to be functional (but might be rough around the edges). Of course that doesn't cover any other actions available in the initial setup. Therefore your proposal (targeting the Final milestone, which seems sensible) makes sense in this regard. There are the screens in the initial setup: 1. Welcome 2. Privacy (Location Services, Automatic Problem Reporting) 3. Online Accounts (Google, Nextcloud, Microsoft, Facebook) 4. About You (Name, Username, Enterprise Login) 5. Password 6. Done Since every screen contains just a couple of things, the "basic functionality test" as you phrased it seems to cover essentially everything that is present in there, with one arguable exception of the Enterprise Login functionality. Do you have the same impression? This will also cover the other initial setup screen that is visible for KDE and other desktops (does it run also for ARM text installs? I'm not sure). That one contains: 1. User Creation (Name, Username, Password, Make admin, Advanced) And that was all (at least for my KDE install during which I didn't create a regular user). Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems fine to me. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-31-20200902.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Introduction
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 12:23 -0500, Klein Kravis wrote:
> Hello QA team. I'm just saying hello before I get to work on testing
> the new F33 nighty. I've been a Fedora user for about 6 months now
> (Ubuntu for 2 years before) Before I started contributing here I
> worked on docs for the Gnome foundation. I'm excited to get to work!
> I hope to see y'all on IRC sometime.
Hello Klein, and welcome.
I've sponsored your apllication to the QA Fas group right now.
It is a good time to join the QA team. :-)
As you know Fedora 33 is on its way to be released in less than a
couple of months. [1] So it is always a good thing that people perform
as many test as possible before the release.
And as you may already know, this week is the Fedora Test Week for
Btrfs [2]
Test days schedule can be found on the fedocal
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/list/QA/?subject=Test+Day
You can start with Release Validation testing. In Release Validation
all you need to do is to check the nightly/TC/RC against certain
criteria. For example, let's take the latest compose nominated for
testing (Fedora 33 Branched 20200822.n.0), you can run test cases which
are mentioned [3] and submit your results in the test matrix.
Note that each of the test cases[4] will have "How to test" section
which will have the steps (to be executed sequentially) and if the
results match with the expected results you can mark it as pass by
editing the wiki page {{result|PASS|}}. Always make sure
to check for "Associated release criterion" which can be found on the
top of test case page, if your test case fails you can mark it fail by
editing the wiki page {{result|FAIL|}} and file a bug at
RHBZ [5] under Fedora.
You can always find the ‘current’ validation pages using these
addresses:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test
You can start off by testing updates in [
http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/] for Fedora 31, Fedora 32, and Fedora
33. Update testing is where a tester tests a package and gives out a +1
Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for FAIL. You can go to
bodhi.fedoraproject.org where you can sort the packages with Fedora
Releases and tags viz "pending" & "testing". You can read much about
update testing here [6]. You can also, use fedora-easy-karma for giving
out feedbacks.
For Automation, you can start looking at Open QA[
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenQA] its maintained by Adamw.
Other Blogs to read:
-
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/getting-started-fedora-qa-part-1/
-
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/getting-started-fedora-qa-part-2/
-
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/getting-started-fedora-qa-part-3/
[1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html
[2]
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/contribute-at-the-fedora-test-week-for-btrfs/
[3]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Branched_20200822.n.0_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_stick_Live_luc
[5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
[6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
Feel free to ping us on IRC if you need any help #fedora-qa@freenode
(or on Telegram https://t.me/fedora_qa)
Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-32-20200902.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200901.0): ID: 652894 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/652894 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
