Re: Merging Fedora IoT Release Criteria into Fedora QA Criteria

2020-09-23 Thread Geoffrey Marr
Hi all,

The following links are temporary locations of the modified Fedora QA
criteria adding IoT, based on the IoT test-matrix template [0].
Respectively, they are as follows: Basic, Basic diff, F33 Beta, F33 Beta
diff, F33 Final, F33 Final diff [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

If you have time, please review them so we can merge the changes into the
official Fedora QA criteria pages.

Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:General_IoT_test_matrix
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Coremodule/Basic_Release_Criteria
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Coremodule%2FBasic_Release_Criteria=revision=589189=589163
[3]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Coremodule/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria
[4]
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Coremodule%2FFedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria=revision=589193=589192
[5]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Coremodule/Fedora_33_Final_Release_Criteria
[6]
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Coremodule%2FFedora_33_Final_Release_Criteria=revision=589191=589190

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:26 PM Paul Whalen  wrote:

>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As Fedora IoT is an official edition now, the Fedora QA team finds it
> > necessary to merge the existing Fedora IoT release criteria [0] into the
> > existing criteria [1]. As it stands however, the IoT criteria have not
> been
> > "rated" as to which criteria go where; Basic, Beta, or Final.
> >
> > The purpose of my email is to start a discussion on how to "rate" each
> > criterion listed [0]. Should there be different versions of each
> criterion
> > for Basic, Beta, and Final? Are some more important and as such,
> expected to
> > work from inception (Basic)? Which are these?
>
> Looking at our test template[1], the tests currently have a Milestone
> rating.
>
> The tests that are common between the Fedoras should share the same
> Milestone,
> currently some do not- they should likely be aligned for simplicity. The
> IoT
> specific tests were given a Milestone that made sense to our group, but
> we're
> also open to further discussion there if they need to be adjusted.
>
> Thanks for getting this started,
> Paul
>
> [1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:General_IoT_test_matrix
>
> >
> > Fedora QA would like to have the official Fedora QA criteria page [1]
> updated
> > soon, (certainly before F33 launch), so that there is an established
> quality
> > standard to which IoT will reach.
> >
> > Thanks for reading.
> >
> > Geoff Marr
> > IRC: coremodule
> >
> > [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/release-criteria/
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
> >
> > ___
> > IoT mailing list -- i...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/i...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
> ___
> IoT mailing list -- i...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/i...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go tomorrow

2020-09-23 Thread Ben Cotton
Hi everyone,

No cancelations this time! The Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is
scheduled for Thursday 24 September. We will meet at 1700 UTC in
#fedora-meeting-1 to determine if we will release Fedora 33 Beta.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9810/

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fedora-33-20200923.n.0 compose check report

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):

ID: 675634  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675634
ID: 675645  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675645
ID: 675733  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675733

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):

ID: 675661  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675661

Soft failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):

ID: 675586  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675586
ID: 675605  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675605
ID: 675632  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675632
ID: 675665  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675665
ID: 675668  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675668
ID: 675682  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675682
ID: 675695  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675695
ID: 675716  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675716

Passed openQA tests: 169/181 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):

ID: 675712  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675712

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
1 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673465#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675594#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
1 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673467#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675596#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 19 MiB to 24 MiB
2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4, python3-inotify
System load changed from 1.34 to 0.69
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673500#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675629#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 27 MiB to 24 MiB
2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4, python3-inotify
System load changed from 0.49 to 0.94
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673502#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675631#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 12 MiB to 14 MiB
2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4, python3-inotify
System load changed from 1.63 to 1.40
Average CPU usage changed from 29.62857143 to 40.75238095
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673519#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675648#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 13 MiB to 16 MiB
2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: lz4, python3-inotify
System load changed from 0.98 to 1.20
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673520#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675649#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 20 MiB to 18 MiB
System load changed from 0.40 to 0.96
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673536#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675665#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 18 MiB to 15 MiB
System load changed from 0.31 to 0.42
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673539#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675668#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: 
Used swap changed from 5 

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200923.n.0 changes

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200923.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   16
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  4.17 MiB
Size of dropped packages:438.00 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   100.10 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   1.57 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Minimal raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Minimal-33-20200923.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Container_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-33-20200923.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz
Image: SoaS raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-33-20200923.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Xfce raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Xfce-33-20200923.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-33-20200923.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: dbus-parsec-0.2.2-3.fc33
Summary: DBus PARSEC interface
RPMs:dbus-parsec
Size:1.06 MiB

Package: parsec-0.4.0-5.fc33
Summary: The PARSEC daemon
RPMs:parsec
Size:3.12 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: gst-transcoder-1.16.0-4.fc33
Summary: GStreamer Transcoding API
RPMs:gst-transcoder gst-transcoder-devel
Size:438.00 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  abrt-2.14.4-5.fc33
Old package:  abrt-2.14.2-5.fc33
Summary:  Automatic bug detection and reporting tool
RPMs: abrt abrt-addon-ccpp abrt-addon-kerneloops abrt-addon-pstoreoops 
abrt-addon-upload-watch abrt-addon-vmcore abrt-addon-xorg abrt-atomic abrt-cli 
abrt-console-notification abrt-dbus abrt-desktop abrt-devel abrt-gui 
abrt-gui-devel abrt-gui-libs abrt-libs abrt-plugin-bodhi abrt-plugin-machine-id 
abrt-plugin-sosreport abrt-retrace-client abrt-tui python3-abrt 
python3-abrt-addon python3-abrt-container-addon python3-abrt-doc
Size: 5.96 MiB
Size change:  -1.05 MiB

Package:  abrt-java-connector-1.2.0-5.fc33
Old package:  abrt-java-connector-1.1.5-8.fc33
Summary:  JNI Agent library converting Java exceptions to ABRT problems
RPMs: abrt-java-connector abrt-java-connector-container
Size: 400.33 KiB
Size change:  14.11 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 26 2020 rebase-helper  - 1.2.0-1
  - new upstream release: 1.2.0

  * Wed Aug 26 2020 Michal Fabik  1.2.0-2
  - Bump release to rebuild in new side tag

  * Wed Sep 02 2020 Michal Fabik  1.2.0-3
  - Bump release to rebuild in new side tag

  * Wed Sep 09 2020 Michal Fabik  1.2.0-4
  - Bump release to rebuild gnome-abrt

  * Mon Sep 14 2020 Michal Fabik  1.2.0-5
  - Bump release to rebuild reportd


Package:  anaconda-33.25.2-4.fc33
Old package:  anaconda-33.25.2-3.fc33
Summary:  Graphical system installer
RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui 
anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets 
anaconda-widgets-devel
Size: 20.83 MiB
Size change:  -8.95 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 17 2020 Martin Kolman  - 33.25.2-4
  - Fix the combo box for an URL type of additional repositories (#1879127) 
(vponcova)


Package:  gnome-abrt-1.3.6-5.fc33
Old package:  gnome-abrt-1.3.5-5.fc33
Summary:  A utility for viewing problems that have occurred with the system
RPMs: gnome-abrt
Size: 698.19 KiB
Size change:  -29.22 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 05 2020 Merlin Mathesius  - 1.3.5-5
  - Minor ELN conditional fixes

  * Mon Aug 24 2020 rebase-helper  - 1.3.6-1
  - new upstream release: 1.3.6

  * Wed Aug 26 2020 Michal Fabik  1.3.6-2
  - Bump release to rebuild in new side tag

  * Wed Sep 02 2020 Michal Fabik  1.3.6-3
  - Bump release to rebuild in new side tag

  * Wed Sep 09 2020 Michal Fabik  1.3.6-4
  - Bump release to rebuild against new libreport

  * Mon Sep 14 2020 Michal Fabik  1.3.6-5
  - Bump release to rebuild reportd


Package:  gnome-remote-desktop-0.1.9-1.fc33
Old package:  gnome-remote-desktop-0.1.7-5.fc33
Summary:  GNOME Remote Desktop screen share service
RPMs: gnome-remote-desktop
Size: 336.54 KiB
Size change:  52.10 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 14 2020 Jonas ??dahl  - 0.1.9-1
  - Update to 0.1.9
  - Backport race condition crash fix
  - Rebase anon-tls patches


Package:  google-api-python-client-2:1.6.7-13.fc33
Old package:  google-api-python-client-1:1.10.0-2.fc33
Summary:  Google APIs Client Library for Python
RPMs: python3-google-api-client
Size: 88.40 KiB
Size change:  -3.59 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 26 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1:1.10.1-1
  - 1.10.1

  * Fri Aug 28 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1:1.11.0-1
  - 1.11.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1:1.12.1-1
  - 1.12.1

  * Wed Sep 16 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 2:1.6.7-13
  - Revert to 1.6.7


Package:  kf5-baloo-5.73.0-3.fc33
Old package:  kf5-baloo-5.73.0-1.fc33
Summary

Fedora-IoT-32-20200923.0 compose check report

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200603.0):

ID: 675515  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675515

Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200603.0):

ID: 675517  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675517
ID: 675525  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675525
ID: 675526  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675526
ID: 675529  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675529
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: a user question

2020-09-23 Thread David
Is Ferdora a fork of Fedora ?

Just kidding



Hello David,
>
> A good place to discuss things about Fedora is
> discussion.ferdoraproject.org.  It is a forum designed specifically for
> this type of content
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: a user question

2020-09-23 Thread Stephen Snow

Hello David,

A good place to discuss things about Fedora is 
discussion.ferdoraproject.org.  It is a forum designed specifically for 
this type of content and also lets the rest of the community see what 
you are trying to solve, so maybe someone else has gone through what 
you are having difficulty with and vice-versa.


Regards,
Stephen

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:52, David  wrote:

I have posted several emails in the past few months, that were
personal in nature about my experiences with Rawhide, and various
Fedora concepts or software, instead of posting about any specific
way to correctly use Fedora, or to fix a bug, or to report a bug.

It has been pointed out to me that I should write these post
in a different forum.

I could write them in my blog, but nobody would read that.

As an example, today was my first day to tinker with appimages
and obviously my first time to tinker with them in Fedora, and in
my case on Rawhide.

My first experience with appimages was unpleasant.But at the
same time, I got to use the latest versions of two applications, Krita
and Firefox. I am in the Firefox 81.0 appimage right now and have
been for most of the evening.I had a few moments were I could
not print and a few moments it seemed to have crashed.I think
some of the settings vanish when I close it and re-launch it.

Is there a place on the list-server where users can rant about things
in Fedora, and even complain about things.

The folks advertising appimages say it is the best invention since
sliced-bread. But when I looked on the appimage hub, I did not
find any applications that I wanted to run.

It would seem using appimages in Rawhide is a good example of
how they can be used, as running the executable file doesn't affect 
the

operating system, and the developers of Rawhide don't have to worry
about repackaging Golden Dictionary.   ( I could not get that one to 
work

as an appimage ), but Rawhide seems to have the most recent version.

I now have about 40 man-hours running Rawhide on a Ryzen 3 1200AF
ASUS X570 computer.No issues to report.

David Locklear
a novice user of Rawhide as my only operating system




___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

2020-09-23 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:44 AM Jaap Bosman  wrote:

> Language problem?
>
> In
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Minimal_Package_Install
>
> it says Enter the *INSTALLATION SOURCE* screen and ensure the box *Don't
> install the latest available software updates.* is checked. If using the
> generic network install image, the source should be set to *Closest
> mirror*. Click *Done*
>
>
> *In the Dutch install. screengives a  choice between *
>
> *1. Only install newest available software (trasaltion from Dutch)*
>
>
> *2. Only install standard versions from instalation source. *
>
> *For test I did choose #2 and that went okay.*
>

Thanks, I updated the testcase.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fedora-Rawhide-20200923.n.0 compose check report

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):

ID: 674908  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674908
ID: 674961  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674961

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):

ID: 674944  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674944
ID: 674948  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674948
ID: 674955  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674955
ID: 674958  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674958
ID: 674959  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674959
ID: 674967  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674967
ID: 675003  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675003
ID: 675028  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675028
ID: 675062  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675062

Soft failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):

ID: 674884  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674884
ID: 674903  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674903

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):

ID: 674943  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674943
ID: 674963  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674963
ID: 674966  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674966
ID: 674980  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674980
ID: 674993  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674993
ID: 675014  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675014

Passed openQA tests: 162/181 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):

ID: 674930  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674930

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.23 to 0.10
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672679#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674892#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.47 to 0.29
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672681#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674894#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 0.09 to 0.27
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672711#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674924#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.30 to 0.11
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672712#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674925#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 3 MiB to 5 MiB
Average CPU usage changed from 31.97619048 to 20.31904762
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672714#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674927#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.72 to 1.23
Average CPU usage changed from 10.27142857 to 32.60952381
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/672716#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674929#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 1.42 to 1.55
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/673870#downloads
Current test 

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200923.0 compose check report

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200923.n.0 changes

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200923.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   192
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  3.01 MiB
Size of dropped packages:438.00 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   7.17 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -74.23 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud_Base tar-gz x86_64
Path: 
Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-GCP-Rawhide-20200923.n.0.x86_64.tar.gz
Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200923.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: plasma-disks-5.19.90-1.fc34
Summary: Hard disk health monitoring for KDE Plasma
RPMs:plasma-disks
Size:740.58 KiB

Package: python-flask-healthz-0.0.2-1.fc34
Summary: Module to easily add health endpoints to a Flask application
RPMs:python3-flask-healthz
Size:12.65 KiB

Package: python-mechanicalsoup-0.12.0-1.fc34
Summary: Python library for automating interaction with websites
RPMs:python-mechanicalsoup-doc python3-mechanicalsoup
Size:291.58 KiB

Package: python-pymc3-3.9.3-2.fc34
Summary: Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
RPMs:python3-pymc3
Size:1.85 MiB

Package: python-readlike-0.1.3-1.fc34
Summary: Readline-like line editing module
RPMs:python3-readlike
Size:14.71 KiB

Package: python-reparser-1.4.3-1.fc34
Summary: Simple regex-based lexer/parser for inline markup
RPMs:python3-reparser
Size:14.87 KiB

Package: python-requre-0.4.0-1.fc34
Summary: Python library what allows re/store output of various objects for 
testing
RPMs:python3-requre
Size:73.80 KiB

Package: rust-vte0.3-0.3.3-1.fc34
Summary: Parser for implementing terminal emulators
RPMs:rust-vte0.3+default-devel rust-vte0.3-devel
Size:45.01 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: gst-transcoder-1.16.0-4.fc33
Summary: GStreamer Transcoding API
RPMs:gst-transcoder gst-transcoder-devel
Size:438.00 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.26.2-2.fc34
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.26.2-1.fc34.1
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules 
NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel NetworkManager-ovs 
NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi 
NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 28.71 MiB
Size change:  27.08 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Sep 19 2020 Yaroslav Fedevych  - 1:1.26.2-2
  - fix build failure due to generating invalid XML documentation


Package:  annobin-9.33-1.fc34
Old package:  annobin-9.32-2.fc34
Summary:  Annotate and examine compiled binary files
RPMs: annobin annobin-annocheck
Size: 1011.83 KiB
Size change:  -34.07 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 21 2020 Nick Clifton  - 9.33-1
  - gcc-plugin: Fix test for empty PowerPC sections.  (#1880634)


Package:  appstream-generator-0.8.2-1.fc34
Old package:  appstream-generator-0.8.1-2.fc33
Summary:  Fast AppStream metadata generator
RPMs: appstream-generator
Size: 2.09 MiB
Size change:  34.84 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 21 2020 Neal Gompa  - 0.8.2-1
  - Update to 0.8.2 (#1834975)


Package:  ark-20.08.1-1.fc34
Old package:  ark-20.08.0-2.fc34
Summary:  Archive manager
RPMs: ark ark-libs
Size: 7.71 MiB
Size change:  18.14 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  ast-9.2.1-1.fc34
Old package:  ast-9.1.3-1.fc34
Summary:  A Library for Handling World Coordinate Systems in Astronomy
RPMs: ast ast-devel ast-doc
Size: 34.04 MiB
Size change:  65.75 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 21 2020 Orion Poplawski  - 9.2.1-1
  - Update to 9.2.1


Package:  awscli-1.18.143-1.fc34
Old package:  awscli-1.18.142-1.fc34
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 1.88 MiB
Size change:  -563 B
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 21 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.18.143-1
  - 1.18.143


Package:  bijiben-3.38.0-1.fc34
Old package:  bijiben-3.37.92-1.fc34
Summary:  Simple Note Viewer
RPMs: bijiben
Size: 2.14 MiB
Size change:  73.18 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 21 2020 Kalev Lember  - 3.38.0-1
  - Update to 3.38.0


Package:  bind-32:9.11.23-1.fc34
Old package:  bind-32:9.11.22-2.fc34
Summary:  The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) 
server
RPMs: bind bind-chroot bind-devel bind-dlz-filesystem bind-dlz-ldap 
bind-dlz-mysql bind-dlz-mysqldyn bind-dlz-sqlite3 bind-dnssec-doc 
bind-dnssec-utils bind-doc bind-libs bind-libs-lite bind-license bind-pkcs11 
bind

Update notification bug

2020-09-23 Thread Ashish Kumar
While testing the following:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_gnome-software_previous_workstation
I encountered a bug wherein update notification does not come up. I am new
to testing contributions. Please tip me off or guide me on how to report a
bug on Bugzilla.

Thank you.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fedora-Cloud-32-20200923.0 compose check report

2020-09-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200921.0):

ID: 674881  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/674881

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

2020-09-23 Thread Jaap Bosman

Language problem?

In 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Minimal_Package_Install


it says Enter the *INSTALLATION SOURCE* screen and ensure the box /Don't 
install the latest available software updates./ is checked. If using the 
generic network install image, the source should be set to /Closest 
mirror/. Click /Done/


/In the Dutch install. screengives a  choice between
/

/1. Only install newest available software (trasaltion from Dutch)/

/2. Only install standard versions from instalation source.
/

/For test I did choose #2 and that went okay./

/
/

/
/

On 22-09-2020 21:14, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/33

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_Beta_1.3_Security_Lab

All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must
pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3].

Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the
test list [5].

Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria
[4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


a user question

2020-09-23 Thread David
I have posted several emails in the past few months, that were
personal in nature about my experiences with Rawhide, and various
Fedora concepts or software, instead of posting about any specific
way to correctly use Fedora, or to fix a bug, or to report a bug.

It has been pointed out to me that I should write these post
in a different forum.

I could write them in my blog, but nobody would read that.

As an example, today was my first day to tinker with appimages
and obviously my first time to tinker with them in Fedora, and in
my case on Rawhide.

My first experience with appimages was unpleasant.But at the
same time, I got to use the latest versions of two applications, Krita
and Firefox. I am in the Firefox 81.0 appimage right now and have
been for most of the evening.I had a few moments were I could
not print and a few moments it seemed to have crashed.I think
some of the settings vanish when I close it and re-launch it.

Is there a place on the list-server where users can rant about things
in Fedora, and even complain about things.

The folks advertising appimages say it is the best invention since
sliced-bread. But when I looked on the appimage hub, I did not
find any applications that I wanted to run.

It would seem using appimages in Rawhide is a good example of
how they can be used, as running the executable file doesn't affect the
operating system, and the developers of Rawhide don't have to worry
about repackaging Golden Dictionary.   ( I could not get that one to work
as an appimage ), but Rawhide seems to have the most recent version.

I now have about 40 man-hours running Rawhide on a Ryzen 3 1200AF
ASUS X570 computer.No issues to report.

David Locklear
a novice user of Rawhide as my only operating system
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

2020-09-23 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 07:37 Jaap Bosman  wrote:

> You know the page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_fmw
> wants us to upgrade/download sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing
> --refresh --best install mediawriter
>
> that will not  install the required testing version (4.0.95)
>
> but a new version.  mediawriter-4.1.4-4.fc32.x86_64
>
> I trust that is OK?
>
Yes, that's okay. I'll update the wiki page in a moment.

>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org